A military vehicle crew station environment was simulated and a series of three experiments was conducted to examine the workload and performance of the combined position of the gunner and robotics operator in a multitasking environment. The study also evaluated whether aided target recognition (AiTR) capabilities (delivered through tactile and/or visual cuing) for the gunnery task might benefit the concurrent robotics and communication tasks and how the concurrent task performance might be affected when the AiTR was unreliable (i.e., false alarm prone or miss prone). Participants’ spatial ability was consistently found to be a reliable predictor of their targeting task performance as well as their modality preference for the AiTR display. Participants’ attentional control was found to significantly affect the way they interacted with unreliable automated systems.
BleckleyM. K.DursoF. T.CrutchfieldJ. M.EngleR. W.KhannaM. M. (2003). Individual differences in working memory capacity predict visual attention allocation. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 10, 884–889.
2.
CalhounG.DraperM. (2006). Multi-sensory interfaces for remotely operated vehicles. In CookeN.PringleH.PedersenH.ConnorO. (Eds.), Human factors of remotely operated vehicles (pp. 149–163). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
3.
CassentiD.KelleyT.SwobodaJ.PattonD. (2009). The effects of communication style on robot navigation performance. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 53, 359–363.
4.
ChappelleW. L.McMillanK. K.NovyP. L.McDonaldK. (2010). Psychological profile of USAF unmanned aerial systems Predator and Reaper pilots. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 81, 339.
5.
ChappelleW. L.NovyP. L.RandallB.McDonaldK. (2010). Critical psychological attributes of U.S. Air Force (USAF) Predator and Reaper sensor operators according to subject matter experts. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 81, 253.
6.
ChenC.CzerwinskiM.MacredieR. (2000). Individual differences in virtual environments–Introduction and overview. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51, 499–507.
7.
ChenJ. Y. C. (2009). Concurrent performance of military tasks and robotics tasks: Effects of automation unreliability and individual differences. Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, 3, 181–188.
8.
ChenJ. Y. C.BarnesM. J.QuZ. (2010). RoboLeader: An agent for supervisory control of multiple robots. Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, 5, 81–82.
9.
ChenJ. Y. C.ClarkB. R. (2008). UAV-guided navigation for ground robot operations. Proceedings of Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 52, 1412–1416.
10.
ChenJ. Y. C.DurlachP. J.SloanJ. A.BowensL. D. (2008). Human robot interaction in the context of simulated route reconnaissance missions. Military Psychology, 20, 135–149.
11.
ChenJ. Y. C.HaasE. C.BarnesM. J. (2007). Human performance issues and user interface design for teleoperated robots. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics–Part C: Applications and Reviews, 37, 1231–1245.
12.
ChenJ. Y. C.JoynerC. T. (2006). Individual differences in concurrent performance of gunner’s and robotic operator’s tasks. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 50, 1759–1763.
13.
ChenJ. Y. C.TerrenceP. I. (2007). Individual differences in performance of robotics tasks in military multi-tasking environments. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 52, 1407–1411.
14.
CookM.SmallmanH.LacsonF.ManesD. (2010). Situation displays for dynamic UAV replanning: Intuitions and performance for display formats. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 54, 492–496.
15.
DerryberryD.ReedM. (2002). Anxiety-related attentional biases and their regulation by attentional control. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 111, 225–236.
16.
DixonS.WickensC. (2006). Automation reliability in unmanned aerial vehicle control: A reliance-compliance model of automation dependence in high workload. Human Factors, 48, 474–486.
17.
DixonS.WickensC.ChangD. (2004). Comparing quantitative model predictions to experimental data in multiple-UAV flight control. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 47, 104–108.
18.
DixonS.WickensC.McCarleyJ. (2007). On the independence of compliance and reliance: Are automation false alarms worse than misses?Human Factors, 49, 564–572.
19.
DzindoletM.PierceL.BeckH.DaweL.AndersonB. (2001). Predicting misuse and disuse of combat identification systems. Military Psychology, 13, 147–164.
20.
EkstromR. B.FrenchJ. W.HarmanH. H. (1976). Kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
21.
EyalR.TendickF. (2001). Spatial ability and learning the use of an angled laparoscope in a virtual environment. In WestwoodJ.. (Eds.), Medicine meets virtual reality 2001 (pp. 146–152). Amsterdam, Netherlands: IOS Press.
22.
Feldman BarrettL.TugadeM. M.EngleR. W. (2004). Individual differences in working memory capacity and dual-process theories of the mind. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 553–573.
23.
