Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

In order to guarantee the tag identification accuracy and efficiency in mobile radio frequency identification system, it is necessary to estimate the tags’ arrival rate before performing identification. This research aims to develop a novel estimation method based on improved grey model(1,1) and sliding window mechanism. By establishing tags’ dynamic arrival model, this article emphasizes the importance of tags’ arrival rate estimation in mobile radio frequency identification system. Using sliding window mechanism and weighted coefficients method, weighted grey model(1,1) with sliding window (WGMSW(1,1)) is proposed based on traditional grey model(1,1). For experimental verification, three kinds of data are used as original data in WGMSW(1,1). The experimental results show that the proposed method has lower estimation error rate, lower computation complexity, and high system stability.

Keywords

Mobile radio frequency identification system weighted grey model tags’ arrival rate slide window

Introduction

With the rapid development of Internet of things (IOT),¹ radio frequency identification (RFID) technology becomes popular to users who want to track something. If the objects with RFID tags are stable, the system is called stable RFID system. Otherwise, if the objects with tags are moving during identification, this kind of system is called mobile RFID system.² No matter stable RFID system or mobile RFID system, there is an unavoidable phenomenon which is called confliction. After receiving the request from reader, tags will rely with their own information. When more than two tags reply the request simultaneously, the confliction will occur.^3,4 In this circumstance, the reader usually cannot identify any of conflicted tags, and the time will be consumed. In stable RFID system, the unidentified tags can attend next identification process, and finally all the tags can be successfully identified. But, in mobile RFID system, if tags cannot be identified before moving out of the identification region, this phenomenon is called tag loss.⁵ And the efficiency of mobile RFID system will decrease. Therefore, tag loss is a more serious problem than that in stable RFID system.

In order to solve this kind of confliction, many researchers proposed some efficient anti-collision algorithms. All algorithms are mainly classified two categories: one is based on ALOHA (which is called ALOHA-based algorithm), the other is based on tree-algorithm (which is called tree-based algorithm).⁶ Dynamic frame slotted ALOHA (DFSA) is the most important method in ALOHA-based algorithms.⁷ Q-algorithm, which uses DFSA method, is applied to some applications.⁸ So far, most of ALOHA anti-collision algorithms focus on how to identify tags as fast and accurately as possible. Tree-based algorithms, such as binary splitting tree (BST)⁹ and query tree (QT),¹⁰ will traverse the entire search space to identify a certain tag. When the tag number increases, the time required to identify one tag will increase dramatically.

In mobile RFID system, new tags may move into or move out of identification area, and the time used for identifying tags is very limited. If tags move very fast, they cannot be identified before they move out of the identification area. So, the tag loss phenomenon is very serious. So, the requirements of mobile RFID system are not only the high speed and accuracy of identification but also the lower tag loss. The original algorithms mentioned above do not take the mobile requirement into consideration, so they cannot be directly applied to mobile RFID system.

With the rapid development of IOT,¹¹ more and more mobile RFID systems are applied in intelligent logistics, intelligent airport, and other supply-chain applications. So many researchers focus on how to improve existing algorithms and apply them to mobile RFID systems.

In mobile RFID system, the number of tags in identification area will change over time. If the tags leave the identification area without being identified, the information of the tags will be lost. Such situation is intolerable in some applications such as intelligent logistics and intelligent airport. In order to reduce the tag loss rate, the most important things for the reader is to know how many tags are in identification area at that time. The reader can adjust the parameter to identify tags. Because of tags’ movement, the number of tags is unknown in advance and how many tags enter the recognition area is also uncertain. So, it is difficult for reader to set parameter according the number of tags. Therefore, the prediction of tag arrival rate is the key point for reader.

At present, there are many ways to achieve prediction such as time-series method,¹² neural network (NN) prediction method,¹³ and statistical prediction method.¹⁴ In RFID system, due to the limitation of memory capacity, the RFID reader cannot record too much previous data, so the chosen algorithm must meet the requirements of small amount of data. Restricted by the reader’s processing ability, the selected prediction algorithm should have lower computational complexity. If the algorithm will be used in mobile RFID system, it should have real-time specificity. For traditional forecasting methods, such as time-series method and NN method, the number of samples will seriously affect the accuracy of forecasting. So, these methods are not suitable for mobile RFID systems without improvement.

