Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

There are many natural conditions in the world, such as floods and earthquakes that cause major accidents. The actual question is how to anticipate and predict such events, which enables us to prepare ourselves in advance. We are interested in the advance classification of incoming calls to the smart city 112 public safety system for Ljubljana, the capital city of Slovenia, and the whole country. We used open Internet of Things data for Ljubljana and the whole of Slovenia for the years 2013–2016. Using different classification methods, different models were obtained and compared with each other. We have provided a report on how accurate the forecasts are and what classification result differences occur when different models or data of the capital city or the whole of Slovenia are used. The results obtained are a sound basis for further work on improving the classification in advance of incoming calls to the smart city 112 public safety system.

Keywords

Public safety 112 smart city classification Internet of Things

Introduction

There are many natural conditions in the world, such as floods, earthquakes, and tsunamis, which lead to major damage and casualties. Information on such events is collected by 112 public safety systems and next-generation systems of 112 systems (NG112).^1,2 A significant amount of research has been invested throughout the world in efforts to predict, monitor, and help involved people both in the control rooms and on the ground.

Public safety is also a topic dealt with in smart cities initiatives.³ Current research is used to improve situational awareness⁴ for various events and dangers. The growing use of social media during crises offers new information sources from which the right authorities can enhance emergency situational awareness. Crowdsourcing platforms, such as the 112 public system,⁴ are becoming increasingly interesting. In Sakaki et al.,⁵ they investigate the real-time interaction of events and propose an algorithm to monitor tweets and to detect a target event. They devise a classifier of tweets based on features such as the keywords in a tweet, the number of words, and their context.

The first question of interest is how to establish such a system for the natural crisis and disaster, but also for other various events with the aim to increase the situational awareness. The answer has been sought by engagement of social media,⁶ and depicting ways to deal with crisis management.⁷ The second question that arises is how to anticipate the range of events, disasters and accidents in advance as we do not know to what extent these disasters and various events will occur in society and nature.

One way to address these questions is using open Internet of Things (IoT) data to increase situation awareness. The area of open IoT data has not yet been explored exhaustedly so far. The advantage of such sensors (open IoT data) is that they are already there, and their data can be used.

In this article, we explore how these disasters and various events will affect the number of incoming calls to 112 public safety system. In contrast to the case in Sakaki et al.,⁵ where they use social networks and tweet analysis, we will in our case use open IoT data for this purpose and classify incoming data according to the volume of incoming calls.

The goal of the research is to find out to what extent we can use open IoT data for forecasting of 112 calls and what is the accuracy of such forecasts. The obtained information will be helpful for special services, as it will allow to mitigate risks in advance and plan the usage of available sources at hand. Based on this, the ambulances, the police, and other involved parties can be prepared in advance for disasters. Hence, the proposed solution can improve the situation awareness.

Our goal is to define a classifier for forecasting the number of incoming calls to the 112 public safety system of the capital city Ljubljana. We will use open IoT data for the city and also the whole of Slovenia for the years 2013 till 2016. Using different classification methods, we prepare different models and then compare them with each other. We are interested in how accurate the forecasts are, and what the classification results differences are when we use different models or data for Ljubljana, the capital of Slovenia, and for the whole country.

Related work

The current work on the topic of smart cities and public safety has attracted a lot of attention in the world and is ongoing. In Santa Cruz, California, USA, local authorities analyze historical crime data.⁸ Each day, the analytical tools generate a list of 10 places where property crimes are more likely to occur; police efforts are then focused on these places even if the officers are not responding to a specific emergency. In 2015, Natal, a city in north-eastern Brazil, joined the IEEE Smart City initiative. This smart city initiative⁹ aims to improve public safety. A Blueprint for Smart Public¹⁰ by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) also contains public safety as an essential element of a smart city. It deals with firefighters, emergency, and rescue teams.

The issue that is currently increasingly relevant is climate change since it is very likely¹¹ that extreme heat waves and heavy rainfall events will become more frequent. In Jabareen,¹² conceptual frameworks for resilient urban and other communities with the goal of making cities more flexible are covered.

