As the military begins to formalize training and standards for cognitive readiness, it is fitting to mark potential barriers to its implementation. This article outlines three general challenges associated with the institutionalization of cognitive readiness: (a) that the training and education community must recognize that higher-order cognitive skills development (at least for lower echelons) is fundamentally new—not merely a slight deviation from the status quo; (b) that commonly discussed cognitive competencies can (and must) be better operationalized for instruction and measurement purposes; and (c) that achieving widespread cognitive readiness will be possible only if senior leaders recognize the importance of sustained support for these competencies. The critical thesis of this article is this: Military leadership tends to view cognitive readiness as an additive aspect (“news”) to what is already known and accepted, instead of as a foundational competency (“new”) that requires widespread transformation. Until the institutionalization of cognitive readiness is recognized as a fundamentally novel, leap-ahead innovation, the military community will struggle to accomplish it.
AdamsB. D.HallC. D. T.ThomsonM. H. (2009). Military individual readiness. État de préparation militaire de l’individu (DRDC No. CR-2009-075). Ontario, Canada: Department of National Defence.
2.
BaranB. E.ScottC. W. (2010). Organizing ambiguity: A grounded theory of leadership and sensemaking within dangerous contexts. Military Psychology, 22, S42–S69.
3.
BatesM.BowlesS.HammermeisterJ.StokesC.PinderE.MooreM. (2010). Psychological fitness: A military demand-resource model. Journal of Military Medicine, 175(2), 21–38.
4.
BolstadC. A.CuevasH. M.BabbittB. A.SempleC. A.VestewigR. E. (2006). Predicting cognitive readiness of military health teams. Paper presented at the International Ergonomics Association 16th World Congress, Maastricht, Netherlands. Available at http://www.satechnologies.com
5.
BryantD. J. (2006). Rethinking OODA: Toward a modern cognitive framework of command decision making. Military Psychology, 18, 183–206.
6.
ColbertW. G. (2010, December). Improvisational leadership: Setting the stage for future army leader development. Army Magazine, pp. 51–53.
7.
ConwayJ. T. (2008). Marine Corps vision and strategy 2025. Washington, DC: General Admin and Management.
8.
CosenzoK. A.FatkinL. T.PattonD. J. (2007). Ready or not: Enhancing operational effectiveness through use of readiness measures. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 78, B96–B106.
9.
CoutuD. L. (2003, April). Sense and reliability: A conversation with celebrated psychologist Kael E. Weick. Harvard Business Review, pp. 84–90.
10.
Dall’AlbaG.SandbergJ. (2006). Unveiling professional development: A critical review of stage models. Review of Educational Research, 76, 383–412.
11.
DempseyM. E. (2010, November). A campaign of learning to achieve institutional adaptation. Army Magazine, pp. 34–35.
12.
DempseyM. E. (2011), The U.S. Army learning concept for 2015 (TRADOC Pam 525-8-2). Washington, DC: Department of the Army HQ, U.S. Training and Doctrine Command.
13.
DempseyM. E. (2011, January). “Mission command.” Army Magazine, pp. 43–44.
14.
Department of the Army. (2005). Army planning and orders production (FM 5-0). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
15.
Department of the Army. (2006). Army leaders: Competent, confident, and agile (FM 6-22). Washington, DC: Author.
16.
DreyfusH. L.DreyfusS. E. (1986). Mind over machine: The power of human intuition and expertise in the era of the computer. New York, NY: Free Press.
17.
DugganW. (2005). Coup d’oeil: Strategic intuition in Army planning. Carlisle Barracks, PA: Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College.
18.
EndsleyM. R. (1997). The role of situation awareness in naturalistic decision making. In ZsambokC. E.KleinG. A. (Eds.), Naturalistic decision making (pp. 269–283). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19.
EtterD. M. (2002). Cognitive readiness: An important research focus for national security. In RocoM. C.BainbridgeW. S. (Eds.), Converging technologies for improving human performance: Nanotechnology, biotechnology, information technology and cognitive science (pp. 330–336). Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
20.
EtterD. M.FosterR. E.SteeleT. P. (2000). Cognitive readiness and advanced distributed learning. Crosstalk: The Journal of Defense Software Engineering, 13, 5–6.
21.
FahleM.PoggioT. (Eds.). (2002). Perceptual learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22.
FautuaD.SchatzS.KobusD.SpikerV. A.RossW.JohnstonJ. H.NicholsonD.ReitzE. A. (2010). Border Hunter research technical report (IST-TR-10-01). Orlando, FL: University of Central Florida, Institute for Simulation and Training.
23.
FautuaD.SchatzS.VierlingK. (2011). The cognitive skill–stance hierarchy: A “new” training framework. In Proceedings of the Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation, and Education Conference (I/ITSEC)(pp. 2003–2012). Washington, DC: National Training and Simulation Association.
24.
FletcherJ. D. (2004). Cognitive readiness: Preparing for the unexpected (IDA Document D-3061). Alexandria, VA: Institute for Defense Analyses.