Grey system theory was first put forward by Chinese scholar Professor D Julong¹⁵ in March 1982. The grey prediction is a method for predicting the system which has uncertain feature. The grey prediction method¹⁶ identifies the degree of difference between the development factors of the system, performs correlation analysis, and then processes the original data to find the law of system variation. According to the law of system variation, the system can perform prediction. This model uses a small number of samples (at least four samples) to predict the value in future. At present, grey forecasting model has been widely used in various small samples forecasting, such as electricity consumption forecasting in the power industry¹⁷ and water quality in rivers and lakes of the hydrological industry.¹⁸ In this article, the tag arrival rate is also a small sample, so the grey prediction can be used in this kind of prediction.

In the grey model(1,1) (also known as GM(1,1)), the first parameter in parentheses means that grey process can be described by a first-order differential equation. The second one means that the system contains only one variable. In GM(1,1), the minimum number of samples required is 4, that is, the fewest modeling length is 4. In mobile RFID system, if the tag arrival rate is as a variable, it meets the requirements of GM(1,1) for variables. However, when the tag arrival rate suddenly changes, the accuracy of GM(1,1) model prediction will decrease. In this article, the author proposed an improved GM(1,1) prediction method based on sliding window mechanism. Traditional GM is used to predict the future data using a set of static data. Using the method in this article, prediction becomes a dynamic process because of a set of dynamic data. This method can be used in many environments such as intelligent logistics, luggage identification in smart Airport, and intelligent animal breeding.

This article is organized as follows. In section “Mobile RFID systems,” this article describes the tag arrival model in mobile RFID system. The improved prediction method is proposed in section “Our method weighted grey model(1,1) with sliding window (WGMSW(1,1)).” Then, we simulate the proposed method and compare the results with existing method to get the results in section “Simulation and analysis.” This article is concluded in section “Conclusion.”

Mobile RFID systems

In order to describe the tag identification model, this article uses the following symbols and definitions:

R (round): in static RFID system, the duration, from the beginning of reader’s broadcasting of instruction to all tags are identified, is called a round (denoted by R).

F_i: the ith frame in an identification process.

t_ij: the jth timeslots in the ith frame.

U_i: the number of tags which move from the ith frame to the (i + 1)th frame.

x_i: the tags’ arrival rate in F_i.

L_i: the timeslots number in F_i.

In static RFID system, the R consists of multiple frames F_i (i ≥ 1), so R = {F_i|i ∈ N}, in which N represents the natural numbers. Each frame F_i is divided into several timeslots t_ij, so F_i = {t_ij|j = 1,2,…,L_i}. Tags in identification area randomly select one timeslot in F_i to wait for being identified. When the tag is successfully identified in this timeslot, this one is called successfully timeslot. If two or more tags select this timeslot, tags cannot be identified because of collision, so this timeslot is called collision timeslot. If no tags select a certain timeslot, this kind of timeslot is called empty timeslot. After a frame, the reader will count three kinds of timeslots. According to the statistical results, the reader sets new parameters and then initialize next frame. In static RFID system, there are no new tags entering the identification area during identification process. The definition of R in static RFID system cannot be used in mobile RFID system. The definition frame F_i in mobile RFID system is the same as that in static RFID system. But during the identification process in mobile RFID system, new tags may come into the identification area. We use the following assumptions that the new tags arrived in F_i will not participate in the identification of current frame, but in the next frame F_i₊₁. Because the tag arrival rate x_i in the frame F_i is unknown, the number of tags arrived in frame F_i cannot be known, and then the number of tags to be identified in the next frame is unknown, and the frame length of the next frame cannot be determined. To solve these problems, we must first predict the tag arrival rate x_i in a frame F_i. The x_i is a dynamic value, and there is no way to know its value accurately in advance. Therefore, online accurate prediction of tag arrival rate has become one of the key issues to be solved for mobile RFID systems. Tags’ arrival model in mobile RFID system is shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Tags’ arrival model in mobile RFID systems.