IoT for smart cities is studied in Abreu et al.¹³ In Brookes and Hutton,¹⁴ various aspects of Public Safety and Emergency Services regarding IoT are presented. Another increasingly relevant dilemma is the use of social networks. The detection of events for emergency calls to 112 using social networks in real time is given.¹⁵ The issue of obtaining data can be solved using crowd-sensing data, as discussed in Sakaki et al.⁵ Researchers are also working to increase situational awareness. A social media crisis mapping platform and statistical analysis were used in Middleton et al.⁴ to generate a real-time crisis map. Crisis management is studied in Middleton et al.⁷ How to increase situational awareness is discussed in Yin et al.⁶

Prediction and risk modeling are also topics of investigation. Natural disasters, such as floods, are one subject. In Hossain et al.,¹⁶ a 5-day forecast of river levels inside Bangladesh was presented. The risk model for a short period (2 or 3 days) is given in Ma et al.¹⁷ In Duan et al.,¹⁸ a model of regional flood risk assessment with factors including rainfall, topography, water density, and population density is presented, and gross domestic product (GDP) was selected to build the model. Other prediction models were also studied. In Ballesteros et al.,¹⁹ the authors evaluate the ability of existing forecasting techniques to predict future safety values: predicting crime, safety indexes, and personalized context safety. An emergency call center with a fuzzy-based decision support system that aids in resource planning is presented in Barrientos and Sainz.²⁰ In Merkuryeva et al.,²¹ the state-of-the-art in flood forecasting and simulation applied to a river flood analysis and risk prediction is presented.

Traffic modeling is also covered when dealing with call centers, such as the 112 public safety system. There are traffic models for calls to the first level (where all the calls are collected) and models for calls at the second level (calls forwarded to firefighters, ambulances, and police). The general model for a given hour using the Poisson model is given in Tandberg et al.²² In Aschenbruck et al.,²³ a traffic study and modeling of calls to the 112 public system based on real-time data are made. In Jasso et al.,²⁴ linear regression was used for traffic prediction. Similarly, in the case of the Portland Oregon area (USA),²⁵ by additionally using spatial distribution of calls and attribute selection (stepwise regression), regression is used. Traffic models for calls to the police are given in the literature.^26–28 In Olligschlaeger,²⁶ weapons-related calls are dealt with, with the city being split into smaller parts. Traffic models for rescue calls are given in Zuidhof²⁹ and Viglino.³⁰ In Zuidhof,²⁹ Poisson’s call distribution is used. In Viglino et al.,³⁰ attributes such as day of the week, holidays, holidays, times of epidemics, and longer time trends were used for forecasting, with 17 attributes together. The model was applied to 1.8% of the French population.

This article is organized as follows. First, the public safety system in Slovenia is described. Then we explain the used data sets and the classification techniques. Finally, we provide the results from the classification and conclude.

Public safety system for the smart city

112 Public safety system sin Slovenia

112 System in Slovenia

112 is the common emergency telephone number that can be dialed free of charge from any stationary or mobile phone. In addition to the conventional 112 system,² the system may include other features, such as eCall and NG112. eCall provides automated emergency calls from cars. NG112¹ enables calls using VoIP, text messaging, instant messaging, real-time text, pictures, and videos; it can also provide emergency services with more data, such as telemetric and health data.

The 112 system operates in two levels. On the first level, the operator in the control room accepts a call to the 112 system. On the second level, if necessary, this operator transfers the call to one of the emergency services, such as firefighters, ambulances, and police. At present, there are 13 regional 112 public safety system centers in Slovenia. Figure 1 shows the distribution of these regional centers.

Figure 1.

Map of Slovenia with regional 112 public safety centers.³¹

Public safety system architecture for smart cities

The public safety system architecture³² for smart cities integrates different types of incoming incident and emergency requests, external interfaces, and warning devices. Incoming requests can be from eCall, 112 calls, video surveillance systems, and open data or from various types of sensors or IoT devices. In addition, the telephone information is considered as information generated by a human sensor. Such a system can be operated for different use cases for the given integrated solution (e.g. safe city, smart city, 112 emergency system). Within the system, there are parts for receiving the input signals (event handling), prediction modules (e.g. module for prediction of numbers of incoming calls to 112 system), the Public Information and Notification System (PINS) and the operators’ workplace. The public safety system architecture is shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Public safety system architecture.³²

Incoming data

In general, any sensor or external system can be used as an input to the system. Depending on the data received, the system or the operator checks the extent of the danger. In the next step, the relevant scenario is to be executed manually or automatically; if notification is necessary, it is made.

