Colorectal cancer is the third most commonly diagnosed tumor in both males and females in the United States. Current modalities for colorectal cancer screening include fecal occult blood testing, flexible sigmoidoscopy, double-contrast barium enema, and colonoscopy. Virtual colonoscopy is a promising new method for assessing the entire colon. Vining and Gelfand first described this technique in 1994. Since then, virtual colonoscopy has been shown to be extremely safe and well tolerated by patients. Indications for virtual colonoscopy include screening for polyps, incomplete or failed colonoscopy, and preoperative assessment of the colon proximal to an occlusive cancer or even redundant fixed or stenotic colon that cannot be endoscopically traversed. Virtual colonoscopy may dramatically increase patient participation in screening programs, leading to early diagnosis of colorectal cancer. Although virtual colonoscopy seems a potentially attractive screening method for colorectal cancer, the cost-effectiveness of this method is yet to be determined.
America Cancer Society.Cancer Facts & Figures 2004. New York: The American Cancer Society, Inc., Surveillance Research; 2004: No 5008.04.
2.
Winawer SJ, Fletcher RH, Miller L., et al. Colorectal cancer screening: clinical guidelines and rationale . Gastroenterology. 1997:112; 594-642.
3.
Imperiale TF , Wagner DR, Lin CY, et al. Results of screening colonoscopy among persons 40 to 49 years of age. N Engl J Med.2002:346;1781-1785.
4.
Rex DK, Johnson DA, Lieberman DA, et al. Colorectal cancer prevention 2000: screening recommendations of the American College of Gastroenterology. Am J Gastroenterol.2000:95;868-877.
5.
Frazier AL, Colditz GA, Fuchs CS, et al. Cost-effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer in the general population. JAMA.2000;284:1954-1961.
6.
Leslie A., Carey FA, Pratt NR, et al. The colorectal adenoma-carcinoma sequence. Br J Surg.2002; 89:845-860.
7.
Bond JHClinical evidence for the adenoma-carcinoma sequence, and the management of patients with colorectal adenomas. Semin Gastrointest Dis . 2000;11:176-184.
8.
Terdiman JPGenomic events in the adenoma to carcinoma sequence. Semin Gastrointest Dis. 2000; 11: 194-206.
9.
Mandel JS, Church TR, Bond JH, et al. The effect of fecal occult blood screening on the incidence of colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med.2000;343:1603-1607.
10.
Kronberg O. , Fenger C., Sondergaard O., et al. Initial mass screening for colorectal cancer with fecal occult blood. Scand J Gastroenterol.1987;22:677-686.
11.
Reilly JM, Ballantyne GH, Fleming FX, et al. Evaluation of the occult blood test in screening colorectal neoplasms. Am Surg.1990;56:119-123.
12.
Simon JBOccult blood screening for colorectal carcinoma: a critical review. Gastroenterology. 1985;88: 820-837.
13.
Kahi CJ, Rex DKCurrent and future trends in colorectal cancer screening. Cancer Metastasis.2004:23;137-144.
14.
Johnson CDVirtual colonoscopy for colorectal polyp detection. Gastroenterology . 1997;5:143-147.
15.
Johnson CD, Harmsen WS, Wilson LA, et al. Prospective blinded evaluation of computed tomographic colonography for screen detection of colorectal polyps. Gastroenterology . 2003;125:311-319.
16.
Rex DK, Cutler CS, Lemmel GT, et al. Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Gastroenterology. 1997;112:24-28.
17.
Lieberman DA, Smith FWScreening for colon malignancy with colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol.1991;86: 1775-1780.
18.
Steine S., Stordahl A., Lunde OC, et al. Double contrast barium enema versus colonoscopy in the diagnosis of neoplastic disorders: aspects of decision-making in general practice. Fam Pract.1993;10:288-291.
19.
Vining DJ, Gelfand DWNoninvasive colonoscopy using helical CT scanning, 3D reconstruction, and virtual reality. Presented at: 1994Meeting of the Society of Gastrointestinal Radiologists; February 13-18, 1994; Maui, Hawaii.
20.
Oto A.Virtual endoscopy. Eur J Radiol.2002;42:231-239.
21.
Hara AK, Johnson CD, Reed JE et al. Detection of colorectal polyps by computed tomography colography: feasibility of a novel technique. Gastroenterology.1996; 110:290-294.
22.
Fenlon HM, McAneny DB, Nunes DP, et al. Occlusive colon carcinoma: virtual colonoscopy in the preoperative evaluation of the proximal colon. Radiology. 1999; 210:423-428.
23.
Morrin MM, Farrell RJ, Raptopoulos V., et al. Role of virtual computed tomographic colonography in patients with colorectal cancers and obstructing colorectal lesions. Dis Colon Rectum.2000;43:303-311.
24.
Fenlon HM, Nunes DP, Schroy PC, et al. A comparison of virtual and conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps. N Engl J Med.1999;341:1496-1503.
25.
Kay CL, Kulling D., Hawes RH, et al. Virtual endoscopy: comparison with colonoscopy in the detection of space-occupying lesions of the colon. Endoscopy.2000;32: 226-232.
26.
Hara AK, Johnson CD, MacCarty RL, Welch TJIncidental extracolonic findings at CT colonography. Radiology . 2000;215:704-711.
27.
Johnson CD, Dachman AHCT colonography: the next colon screening examination? Radiology.2000;216: 331-341.
28.
McFarland EG , Brink JAHelical CT colonography (virtual colonoscopy): the challenge that exists between advancing technology and generalizability . Am J Roentgenol.1999;173:549-559.
29.
Macari M., Berman P., Dicher M., et al. Usefulness of CT colonography in patients with incomplete colonoscopy . AJR Am J Roentgenol.1999;173:561-564.
