The objective of this study was to identify and model the comprehension and decision making of law enforcement personnel with respect to terrorism-centric behaviors. In this study, 44 participants provided 1,496 judgments ranked on an 11-point Likert-type suspicion scale about individual text-based scenario components emulating real-world events encountered during routine policing. The data were analyzed to assess the influence of jurisdiction, training, experience, and terrorism familiarity on the recognition of terrorism-centric behaviors. Measurements of those factors were used to formulate a Bayesian network, and Monte Carlo simulation was performed to estimate their effect on terrorism-centric cognitive judgment and decision making, defined by the response to a wide variety of simulated terrorism-centric behaviors using text-based scenarios.
ApostolakisG. E.LemonD.M. (2005). A screening methodology for the identification and ranking of infrastructure vulnerabilities due to terrorism. Risk Analysis, 25, 361–376.
2.
BanburyS.TremblayS. (2004). A cognitive approach to situation awareness. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
3.
BloisM. S. (1980). Clinical judgment and computers. New England Journal of Medicine, 303, 192–197.
4.
CohenM. S. (1993). The naturalistic basis of decision biases. In KleinG. A.OrasanuJ.CalderwoodR.ZsambokC. E. (Eds.), Decision making in action (pp. 51–99). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
5.
CushmanF.YoungL.HauserM. (2006). The role of conscious reasoning and intuition in moral judgment. Psychological Science, 17, 1082–1089.
6.
DillonR. L.LiebeR. M.BestafkaT. (2009). Risk-based decision making for terrorism applications. Risk Analysis, 29, 321–335.
7.
EndsleyM. R. (1995a). Measurement of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors, 37, 65–84.
8.
EndsleyM. R. (1995b). Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors, 37, 32–64.
9.
EndsleyM. R.GarlandD. J. (Eds.). (2009). Situation awareness analysis and measurement. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10.
FlachJ. M. (1995). Situation awareness. Human Factors, 37, 149–157.
11.
GamermanD. (1997). Markov chain Monte Carlo: Stochastic simulation for Bayesian inference. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
12.
GolalikhaniM.ZhuangJ. (2011). Modeling arbitrary layers of continuous-level defenses in facing with strategic attackers. Risk Analysis, 31, 533–547.
13.
GreeneJ. D.SommervilleR. B.NystromL. E.DarleyJ. M.CohenJ. D. (2001). An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science, 293, 2105–2108.
14.
HammersleyJ. M. (1960). Monte Carlo methods for solving multivariable problems. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 86, 844–874.
15.
JensenC. J.McElreathD. H.GravesM. A. (2012). Introduction to intelligence studies. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis.
16.
JensenC. J. (2003). A test of bounded rationality in police investigative decision-making (Doctoral dissertation). University of Maryland, College Park.
17.
Kataoka-YahiroM.SaylorC. (1994). A critical thinking model for nursing judgment. Journal of Nursing Education, 33, 351–356.
18.
KollerD.FriedmanN. (2009). Probabilistic graphical models: Principles and techniques. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19.
LeungaS.-O. (2011). A comparison of psychometric properties and normality in 4-, 5-, 6-, and 11-point likert scales. Journal of Social Service Research, 37, 412–421.
20.
LevitinG.HauskenK. (2012). Resource distribution in multiple attacks with imperfect detection of the attack outcome. Risk Analysis, 32, 304–318.
21.
McGarrellE. F.FreilichJ. D.ChermakS. (2007). Intelligence-led policing as a framework for responding to terrorism. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 23, 142–158.
22.
MorrisonJ. E.FletcherJ. D. (2002). Cognitive readiness (IDA Paper P-3735). Alexandria, VA: Institute for Defense Analyses.
23.
NikoofalM. E.ZhuangJ. (2012). Robust allocation of a defensive budget considering an attacker’s private information. Risk Analysis, 32, 930–943.
24.
PatéM. E.GuikemaS. D. (2002). Probabilistic modeling of terrorist threats. Military Operations Research, 7(4), 5–23.
25.
PetersonM. (2005). Intelligence-led policing: The new intelligence architecture. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Assistance.
26.
PrestonC. C.ColmanA. M. (2000). Optimal number of response categories in rating scales. Acta Psychologica, 104, 1–15.
27.
RedelmeierD. A.FerrisL. E.TuJ. V.HuxJ. E.SchullM. J. (2001). Problems for clinical judgement. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 164, 358–360.
28.
RegensJ. L.JensenC. J.EdgerD. N. (in press). Situational awareness as a cornerstone of terrorism threat characterization. Journal of Intelligence Analysis.
29.
RieblingM. (2006). Hard won lessons: The new paradigm-merging law enforcement and counterterrorism strategies. New York, NY: Manhattan Institute for Policy Research.
30.
RileyK. J.TrevertonG. F.WilsonJ. M.DavisL. M. (2005). State and local intelligence in the war on terrorism. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
31.
SarterN. B.WoodsD. D. (1991). Situation awareness. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 1, 45–57.
32.
SmithJ. F.KidaT. (1991). Heuristics and biases. Psychological Bulletin, 10, 472–489.
33.
SpringerD. R.RegensJ. L.EdgerD. N. (2009). Islamic radicalism and global jihad. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
34.
TrémolièreB.BonnefonJ.-F. (2014). Efficient kill–save ratios ease up the cognitive demands on counterintuitive moral utilitarianism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 923–930.
35.
WillisH. H. (2007). Guiding resource allocations based on terrorism risk. Risk Analysis, 27, 597–606.