The system can accept data from different sensors intended for floods, for example, water level, the amount and intensity of precipitation, the type of precipitation, wind speed and direction, the temperature and relative humidity of the air, as well as absolute and relative atmospheric pressure. The data can be obtained directly from the sensors, or from organizations that collect sensor data. In addition, the system enables the accepting and processing of data of other types of sensors that are not intended for floods, such as sensors for natural gas, fire, and earthquakes. Data can be received from systems for eCall, 112 calls, NG112 calls, and others.

Working operator

112 operators in the control room, working at the first level, receive and process all types of incoming requests in the system. They enter the main characteristics of the incident into the system database, perform analysis, and transfer the data on the accident, including the incident report, to appropriate emergency dispatch services. The operators’ dashboard is shown in Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Operator dashboard: (a) incoming emergency request and (b) warning zone with warning devices on GIS map.

Prediction module for the 112 system

With the prediction module for the 112 system, we wish to predict (including conducting classification, regression, etc.) the number of calls to the system for different cases (e.g. for rain, floods, mild weather, summer, winter, etc.). With this, we can prepare the plan for the emergency system (number of employees) as well activities for risk mitigation. With its prediction system and more accurate assessment, this module provides an improvement for public safety.

Notification system

Public warning is the capability to bring to the immediate attention of all people who might be directly impacted following the onset, or predicted onset, of an emergency, so that they can take action to mitigate the impact of this incident. The PINS is intended for mass communication for national, regional, and local approaches.

Data preparation for the simulation

Predispositions for the data preparation

We began with these starting points for the data preparation:

We are interested in the data for the smart city of Ljubljana, but we will also use the data for the whole country. The city’s population is 15% of the total population of the country. The number of incoming calls to the system 112 is 25% of all calls.

In our case, the real data observed were the statistics about the total number of all incoming calls to the regional 112 centers per day. Due to the purpose of unification, the number of incoming calls for the whole country will be taken as the dependent attribute. Based on this, classification is made.

We obtained data from publicly available sources; these were open data sources.^31,33,34

We left the data retrieved as they were. However, from the obtained IoT open data, we removed for each data instance the data about the year, the month, and the day within the month. Instead, we added information about the day of the week and whether the data are taken during the working day or the weekend.

Incoming calls to the 112 system

The most significant damage caused by natural disasters in Slovenia in recent years has been due to floods, fires, drought, storms (strong wind), and a series of landslides and heavy snow; sleet was also a significant factor. For example, in 2013, the damage due to drought was estimated at 0.3% GDP (106 million Euro) and due to floods estimated at 2% GDP (650 million Euro) in 2014. On this basis, we have defined the parameters for the data sets. In addition, other data parameters were added, such as day data and traffic accidents data.

The main data used were the number of incoming call to the 112 emergency system for the whole of Slovenia. Since Slovenia has 13 regional 112 centers, we attempted to evenly allocate the data according to the centers. Figure 4 shows a map of Slovenia with (a) weather stations³³ and (b) rivers with stations.³³

Figure 4.

Map of Slovenia with (a) weather stations³³ and (b) rivers with stations.³³

Open IoT data

We classify the open IoT data into four groups: day data (G1), weather data (G2), river discharge data (G3) and accident data (G4). Each group contains multiple attributes. In Figure 4, maps of Slovenia with weather stations and rivers with stations are shown.

Day data

We used day data: weekday (1—Monday, 7—Sunday), and weekend classification (1—Workday, 2—Saturday, 3—Sunday).

Weather station data

We chose weather stations from places where the 112 regional centers are located. In 2015, these 112 regional centers had about 90% of all incoming calls within the state. Weather stations with statistics for the year 2015 are shown in Table 1.

Table 1.

Weather stations observed with statistics for 2015.

