This study evaluated the performance of two distinct biocarriers—plastic brush (bristle-containing toothbrush heads) and polyethylene sponge—for enriching anaerobic ammonium oxidation (anammox) bacteria under realistic (nonsteady state) conditions. Over a 130-day period, three sequencing batch reactors (R1–R3) were operated with a mixed seed inoculum (anaerobic, activated, and anammox sludge; 1:1:0.5). R1 served as the control (no carrier), while R2 and R3 used sponge and brush carriers, respectively. All reactors were operated at ambient temperatures, without dissolved oxygen (DO) control, under varying nitrogen loading rates (NLRs) (20–60 g N m−3 d−1). Performance evaluation across operational phases revealed a statistically significant difference during Phase III (p < 0.05): R1 showed the lowest total nitrogen removal efficiency (∼12%), R2 moderate (∼65%), and R3 the highest (∼83%), despite declining ambient temperatures. However, 16S rRNA gene sequencing revealed contrasting microbial communities. R1 was dominated by Bacillus (70.29%) and Lactobacillus (7.92%), suggesting poor anammox enrichment. R2 fostered a more diverse community, including Acinetobacter (14.77%), Flavobacterium (11.72%), and a threefold increase in Candidatus Kuenenia (0.18–0.54%), confirming successful anammox enrichment. R3 was dominated by denitrifiers such as Stenotrophomonas (25.48%) and Pseudomonas (24.9%), implying total nitrogen removal was primarily via heterotrophic denitrification. Overall, polyethylene sponge proved more suitable for anammox enrichment, while brush-type carriers supported heterotrophic denitrification. Notably, this study demonstrates the first use of plastic toothbrush heads as biocarriers under realistic conditions, offering a novel comparison with conventional sponge carriers for nitrogen removal.
LiY, DongW, HouZ, et al.Insight into enhanced enrichment and nitrogen removal performance of Anammox bacteria with novel biochar/tourmaline polyurethane sponge modified biocarrier. Bioresour Technol, 2025; 418(December 2024):131946; doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2024.131946
2.
LuoJ, YangJ, LiS, et al.Initiating an anaerobic ammonium oxidation reactor by inoculation with starved anaerobic ammonium oxidation sludge and modified carriers. Bioresour Technol, 2022; 359(April):127438; doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2022.127438
3.
VermaS, DavereyA. Anammox Process: Role of Reactor Systems for Its Application and Implementation in Wastewater Treatment Plants. In: Integrated and Hybrid Process Technology for Water and Wastewater Treatment. Elsevier; 2021; pp. 273–292; doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-823031-2.00005-7
4.
VermaS, HaqE, DavereyA. Effect of linear anionic surfactant (sodium dodecyl sulfate) dosage on nitrogen removal performance of an Anammox reactor. CLEAN Soil Air Water, 2024; 52(12):1–10; doi: 10.1002/clen.202300226
5.
AdamsM, IssakaE, ChenC. Anammox-based technologies: A review of recent advances, mechanism, and bottlenecks. J Environ Sci (China), 2025; 148:151–173; doi: 10.1016/j.jes.2024.01.015
6.
WeralupitiyaC, WanigatungeR, JosephS, et al.Anammox bacteria in treating ammonium rich wastewater: Recent perspective and appraisal. Bioresour Technol, 2021; 334(March):125240; doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125240
7.
van der StarWRL, AbmaWR, BlommersD, et al.Startup of reactors for anoxic ammonium oxidation: Experiences from the first full-scale Anammox reactor in Rotterdam. Water Res, 2007; 41(18):4149–4163; doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2007.03.044
8.
HoekstraM, de WeerdFA, KleerebezemR, et al.Deterioration of the anammox process at decreasing temperatures and long SRTs. Environ Technol, 2018; 39(5):658–668; doi: 10.1080/09593330.2017.1309078
9.
JinRC, YangGF, YuJJ, et al.The inhibition of the Anammox process: A review. Chem Eng J, 2012; 197:67–79; doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2012.05.014
10.
PengL, ShiR, TaoY, et al.Starting up anammox system with high efficiency nitrogen removal at low temperatures: Performance optimization, sludge characterization and microbial community analysis. J Environ Manage, 2023; 325(Pt B):116542; doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116542
11.
WangX, YangH, SuY, et al.Effect of the form of granular sludge and temperature on anammox immobilized fillers: From performance to microbial community analysis. Sci Total Environ, 2022; 803:149754; doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149754
12.
GaoR, PengY, LiJ, et al.Mainstream partial denitrification-anammox (PD/A) for municipal sewage treatment from moderate to low temperature: Reactor performance and bacterial structure. Sci Total Environ, 2022; 806(Pt 2):150267; doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150267
13.