25.
FosterR. E.FletcherJ. D. (2003). Modeling the user for education, training, and performance aiding. In Proceedings of the RTO HFM Symposium on Advanced Technologies for Military Training (RTO-MP-HFM-101) (pp.1–22). Genoa, Italy: NATO.
26.
FowlkesJ.SchatzS.StaglK. C.NormanJ. W. (2010, September). Domain ontology for advanced skills training. In NicholsonD.SchatzS. (Symposium chairs), Making the implicit explicit: Operationalizing tacit facets of scenario-based training. Paper presented at the 54th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, San Francisco, CA.
27.
GideonsC. (2008). Sample of after action report (AAR) comments on Combat Hunter program as used by 2D Battalion, 7th Marines (2/7) in Afghanistan (1000 AITB). Camp Pendleton, CA: U.S. Marine Corps, Advanced Infantry Training Battalion, School of Infantry (West).
28.
GideonsC.PadillaF.LethinC. (2008, September). Combat Hunter: The training continues. Marine Corps Gazette, pp. 79–84.
29.
GladwellM. (2002, August5). The naked face: Can you read peoples thoughts by just looking at them?New Yorker, pp. 38–49.
30.
GordonB.BergerL. (2003). Intelligent memory: A prescription for improving your memory. New York, NY: Penguin Books.
31.
GovindarajanV.TrimbleC. (2010). The other side of innovation: Solving the execution challenge. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.
32.
GrassoA.LaPlanteW. (2011). Enhancing adaptability of U.S. military forces: Part A. Main report: Report of the Defense Science Board, 2010 summer study. Washington, DC: Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics.
33.
HayashiA. M. (2011, February). When to trust your gut. Harvard Business Review, pp. 54–65.
34.
HilburnM. (2007, October). Combat Hunter: Experimental Marine Corps project aims to turn the hunted into the hunter. SEAPOWER, pp. 1–3.
35.
JohnstonJ. H.Cannon-BowersJ. A.SalasE. (1998, April). Tactical Decision Making Under Stress (TADMUS): Mapping a program of research to a real world incident—the USS Vincennes. Paper presented at the RTO HFM Symposium on Collaborative Crew Performance in Complex Operational Systems, Edinburgh, United Kingdom. Retrieved from the NATO Research and Technology Organisation website: http://www.rta.nato.int
36.
KleinG. A.WeickK. E. (2000). Decisions. Across the Board, 37(6), 16.
37.
KleinG. A. (2003). Intuition at work: Why developing your gut instincts will make you better at what you do. New York, NY: Currency Books.
KozlowskiS. W. J. (1998). Training and developing adaptive teams: Theory, principles and research. In Cannon-BowersJ. A.SalasEduardo (Eds.), Making decisions under stress (pp. 115–153). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
40.
KozlowskiS.W. J.BrownK. G.WeissbeinD. A.Cannon-BowersJ. A.SalasE. (2000). A multi-level approach to training effectiveness: Enhancing horizontal and vertical transfer. In KleinK. J.KozlowskiS. W. J. (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations (pp. 157–210). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
41.
KuhnJ. S.MarsickV. J. (2005). Action learning for strategic innovation in mature organizations: Key cognitive, design and contextual considerations. Action Learning: Research and Practice, 2(1), 29–48.
42.
LynnW. J. (2010). Strategy for the next generation of training for the Department of Defense. Washington, DC: Office of the Secretary of Defense.
43.
MayK. A. (2010, May). Cognitive readiness special interest group. Presentation at the DoD HFE TAG, Mesa, AZ.
44.
MarshallS. P. (1995). Schemas in problem solving. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
45.
MaurerK. (2008, November2). What cops and hunters can teach marines. Los Angeles Times, p. 4.
46.
McConeD. R.ScottW. J.MastroianniG. R. (2008, January). The 3rd ACR in Tal’Afar: Challenges and adaptations. Of Interest: Strategic Studies Institute, pp. 1–23.
MillerA.SandersonP. (2000). Modeling “deranged” physiological systems for ICU information system design. In Proceedings of the HFES2000/IEA2000 Congress (pp. 4.245–4.248). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
49.
MillerC. C.IrelandR. D. (2005). Intuition in strategic decision making: Friend or foe in the fast-paced 21st century?Academy of Management Executive, 19(1), 19–23.
50.
MorrisonJ. E.FletcherJ. D. (2002). Cognitive readiness (IDA Paper P-3735). Alexandria, VA: Institute for Defense Analysis.
51.
O’DonnellR. D.MoiseS.EddyD.SchmidtR. M. (2010). Integrating cognitive assessment into the test and evaluation process. ITEA Journal, 31, 210–216.
52.
O’DonnellR. D.MoiseS.SchmidtR. M. (2005). Generating performance test batteries relevant to specific operational tasks. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 76, C24–30.
53.
