Designing for Social Engagement in Online Social Networks Using Communities-of-Practice Theory and Cognitive Work Analysis

Abstract

New social networking and social web tools are becoming available and are easing the process of customizing online social environments for enterprises. With these developments, core design efforts have been extending beyond usability for individual users and are beginning to include notions of sociability for the engagement of communities of users. In an effort to make it easier to design for social engagement in an online social environment, the authors developed a domain-community model based on the communities-of-practice concept and the work domain analysis used in cognitive work analysis. Through a case study of University-Community Partnerships for Social Action Research, an international development leadership community of practice, the authors illustrate how the domain-community model could be used to design web components of an online social environment that integrate internal issues of social engagement and external issues of domain effectiveness. It is expected that this model can provide a basis for designers of online communities to more systematically account for social phenomena of collective efforts in a given work domain.

Keywords

virtual environments collaboration analysis methods design methods

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

APQC. (2010). Sustaining effective communities of practice: Study overview. Retrieved from http://www.apqc.org/knowledge-base/documents/sustaining-effective-communities-practice-study-overview

Brown

J. S.

Duguid

(1991). Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organization Science, 2, 40–57.

Dubé

Bourhis

Jacob

(2006). Towards a typology of virtual communities of practice. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management, 1, 3–13.

Fuller

(2007). Critiquing theories of learning and communities of practice. In Hughes

Jewson

Unwin

(Eds.), Communities of practice: Critical perspectives (pp. 17–29). New York, NY: Routledge.

Hara

(2009). Communities of practice: Fostering peer-to-peer learning and informal knowledge sharing in the work place. Berlin, Germany: Springer.

Hara

Shachaf

Stoerger

(2009). Online communities of practice typology revisited. Journal of Information Science, 35, 740–757.

Hildreth

P. M.

(2004). Going virtual: Distributed communities in practice. Hershey, PA: Idea Group.

IGLOO Software. (2011). Social software for business. Retrieved from http://www.igloosoftware.com/.

Iriberri

Leroy

(2009). A life-cycle perspective on online community success. ACM Computing Surveys, 41(2), 1–29.

10.

Karacapilidis

(Ed.). (2010). Web-based learning solutions for communities of practice: Developing virtual environments for social and pedagogical environments. Hershey, NY: Information Science Reference.

11.

Kimble

Hildreth

P. M.

Bourdon

(2008). Communities of practice: Creating learning environments for educators (Vol. 1.) Charlotte, NC: Information Age.

12.

King

W. R.

(2009). Knowledge management and organizational learning. New York, NY: Springer.

13.

Lave

Wenger

(1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

14.

McNichols

(2008). Tacit knowledge: An examination of intergenerational knowledge transfer within an aerospace engineering community. Tempe: University of Phoenix.

15.

Merriam-Webster Online. (2009). Participating. Retrieved from http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/participating

16.

Preece

(2004). Etiquette, empathy and trust in communities of practice: Stepping-stones to social capital. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 10, 294–302.

17.

Rasmussen

Pejtersen

A. M.

Goodstein

L. P.

(1994). Cognitive systems engineering. New York, NY: Wiley-Interscience.

18.

Saint-Onge

Wallace

(2003). Leveraging communities of practice for strategic advantage. Burlington, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann.

19.

Stahl

G. K.

Björkman

(2006). Handbook of research in international human resource management. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

20.

Stuckey

(2007). Growing online community: Core conditions to support successful development of community in Internet-mediated communities of practice (Unpublished thesis). University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia. Retrieved from http://www.bronwyn.ws/research/StuckeyTHESIS.pdf

21.

Suchman

L. A.

(1987). Plans and situated action: The problem of human-machine interaction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

22.

Vicente

K. J.

(1999). Cognitive work analysis: Toward safe, productive, and healthy computer-based work. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

23.

Wenger

(1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

24.

Wenger

McDermott

Snyder

(2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

25.

Wenger

White

Smith

(2009). Digital habitats: Stewarding technology for communities. Portland, OR: CPsquare.