WangL, GuW, LiuY, et al.Challenges, solutions and prospects of mainstream anammox-based process for municipal wastewater treatment. Sci Total Environ, 2022; 820:153351; doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153351
14.
PengZ, LeiY, LiuY, et al.Fast start-up and reactivation of anammox process using polyurethane sponge. Biochem Eng J, 2022; 177(July 2021):108249; doi: 10.1016/j.bej.2021.108249
15.
SuD, ZhangW, ChenY. Advanced carrier materials for anammox in wastewater nitrogen removal. Next Mater, 2025; 7(September 2024); doi: 10.1016/j.nxmate.2024.100380
16.
ZhangQ, LinJ-G, KongZ, et al.A critical review of exogenous additives for improving the anammox process. Sci Total Environ, 2022; 833(April):155074; doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155074
17.
WangJ, LiangJ, NingD, et al.A review of biomass immobilization in anammox and partial nitrification/anammox systems: Advances, issues, and future perspectives. Sci Total Environ, 2022; 821:152792; doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152792
18.
VermaS, DavereyA. Valorization of dishwashing scrubber as biocarrier for the enrichment of Anammox bacteria under realistic conditions. Geomicrobiol J, 2023; 0(0):1–12; doi: 10.1080/01490451.2023.2218363
19.
Banach-WiśniewskaA, Ćwiertniewicz-WojciechowskaM, Ziembińska-BuczyńskaA. Effect of temperature shifts and anammox biomass immobilization on sequencing batch reactor performance and bacterial genes abundance. Int J Environ Sci Technol, 2021; 18(7):1719–1730; doi: 10.1007/s13762-020-02957-w
20.
AdamsM, XieJ, XieJ, et al.The effect of carrier addition on anammox start-up and microbial community: A review. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol, 2020; 19(2):355–368; doi: 10.1007/s11157-020-09530-4
21.
FengX, WangX, ChenZ, et al.Nitrogen removal from iron oxide red wastewater via partial nitritation-anammox based on two-stage zeolite biological aerated filter. Bioresour Technol, 2019; 279(January):17–24; doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.01.113
22.
WangW, LiuQ, XueH, et al.The feasibility and mechanism of redox-active biochar for promoting anammox performance. Sci Total Environ, 2022; 814:152813; doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152813
23.
GuW, WangL, LiuY, et al.Anammox bacteria enrichment and denitrification in moving bed biofilm reactors packed with different buoyant carriers: Performances and mechanisms. Sci Total Environ, 2020; 719:137277; doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137277
24.
YangX, ZhouJ, HuoT, et al.Metabolic insights into the enhanced nitrogen removal of anammox by montmorillonite at reduced temperature. Chem Eng J, 2021; 410(5):128290; doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.128290
25.
LyuY, YanS, GongZ, et al.Enrichment and characterization of anammox bacteria in a non-woven membrane reactor. Water Pract Technol, 2022; 17(3):798–807; doi: 10.2166/wpt.2022.021
26.
DolejšI, StloukalR, RosenbergM, et al.Nitrogen removal by co-immobilized anammox and ammonia-oxidizing bacteria in wastewater treatment. Catalysts, 2019; 9(6):523; doi: 10.3390/catal9060523
27.
VermaS, DavereyA, LinJG. Successful start-up of anammox process from activated sludge and anaerobic sludge in a sequencing batch reactor using an unconventional strategy. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad, 2021; 156(August 2020):105132; doi: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2020.105132
28.
DavereyA, ChenYC, DuttaK, et al.Start-up of simultaneous partial nitrification, anammox and denitrification (SNAD) process in sequencing batch biofilm reactor using novel biomass carriers. Bioresour Technol, 2015; 190:480–486; doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.02.064
29.
EatonAD, ClesceriLS, RiceEW, GreenbergAE. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 21st ed. American Public Health Association: Washington, DC; 2005.
30.
WangT, WangX, YuanL, et al.Start-up and operational performance of anammox process in an Anaerobic Baffled Biofilm Reactor (ABBR) at a moderate temperature. Bioresour Technol, 2019; 279:1–9; doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.01.114
31.
FuX, HouR, YangP, et al.Application of external carbon source in heterotrophic denitrification of domestic sewage: A review. Sci Total Environ, 2022; 817:153061; doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153061
32.
GuptaHP, AroraS, VermaS, et al.Evaluation of corncob as a bio-carrier for the enrichment of anammox bacteria using activated sludge as seed. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol, 2019; 19(March):101140; doi: 10.1016/j.bcab.2019.101140
33.
ChenR, YaoJ, AilijiangN, et al.Abundance and diversity of nitrogen-removing microorganisms in the UASB-anammox reactor. PLoS One, 2019; 14(4):e0215615; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215615
34.
