The present study examined whether shared mental models of team members’ characteristics were associated with team outcomes (i.e., performance, communication, and physical arousal) in cross training and a high-intensity simulation requiring coordinated team action. In a quasi-experimental design, 36 Navy officer cadets were randomly assigned to 12 newly formed tactical teams in the no shared mental modal condition (NoSMM). In contrast, 33 Navy officer cadets in 11 seasoned teams were included in the shared mental model condition (TMSMM). All teams were exposed to the same naval scenarios in their cross training and simulation exercise. The results showed that teams with TMSMM had superior performance and communication patterns characterized by updates and confirmations compared to the NoSMM teams during cross training and simulation. During cross training, TMSMM teams provided more backup than NoSMM teams. These findings suggest that shared mental models of team member are transferable through tasks and enhance the effects of cross training. The present study extends previous research indicating that shared mental models of team members represent an independent, adaptive asset at the group level that enhances team efficiency.
BandowD. (2001). Time to create sound teamwork. Journal for Quality and Participation, 24, 41–47.
2.
BolstadC. A.CuevasH. M.CostelloA. M.RouseyJ. (2005, October). Improving situation awareness through cross training. Paper presented at the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 49th Annual Meeting, Orlando, FL.
3.
BussoC.NarayananS. (2007). Interrelation between speech and facial gestures in emotional utterances: A single subject study. IEEE Transactions on Speech, Audio and Language Processing, 15, 2331–2347.
4.
Cannon-BowersJ. A.SalasE. (1997). A framework for developing team performance measures in training. In BrannickM. T.SalasE.PrinceC. (Eds.), Team performance assessment and measurement (pp. 45–63). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5.
Cannon-BowersJ. A.SalasE. (1998). Making decisions under stress. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
6.
Cannon-BowersJ. A.SalasE.ConverseS. (1993). Shared mental models. In CastellanJ. N (Ed.), Individual and group decision making (pp. 221–246). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7.
CookeN. J.GormanJ. C.DuranJ. L.TaylorA. R. (2007). Team cognition in experienced command-and-control teams. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 13, 146–157.
8.
CookeN. J.SalasE.KiekelP. A.BellB. (2004). Advances in measuring team cognition. In SalasE.FioreS. M. (Eds.), Team cognition: Understanding the factors that drive process and performance (pp. 83–106). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
9.
DuncanP. C.RouseW. B.JohnstonJ. H.Cannon-BowersJ. A.SalasE.BurnsJ. (1996). Training teams working in complex systems: A mental approach. In RouseW. E. (Ed.), Human/technology interaction in complex systems (pp. 221–246). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
10.
EidJ.JohnsenB. H.BartoneP. T.NissestadO. A. (2008). Developing transformational leaders: The role of personality hardiness. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 29, 4–23.
11.
EkmanP.FriesenW. V. (2003). Unmasking the face. Cambridge, MA: Malor Books.
12.
EndsleyM. R. (1995). Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors, 37, 32–64.
13.
EspevikR.JohnsenB. H.EidJ. (2010). Do shared mental models of team members influence performance in distributed teams?Unpublished manuscript, Royal Norwegian Naval Academy, Bergen, Norway.
14.
EspevikR.JohnsenB. H.EidJ.ThayerJ. (2006). Shared mental models and operational effectiveness: Effects on performance and team processes in submarine attack teams. Military Psychology, 18(Suppl.), 23–36.
15.
FergusonG. A. (1981). Statistical analysis in psychology and education. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
16.
GriepentrogB. K.FlemingP. J. (2003, April). Shared mental models and team performance: Are you thinking what I am thinking?Paper presented at the 18th Annual Conference of the Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Orlando, FL.
17.
HarrisonD. A.MohammedS.McGrathJ. E.FloreyA. T.VanderstoepS. W. (2003). Time matters in team performance: Effects of member familiarity, entrainment, and task discontinuity on speed and quality. Personnel Psychology, 56, 633–699.
18.
KankiM. A.FousheeH. C. (1989). Communication as group performance mediator of aircrew performance. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 60, 402–410.
19.
KleinmanD. L.SerfatyD. (1989). Team performance assessment in distributed decision making. In GilsonR.KincaidJ. P.GoldiezB. (Eds.), Proceedings: Interactive network simulation for training conference (pp. 22–27). Orlando, FL: Naval Training System Center.
20.
KlimoskiR.MohammedS. (1994). Team mental model: Construct or metaphor?Journal of Management, 20, 403–437.
21.
KozlowskiS. W. J.IlgenD. R. (2006). Enhancing the effectiveness of work groups and teams. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 7, 77–124.
22.
KudielkaB. M.Buske-KirschbaumA.HellhammerD. H.KirschbaumC. (2004). Differential heart rate reactivity and recovery after psychosocial stress (TSST) in healthy children, younger adults, and elderly adults: The impact of age and gender. International Journal of Behavioural Medicine, 11, 116–121.
