Real-Time Objective Assessment of Knot Quality With a Portable Tensiometer Is Superior to Execution Time for Assessment of Laparoscopic Knot-Tying Performance

Abstract

Objective: Laparoscopic intracorporeal knot tying is a difficult skill to acquire. Currently, time to complete a knot is the most commonly used metric to assess the acquisition of this skill; however, without a measure of knot quality, time is a poor indicator of skills mastery. Others have shown that knot quality can be accurately assessed with a tensiometer, but obtaining this type of assessment has typically been cumbersome. We investigated a new method of real-time assessment of knot quality that allows for more practical use of knot quality as a performance metric. Methods: Eleven experienced endoscopic surgeons tied 100 intracorporeal knots in a standard box trainer. Each of the knots was immediately tested using the InSpec 2200 benchtop tensiometer (INSTRON, Canton MA) where a knot quality score (KQS) is generated based on the load handling properties of the knotted suture. The execution time was also recorded for each knot. Results: The assessment of all knots ended with one of two end points: knots that slipped (n = 48)or knots that held until the suture broke (n = 52). Knots that slip are generally of poorer quality than those that held. Execution time did not correlate with knot-quality score (r= 0.009, P= .9), and the mean execution time did not differ significantly between slipped and held knots (65 vs 68 seconds, P= .8). No completion time criteria were able to accurately predict slipped versus held knots. The mean KQS difference between held and slipped knots was highly significant (24 vs 12, P< .0001). A knot with a KQS exceeding 20 was nearly 10 times more likely to hold than slip. Conclusion: Time to complete a knot is a poor metric for the objective assessment of intracorporeal knot-tying performance in the absence of a measure of knot quality. Real-time evaluation of the knot quality can accurately distinguish welltied knots from poorly tied knots. This mode of assessment should be incorporated into training curriculum for surgical knot tying.

Keywords

laparoscopic intracorporeal knot tying tensiometer real-time assessment

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Fried GM , Feldman LS , Vassiliou MC , et al. Proving the value of simulation in laparoscopic surgery. Ann Surg 240(3):518-528, 2004.

Derossis A , Antoniuk M , Fried GM . Evaluation of laparoscopic skills: a 2-year follow up during residency training. Can J Surg 42:293-296, 1999.

Pearson A , Gallagher A , Rosser J , et al: Evaluation of structured and quantitative training methods for teaching intracorporeal knot tying. Surg Endosc 16:130-137, 2002.

Pearson A , Gallagher A , Rosser JC , et al: Quantitative evaluation of five training methods for teaching intracorporeal knot tying. Surg Endosc 16:130-137, 2002.

Rosser J , Rosser L , Savalgi R . Objective evaluation of a laparoscopic surgical skill program for residents and senior surgeons. Arch Surg 133:657-661, 1998.

Van Sickle K , McClusky D , Smith CD , et al: A. Construct validity of the ProMIS simulator using a novel laparoscopic suturing task. European Association of Endoscopic Surgeons. Barcelona, Spain, 2004. Unpublished Data.

Smith CD , Farrell TM , McNatt SS , et al: Assessing laparoscopic manipulative skills. Am J Surg 181:547-550, 2001.

Hanna G , Frank T , Cuschieri A : Objective assessment of endoscopic knot quality. Am J Surg 174:410-413, 1997.

Scott-Oconnor CEH : The SAGES Manual: Fundamentals of Laparoscopy and GI Endoscopy. New York: Springer, 1999.