A user-friendly system that yields operational benefit results from data-driven prototype evaluations and benefits analyses that iteratively feed back into the prototype design and development. In this study, initial requirements development and field evaluations were conducted using a shadow operations technique at the center tower backup Dallas–Fort Worth International Airport air traffic control tower (ATCT). Results are discussed in reference to the design process of the Tower Flight Data Manager (TFDM) prototype. Nonintrusive measures for quantitatively validating human–systems design issues were identified for this study, including visual gaze analysis and verbal command sequence analysis. Behavioral validation of design issues simplifies the process to prioritize beneficial design changes. The iterative process used resulted in an interim TFDM prototype that was rated by active air traffic controllers as both beneficial and usable in an operational ATCT environment.
AyazH.WillemsB.BunceS.ShewokisP. A.IzzetogluK.HahS.. . . OnaralB. (2010). Cognitive workload assessment of air traffic controllers using optical brain imaging sensors. In MarekT.KarwowskiW.RiceV. (Eds.), Advances in understanding human performance: neuroergonomics, human factors design, and special populations (pp. 21–32). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
2.
BagassiS.De CrescenzioF.PersianiF. (2010). Design and evaluation of a four-dimensional interface for air traffic control. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Aerospace Engineering, 224, 937.
3.
BosT.BlankenM. S.HuismanH. (2011). Towards a paperless air traffic control tower. Human Centered Design in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 6776, 360–368.
4.
CardosiK.YostA. (2001). Controller and pilot error in airport operations: a review of previous research and analysis of safety data (DOT/FAA/AR-00/51). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation.
5.
Davison ReynoldsH. J.DeLauraR. A.RobinsonM. (2010). Field & (data) stream: A method for functional evolution of the air traffic management Route Availability Planning Tool (RAPT). In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 54th Annual Meeting (pp. 104–108). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
6.
DeLauraR.AllanS. (2003, June). Route selection decision support in convective weather: Case study of the effects of weather and operational assumptions on departure throughput. Paper presented at the 5th Eurocontrol/FAA ATM R&D Seminar, Budapest, Hungary.
7.
DowellJ. (1998). Formulating the cognitive design problem of air traffic management. International Journal of Human– Computer Studies, 49, 743–766.
8.
DursoF. T.DattelA. R.JohnsonB. R.ManningC. A.HackworthC. A.DillbeckR.. . . WunnR. (2008). Real-time use of paper in air traffic control towers: Criticality and benefits. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 18, 268–289.
9.
FrenschP. A.MinerC. S. (1994). Effects of presentation rate and individual differences in short-term memory capacity on an indirect measure of serial learning. Memory and Cognition, 22, 95–110.
10.
GronlundS.CanningJ. M.MoertlP. M.JohanssonJ.DoughertyM. R. P.MillsS. H. (2002). An information organization tool for planning in air traffic control. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 12, 377–390.
11.
EmbreyD.BlackettC.MarsdenP.PeacheyM. (2006). Development of a human cognitive workload assessment tool. Dalton, UK: Human Reliability Associates.
JordanR. K.IshutkinaM. A.ReynoldsT. G. (2010). Preliminary benefits pool assessment for the Tower Flight Data Manager (MIT Lincoln Laboratory Tech. Rep. 43PM-WX-0113). Lexington, MA: MIT Lincoln Laboratory.
15.
JungY.MonroeG. (2005, September). Development of surface management system integrated with CTAS arrival tool. Paper presented at the 5th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations (ATIO) Conference, Arlington, VA
16.
MackayW. E.FayardA. L. (1999). Designing interactive paper: Lessons from three augmented reality projects. In BehringerR.KlinkerG.MizellD. W. (Eds.), Augmented reality: Placing artificial objects in real scenes (pp. 81–90). Natick, MA: A. K. Peters.
17.
MulfingerD.SadovskyA. (2011, September). Design and evaluation of a stochastic time-based arrival scheduling simulation system. Paper presented at the 11th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations (ATIO) Conference, Virginia Beach, VA.
18.
NagleG.SweetD.CarrG.FelipeV.TrapaniA.CoppenbargerR.HayashiM. (2011, September). Human-in-the-loop simulation of three-dimensional path arrival management with trajectory error. Paper presented at the 11th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations (ATIO) Conference, Virginia Beach, VA.
19.
PavetD.GarronJ.CoullonI. (2001, December). Use of paper strips by Tower ATCO and promises offered by new design techniques on user interface. Paper presented at the 4th USA/Europe Air Traffic Management Research & Development Seminar, Santa Fe, NM.
20.
PinskaE. (2006). An investigation of the head-up time at tower and ground control positions. In Proceedings of the 5th Eurocontrol Innovative Research Workshop (pp. 81–86). Brétigny sur Orge, France: Eurocontrol.
21.
PrevotT.MercerJ. S.MartinL. H.HomolaJ. R.CabrallC. D.BrasilC. L. (2011, September). Evaluation of high density air traffic operations with automation for separation assurance, weather avoidance and schedule conformance. Paper presented at the 11th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations (ATIO) Conference, Virginia Beach, VA.
22.
ReismanR. J.BrownD. M. (2006, September). Design of augmented reality tools for air traffic control towers. Paper presented at the 6th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration and Operations (ATIO) Conference, Wichita, KS.
23.
ReynoldsT. G.JordanR. K.IshutkinaM. A.SeaterR. M.KucharJ. K. (2010, September). Benefits assessment methodology for an air traffic control tower advanced automation system. Paper presented at the 10th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration and Operations (ATIO) Conference, Fort Worth, TX.
24.
RobinsonM.UnderhillN.DeLauraR. (2009, June/July). The Route Availability Planning Tool (RAPT): Evaluation of departure management decision support in New York during the 2008 convective weather season. Paper presented at the 8th USA/Europe Air Traffic Management Research and Development Seminar, Napa, CA.
25.
SchieberF.HarmsM. L.BerkhoutJ.SpanglerD. S. (1997). Precision and accuracy of video-based measurements of driver’s gaze location. Unpublished manuscript.
ShanksD. R.ChannonS. (2002). Effects of a secondary task on “implicit” sequence learning: Learning or performance?Psychological Research, 66, 99.
28.
ShanksD. R.RowlandL. A.RangerM. S. (2005). Attentional load and implicit sequence learning. Psychological Research, 69, 369–382.
29.
StadlerM. A. (1995). Role of attention in sequence learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 674–685.
30.
SwieringaK.MurdochJ. L.BaxleyB.HubbsC. (2011, September). Evaluation of an airborne spacing concept, on-board spacing tool, and pilot interface. Paper presented at the 11th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations (ATIO) Conference, Virginia Beach, VA.