The notations used in Figure 1 are the same to ones in static RFID system. U_i is the number of unidentified tags which should be identified in F_i₊₁. w is the total number of frames in identification area. d is the distance of identification area. F₀ is the initial frame. In F₀, the reader does not identify any tags, so all tags in F₀ will attend identification process in F₁. According to DFSA algorithm,¹⁹ U_i(i ≥ 1) consists of two parts, one part is the number of unidentified tags N_i in the ith frame due to confliction, the other one is the number of new tags arrived in the ith frame x_i × L_i

U_{i} = N_{i} + x_{i} \times L_{i}

(1)

In equation (1), $N_{i}$ can be obtained by the reader using many methods.²⁰ But the tag arrival rate x_i is unknown in advance and it will change over time. So, the important problem in mobile RFID tag is to get the tag arrival rate, and the reader should have the ability to predict tag arrival rate online.

In Alcaraz et al.,²¹ based on frame slotted aloha (FSA) algorithm and dynamic system theory, the author proposes a model to calculate tag loss rate and then obtains the optimal frame length setting method. YH Chen et al.²² put forward the method which dynamically changes the modeling length of GM to improve the accuracy of prediction.

Our method WGMSW(1,1)

The theory of GM(1,1) in mobile RFID system

In mobile RFID system, the tag arrival rate should be predicted in advance. Many methods are proposed for predicting data, but not all methods are suitable for mobile RFID system. GM has the characteristics of needing fewer samples and less computation complexity, so it is suitable for the requirement of mobile RFID system.

GM forecasting is to identify the development trend of the system and to generate data series with strong regularity, then to establish corresponding differential equations, and finally achieve the purpose of forecasting the future state.

The first-order single-variable grey differential equation model is called GM(1,1). GM(1,1) performs accumulated generating operation (1-AGO) to generate data which follows approximate exponential laws and then describe these data using first-order differential equations.

For an original nonnegative time-series $X^{0}$ with modeling length m, it can be expressed as

X^{0} = {x^{0} (1), x^{0} (2), \dots x^{0} (i), \dots, x^{0} (m)}

(2)

The GM(1,1) can describe the trend of data using equation (3)

\begin{matrix} {\tilde{x}}^{0} (k) = (x^{1} (1) - \frac{b}{a}) \times e^{- a (k - 1)} \\ * (1 - e^{a}), k = 1, 2, 3, \dots, m, m + 1 \end{matrix}

(3)

Using equation (3), we can predict the next data. The parameter a represents the development index, and the parameter b represents the grey actuating quality. It can be seen from the results that the value of ${\tilde{x}}^{0} (k)$ is closely related to the value of $x^{1} (1)$ . In basic GM(1,1), to solve the differential equation, $x^{0} (1)$ replace $x^{1} (1)$ . But this kind of method does not reflect the correlation of other samples. So, in next subsection, we will improve basic GM(1,1) using weighting method and sliding window mechanism.

Our method WGMSW(1,1)

In mobile RFID system, the latest tag arrival rate has a great impact on predicting future tag arrival rates. Tag arrival rate has local correlation. For this reason, we make improvement to GM(1,1) as follows.

Sliding window mechanism

After a prediction process, the RFID reader gets a new tag arrival rate. Using this estimation value, the reader sets frame length and performs next reading cycle. To keep local correlation, this estimation value should be appended to the raw data as a latest value, and the oldest value in raw data should be deleted. The model length m will not change. This mechanism is just like a window which slides with the identification process. The window size is the number of raw data. After a reading cycle, the window will slide foreword, as shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Sliding window mechanism.

Using weighting method to update x¹(0)

From section “The theory of GM(1,1) in mobile RFID system,” we know that traditional GM(1,1) uses $x^{0} (1)$ to replace $x^{1} (1)$ . This means that $x^{1} (1)$ is only related to $x^{0} (1)$ , but it is inappropriate. Therefore, we use the weighted ${\tilde{x}}^{1} (1)$ to replace the raw data $x^{1} (1)$

{\tilde{x}}^{1} (1) |_{k = φ} = γ_{1} x^{0} (1) + γ_{2} x^{0} (2) + \dots γ_{m} x^{0} (m)

(4)

In equation (4), $γ_{k} (0 < γ_{k} < 1) (k = 1, 2, \dots m)$ is the weighted coefficient, and $φ$ is the time input coefficient. According to the principle of local correlation, the latest data have greatest impact on the forecast, and the oldest data have less impact on prediction results. So $γ_{k}$ is set as equation (5)

γ_{k} = \frac{k}{\sum_{j = 1}^{m} m}, \sum_{k = 1}^{m} γ_{k} = 1

(5)

So the implementation schematic of WGMSW(1,1) is shown in Figure 3.