FincannonT.OsoskyS.JentschF.KeeblerJ.PhillipsE. (2010). Some good and bad with spatial ability in three person teams that operate multiple unmanned vehicles. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Meeting, 54, 1615–1619.
24.
GugertyL.BrooksJ. (2004). Reference-frame misalignment and cardinal direction judgments: Group differences and strategies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 10, 75–88.
25.
HartS.StavelandL. (1988). Development of NASATLX(Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research. In HancockP.MeshkatiN. (Eds.), Human Mental Workload (pp. 139-183). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
26.
HoC.TanH.SpenceC. (2005). Using spatial vibrotactile cues to direct visual attention in driving scenes. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 8, 397–412.
27.
KahnemanD.Ben-IshaiR.LotanM. (1973). Relation of a test of attention to road accidents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 58, 113–115.
28.
KozhevnikovM.HegartyM.MayerR. (2002). Revising the visualizer-verbalizer dimension: Evidence for two types of visualizers. Cognition and Instruction, 20, 47–77.
29.
LathanC.TraceyM. (2002). The effects of operator spatial perception and sensory feedback on human-robot teleoperation performance. Presence, 11, 368–377.
30.
LeeJ.MorayN. (1994). Trust, self-confidence, and operators’ adaptation to automation. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 40, 153–184.
31.
LeeJ.SeeK. (2004). Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance. Human Factors, 46, 50–80.
32.
ManzeyD.ReichenbachJ.OnnaschL. (2008). Performance consequences of automated aids in supervisory control: The impact of function allocation. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Meeting, 52, 297–301.
33.
Menchaca-BrandanM.LiuA.OmanC.NatapoffA. (2007). Influence of perspective-taking and mental rotation abilities in space teleoperation. Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, 2, 271–278.
34.
MeyerJ. (2001). Effects of warning validity and proximity on responses to warning. Human Factors, 43, 563–572.
35.
MeyerJ. (2004). Conceptual issues in the study of dynamic hazard warnings. Human Factors, 46, 196–204.
36.
MitchellD. (2005). Soldier workload analysis of the mounted combat system (MCS) platoon’s use of unmanned assets (Tech Rep. No. ARL-TR-3476). Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD: U.S. Army Research Laboratory.
37.
Naveh-BenjaminM.CraikF.PerrettaJ.TonevS. (2000). The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes: The resiliency of retrieval processes. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53A, 609–625.
38.
ParasuramanR.MolloyR.SinghI. (1993). Performance consequences of automation-induced “complacency.”International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 3, 1–23.
39.
RodesW.BrooksJ.GugertyL. (2005, May). Using verbal protocol analysis and cognitive modeling to understand strategies used for cardinal direction judgments. Poster presented at the Human Factors of UAVs Workshop, Mesa, AZ.
40.
RubinsteinJ.MeyerD.EvansJ. (2001). Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 763–797.
41.
SchumacherE.SeymourT.GlassJ.FencsikD.LauberE.KierasD.MeyerD. (2001). Virtually perfect time sharing in dual-task performance: Uncorking the central cognitive bottleneck. Psychological Science, 12, 101–108.
42.
SchipaniS. (2003, September). An evaluation of operator workload during partially-autonomous vehicle operations. Paper presented at the 2003 PerMIS, Gaithersburg, MD.
43.
SklarA.SarterN. (1999). Good vibrations: Tactile feedback in support of attention allocation and human-automation coordination in event-driven domains. Human Factors, 41, 543–552.
StanneyK.SalvendyG. (1995). Information visualization: Assisting low spatial individuals with information access tasks through the use of visual mediators. Ergonomics, 38, 1184–1198.
46.
ThomasL.WickensC. (2004). Eye-tracking and individual differences in off-normal event detection when flying with a synthetic vision system display. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Meeting, 48, 223–227.
47.
VincowM. (1998). Frame of reference and navigation through document visualizations (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
48.
WickensC.DixonS. (2005). Is there a magic number 7 (to the minus 1)? The benefits of imperfect diagnostic automation: A synthesis of the literature (Tech Rep. No. AHFD-05–01). Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois.
49.
WickensC.DixonS.GohJ.HammerB. (2005). Pilot dependence on imperfect diagnostic automation in simulated UAV flights: An attentional visual scanning analysis (Tech Rep. No. AHFD-05-02). Urbana-Champaign, IL: Univ. of Illinois.
50.
YoungM.StantonN. (2007a). Back to the future: Brake reaction times for manual and automated vehicles. Ergonomics, 50, 46–58.
51.
YoungM.StantonN. (2007b). What’s skill got to do with it? Vehicle automation and driver mental workload. Ergonomics, 50, 1324–1339.
