Jones JW, McCullough LB, Richman BWEthics of surgical innovation to treat rare disease. J Vasc Surg. 2004;39:918-919.
4.
Miller FGEthical issues in surgical research. Thorac Surg Clin. 2005;15:543-554.
5.
Morreim H., Mack MJ, Sade RMSurgical innovation: too risky to remain unregulated? Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;82:1957-1965.
6.
Forde KAEthics of human research. Surg Endosc. 2008 ;22:577-579.
7.
American College of Surgeons.Giving your informed consent: public information from the American College of Surgeons . http://www.facs.org/public_info/operation/consent.html. Published May 2008. Accessed June 25, 2008.
Hopper KD, Tenhaven TR, Tully DA, Hall TEThe readability of currently used surgical/procedure consent forms in the United States. Surgery. 1998;123:496-503.
10.
Ross N.Improving surgical consent. Lancet. 2004;364: 812-813.
11.
Cassell EJConsent or obedience? Power and authority in medicine. New Engl J Med. 2005;352:328-330.
12.
Mann M., Tendulkar A., Birger N., Howard C., Ratcliffe MBNational Institutes of Health funding for surgical research. Ann Surg. 2008;247:217-221.
13.
Brennan TA, Rothman DJ, Blank L., et al. Health industry practices that create conflicts of interest: a policy proposal for academic medical centers. JAMA. 2006;295:429-433.
Krimsky S., Rothenbert LS, Scott P., Kyle G.Scientific journals and their authors' financial interests: a pilot study . Psychother Psychosom. 1998;67:194-201.
17.
Piantadosi D.Clinical Trials: A Methodologic Perspective . 2nd ed. New York, NY: John Wiley; 2005.
18.
Minion D., Sorial E., Endean E.Ethics of guidelines for reviewers of medical manuscripts. J Vasc Surg. 2007;46: 391-393.
19.
Biffl.WL, Spain, DA, Reitsma, A. et al. Responsible Development and Application of Surgical Innovations: A Position Statement of The Society of University Surgeons, J Am Coll Surg. 2008: 206:1204-1209