Nr.	112 regional center	Weather station	Inc calls 2015	Inc calls (%)	Lon	Lat	ALT (m)
1	Brezice (BR)	Airport Cerklje	21,938	5.1	15.5184	45.8987	154
2	Celje (CE)	Celje	41,827	9.7	15.2259	46.2366	242
3	Koper (KP)	Airport Portoroz	32,379	7.5	13.6160	45.4753	2
4	Kranj (KR)	Airport Brnik (Ljubljana)	36,981	8.6	14.4728	46.2178	364
5	Ljubljana (LJ)	Ljubljana	108,401	25.2	14.5124	46.0655	299
6	Maribor (MB)	Airport Maribor	52,917	12.3	15.6821	46.4797	264
7	M. Sobota (MS)	Murska Sobota	20,700	4.8	16.1913	46.6521	187
8	Nova Gorica (NG)	Bilje	24,297	5.7	13.6243	45.8954	55
9	Novo mesto (NM)	Novo mesto	28,244	6.6	15.1773	45.8018	220
10	Postojna (PO)	Postojna	21,475	5.0	14.1928	45.7661	533
	Total (1–10)		389,159	90.5
	Total (2015)		430,147	100.00

For each station, we have prepared 16 parameters for each day: average, maximum, and minimum daily temperature (C), average wind speed (m/s), cloudiness (%), humidity (%), amount of rainfall (mm), height of snow (cm), height of new snow (cm), sunshine duration (h), flag for strong and stormwind (0—no, 1—yes), flag for thunderstorm (0—no, 1—yes), and flags for freezing rain, hail, or frost (0—no, 1—yes). Weather data were obtained from the open data system of the National Meteorological Service of Slovenia.³³

When we checked all the data, we found that some data do not exist (height parameters of new snow and sunshine duration, for the weather stations at Brezice and Kranj), so we removed these two attributes. This did not significantly affect the final results.

River discharge data

Data on river discharge were obtained from the open data accessible system³³ of the National Meteorological Service of Slovenia. We took the data from rivers and stations with the highest discharges. The data are presented in Table 2. For each station, longitude (Lon), latitude (Lat), and altitude (ALT) in meters are given. In addition, hinterland (Hint) for the entire Slovenia territory (in %) is given. It can be seen that the sum of the hinterland is 54,159 km², which is more than twice the whole surface area of Slovenia, which is 20,273 km². This is because some rivers’ hinterlands are in neighboring countries: the Mura River also flows in Hungary, the Drava in Austria, and some of the hinterland of the Sava River is in Croatia.

Table 2.

River stations observed.

Nr.	Station	River	Hint (km²)	Hint (%)	Lon	Lat	ALT (m)
1	G. Radgona	Mura	10,197	50.3	16.0002	46.6815	202
2	Borl	Drava	14,662	72.3	16.0011	46.3713	201
3	Videm	Dravinja	764	3.8	15.9079	46.3687	209
4	Radovljica	Sava	908	4.5	14.1701	46.3404	408
5	Sentjakob	Sava	2285	11.3	14.5872	46.0844	268
6	Hrastnik	Sava	5177	25.5	15.0955	46.1221	194
7	Catez	Sava	10,187	50.2	15.6149	45.8935	137
8	Suha	Sora	566	2.8	14.3307	46.1624	329
9	Radenci	Kolpa	1191	5.9	15.0966	45.4650	175
10	Moste	Ljubljanica	1762	8.7	14.5492	46.0557	281
11	Veliko Sirje	Savinja	1842	9.1	15.1972	46.0923	190
12	Podbocje	Krka	2238	11.0	15.4602	45.8651	146
13	Solkan	Soca	1573	7.8	13.6599	45.9819	52
14	Podroteja	Idrijca	113	0.6	14.0354	45.9871	327
15	Dolenje	Vipava	317	1.6	13.9060	45.8665	82
16	C. Mlin	Reka	378	1.9	14.0655	45.6552	342

From the open data source,³³ the data for each station were available: mean monthly discharge (daily average), the smallest monthly discharge (daily average with day present), and the highest monthly discharge (extreme discharge with day present). We used the mean monthly discharge for each day in the month, with corrections for smallest and most extreme discharges for the given day and the day’s close. The discharge was measured in m³/s.

Traffic accident data

We obtained traffic accident data from the Slovenian police force.³⁴ Only total data were available: statistics for the distribution of traffic per month and days of the week. We distributed month data for each day evenly. Since statistics show that accidents are distributed differently depending on the day of the week, we additionally corrected each day’s traffic data. Specifically, about 15% accidents are on each day from Mondays to Thursdays, 16.7% on Fridays, 13.3% on Saturdays and 10% on Sundays. We use two parameters of statistics: the number of accidents and the number of people involved in accidents.