Figure 3.

The implementation scheme of WGMSM(1,1).

The reader side performs prediction and reading, as shown in Figure 3. The tags are passive tags, which only receive the signal of reader and reply information at certain time. The interaction between reader and tag is shown in Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Interaction between reader and tags.

Evaluation of WGMSW(1,1)

In order to evaluate the accuracy of WGMSW(1,1), we use following definition.

Residual sequence ε⁰

ε^{0} = (ε^{0} (1), ε^{0} (2), ε^{0} (i), \dots, ε^{0} (m)), ε^{0} (i) = x^{0} (i) - {\tilde{x}}^{0} (i)

(6)

where $x^{0} (i)$ is the raw data, and ${\tilde{x}}^{0} (i)$ is the prediction data.

Mean relative error ( $\bar{MRE}$ )

\bar{MRE} = \frac{1}{m} \sum_{i = 1}^{m} MR E_{i}

where $MR E_{i} = ε^{0} (i) / x^{0} (i)$ , The smaller MRE, the higher accuracy of prediction is.

Mean variance ratio

\bar{x} = \frac{1}{m} \sum_{i = 1}^{m} x^{0} (k), S_{1}^{2} = \frac{1}{m} \sum_{i = 1}^{m} {(x^{0} (i) - \bar{x})}^{2}

(7)

\bar{ε} = \frac{1}{m} \sum_{i = 1}^{m} ε^{0} (k), S_{2}^{2} = \frac{1}{m} \sum_{i = 1}^{m} {(ε^{0} (i) - \bar{ε})}^{2}

(8)

C = \frac{S_{2}^{2}}{S_{1}^{2}}

(9)

Small error probability (p)

In order to evaluate the performance of GM, many research works^15,16 put forward equation (10), in this article, we adopt this as a method

p = p (| ε^{0} (k) - \bar{ε} | < 0.6745 S_{1}^{2})

(10)

Many researchers believe that the model performance is determined by $\bar{MRE}$ , $C$ , and $p$ (Table 1).

Table 1.

Performance evaluation of GM model.

P	C	Model performance
>0.95	<0.35	Excellent
>0.80	<0.5	Good
>0.70	<0.65	Medium
<0.70	>0.65	Bad

GM: grey model.

In this algorithm, the model length is always 4, so the system is stable. During forecasting process, the reader needs to calculate the parameter a and b by least square method. The calculation amount of this method is less. The time complexity of WGMSW(1,1) is the same as traditional GM(1,1) which is O(m²).

Simulation and analysis

Preparation of the original data

Many researchers regard tag arrival as a stationary Poisson process in which the tag arrival rate is constant. In fact, the arrival rate may change over time, and in generally, the arrival rate takes the single-peak or multiple-peaks’ shapes. In this article, Gaussian distribution is proposed to simulate the arrival rate of tags, which makes the procedure more objective.

The reading efficiency of DFSA algorithm is generally 0.368.²³ After optimization, the efficiency can reach 0.46.²⁴ Tags can be considered as customers in queuing systems, and the reader is the server. According to queuing theory, the arrival rate of tags should not exceed 0.46.

This article uses normal distribution $x (t)$ to represent the tags arrival rate. So $x (t) ~ N (μ, σ)$ , $μ$ is the mean value, and $σ$ is the variance. In this article, we take $μ$ as 50 and $σ$ as 15 and 25.

Before prediction, the series ratio of original data should be calculated first to insure the data can be predicted by WGMSW(1,1). The series ration can be defined as

ρ_{i} = \frac{x (i)}{x (i + 1)}

(11)

According to GM(1,1) application conditions, $ρ_{i}$ should fall in [ $e^{- 2 / m + 1}, e^{2 / m + 1}$ ], m is the raw data number. If this condition is not satisfied, the original data need to be pre-processed before the WGMSW(1,1) can be used. The data we choose to simulate are shown in Table 2.

Table 2.

The raw data used in this article with different μ and σ.

