The aim of this study was to describe the decision making of professional defensive football players according to the recognition-primed decision (RPD) model and to investigate relationships between their recognition processes and use of salient situational features in a naturalistic setting. Behavioral data were obtained from video recordings of four high-level football players in a top-level game, supplemented by verbal data collected during video-cued recall interviews, with the players watching the videotapes. Seven critical defensive stages in one game were studied. The data were analyzed using content analysis in relation to the RPD model in five steps. Considering the salient features the athletes used, 112 decisions were classified into three types of processes and eight typical decisions for defensive stages. These findings are discussed from three perspectives: the salient features the athletes used to assess the situation, the recognition processes of expert sport players’ decision making, and future directions for research and decision-making training.
BossardC.De KeukelaereC.CormierJ.PascoD.KermarrecG. (2010). L’activité décisionnelle en phase de contre-attaque en Hockey sur glace [Decisional activity during counterattacks in ice hockey]. @ctivités, 7(1), 41-60.
2.
BossardC.KermarrecG.De KeukelaereC.PascoD.TisseauJ. (2011). Analyser l’activité décisionnelle de joueurs de football en situation d’entraînement pour développer un modèle de joueur virtuel [Decisional activity analysis during training in order to design a virtual player model]. ejRIEPS, 23, 124-151.
3.
Cannon-BowersJ. A.SalasE.PruittJ. S. (1996). Establishing the boundaries of a paradigm for decision research. Human Factors, 38, 193-205. doi:10.1177/001872089606380202
4.
CardinY.BossardC.BucheC.KermarrecG. (2013). Investigate naturalistic decision making of football players in virtual environment: Influence of viewpoints in recognition. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Naturalistic Decision Making (pp. 109-117). Marseille, France: Arpege.
5.
FioreS. M.SalasE. (2006). Team cognition and expert teams: Developing insights from cross-disciplinary analysis of exceptional teams. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 4(4), 369-375. Retrieved from http://www.fitinfotech.com/IJSEP/IJSEP.tpl
6.
HoffmanR. R.LinternG. (2006). Eliciting and representing the knowledge of experts. In EricssonK. A.CharnessN.HoffmanR. R.FeltovichP. J. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 203-222). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816796
7.
Houge MackenzieS.KerrJ. H. (2012). Head-mounted cameras and stimulated recall in qualitative sport research. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 4(1), 51-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2011.653495
8.
KibeleA. (2006). Non-consciously controlled decision making for fast motor reactions in sports: A priming approach for motor responses to non-consciously perceived movement features. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 7, 591-610. doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2006.05.001
9.
KleinG. (1993). A recognition-primed decision (RPD) model of rapid decision making. In KleinG. A.OrasanuJ.CalderwoodR.ZsambokC. E. (Eds.), Decision making in action: Models and methods (pp. 138-147). Norwood, CT: Ablex.
10.
KleinG. (1997). The recognition-primed decision (RPD) model: Looking back, looking forward. In ZsambokC. E.KleinG. A. (Eds.), Naturalistic decision making (pp. 285-292). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11.
KleinG. (1998). Sources of power: How people make decisions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12.
KleinG. (2008). Naturalistic decision making. Human Factors, 50(3), 456-460. doi:10.1518/001872008X288385
13.
KleinG. A.CalderwoodR.MacgregorD. (1989). Critical decision method for eliciting knowledge. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 19, 462-472. doi:10.1109/21.31053
14.
LenzenB.TheunissenC.CloesM. (2009). Situated analysis of team handball players’ decisions: An exploratory study. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 28, 54-74.
15.
LipshitzR.Ben ShaulO. (1997). Schemata and mental models in recognition-primed decision making. In ZsambokC.KleinG. A. (Eds.), Naturalistic decision making (pp. 293-304). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16.
LipshitzR.KleinG.OrasanuJ.SalasE. (2001). Focus article: Taking stock of naturalistic decision making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 14, 331-352. doi:10.1002/bdm.381
17.
MacquetA. C. (2009). Recognition within the decision-making process: A case study of expert volleyball players. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 21(1), 64-80.
18.
MannD. T.WilliamsA. M.WardP.JanelleC. M. (2007). Perceptual-cognitive expertise in sport: a meta-analysis. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 29(4), 457-478.
19.
McPhersonS. L.KernodleM. W. (2003). Tactics, the neglected attribute of expertise. In StarkesJ. L.EricssonE. (Eds.), Expert performance in sports: Advances in research on sport expertise (pp. 19-49). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
20.
MouchetA. (2005). Subjectivity in the articulation between strategy and tactics in team sports: An example in rugby. Italian Journal of Sport Sciences, 12, 24-33.
21.
MulliganD.McCrackenJ.HodgesN. J. (2012). Situational familiarity and its relation to decision quality in ice-hockey. International Journal of Sport and Exercise, 10(3), 198-210. doi:10.1080/1612197X.2012.672009
22.
OmodeïM. M.McLennanJ.WitfordP. (1998). Using a head-mounted video-camera and two stages replay to enhance orienteering performance. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 29, 115-131.
23.
PiegorschK. M.WatkinsK. W.PiegorschW. W.ReiningerB.CorwinS. J.ValoisR. F. (2006). Ergonomic decision-making: A conceptual framework for experienced practitioners from backgrounds in industrial engineering and physical therapy. Applied Ergonomics, 37, 587-598.
24.
RaabM.JohnsonJ. G. (2008). Implicit learning as a means to intuitive decision making in sports. In PlessnerH.BetschC.BetschT. (Eds.), Intuition in judgment and decision making (pp. 119-133). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
25.
RossK. G.ShaferJ. L.KleinG. (2006). Professional judgments and “naturalistic decision making.” In EricssonK. A.CharnessN.HoffmanR. R.FeltovichP. J. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 403-419). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
26.
SèveC.RiaL.PoizatG.SauryJ.DurandM. (2007). Performance induced emotions experienced during high-stakes table tennis matches. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 8, 25-46.
27.
SèveC.SauryJ.RiaL.DurandM. (2003). Structure of expert table tennis players’ activity during competitive interaction. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 74, 71-83.
28.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29.
TheureauJ. (1992). Le cours d’action: Analyse sémiologique [Course of action: Semiologic analysis]. Berne, Switzerland: Peter Lang.
30.
VarelaF. J.ShearJ. (1999). The view from within: First person approaches to the study of consciousness. Bowling Green, OH: Academic Press.
31.
WilliamsA. M.HodgesN. J.NorthJ. S.BartonG. (2006). Perceiving patterns of play in dynamic sport tasks: Investigating the essential information underlying skilled performance. Perception, 35, 317-332. doi:10.1068/p5310
32.
ZoudjiB.ThonB.DebûB. (2010). Efficiency of the mnemonic system of expert soccer players under overload of the working memory in a simulated decision-making task. Psychology of Sport & Exercise, 11, 18-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2009.05.006