Preparing data for classification

The last stage of data preparation is to prepare data for classification. The classification task is performed as follows:

We take open IoT data for the period from 2013 (January) to 2016 (March). Each data record represents one day of data. In total, the obtained data consist of 1186 data instances.

The minimum number of incoming calls per day in that period for the whole of Slovenia is 890; the maximum number is 9538; the average is 1478.90.

For each data record, we defined two classes according to the number of incoming calls. We defined one class with two different values (class2: regular, urgent) and another class with four different values (class4: small, normal, bigger, urgent). There are two values in class2 in order to distinguish regular traffic from urgent traffic, when the operators are informed that urgent incoming traffic is on the way. In the case of the four values in class4, we further distinguish regular traffic into small, normal, and bigger traffic. In such a way, the operator can additionally distinguish the incoming traffic. The boundaries between the individual classes were set to 1250, 1450, and 1700 incoming calls.

From all the data obtained, we have defined two data sets. One for Ljubljana, which we called the LJ data set; it consists of 20 attributes of data. The other is the SLO data set, which consists of all the prepared data attributes; it consists of 176 data attributes. Table 3 shows the structure of both data sets used. All the attributes that are included in the LJ data set represent a subset of the SLO data set. The LJ data set is only a subset (containing 20 attributes) of the SLO data set (containing a total of 176 attributes).

Table 3.

Data sets with attributes used.

Group	Group name	LJ data set	SLO data set
G1	Day	Day (2)	Day (2)
G2	Weather	Weather data for Ljubljana (16)	Weather data for Slovenia (16 × 10⁻⁴)
G3	River	Sava Sentjakob, Ljubljanica Moste (2)	All rivers (16)
G4	Accidents		Accidents data (2)
Total attributes		20	176

Figure 5 shows the distribution of incoming calls per day for the whole country for the period 2013–2016. The x-axis of the histogram starts with the minimal number of calls, which is 890 and ends with the maximal number of daily calls which is 9538. The y-axis indicates the number of days from 2013 to 2016 when the certain number of incoming calls was achieved. For example, 890 calls per day happened 11 times during 2013–2016. Figures 6 and 7 show the distributions of incoming calls converted into four and two classes, respectively, for both LJ and SLO data sets.

Figure 5.

Incoming calls distribution from minimum to a maximum number of calls per day for the whole country for a given period 2013–2016 (x-axis: distribution of calls according to the volume of calls; y-axis: how many times the given number of calls has been made).

Figure 6.

Incoming calls converted into four classes (classes from the left to the right: small, normal, bigger, and urgent) for both LJ and SLO data sets. Numbers represent the number of incoming calls for given classes.

Figure 7.

Incoming calls converted into two classes (classes from the left to the right: regular and urgent) for both LJ and SLO data sets. Numbers represent the number of incoming calls for given classes.

Simulation by classification

Classifications used

For the classification,^35,36 we have used the Weka tool.^37–39 Classifiers used and compared to each other are Naïve Bayes, Support Vector Machines (LibSVM), boosting classifier (AdaBoostM1), tree classifier J48, and a class for constructing a forest of random trees (Random Forest). In addition, we used the zero rule (ZeroR), which relies on the target and ignores all predictors.

For each classification method, we have used 10-fold cross-validation. The data pool for a given fold was the same for examining different classifiers. Therefore, the results are comparable.

Simulation results

The results of the simulation are presented in Tables 4 and 5. For each simulation case, we have checked the cost function values: accuracy (Acc), precision (Pre), recall (Rec), F1 measure (F1), and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

Table 4.

Classification results for class with four distinctive values (class4) (the best results are in bold).

Data set	Method	Acc (%)	Prec	Rec	F1	ROC
LJ	ZeroR	34.65	0.120	0.347	0.178	0.495
	Naïve Bayes	40.64	0.432	0.406	0.383	0.664
	LibSVM	39.29	0.531	0.393	0.305	0.536
	AdaBoostM1	40.39	0.284	0.404	0.327	0.579
	J48	44.44	0.443	0.444	0.443	0.624
	Random Forest	51.60	0.527	0.516	0.511	0.740
SLO	ZeroR	34.65	0.120	0.347	0.178	0.495
	Naïve Bayes	39.21	0.434	0.392	0.365	0.671
	LibSVM	34.57	0.120	0.346	0.178	0.499
	AdaBoostM1	39.71	0.282	0.397	0.318	0.570
	J48	44.27	0.441	0.443	0.441	0.628
	Random Forest	53.63	0.554	0.536	0.531	0.756

Table 5.