PackerG. (2006, April10). Letter from Iraq: The lesson of Tal Afar. New Yorker, p. 48.
54.
PaparoneC. R. (2001, July/August). US Army decision-making: Past, present and future. Military Review, pp. 45–53.
55.
PaparoneC. R. (2010, November9). Design and the prospects for decision. Small Wars Journal, pp. 1–13.
56.
PaparoneC. R.ReedG. (2008, March/April). The reflective military practitioner: How military professionals think in action. Military Review, pp. 66–76.
57.
RasmussenJ. (1986). Information processing and human-machine interaction. New York, NY: North Holland.
58.
RoselloV. M. (2009). Soft skills for the 21st century land dominance (No. 09-1). Arlington, VA: Land Warfare Publication, Association of the United States Army.
59.
SalasE.Cannon-BowersJ. A. (2001). The science of training: A decade of progress. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 471–499.
60.
SalasE.WilsonK. A.PriestH. A.GuthrieJ. W. (2006). Design, delivery and evaluations of training systems. In SalvendyGavriel (Ed.), Handbook of human factors and ergonomics (3rd ed., pp. 472–512). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
ScalesR. H. (2009). Clausewitz and World War IV. Military Psychology, 21(Suppl. 1), S23–S35.
63.
SchatzS.ReitzE.NicholsonD.FautuaD. (2010). Expanding Combat Hunter: The science and metrics of Border Hunter. In Proceedings of the 2010 Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation, and Education Conference (I/ITSEC) (pp. 3225–3233). Washington, DC: National Training and Simulation Association.
64.
ScottW. J.McConeD. R.MastroianniG. R. (2006). Psychological contracts in two U.S. combat units in Iraq: What happens when expectations and realities diverge?Sociological Focus, 39, 301–318.
65.
ScottW. J.McConeD. R.MastroianniG. R. (2009). The deployment exercises of Ft. Carson’s soldiers in Iraq: Thinking about and training for full-spectrum warfare. Armed Forces and Society, 35, 460–476.
66.
SeligmanM. E. P.KahanaM. (2009). Unpacking intuition: A conjecture. Association for Psychological Science, 4, 399–402.
67.
ShadrickS. B.FiteJ. E. (2009). Assessment of the Captains in Command training program for adaptive thinking skills (Tech. Rep. 1240). Arlington, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute.
68.
SpikerA.JohnstonJ. H.WilliamsG.LethinG. (2010). Training tactical behavior profiling skills for irregular warfare. In Proceedings of the Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation and Education Conference (I/ITSEC) (pp. 3234–3244). Washington, DC: National Training and Simulation Association.
69.
StanleyE. (2010). Neuroplasticity, mind fitness and military effectiveness. In ArmstrongR. E.DrapeauM. D.LoebC. A.ValdesJ. L. (Eds.), Bio-inspired innovation and national security (pp. 257–279). Washington, DC: National Defense University Press.
70.
StanleyE. A.JhaA. P. (2009). Mind fitness: Improving operational effectiveness and building warrior resilience. Joint Force Quarterly, 55, 144–151.
71.
SteinbergR.KornguthS. (2009). Sustaining performance under stress: Overview of this issue. Military Psychology, 21(1), 1–8.
72.
StringerK. D. (2009, September/October). Educating the strategic corporal. Military Review, pp. 87–95.
73.
Small Unit Decision Making. (2011). US Marine Corps Small Unit Decision Making January 2011 workshop report. Quantico, VA: USMC Training and Education Command.
74.
SwannM.SchmidtR. M. (2005). Army cognitive readiness assessment: A next generation performance battery. In Human-Computer Interaction International Proceedings [CD-ROM]. Brentwood, MO: Mira Digital.
75.
U.S. Joint Forces Command. (2009). Irregular warfare training symposium: The future of small unit excellence in immersive cognitive training. Final report. Norfolk, VA: Author.
76.
U.S. Joint Forces Command. (2010). Design for military operations: A primer for joint warfighters (JWFC Doctrine Pamphlet 10). Norfolk, VA: Author.
77.
VaneM.ToguchiR. (2010, May/June). Achieving excellence in small unit performance. Military Review, pp. 73–81.
78.
VicenteK. J. (1999). Cognitive work analysis: Towards safe productive and healthy computer-based work. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
79.
VowellJ. B. (2004). Between discipline and intuition: The Military Decision Making Process in the army’s future force (Master’s thesis). U.S. Army School for Advanced Military Studies, Fort Leavenworth, KS.
80.
WeickK. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
81.
WilliamsB. S. (2010, September/October). Heuristics and biases in military decision making. Military Review, pp. 40–52.
82.
WoodD. (2009, December). Roadside bomb hunting: A learned skill or intuition?Politics Daily, p. 1.
83.
YancyS. D. (2006). Adapting professional military education to the current threat (AU/ACSC/5694/2006-04). Maxwell Air Force Base, AL: Air Command and Staff College, Air University.