(a) μ = 50, σ = 25.
Frame no.	1	2	3	4	5	…	48	49	50
Tags’ arrival rate	0.0660	0.0714	0.0770	0.0829	0.0892	…	0.4493	0.4504	0.4507
Frame no.	51	52	53	…	96	97	98	99	100
Tags’ arrival rate	0.4504	0.4493	0.4475	…	0.0829	0.0770	0.0714	0.0660	0.0610
(b) μ = 50, σ = 15.
Frame no.	1	2	3	4	5	…	48	49	50
Tags’ arrival rate	0.0022	0.0027	0.0034	0.0043	0.0051	…	0.4535	0.4566	0.4576
frame No.	51	52	53	…	96	97	98	99	100
Tags’ arrival rate	0.4566	0.4535	0.4485	…	0.0042	0.0030	0.0027	0.0022	0.0018

Simulation and comparison

The pseudo code of WGMSW(1,1) is shown as follows:

m = 4;
traindata = rawdata(1:m); //Initialize the original data, m is the model length.

ratiomax = exp(2/(m + 1)); //calculate the ratio range of train data
ratiomin = exp(−2/(m + 1));
ratio = traindata(1: m − 1)/traindata(2: m);
If ratio not in range [ratiomin, ratiomax] // if the ratio of sequence are not in range, the data //should be preprocessing
train data prepressing;
end
return_data = wgmsw(traindata) // calling function wgmsw() for prediction the (m + 1)th data

errorrate = (traindata(2: m,:)-return_data(2: m,:)))./traindata(2: m,:); // to calculate the relative error

average_errorrate = sum(errorrate)/(m − 1); //to calculate the average error

est_result(m + 1,:) = return_data(m + 1); // record the prediction results

In mobile RFID system, using the pseudo code above, the reader can predict one future tag arrival rate which will be used for setting frame length in the next reading process. Looping of this pseudo can get more arrival rate using sliding window.

The hardware platform used to simulation is CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-4590 CPU at 3.3 GHz; RAM: 8 GB. The operation system of PC is windows 7, and the simulation software is MATLAB 2015b.

To evaluate the performance of WGMSW(1,1), we choose different $μ$ and different $σ$ and get 100 data. Using the sliding window, the algorithm should run 96 times to predict the arrival rate [5th, 100th].

In Figure 5(a), at the 52nd frame, the original data is 0.4535, but the estimation result is 0.5, so the estimation error is bigger than others using traditional GM(1,1) for normal arrival model with $μ = 50$ and $σ = 15$ . The same results can be seen in Figure 5(c). In Figure 5(b) and (d), there is no sudden change in error rate prediction. So the WGMSW(1,1) is stable than traditional GM(1,1).

Figure 5.

Estimation results with different original data: (a) GM(1,1) with $μ = 50$ and $σ = 15$ , (b) WGMSW(1,1) with $μ = 50$ and $σ = 15$ , (c) GM(1,1) with $μ = 50$ and $σ = 25$ , and (d) WGMSW(1,1) with $μ = 50$ and $σ = 25$ .

In order to compare the estimation error rate between GM(1,1) and WGMSW(1,1), we calculate the average estimation error rate, as shown in Table 3.

Table 3.

Average estimation error rate with different $μ$ and $σ$ using GM(1,1) and WGMSW(1,1).

Algorithm	Average estimation error rate $ε$
GM(1,1) with $μ = 50$ and $σ = 15$	0.0071
WGMSW(1,1) with $μ = 50$ and $σ = 15$	0.0055
GM(1,1) with $μ = 50$ and $σ = 25$	0.0035
WGMSW(1,1) with $μ = 50$ and $σ = 25$	0.0019

WGMSW(1,1): weighted grey model(1,1) with sliding window; GM(1,1): grey model(1,1).

Comparing with traditional GM(1,1) and WGMSW(1,1) in Table 3, WGMSW(1,1) is superior to traditional GM(1,1) in average estimation error rate. When $σ$ is larger, the tags’ arrival rate changes slowly. When $μ = 50$ , $σ = 15$ the average estimation error rate is improved 22.5% using our proposed method. When $μ = 50$ , $σ = 25$ the average estimation error rate is improved 45.7%

using our proposed method. When $σ$ is larger, the tags’ arrival rate changes slowly. So, the estimation error rate is lower.