Classification results for class with two distinctive values (class2) (the best results are in bold).

Data set	Method	Acc (%)	Prec	Rec	F1	ROC
LJ	ZeroR	87.77	0.770	0.878	0.821	0.491
	Naïve Bayes	81.20	0.850	0.812	0.828	0.755
	LibSVM	87.77	0.770	0.878	0.821	0.500
	AdaBoostM1	88.03	0.871	0.880	0.828	0.750
	J48	87.27	0.855	0.873	0.862	0.659
	Random Forest	90.13	0.891	0.901	0.880	0.815
SLO	ZeroR	87.77	0.770	0.878	0.821	0.491
	Naïve Bayes	72.85	0.875	0.728	0.773	0.784
	LibSVM	87.77	0.770	0.878	0.821	0.500
	AdaBoostM1	87.69	0.840	0.877	0.843	0.765
	J48	88.03	0.872	0.880	0.876	0.682
	Random Forest	90.22	0.895	0.902	0.879	0.853

Classification accuracy (Acc) is the ability to predict categorical class labels. It is the simplest scoring measure. Accuracy calculates the proportion of correctly classified instances. The evaluation measures used were based on TP (true positive), FP (false positive), and FN (false negative). TP is a rate of true positives, that is, of instances correctly classified as a given class. It means that the value of the actual class is yes and the value of the predicted class is also yes. FP is a rate of false positives, that is, of instances falsely classified as a given class. It represents cases when the value of the actual class is no, and the value of the predicted class is yes. FN is a rate of false negatives, that is, instances falsely classified as negative. It represents cases when the value of the actual class is yes, and the value of the predicted class is no.

Precision is the number of correct results divided by the number of all positive predicted results. The formula is precision = TP/(TP + FP). Recall, also called sensitivity, is the ratio of the correctly predicted positive observations to all the observations in the actual class—yes. The formula is recall = TP/(TP + FN). The F1 measure is the weighted average of precision and recall. Therefore, this score takes both false positives and false negatives into account. The formula is F1 measure = 2 * (recall * precision) / (recall + precision). ROC curve depicts the performance of a classification algorithm as the classification threshold is varied. ROC area approaching 1 means the best classifier and 0.5 means random guessing.

Discussion of the simulation results

The basic questions for the discussion of the simulation results are which class type (class2, class4), which data sets (LJ, SLO), and which method are better to use. There is not one answer, but many; there is not one best solution. However, there are situations when the best solutions differ.

It seems that in general, binary classification (class2) gives better results than multiclass classification with four classes (class4). The accuracy is better for binary classification, but also other parameters behave similarly. From the classification methods, Random Forest provides the best results in all the cases. For different situations, J48, AdaBoostM1, and Naïve Bayes also give good results.

From the results obtained with ROC, we conclude that it is the best to use only the class with two values (class2) and with more data attributes (SLO data set). The best performer when using ROC is always Random forest.

Conclusion

In this article, the classification of incoming calls for the smart city 112 public safety system based on open IoT data was presented. We describe the system, the procedure of data preparation, and the simulation. We confirmed that it is possible to carry out classification based on open IoT data. The main contribution of the paper was the classification of the incoming calls. We showed that method and class type are also relevant. As the best data set has been shown to be the one for the whole country, not only the capital city, and the best class type was with two values only. The Random Forest method has proved to be the best method for all the scenarios.

Because the field of data mining is still evolving, it is to expect that there will be more and more proposals and new possibilities in the direction of public safety for smart cities. New challenges are how to further increase the accuracy of the classification. Another interesting topic is how to expand the forecasting of incoming calls toward police and rescue services, for example, with data about epidemics and crime. As a whole, the results obtained are a good basis for further work on improving the classification in advance of incoming calls to the smart city public safety system.

