Born-digital materials are fleeting and fragile, yet digital preservation has been a challenge with its evolving methods and technical requirements. Added to this, many libraries, archives, and museums lack broad capacity to preserve born-digital materials with confidence. This case study offers an example of how one minimally resourced public university navigated the landscape to establish a born-digital preservation program. It distills the immense literature into practical, manageable actions while utilizing limited resources to meet feasible goals. In recognizing the hurdles that can keep an institution from taking steps to establish a digital preservation program, this case study seeks to empower librarians, archivists, and museum professionals as it traces a process that can serve as a foundation for maintaining and incrementally growing a robust digital preservation program.
CunninghamAdrian. 2008. “Digital Curation/Digital Archiving: A View from the National Archives of Australia.” American Archivist71(2): 530-543.
7.
CunninghamAdrian. 1994. “The Archival management of Personal Records in Electronic Format: Some Suggestions.” Archives and Manuscripts22 (1): 94-105.
8.
CunninghamAdrian. 1999. “Waiting for the Ghost Train: Strategies for Managing Electronic personal Records Before It Is Too Late.” Archival Issues24(1): 55-64.
DooleyJackie M.LuceKatherine. 2010. Taking Our Pulse: The OCLC Research Survey of Special Collections and Archives. Dublin, OH: OCLC.
13.
DresslerVirginia A.2017. “The State of Affairs with Digital Preservation at ARL Member Libraries: A Survey and Analysis of Policy.” Digital Library Perspectives32 (2): 137-155.
14.
DurantiLucianaMacNeilHeather. 1996. “The Protection of the Integrity of Electronic Records: An Overview of the UBC-MAS Research Project.” Archivaria42: 46-67.
15.
Educopia Institute. “OSSArcFlow: Investigating, Synchronizing, and Modeling a Range of Archival Workflows for Born-Digital Content.” Accessed November 30, 2020. https://educopia.org/ossarcflow/.
16.
FaulderErin. 2016. “Accessioning Digital Archives.” In Appraisal and Acquisition Strategies, edited by ShallcrossM.PromC. J., 121-185. Chicago: Society of American Archivists.
17.
ForstromMichael. 2009. “Managing Electronic Records in Manuscript Collections: A Case Study from the Beinecke Rare Book and Manuscript Library.” American Archivist72 (2): 460-477.
18.
GoldmanBen. 2011. “Bridging the Gap: Taking Practical Steps Toward Managing Born-Digital Collections in Manuscript Repositories.” RBM: A Journal of Rare Books, Manuscripts, and Cultural Heritage12 (1): 11-24.
19.
GollinsTim. 2009. “Parsimonious Preservation: Preventing Pointless Processes.” In Online Information 2009 Proceedings, edited by TurnerC.AlisonY., 75-78. London: Incisive Media.
20.
GorzalskiMatt. 2018. “Digital Preservation Practices among Midwestern Four-year Public Colleges and Universities.” Archival Issues39 (1): 26-52.
21.
GreeneMark. 2010. “MPLP: It’s Not Just for Processing Anymore.” American Archivist73 (1): 175-203.
22.
HowardRachelFoxHeatherDanielsCaroline. 2011. “The Born-Digital Deluge: Documenting Twenty-First Century Events.” Archival Issues33 (2): 100-111.
23.
HuthGeof. 2016. “Appraising Digital Records.” In Appraisal and Acquisition Strategies, edited by ShallcrossM.PromC. J., 10-68. Chicago: Society of American Archivists.
24.
HyryTomOnufRachel. 1997. “The Personality of Electronic Records: The Impact of New Information Technology on Personal Papers.” Archival Issues22 (1): 37-44.
25.
KenneyAnne R.McGovernNancy Y.2003. “The Five Organizational Stages of Digital Preservation." In Digital Libraries: A Vision for the Twenty-first Century: A Festschrift to Honor Wendy Lougee on the Occasion of her Departure from the University of Michigan, edited by HodgesP.BonnM.SandlerM.WilkinJ. P.Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan. http://dx.doi.org/10.3998/spobooks.bbv9812.0001.001.
McMeekinSharon. October2011. “With a Little Help from OAIS: Starting down the Digital Curation Path.” Journal of the Society of Archivists32 (2): 241-253.
29.
McMillanGailSchultzMattSkinnerKatherine. 2011. SPEC Kit 325: Digital Preservation. Washington, DC: Association of Research Libraries.
National Library of Australia. 2003. Guidelines for the Preservation of Digital Heritage. Paris: Information Society Division, United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
O’MearaErinStrattonKate. 2016. “Preserving Digital Objects.” In Digital Preservation Essentials, edited by PromC. J., 8-73. Chicago: Society of American Archivists.
35.
PetersCatherine Stollar. 2006. “When Not All Papers Are Papers: A Case Study in Digital Archivy.” Provenance24 (1): 22-34.
PromChristopher J.2011. “Making Digital Preservation Practical: A Personal Odyssey.” Provenance29 (1): 3-21.
39.
RayJoyce. 2009. “Sharks, Digital Curation, and the Education of Information Professionals.” Museum Management and Curatorship24 (4): 357-368.
40.
RLG/OCLC Working Group on Digital Archive Attributes. 2002. Trusted Digital Repositories: Attributes and Responsibilities. Mountain View, CA: Research Libraries Group.
41.
RossSeamus. 2012. “Digital Preservation, Archival Science and Methodological Foundations for Digital Libraries.” New Review of Information Networking17 (1): 43-68.
42.
SandyHeather MoulaisonCorradoEdward M.2018. “Bringing Content into the Picture: Proposing a Tri-Partite Model for Digital Preservation.” Journal of Library Administration58 (1): 1-17.
43.
SheinCyndi. 2014. “From Accession to Access: A Born-Digital Materials Case Study.” Journal of Western Archives5 (1): 1-42.
VardiganMaryWhitemanCole. 2007. “ICPSR meets OAIS: Applying the OAIS Reference Model to the Social Science Archive Context.” Archival Science7 (1): 73-87.
47.
WeinraubEvvivaAlagnaLauraCaizziCarolynQuinnBrendanSchaeferSibyl. 2018. Beyond the Repository: Integrating Local Preservation Systems with National DistributionServices. Washington, DC: IMLS.
48.
WilseyLauraSkirvinRebeccaChanPeterEdwardsGlynn. 2013. “Capturing and Processing Born-Digital Files in the STOP AIDS Project Records: A Case Study.” Journal of Western Archives4 (1): 1-22.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
