Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Urban search and rescue (USAR) robots get stuck. Furthermore, USAR workers complained that it is difficult to judge whether a teleoperated robot can go through certain apertures. Two experiments tested teleoperators’ abilities to (a) judge whether a robot could fit through apertures (passability), (b) judge whether they could drive a robot through apertures (driveability), and (c) drive the robot through apertures. Experiment 1 examined teleoperators’ passability judgments and whether those same operators hit apertures that were wider than the robot. Experiment 2 replicated Experiment 1 and examined driveability judgments. Experiment 1 indicated that teleoperators made accurate passability judgments and routinely hit apertures that were wider than the robot. Experiment 2 successfully replicated Experiment 1 and demonstrated that teleoperators did not make accurate driveability judgments. Experiment 1 indicated that teleoperating a robot through an aperture is constrained by the robots’ physical dimensions plus a safety margin associated with how well the operators drive the robot. Thus, teleoperators should base decisions to enter an aperture on their ability to drive the robot. However, Experiment 2 indicated that teleoperators do not make accurate driveability judgments. These results have implications for teleoperator training and the design of robots for specific applications.

Keywords

urban search and rescue human-robot interaction teleoperation remote control aperture robot training affordance

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Baker

Casey

Keyes

Yanco

(2004). Improved interfaces for human-robot interaction in urban search and rescue. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 2960–2965.

Burke

J. L.

Murphy

R. R.

Coovert

M. D.

Riddle

D. L.

(2004). Moonlight in Miami: Field study of human-robot interaction in the context of an urban search and rescue disaster response training exercise. Human Computer Interaction, 19, 85–116.

Carlson

Murphy

R. R.

(2005). How UGVs physically fail in the field. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 21, 423–437.

Casper

(2002). Human-robot interactions during the robot assisted urban search and rescue response at the World Trade Center (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of South Florida, Tampa.

Casper

Murphy

R. R.

(2003). Human-robot interactions during the robot assisted urban search-and-rescue response at the world trade center. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B, 33, 367–385.

Chadwick

R. A.

(2005). The impact of multiple robots and display views: An urban search and rescue simulation. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (pp. 387–391). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.

Chadwick

R. A.

Pazuchanics

S. L.

Gillan

D. J.

(2006). What the robot’s camera tells the operator’s brain. Human Factors of Remotely Operated Vehicles, Advances in Human Performance and Cognitive Engineering Research. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Cumming

Finch

(2005). Inference by eye. American Psychologist, 60, 170–180.

Federal Emergency Management Agency. (2000). Urban search and rescue response system in federal disaster operations: Operations manual (FEMA 9356.1-PR). Washington, DC: Author.

10.

Ishak

Adolph

K. E.

Lin

G. C.

(2008). Perceiving affordances for fitting through apertures. Journal of Experimental Psychology–Human Perception and Performance, 34, 1501–1514.

11.

Keyes

(2007). Evolution of a telepresence robot interface (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Massachusetts, Lowell.

12.

Keyes

Casey

Yanco

H. A.

Maxwell

B. A.

Georgiev

(2006, August). Camera placement and multi-camera fusion for remote robot operation. Paper presented at the IEEE International Workshop on Safety, Security, and Rescue Robotics, Gaithersburg, MD.

13.

McGovern

D. E.

(1991). Experience and results in teleoperation of land vehicles. In Ellis

S. R.

(Ed.), Pictorial communication in virtual and real environments (pp. 182–195). Bristol, PA: Taylor & Francis.

14.

Micire

M. J.

(2008). Evolution and field performance of a rescue robot. Journal of Field Robotics, 25, 17–30.

15.

Moore

K. S.

Gomer

J. A.

Pagano

C. C.

Moore

D. D.

(2009). Perception of robot passability during direct line of sight and teleoperation. Human Factors, 51, 557–570.

16.

National Fire Academy. (1993). Rescue Systems 1. Emmitsburg, MD: U.S. Fire Administration.

17.

van Erp

J. B. F.

(2000). Controlling unmanned vehicles: The human factors solution. RTO Meeting Proceedings 44, Advances in Vehicle Systems Concepts and Integration (Rep. RTP-MP-44) (pp. B8-1–B8-12). Neuilly-Sur-Seine, France: NATO.

18.

Vertut

Coiffet

(1985). Teleoperations and robotics: Applications and technology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

19.

Wagman

J. B.

Malek

E. A.

(2008). Perception of affordances for walking under a barrier from proximal and distal points of observation. Ecological Psychology, 20, 65–83.

20.

Wagman

J. B.

Malek

E. A.

(2009). Geometric, kinetic-kinematic, and intentional constraints influence willingness to pass under a barrier. Experimental Psychology, 56(6), 409–417.

21.

Warren

W. H.

(1984). Perceiving affordances: Visual guidance of stair climbing. Journal of Experimental Psychology–Human Perception and Performance, 10, 683–703.

22.

Warren

W. H.

Whang

(1987). Visual guidance of walking through apertures: Body-scaled information for affordances. Journal of Experimental Psychology–Human Perception and Performance, 13, 371–383.

23.

Woodworth

R. S.

Schlosberg

(1954). Experimental psychology. New York, NY: Holt.

24.

Yanco

H. A.

Baker

Casey

Keyes

Thoren

Drury

J. L.

. . . Bruemmer

(2006, August). Analysis of human-robot interaction for urban search and rescue. Paper presented at the IEEE International Workshop on Safety, Security, and Rescue Robotics, Gaithersburg, MD.

25.

Yanco

H. A.

Drury

J. L.

(2007). Rescuing interfaces: A multi-year study of human-robot interaction at the AAAI robot rescue competition. Autonomous Robots, 22, 333–352.

26.

Yanco

H. A.

Drury

(2004). “Where am I?” Acquiring situation awareness using a remote robot platform. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (pp. 2835–2840). New York: IEEE.

27.

Yanco

H. A.

Keyes

Drury

J. L.

Nielsen

C. W.

Few

D. A.

Bruemmer

D. J.

(2007). Evolving interface design for robot search tasks. Journal of Field Robotics, 24, 779–799.

Teleoperation Through Apertures

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References