To compare data used by other researchers, we quoted data in Chen et al.²²

The average estimation error rate is got by 41st data to 47th one, so these values may different from the results in Chen et al.,²² but it does not affect the conclusions. From the results we can conclude that WGMSW(1,1) has lower average estimation error rate than the algorithm proposed by Chen et al.²² In Chen et al.,²² the model length is 4 or 8, and it will change according to the raw data. But using WGMSW(1,1), model length is a constant 4, so the system is steady (Table 4).

Table 4.

Estimation results using data in Chen et al.²²

Frame number	Measurement value	m = 4 estimation value in Chen et al.²²	m = 4 estimation error rate	m = 12 estimation value in Chen et al.²²	m = 12 estimation error rate	WGMSW(1,1) estimation value	WGMSW(1,1) estimation error rate
40	0.46	0.6371	0.385	0.3879
41	0.47	0.5899	0.2551	0.478	0.0170	0.4505	0.0415
42	0.42	0.5089	0.2117	0.622	0.4810	0.405	0.0357
43	0.38	0.4122	0.0847	0.6248	0.6442	0.364	0.0421
44	0.37	0.3405	0.0797	0.5802	0.5681	0.3272	0.1157
45	0.2	0.3419	0.7095	0.5267	1.6335	0.3482	0.7410
46	0.26	0.1839	0.2927	0.4079	0.5688	0.1678	0.3546
47	0.19	0.3545	0.8658	0.1711	0.0995	0.1633	0.1405
Average estimation error rate			0.3570		0.5732		0.2102

The WGMSW(1,1) only optimizes the initial value and the calculation is very simple. The complexity of this algorithm has not increased compared with traditional GM(1,1).

Evaluation of WGMSW(1,1)

Using MRE, C, and p, we can evaluate the WGMSW(1,1).

According to Tables 1 and 5, we can conclude that the WGMSW(1,1) is superior than GM(1,1) in MER, C, and p.

Table 5.

Evaluation of WGMSW(1,1) and GM(1,1).

	$μ = 50$ and $σ = 15$		$μ = 50$ and $σ = 25$
Algorithms	GM(1,1)	WGMSW(1,1)	GM(1,1)	WGMSW(1,1)
MER	0.0071	0.0055	0.0035	0.0019
C	8.3152e-04	3.1274e-05	0.0015	4.4284e-06
p	0.99	1	0.99	1

WGMSW(1,1): weighted grey model(1,1) with sliding window; GM(1,1): grey model(1,1).

Conclusion

In this article, we proposed a tag arrival rate prediction method WGMSW(1,1) based on traditional GM(1,1) in RFID systems. Using sliding window mechanism and weighted GM(1,1) method, Our WGMSW(1,1) method produces lower estimation error rate and computational complexity when tag arrival rate is a normally distribution. In the reader’s hardware system, the algorithm program proposed in this article is built in. When the reader recognizes the tag, it automatically runs the program to complete the continuous prediction of the number of tags and the arrival rate. In the reader’s hardware system, the algorithm program proposed in this article is built in. When the reader recognizes the tag, it automatically runs the program to complete the continuous prediction of the number of tags and the arrival rate. There are some limitations in proposed method. First, the method use isometric GM(1,1) as the basic method, while further research works may use non-isometric GM(1,1) to perform prediction. Second, for getting background value, this article adopts an intermediate value. Further research works should take other method to get much more accurate background value.

Footnotes

Handling Editor: Yanjiao Chen

Declaration of conflicting interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This research was supported by the National Nature Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 61962047, the Project of Scientific Research Foundation of Department of Education of Inner Mongolia Antonymous Region under Grant No. NJZY17057, and the Nature Science Foundation of Inner Mongolia Antonymous Region under Grant No. 2019MS06015. The authors are with the College of Computer and Information Engineering, Inner Mongolia Agriculture University, Hohhot 010010, China.

ORCID iD

Liqian Zhang

References

Pal

Kant

. IoT-based sensing and communications infrastructure for the fresh food supply chain. Computer 2018; 51(2): 76–80.

Zhang

. Round-priority-based anti-collision tag identification method in a mobile radio-frequency identification system. Int J Distrib Sensor Network 2019; 15(5): 6046.

Finkenzeller

. RFID handbook. 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2010.