Footnotes

Handling Editor: Aitor Almeida

Declaration of conflicting interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: The authors acknowledge the financial support from the Slovenian Research Agency (research core funding “Algorithms and Optimization Procedures in Telecommunications”), the Ministry of Education, Science and Sport of Slovenia (project ≫Ekosmart≪ - Smart City Ecosystem) and the Ministry of Economic Development and Technology (project ≫5G Safety≪ - 5G Enabled Public Safety Services and Applications). We also acknowledge funding from the Slovenian Research Agency via program Complex Networks P1–0383.

References

EENA Operations Document. Next generation 112, long term definition. 2013, http://www.eena.org/ressource/static/files/2013-03-15-eena_ltd_v1-1_final.pdf

EENA Operations Document. Public warning. 2015, http://www.eena.org/uploads/gallery/files/pdf/2015_07_15_PWS_Final.pdf (accessed 7 September 2018).

Ojo

Curry

Zeleti

. A tale of open data innovations in five smart cities. In: 48th Hawaii international conference on system sciences, Kauai, HI, 5–8 January 2015, pp.2326–2335. New York: IEEE.

Middleton

Modafferi

Real-time crisis mapping of natural disasters using social media. IEEE Intell Syst 2014; 29: 9–17.

Sakaki

Okazaki

Matsuo

Tweet analysis for real-time event detection and earthquake reporting system development. IEEE T Knowl Data En 2013; 25: 919–931.

Yin

Lampert

Cameron

et al . Using social media to enhance emergency situation awareness. IEEE Intell Syst 2012; 27: 52–59.

Middleton

Zielinski

Necmioǧlu

et al . Spatio-temporal decision support system for natural crisis management with TweetComP1. In: Dargam

Hernández

Zaraté

et al . (eds) Decision support systems III—impact of decision support systems for global environments (Lecture notes in business information processing). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, 2014, pp.11–21.

Baxter

Modest gains in first six months of Santa Cruz’s predictive police program. Santa Cruz Sentinel, 26February, http://www.santacruzsentinel.com/article/ZZ/20120226/NEWS/120227300 (2012, accessed 6 January 2018).

Mendonca

Moreira

Coelho

et al . Improving public safety at fingertips: a smart city experience. In: IEEE international smart cities conference (ISC2), Trento, 12–15 September 2016, pp.1–6. New York: IEEE.

10.

Bannan

Burbridge

Dunaway

et al . Blueprint for smart public safety in connected communities. Global City Teams Challenge, National Institute of Standards and Technology, https://pages.nist.gov/GCTC/uploads/blueprints/20170824-PSSC_Blueprint_20170823_FINAL.pdf (2017, accessed 5 January 2018).

11.

Aldrian

Oludhe

Garanganga

et al . Regional climate information for risk management. Procedia Environ Sci 2010; 1: 369–383.

12.

Jabareen

Planning the resilient city: concepts and strategies for coping with climate change and environmental risk. Cities 2013; 31: 220–229.

13.

Abreu

Velasquez

Curado

et al . A resilient Internet of Things architecture for smart cities. Ann Telecommun 2016; 72: 19–30.

14.

Brookes

Hutton

Public safety digital transformation the Internet of Things ( IoT) and emergency services, 2016, pp.1–26, http://www.eena.org/download.asp?item_id=170

15.

Zhang

Liu

et al . Crowd sensing of urban emergency events based on social media big data. In: IEEE 13th international conference on trust, security and privacy in computing and communications, Beijing, China, 24–26 September 2014, pp.605–610. New York: IEEE.

16.

Hossain

Siddique-E-Akbor

Mazumder

et al . Proof of concept of an altimeter-based river forecasting system for transboundary flow inside Bangladesh. IEEE J Sel Top Appl 2014; 7: 587–601.

17.

Zhang

Jiang

et al . GIS-based risk assessment model for flood disaster in China. In: 18th international conference on geoinformatics, Beijing, China, 18–20 June 2010, pp.2–6. New York: IEEE.

18.

Duan

Zhao

et al . An improved model of regional flood disaster risk assessment based on remote sensing data. In: 19th international conference on geoinformatics, Shanghai, China, 24–26 June 2011, pp.1–6. New York: IEEE.

19.

Ballesteros

Carbunar

Rahman

et al . Towards safe cities: a mobile and social networking approach. IEEE T Parall Distr 2014; 25: 2451–2462.

20.

