Background. Children with giant congenital melanocytic nevi (GCMN) pose a great challenge to pediatric and reconstructive surgeons because they have to cover the widely exposed area after its excision. A variety of treatment options exist for the management of such cases. In this retrospective review of a selected group of children who had a GCMN of their abdominal walls managed with implantation of tissue expanders (TEs) for staged reconstruction, patients were evaluated with respect to complications and general and esthetic criteria for patient and parent satisfaction. Objective. The purpose was to study the feasibility of use of TEs in the management of children who had GCMN, with special emphasis on the complications and children’s and parents’ satisfaction. Material and methods. Retrospective data from the 12 patients’ charts, operative data of 86 surgical procedures, and follow up visits were analyzed using the Student’s t test, and P < .05 was considered statistically significant. Results. In a period of 4 years, from 2004 to 2008, the results of using 37 different sizes of TEs and 86 operative procedures in 12 children (9 boys and 3 girls) aged from 2 to 12 years with different types of abdominal wall GCMN are discussed. Conclusion. The TE is a useful and feasible tool for reconstruction of the abdominal wall in cases of GCMN in children. Parents and children are satisfied in general and also with the body image.
Ruiz-Maldonado R., Tamayo L., Laterza AM, Duran C.Giant pigmented nevi: clinical, histopathologic, and therapeutic considerations. J Pediatr. 1992;120:906-911.
2.
Bittencourt FV, Marghoob AA, Kopf AW, et al. Large congenital melanocytic nevi and the risk for development of malignant melanoma and neurocutaneous melanocytosis . Pediatrics. 2000;106:736-741.
3.
Tannous ZS, Mihm MS, Arthur J., et al. Congenital melanocytic nevi: clinical and histopathologic features, risk of melanoma, and clinical management. J Am Acad Dermatol . 2005;52:197-203.
4.
Margulis A., Bauer BS, Fine NALarge and giant congenital pigmented nevi of the upper extremity: an algorithm to surgical management. Ann Plast Surg. 2004 ;52:158-167.
5.
LoGiudice J. , Gosain AKPediatric tissue expansion: indications and complications. J Craniofac Surg. 2003;14:866-872.
6.
Neumann CGThe expansion of an area of skin by progressive distension of a subcutaneous balloon: use of the method for securing skin for subtotal reconstruction of the ear. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1957;19:124-130.
Pirson G., Vanwijck R., de Vooght A., Veyckmans F., Bayet B.Giant congenital melanocytic nevi: long-term results of treatment modalities . Eur J Plast Surg. 2005;28:152-158.
9.
Foster R., Williams ML, Barkovich AJ, et al. Congenital melanocytic nevi: the significance of neurocutaneous melanosis in neurologically asymptomatic children. J Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;107:933-941.
10.
Bauer BS, Vicari FA, Richard METhe role of tissue expansion in pediatric plastic surgery. Clin Plast Surg. 1990;17:101.
11.
Pisarski GP , Mertens D., Warden GDTissue expander complications in the pediatric burn patient. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;102:1008.
12.
Zaal LH, van der Horst CMResults of the early use of tissue expansion for giant congenital melanocytic naevi on the scalp and face. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg . 2009;62: 216-220.
13.
Marghoob AA , Borrego JP, Halpern ACCongenital melanocytic nevi: treatment modalities and management options. Semin Cutan Med Surg. 2003;22:21-32.
14.
Gosain AK, Santoro TD, Larson DL, et al. Giant congenital nevi: a 20-year experience and an algorithm for their management. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;108:622-631.
15.
DiCenso AM, Guyattb G., Paesd B., et al. A new measure of parent satisfaction with medical care provided in the neonatal intensive care unit. J Clin Epidemiol. 1996;49:313-318.
16.
Whang KK, Kim MJ, Song WK, Cho S.Comparative treatment of giant congenital melanocytic nevi with curettage or Er:YAG laser ablation alone versus with cultured epithelial autografts . Dermatol Surg. 2005;12:1660-1667.