Zhu

Cao

Chan

HCB

, et al. Mobile RFID with a high identification rate. IEEE T Comput 2014; 63(7): 1778–1792.

Zhang

Xiang

Tang

. An efficient bit-detecting protocol for continuous tag recognition in mobile RFID systems. IEEE T Mobile Comput 2017; 17(3): 503–516.

Chen

. An accurate tag estimate method for improving the performance of an RFID anticollision algorithm based on dynamic frame length ALOHA. IEEE T Autom Sci Eng 2009; 6(1): 9–15.

Šolić

Radić

Rožić

. Energy efficient tag estimation method for ALOHA-based RFID systems. Sens J IEEE 2014; 14(10): 3637–3647.

Chen

. A feasible and easy-to-implement anticollision algorithm for the EPC global UHF class-1 generation-2 RFID protocol. IEEE T Autom Sci Eng 2014; 11(2): 485–491.

Mohammed

Salah

. Parallel binary tree splitting protocol for tag anti-collision in RFID systems. In: 4th international design and test workshop (IDT), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, 15–17 November 2009. New York: IEEE.

10.

Choi

Lee

. Query tree-based reservation for efficient RFID tag anti-collision. IEEE Commun Lett 2007; 11(1): 85–87.

11.

Ding

Jiang

. RFID-based production data analysis in an IoT-enabled smart job-shop. IEEE/CAA J Automatic Sinica 2018; 5(1): 128–138.

12.

Chen

Lei

. Poster abstract: traffic flow prediction with big data: a deep learning based time series model. In: 2017 IEEE conference on computer communications workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS), Atlanta, GA, 1–4 May 2017. New York: IEEE.

13.

Che

Purushotham

Cho

, et al. Recurrent neural networks for multivariate time series with missing values. Sci Report 2018; 2018: 6058.

14.

Hao

Xia

, et al. A statistical method for categorical drought prediction based on NLDAS-2. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 2016; 55(4): 1049–1061.

15.

Ju-Long

. Control problems of grey systems. Syst Control Lett 1982; 1(5): 288–294.

16.

Chen

Liu

Hsieh

. Time series interval forecast using GM(1,1) and NGBM(1,1) models. Soft Comput 2017; 23(5): 1541–1555.

17.

. Electricity consumption prediction using a neural-network-based grey forecasting approach. J Oper Res Soc 2017; 68(10): 1259–1264.

18.

Ying

Qianqian

. Comprehensive prediction model of water quality based on Grey model and fuzzy neural network. Chin J Environ Eng 2015; 9(2): 537–545.

19.

Klair

Chin

Raad

. A survey and tutorial of RFID anti-collision protocols. IEEE Commun Surv Tutor 2010; 12(3): 400–421.

20.

Zhang

, et al. An improved maximum a posterior-based estimation method coping with capture effect for RFID tags identification. Int J Pattern Recogn Artif Intel 2019; 34: 2050011.

21.

Alcaraz

Egealpez

Valesalonso

, et al. Dynamic system model for optimal configuration of mobile RFID systems. Comput Netw 2011; 55(1): 74–83.

22.

Chen

Feng

Yang

. Dynamic self-adaptive gray prediction algorithm for RFID tag arrival rate. Comput Sci 2013; 40(7): 40–43.

23.

Schoute

. Dynamic frame length ALOHA. IEEE T Commun 1983; 31(4): 565–568.

24.

Chen

Feng

. A collision avoidance identification algorithm for mobile RFID device. IEEE Trans Consum Electr 2019; 65(4): 493–501.

A tags’ arrival rate estimation method using weighted grey model(1,1) and sliding window in mobile radio frequency identification systems

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Mobile RFID systems

Our method WGMSW(1,1)

The theory of GM(1,1) in mobile RFID system

Our method WGMSW(1,1)

Sliding window mechanism

Using weighting method to update x1(0)

Evaluation of WGMSW(1,1)

Residual sequence ε0

Mean relative error ( MRE ¯ )

Mean variance ratio

Small error probability (p)

Simulation and analysis

Preparation of the original data

Simulation and comparison

Evaluation of WGMSW(1,1)

Conclusion

Footnotes

Declaration of conflicting interests

Funding

ORCID iD

References

Using weighting method to update x¹(0)

Residual sequence ε⁰

Mean relative error ( $\bar{MRE}$ )