23.
LimB.KleinK. J. (2006). Team mental models and team performance: A field study of team mental model similarity and accuracy. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 27, 403–418.
24.
MarksM. A.SabellaM. J.BurkeC. S.ZaccaroS. J. (2002). The impact of cross-training on team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 3–13.
25.
MathieuJ. E.HeffnerT. S.GoodwinG. F. (2005). Scaling the quality of teammates’ mental models: Equifinality and normative comparisons. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 37–56.
26.
MathieuJ. E.HeffnerT. S.GoodwinG. F.SalasE.Cannon-BowersJ. (2000). The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 273–283.
27.
MathieuJ. E.RappT. L.MaynardM. T.MagosP. M. (2010). Interactive effects of team and task mental models as related to air traffic controllers collective efficiency and effectiveness. Human Performance, 23, 22–40.
28.
McCannC.BaranskiJ. V.ThompsonM. M.PigeauR. A. (2000). On the utility of experimental cross-training for decision making under time stress. Ergonomics, 43, 1095–1110.
29.
MohammedS.FerzandiL.HamiltonK. (2010). Metaphor no more: A 15-year review of the team mental model construct. Journal of Management, 36, 876–910.
30.
MohammedS.KlimoskiR.RentschJ. R. (2000). The measurement of team mental models: We have no shared schema. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 123–165.
31.
NissestadO. A. (2007). An empirical study of effectiveness of the leadership development program at the Royal Norwegian Naval Academy and its impact on preparing officers to execute leadership in today’s conflicts and the conflicts in the years ahead. Bergen: Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration.
32.
Norwegian Official Reports. (2000). 31. The grounding of fast coastal passenger MS Sleipner grounding 26 November 1999 (Report from commission). Oslo, Norway: Ministry of Justice and the Police.
33.
OrasanuJ.SalasE. (1993). Team decision making in complex environments. In KleinG.OrasanuJ.CalderwoodR.ZsambokC. E. (Eds.), Decision making in action: Models and methods (pp. 327–345). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
34.
PolleyR. B.EidJ. (1990). Leadership training on the Bergen fjord: A case study and evaluation. Group and Organizational Studies, 15, 192–211.
35.
SalasE.FioreS. M. (2004). Team cognition: Understanding the factors that drive process and performance. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
36.
SalasE.RosenM. A.BurkeC. S.NicholsonD.HowseW. R. (2007). Markers for enhancing team cognition in complex environments: The power of team performance diagnosis. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 78(5), 77–85.
37.
SalasE.SimsD. E.BurkeC. S. (2005). Is there a “big five” in teamwork. Small Group Research, 36, 555–599.
38.
SalmonP. M.StantonN. A.WalkerG. H.JenkisD. P. (2009). Distributed situation awareness. Theory, measurement and application to teamwork. Bodmin, UK: MPG Books Group.
39.
SausE. R.JohnsenB. H.EidJ.RiisemP. K.AndersenR.ThayerJ. (2006). The effect of brief situational awareness training in a police shooting simulator: An experimental study. Military Psychology, 18(Suppl.), 3–21.
40.
SausE. R.JohnsenB. H.EidJ.ThayerJ. F. (2011). Who benefits from simulator training? Personality and its effects on situational awareness in navigation training. Manuscript submitted for publication.
41.
SchommerN. C.HellhammerD. H.KirschbaumC. (2004). Dissociation between reactivity of the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis and the sympathetic-adrenal-medullar system to repeated psychosocial stress. Psychosomatic Medicine, 65, 450–460.
42.
Smith-JentschK. A.KraigerK.Cannon-BowersJ. A.SalasE. (2009). Transactive memory in air traffic control. Human Factors, 51, 181–192.
43.
StantonR. N. A.StewartR.HarrisD.HoughtonR. J.BaberC.McMasterR.. . . GreenD. (2006). Distributed situation awareness in dynamic systems: Theoretical development and application of an ergonomics methodology. Ergonomics, 49, 288–311.
44.
StoutR. J.Cannon-BowersJ. A.SalasE. (1996). The role of shared mental models in developing team situational awareness: Implications for training. Training Research Journal, 2, 85–116.
45.
StoutR. J.Cannon-BowersJ. A.SalasE.MilanovichD. M. (1999). Planning, shared mental models, and coordinated performance: An empirical link is established. Human Factors, 41, 61–71.
46.
UrbanJ. M.BowersC. A.MondayS. D.MorganB. B. (1995). Workload, team structure, and communication in team performance. Military Psychology, 7, 123–139.
47.
VolpeE. C.Cannon-BowersJ. A.SalasE.SpectorP. E. (1996). The impact of cross-training on team functioning: An empirical investigation. Human Factors, 38, 87–100.
48.
WoodyJ. R.McKinneyE. H.BarkerJ. M.ClothierC. C. (1994). Comparison of fixed versus formed aircrew in military transport. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 65, 153–156.