30.
Tarjan Z., Zagoni T., Gyorke T., et al. Spiral CT colonography in inflammatory bowel disease. Eur J Radiol.2000;35:193-198.
31.
Gryspeerdt S., Van Holsbeeck, Bakeelandt M., Lefere P.Colonic cleansing with tagging of fecal residues prior to virtual CT colonoscopy: ESGAR 2000 . Eur Radiol.2000;10:D2.
32.
Macari M., Lavelle M., Pedrosa I., et al. Effect of different bowel preparations on residual fluid during CT colonography. Radiology. 2001;218:274-277.
33.
Lefere P., Gryspeerdt S., Marranes J., et al. CT colonography after fecal tagging with a reduced cathartic cleansing and a reduced volume of barium. AJR Am J Roentgenol.2005;184:1836-1842.
34.
Chaoui AS, Barish MAVirtual colonoscopy: a new tool for colorectal cancer screening. Gastroenterology. 2001; 17:78-85.
35.
Callstrom MR , Johnson CD, Fletcher JG, et al. CT colonography without cathartic preparation: feasibility study. Radiology.2001;219:693-698.
36.
Chaoui AS, Blake MA, Barish MA, et al. Virtual colonoscopy and colorectal cancer screening. Abdom Imaging. 2000;25:361-367.
37.
Johnson CD, Hara AK, Reed JEComputed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): a new method for detecting colorectal neoplasms. Endoscopy. 1997;29: 454-461.
38.
Royster AP, Fenlon HM, Clarke PD, et al. CT colonoscopy of colorectal neoplasms: two-dimensional and three-dimensional virtual—reality techniques with colonoscopic correlation . AJR Am J Roentgenol.1997;169:1237-1242.
Yee J., Hung RK, Akerkar GA, et al. The usefulness of glucagons hydrochloride for colonic distention in CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol.1999 ;173;169-172.
41.
Kamar, M., Portnoy, O., Bar-Dayan, A., et al. Actual colonic perforation in virtual colonoscopy: report of a case. Dis Colon Rectum.2004;47:1242.
42.
Coady-Fariborzian L., Angel, LP, Procaccino, JAPerforated colon secondary to virtual colonoscopy: report of a case. Dis Colon Rectum.2004;47:1247.
43.
Morrin MM, LaMont JTScreening virtual colonoscopy: ready for prime time?N Engl J Med.2003;349:2261-2264.
44.
Morrin MM, Kruskal JB, Farrell RJ, et al. Endoluminal CT colonography after an incomplete endoscopic colonoscopy . AJR Am J Roentgenol.1999;172:913-918.
45.
Sonnenberg A., Delco F., Bauerfeind P.Is virtual colonoscopy a cost-effective option to screen for colorectal cancer. Am J Gastroenterol.1999:94;2268-2274.
Luboldt W., Fletcher JG, Vogl TJColonography: current status, research directions and challenges: update 2002 . Eur Radiol.2002;12:502-524.
52.
Mendelson R. , Ramsay D., Edwards J., et al. Virtual colonoscopy: issues in implementation . Aust Radiol.2005; 49:8-14.
53.
Macari M., Bini EJ, Xue X., et al. Colorectal neoplasms: prospective comparison of thin-section low-dose multi-detector row CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy for detection . Radiology. 2002;224:383-392.
54.
Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I., et al. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med.2003; 349:2191-2200.
55.
Cotton PB, Durkalski VL, Pineau BC, et al. Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): a multi-center comparison with standard colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasia . JAMA.2004;291:1713-1719.
56.
Rockey DC, Paulson E., Niedzwiecki D., et al. Analysis of air contrast barium enema, computed tomographic colonography, and colonoscopy: prospective comparison. Lancet.2005;365:305-311.
57.
Laghi A., Iannaccone R., Carbone I., et al. Detection of colorectal lesions with virtual computed tomographic colonography. Am J Surg.2002;183:124-131.
58.
Pineau BC, Paskett ED, Chen GJ, et al. Virtual colonoscopy using oral contrast compared with colonoscopy for the detection of patients with colorectal polyps. Gastroenterology . 2003;125:304-310.
59.
Hoppe H., Netzer P., Spreng A., et al. Prospective comparison of contrast enhanced CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasms in a single institutional study using second-look colonoscopy with discrepant results . Am J Gastroenterol.2004;99:1924-1935.
60.
Van Gelder RE , Nio CY, Florie J., Bartelsman JF, et al. Computed tomographic colonography compared with colonoscopy in patients at increased risk for colorectal cancer . Gastroenterology. 2004;127:41-48.
61.
Rex DKVirtual colonoscopy: time for some tough questions for radiologists and gastroenterologists . Endoscopy. 2000;3:260-263.
62.
Hopper KD, Khandelwal M., Thompson C.CT colonoscopy: experience of 100 cases using volumetric rendering. Proc SPIE.2001;12:489-494.
63.
Serracino-Inglott F., Atkinson Hde, Jha P., et al. Early experiences with computed axial tomography colonography. Am J Surg.2004;187:511-514.
64.
Anupindi S. , Perumpillichira J., Jaramillo D., Zalis ME, et al. Low-dose CT colonography in children: initial experience, technical feasibility, and utility. Pediatr Radiol.2005;35:518-524.
65.
Capunay CM, Carrascosa PM, Bou-Khair A., et al. Low radiation dose multislice CT colonography in children: experience after 100 studies. Eur J Radiol.2005;56: 398-402.
66.
Jardine VL, Sala E., Lomas DJMR colonography: baseline appearance of the unprepared rectosigmoid. Br J Radiol.2005;78:202-206.
