This persuasive position paper aims to discuss the public policy gaps in digital preservation identified by UNESCO and persuade the development of the current digital public policies. To evidence these gaps, the principal topics of digital public policies (digital strategy) from four countries were analyzed: Brazil, France, Spain, and the United Kingdom. The analysis evidence that these digital public policies are focused on the modernization of public administration and cybersecurity; they do not contemplate digital preservation. To support the position, current legislation in record management is indicated to connect the preservation of physical and digital documents. The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development is also used to persuade because digital preservation is an indispensable component of sustainable development. That is because today, large amounts of cultural heritage are created and only available digitally, and never “fixed” in a physical form, museums, archives, and libraries, also embarking on an epic journey to digitization and “no development is sustainable without considering culture.” Digital culture heritage must be available for future generations, and only digital preservation can guarantee that; therefore, digital preservation must be treated as a public policy.
AudunsonRagnarAndresenHerbjørnFagerlidCicilieHenningsenErikHobohmHans-ChristophJochumsenHenrikLarsenHåkon, et al. 2020. Libraries, Archives, and Museums as Democratic Spaces in a Digital Age. Berlin and Boston, MA: De Gruyter Saur. doi:10.1515/9783110636628.
2.
BarrettSusan M.2004. “Implementation Studies: Time for a Revival? Personal Reflections on 20 Years of Implementation Studies.” Public Administration82 (2): 249–62.
3.
BirklandThomas A.2007. “Agenda Setting in Public Policy.” In Handbook of Public Policy Analysis – Theory, Politics, and Methods, edited by FischerF.MillerG. J.SidneyM. S., 63–78. London: CRC Press.
4.
BrungsJuliaStephenWyber. 2016. Preserving Our Digital Culture for the Future: Overcoming Obstacles Through Collaboration. The Netherlands: International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA).
5.
CapanoGilibertoPritoniAndrea. 2020. “Policy Cycle.” In The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Interest Groups, Lobbying and Public Affairs, edited by HarrisP.BitontiA.FleisherC.Skorkjær BinderkrantzA., 1–7. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-13895-0_69-1.
6.
Conselho Nacional de Arquivos. 2014. Diretrizes para implementação de repositórios digitais confiáveis de documentos arquivísticos. Rio de Janeiro: Arquivo Nacional Brasil.
7.
Decreto Real 1708, de 18 de noviembre de 2011. Se establece el Sistema Español de Archivos y se regula el Sistema de Archivos de la Administración General del Estado y de sus Organismos Públicos y su régimen de acceso. Agencia Estatal Boletín Oficial del Estado.
8.
DyeThomas R.1972. Understanding Public Policy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
GrauOliver. 2017. Museum and Archive on the Move: Changing Cultural Institutions in the Digital Era. Berlin and Boston, MA: De Gruyter. doi:10.1515/9783110529630.
HodderJakeBeckinghamDavid. 2022. “Digital Archives and Recombinant Historical Geographies.” Progress in Human Geography46 (6): 1298–310. doi:10.1177/03091325221103603.
15.
HowlettMichael. 2018. Designing Public Policies. Principles and Instruments. 2nd ed.London and New York, NY: Routledge.
16.
HowlettMichaelGiestSarah. 2018. “The Policy-Making Process.” In Routledge Handbook of Public Policy, edited by AraralE.FritzenS.HowlettM.RameshM.WuX., 17–28. London and New York, NY: Routledge.
17.
HowlettMichaelRameshM.2003. Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems. Toronto, Canada: Oxford University Press.
18.
HowlettMichaelRameshM.PerlAnthony. 2020. Studying Public Policy. Principles and Processes. 4th ed.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19.
JannWernerWegrichKai. 2007. “Theories of the Policy Cycle.” In Handbook of Public Policy Analysis – Theory, Politics, and Methods, edited by FischerF.MillerG. J.SidneyM. S., 43–62. London: CRC Press.
20.
JenkinsWilliam Ieuan. 1978. Policy Analysis: A Political and Organizational Perspective. London: Martin Robertson.
21.
KimJihoon. 2020. “The Archive with a Virtual Museum: The (Im)possibility of the Digital Archive in Chris Marker’s Ouvroir.” Memory Studies13 (1): 90–106. doi:10.1177/1750698018766386.
LasswellHarold Dwight. 1956. The Decision Process: Seven Categories of Functional Analysis. College Park, MD: The University of Maryland Press.
25.
Lei 8.159, de 08 de janeiro de 1991. Dispõe sobre a política nacional de arquivos públicos e privados e dá outras providências. Diário Oficial da República Federativa do Brasil.
26.
LOI n° 2008-696 du 15 juillet 2008. Relative aux archives. Journal Officiel de la République Française.
27.
MinogueMartin. 1993. “Theory and Practice in Public Administration.” In The Policy Process, edited by HillM., 10–33. New York, NY: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Public Records Act 1958, 23rd July 1958. “An Act to Make New Provisions Concerning Public Records and the Public Record Office, and for Connected Purposes.” The National Archives. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Eliz2/6-7/51
TilleyHelenTilleyHelenShaxsonLouiseReaJoannaBallLouiseYoungJohn. 2017. 10 Things to Know About How to Influence Policy with Research. Overseas Development Institute (ODI).