Barrientos

Sainz

. Knowledge extraction based on fuzzy unsupervised decision tree: application to an emergency call center. In: García-Pedrajas

Herrera

Fyfe

et al . (eds) Trends in applied intelligent systems (Lecture notes in computer science, Including Subser Lect Notes Artif Intell Lect Notes Bioinformatics), vol. 6097. Berlin: Springer, 2010, pp.193–202.

21.

Merkuryeva

Merkuryev

Sokolov

et al . Advanced river flood monitoring, modelling and forecasting. J Comput Sci 2014; 10: 77–85.

22.

Tandberg

Easom

Qualls

Time series forecasts of poison center call volume. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 1995; 33: 11–18.

23.

Aschenbruck

Fuchs

Martini

. Traffic characteristics and modeling of emergency calls at the PSAP. In: IEEE international symposium on modeling, analysis & simulation of computer and telecommunication systems (MASCOTS 2009), London, 21–23 September 2009, pp.494–501. New York: IEEE.

24.

Jasso

Fountain

Baru

et al . Prediction of 9-1-1 call volumes for emergency event detection. In: The proceedings of the 8th annual international digital government research conference (Dg.o 2007), Philadelphia, PA, 20–23 May 2007, pp.148–154. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

25.

Cramer

Brown

Predicting 911 calls using spatial analysis. Stud Comput Intell 2012; 377: 15–26.

26.

Olligschlaeger

Artificial neural networks and crime mapping. Crime Mapp Crime Prev 1998; 8: 314–346.

27.

Wang

Gerber

Brown

DE.

Automatic crime prediction using events extracted from Twitter posts. In: Yang

Greenberg

Endsley

(eds) Social computing, behavioral—cultural modeling and prediction (Lecture notes in computer science, including subseries lecture notes in artificial intelligence and lecture Notes in bioinformatics). Berlin: Springer, 2012, pp.231–238.

28.

Evans

Spatial analyses of crime. Geography 2001; 86: 211–223.

29.

Zuidhof

GM.

Capacity planning of ambulance services: statistical analysis, forecasting and staffing. MSc Thesis, 2010, https://beta.vu.nl/nl/Images/stageverslag-zuidhof_tcm235-210831.pdf (accessed 17 September 2017).

30.

Viglino

Vesin

Ruckly

et al . Daily volume of cases in emergency call centers: construction and validation of a predictive model. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2017; 25: 86.

31.

Statklic. Administration of the Republic of Slovenia for Civil Protection and Disaster Relief, Ministry of Defence, Republic of Slovenia, statklic.sos112.si

32.

Public Safety Solution. Iskratel, www.iskratel.si

33.

ARSO meteo. Slovenian Environment Agency (ARSO), Ministry of Agriculture and Environment, Republic of Slovenia, meteo.arso.gov.si

34.

Police. Ministry of the Interior, Republic of Slovenia, www.policija.si

35.

Hastie

Tibshirani

Friedman

The elements of statistical learning. 2nd ed.New York: Springer, 2009.

36.

James

Witten

Hastie

et al . An introduction to statistical learning: with applications in R. New York: Springer, 2014.

37.

Frank

Hall

Witten

IH.

The WEKA workbench. Online appendix for “Data mining: practical machine learning tools and techniques.”4th ed. Morgan Kaufmann, 2016, www.cs.waikato.ac.nz/ml/weka/Witten_et_al_2016_appendix.pdf (accessed 23 September 2017).

38.

Witten

Frank

Hall

MA.

Data mining: practical machine learning tools and techniques. 3rd ed.Cambridge, MA: Elsevier, 2011.

39.

WEKA, The University of Waikato. Mining big data with Weka 3, https://www.cs.waikato.ac.nz/ml/weka/bigdata.html (accessed 14 August 2018).

Classification of incoming calls for the capital city of Slovenia smart city 112 public safety system using open Internet of Things data

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Related work

Public safety system for the smart city

112 Public safety system sin Slovenia

112 System in Slovenia

Public safety system architecture for smart cities

Incoming data

Working operator

Prediction module for the 112 system

Notification system

Data preparation for the simulation

Predispositions for the data preparation

Incoming calls to the 112 system

Open IoT data

Day data

Weather station data

River discharge data

Traffic accident data

Preparing data for classification

Simulation by classification

Classifications used

Simulation results

Discussion of the simulation results

Conclusion

Footnotes

Declaration of conflicting interests

Funding

References