Every object is physical proof of history. The object serves as a manifestation of raw material, human thoughts, and events. Once the heritage expert accepts this, he takes responsibility for interacting with its history by preserving it, adding to it, or removing it. This article defines three aspects of intended interaction with an object's history: restoration, de-restoration and re-restoration. When preparing an object for exhibition or study, ethical considerations, formed through the years amongst museums and organisations, should be considered in order to achieve the best decision regarding an object's treatment. There is no single solution to issues that derive from past restorations as noted in the case studies presented here from the Islamic Arts Museum of Malaysia.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlbergeDalya, “Louvre masterpiece by Veronese ‘mutilated’ by botched nose jobs,”The Observer 12 June 2010.
BendtsenMargit“The Acropolis and the Athenian City Plan,” in Acta Hyperborea Vol. 2: The Classical Heritage in Nordic Art and Architecture. edited by NielsenMarjatta. Publication of an Interdisciplinary Seminar held at the University of Copenhagen, 1988. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press, 1990, pp. 210–218.
4.
BaumeisterMechthild, EdelsteinBeth, RizzoAdriana, GambirasiArianna, HayesTimothy, KepplerRoos, & SchultzJulia. “A Splendid Welcome to the ‘House of Praises, Glorious Deeds and Magnanimity” in Conservation and the East Mediterranean. Preprints of the Istanbul Congress, 20–22 Sept. London: International Institute for Conservation of Historic and Artistic Works, 2010, pp. 126–133.
5.
ChildRobert E. in Things Fall Apart: Museum Conservation in Practice.ButtlerCaroline, and DaviesMary (eds.), Cardiff: Llyfrau Amgueddfa Cymru - National Museum of Wales, 2006.
6.
Islamic Arts Museum Malaysia, www.iamm.org.my (accessed 23 November 2010).
7.
Paul Getty MuseumJ., The Hope Hygieia: Restoring a Statue's History in Past Exhibitions on view 10 April - 8 September, 2008. http://www.getty.edu/art/exhibitions/hope_hygieia/ (accessed 10 July 2012).
8.
Kardamitsi-AdamiMaro. Avάktoρα σtηv Eλλάδα (Palaces in Greece). Athens: National Historical Museum/Melissa, 2009.
9.
KokkouAggelikiH Méρiμvα Λiα Tiζ Aρχαiótηteζ ∑tηv Eλλάδα Kαi Tα TΠρώtα Movσ∊iα (Concern/care for the antiquities in Hellas and the first museums). Athens: Kapon, 2009.
Mallouchou-TufanoFani. H Π∊ρiπét∊iα τηζ Aκρóπoληζ τov 190 αiώva (The Adventure of Acropolis during the 19th century) in ValavanisPanos (ed.) M∊γάλ∊ζ ∑τiγμéζ τηζ Eλληviκήζ Aρχαioλoγiαζ (Great Moments in Greek Archaeology). Athens: Kapon, 2009 and Los Angeles: J. Paul Getty, 2007, pp. 36–57.
12.
NarkissIrit“Is it real? Authenticity, Conservation and Visitor Experience” in HermensErma, and FiskeTina (eds.) Art Conservation and Authenticities: Material, Concept, and Context. Proceedings of the International Conference held at the University of Glasgow, 12–14 September 2007. London: Archetype, 2009, pp. 237–245.
13.
Ribeiro da CostaAntonio. “Christian Sacred Art: A Conservation Challenge” in The Object in Context, Cross Conservation Boundaries, Preprints of the Munich Congress, 28 August-1 September 2006. London: International Institute for Conservation of Historic and Artistic Works, 2006, pp. 7–11.
14.
RisserErik, and DaehnerJens. “A ‘Pouting Satyr’ from Castel Gandolfo: History and Conservation,” in The Object in Context, Cross Conservation Boundaries, Preprints of the Munich Congress, 28 August-1 September 2006. London: International Institute for Conservation of Historic and Artistic Works, 2006, pp. 190–196.
15.
RiversShayne, and YamashitaYoshihiko. “A Cross-Cultural Approach to Urushi Conservation: Consolidation of the Decoration on the Mazarin Chest” in The Object in Context, Cross Conservation Boundaries, Preprints of the Munich Congress, 28 August-1 Sept. International Institute for Conservation, London, 2006, pp. 286–292.
16.
RobinetLaurianne, “Glass Deterioration Group, The group is still growing!”Newsletter of the ICOM Committee for Conservation, Issue 17, Winter 2008–2009, Working Group, Glass and Ceramics, ISSN: 0960–5657, p. 10.
17.
SakkiZ., KarydisC., SpiliopoulouC., and MaraveliasC.“‘Knives Cost Lives’: Ethical Issues Relating to the Conservation of a Group of Weapons at the Museum of Criminology of the Medical School -University of Athens” in ArgyropoulosV., HeinA., & HarythM.A. (eds.), Strategies for Saving our Cultural Heritage. Proceedings for the International Conference, on Strategies for Saving Indoor Metallic Collections, Cairo, Egypt, 25 February-1 March 2007.
18.
AthensGreeceDepartment of Conservation of Antiquities and Works of Art, T.E.I. of Athens, 2007, pp. 244–250.
19.
ScottDavid A., PodanyJerry, ConsidineBrian B.Ancient & Historic Metals: Conservation and Scientific Research: Proceedings of a Symposium organized by the J. Paul Getty Museum and the Getty Conservation Institute, November 1991.Los Angeles: Getty Conservation Institute, 1994.
20.
ShtrumBatyah“LACMA'S Classical Sculpture Collection: Reconsidered, Again” in in The Object in Context, Cross Conservation Boundaries, Preprints of the Munich Congress, 28 August-1 September 2006. London: International Institute for Conservation of Historic and Artistic Works, 2006, pp. 197–203.
21.
ThorntonJonathan“A Brief History and Review of the Early Practice and Materials of Gap-Filling in the West”Journal of the American Institute for Conservation, Vol. 37(1): Spring 1998, pp. 3–22.