IzadiP, IzadiP, EldyastiA. Influence of microbial population dynamics on accelerated development of anammox micro-granular consortium. J Water Process Eng, 2020; 36(May):101384; doi: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2020.101384
35.
AroraAS, NawazA, YunCM, et al.Ecofriendly anaerobic ammonium oxidation system: Optimum operation and inhibition control strategies for enhanced nitrogen removal. Ind Eng Chem Res, 2019; 58(45):20847–20856; doi: 10.1021/acs.iecr.9b04591
36.
DavereyA, HungNT, DuttaK, et al.Ambient temperature SNAD process treating anaerobic digester liquor of swine wastewater. Bioresour Technol, 2013; 141:191–198; doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.02.045
37.
StrousM, KuenenJG, JettenMS. Key physiology of anaerobic ammonium oxidation downloaded from. Appl Environ Microbiol, 1999; 65(7):3248–3250; doi: 10.1128/AEM.65.7.3248-3250.1999
38.
OyarzúaP, Bovio-WinklerP, EtchebehereC, et al.Microbial communities in an anammox reactor treating municipal wastewater at mainstream conditions: Practical implications of different molecular approaches. J Environ Chem Eng, 2021; 9(6):106622; doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2021.106622
39.
ChenH, HuHY, ChenQQ, et al.Successful start-up of the anammox process: Influence of the seeding strategy on performance and granule properties. Bioresour Technol, 2016; 211:594–602; doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.03.139
40.
PanC, XuD, DongZ, et al.Effect of temperature decrease on anammox granular sludge: Shock and adaptation. Sci Total Environ, 2021; 798:149242; doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149242
41.
ZhouS, SongZ, SunZ, et al.The effects of undulating seasonal temperature on the performance and microbial community characteristics of simultaneous anammox and denitrification (SAD) process. Bioresour Technol, 2021; 321(November 2020):124493; doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.124493
42.
YangS, PengY, ZhangS, et al.Carrier type induces anammox biofilm structure and the nitrogen removal pathway: Demonstration in a full-scale partial nitritation/anammox process. Bioresour Technol, 2021; 334(May):125249; doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125249
43.
ZhangD, XuS, AntwiP, et al.Accelerated start-up, long-term performance and microbial community shifts within a novel upflow porous-plated anaerobic reactor treating nitrogen-rich wastewater: Via ANAMMOX process. RSC Adv, 2019; 9(45):26263–26275; doi: 10.1039/c9ra04225c
44.
HuangQ, DuW-L, MiaoL-L, et al.Microbial community dynamics in an ANAMMOX reactor for piggery wastewater treatment with startup, raising nitrogen load, and stable performance. AMB Express, 2018; 8(1):156; doi: 10.1186/s13568-018-0686-0
45.
PereiraAD, CabezasA, EtchebehereC, et al.Microbial communities in Anammox reactors: A review. Environ Technol Rev, 2017; 6(1):74–93; doi: 10.1080/21622515.2017.1304457
46.
WangS, YinY, GaoY, et al.Rapid start-up of Anammox process with a stepwise strategy: System performance, microbial community succession and mechanism exploration. Water (Basel), 2024; 16(24):3619; doi: 10.3390/w16243619
47.
ChenW, DaiX, CaoD, et al.Characterization of a microbial community in an Anammox process using stored Anammox sludge. Water (Switzerland), 2017; 9(11):829; doi: 10.3390/w9110829
48.
PekyavasG, Yangin-GomecC. Response of anammox bacteria to elevated nitrogen and organic matter in pre-digested chicken waste at a long-term operated UASB reactor initially seeded by methanogenic granules. Bioresour Technol Reports, 2019; 7(May):100222; doi: 10.1016/j.biteb.2019.100222
49.
LeLT, JeonJ, DangBT, et al.Influence of temperature on anammox reaction and microbial diversity in a bio-carriers reactor under mainstream conditions. Environ Technol Innov, 2022; 25:102178; doi: 10.1016/j.eti.2021.102178
50.
WeiY, JinY, ZhangW. Domestic sewage treatment using a one-stage ANAMMOX process. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2020; 17(9):3284; doi: 10.3390/ijerph17093284
51.
PopovaP, Astete VasquezL, BoldenS, et al.Enrichment of anammox bacteria in up-flow bioreactors enhanced with plastic and rock media: Long-term performance monitoring with fluorescence and specific conductivity. Bioresour Technol Reports, 2025; 29(December 2024):102081; doi: 10.1016/j.biteb.2025.102081
52.
ChenY, ZhangC, ChenZ, et al.Achieving nitrite shunt using in-situ free ammonia enriched by natural zeolite: Pilot-scale mainstream anammox with flexible nitritation strategy. Water Res, 2024; 265(June):122314; doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2024.122314
