In 2025, the University of Idaho Library’s Special Collections and Archives accepted a donation of nearly 2000 political buttons, a collection type traditionally not held by archives. This case study documents archivists’ experiences processing and providing access to this artifact collection using existing archival infrastructure and expertise, including ArchivesSpace for item-level artifact description, standard archival supplies for storage, and CollectionBuilder for digital access. The project required adaptation and problem-solving at every step, from developing a flexible numbering system to imaging artifacts with flatbed scanners. Our experience illustrates LAM (library, archives, and museum) convergence as a matter of stretching archival practice rather than formal collaboration with museum experts. Despite encountering challenges such as time-intensive processing and limited experience handling artifacts, we have found the collection to be a valuable resource for instruction, exhibits, and research. This case study demonstrates both the possibilities and limitations of adapting archival practice to three-dimensional artifacts.
AllenMichael. “Political Buttons and the Material Culture of American Politics, 1828–1976.” The Pacific Northwest Quarterly99, no. 1 (Winter 2007/2008): 30–3. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40492044.
ChristianMichele. “A Curatorial Challenge: Managing Artifacts in Academic Archives.” Collections: A Journal for Museum and Archives Professionals1, no. 4 (2005): 329–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/155019060400100404.
CrossJames Edward. “Campaign Buttons in a Black Box: Appraisal Standards for Strom Thurmond Memorabilia.” In An American Political Archives Reader, edited by PaulKaren D.GrayGlennMelvinRebecca Johnson (Scarecrow Press, 2009), 207–20.
9.
FernsHope JE. “What’s Important to You? A Look into the Historical and Social Significance of Buttons.” Undergraduate thesis, Portland State University, 2021. https://doi.org/10.15760/honors.1060.
HendryKollynn. “The Politics of Preservation: Stewarding Artifacts in Archives.” MA thesis, Stephen F. Austin State University, 2023. https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/etds/521/.
14.
HendricksonLois. “Teaching with Artifacts and Special Collections.” Bulletin of the History of Medicine90, no. 1 (2016): 136–40. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26310794.
15.
JonesMatthew. “Archives and Museums – Threat or Opportunity?” Journal of the Society of Archivists18, no. 1 (1997): 27–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/00379819709511810.
16.
KoelschBeth Ann. “Research and Institutional Uses of Ephemera and Realia in Academic Library Archival Collections.” MA thesis, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, 2007. https://ils.unc.edu/MSpapers/3269.pdf.
17.
MadsenArnieFritchJohn. “100 Million Buttons Can’t Be Wrong: Argument in Political Pinback Buttons.” In Disturbing Argument: Selected Works from the 18th NCA/AFA Alta Conference on Argumentation, edited by PalczewskiCatherine H. (Routledge, 2015), 193–200.
RasmussenCasper Hvenegaard. “Is Digitalization the Only Driver of Convergence? Theorizing Relations Between Libraries, Archives, and Museums.” Journal of Documentation75, no. 6 (2019): 1258–73. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-02-2019-0025.
23.
RasmussenCasper HvenegaardHjørlandBirgir. “Libraries, Archives, and Museums (LAMs): Conceptual issues with focus on their convergence.” Knowledge Organizations49, no. 8 (2023): 577–621. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2022-8-577.
SevernJill Robin. “Adventures in the Third Dimension: Reenvisioning the Place of Artifacts in Archives.” In An American Political Archives Reader, edited by PaulKaren D.GrayGlennMelvinRebecca Johnson (Scarecrow Press, 2009), 221–33.
