EcclesJC. The Inhibitory Pathways of the Central Nervous System. Liverpool: University Press.1969.
2.
AdlerLEPachtmanEFranksRDPecevichMWaldoMCFreedmanR. Neurophysiological evidence for a defect in neuronal mechanisms involved in sensory gating in schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry1982; 7: 639–654.
3.
AdlerLEWaldoMCFreedmanR. Neurophysiological studies of sensory gating in schizophrenia: Comparison of auditory and visual responses. Biol Psychiatry1985; 17: 1284–1296.
4.
BakerNJAdlerLEFranksRD. Neurophysiological assessment of sensory gating in psychiatric inpatients: Comparison between schizophrenia and other diagnoses. Biol Psychiatry1987; 22: 603–617.
5.
BakerNJSauntonMAdlerLE. Sensory gating deficits in psychiatric inpatients: Relation to catecholamine metabolites in different diagnostic groups. Biol Psychiatry1990; 27: 519–528.
6.
BoutrosNNZouridakisGOverallJ. Replication and extension of P50 findings in schizophrenia. Clin Electroencephalogr1991; 22: 40–45.
7.
BoutrosNZouridakisGRustinTPeabodyCWarnerD. The P50 component of the auditory evoked potential and subtypes of schizophrenia. Psychiatry Research1993; 47: 243–254.
8.
JuddLLMcAdamsLBudickBBraffDL. Sensory gating deficits in schizophrenia: New results. Am J Psychiatry1992; 149: 488–493.
9.
FreedmanRAdlerLEWaldoMCPachtmanEFranksRD. Neurophysiological evidence for a defect in inhibitory pathways in schizophrenia: Comparison of medicated and drug-free patients. Biol Psychiatry1983; 18: 537–551.
10.
NagamotoHTAdlerLEWaldoMCFreedmanR. Sensory gating in schizophrenic patients and normal controls: Effects of changing stimulation interval. Biol Psychiatry1989; 25: 549–561.
11.
SiegelCWaldoMCMinzerGAdlerLEFreedmanR. Deficits in sensory gating in schizophrenia patients and their relatives. Arch Gen Psychiatry1984; 41: 607–612.
FranksRDAdlerLEWaldoMCPachtmanEAlpertJFreedmanR. Neurophysiological studies of sensory gating in mania: Comparison with Schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry1983; 18: 989–1005.
14.
FreedmanRAdlerLEGerhardtGA. Neurobiological studies of sensory gating in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin1987; 13: 669–678.
15.
WaldoMCFreedmanR. Gating of auditory evoked responses in normal college students. Psychiatry Research1986; 19: 233–239.
16.
JergerKBigginsCFeinG. P50 suppression is not affected by attentional manipulations. Biol Psychiatry1992; 31: 365–377.
17.
JohnsonMRAdlerLE. Transient impairment in P50 auditory sensory gating induced by a cold-pressor test. Biol Psychiatry1993; 33: 380–387.
18.
WaldoMCCareyGMyles-WorselyM. Codistribution of a sensory gating deficit and schizophrenia in multi-affected families. Psychiatric Research1991; 39: 257–268.
19.
GuttermanYJosiassenRC. Sensory gating deviance in schizophrenia in the context of task related effects. International J Psychophysiology1994; 18: 1–12.
20.
LambertiJSSchwarzkopfSBBoutrosNCrillyJFMartinR. Within-session changes in sensory gating assessed by P50 evoked potentials in normal subjects. Progr Neuro-Psychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry1993; 17: 781–791.
21.
BoutrosNNOverallJZouridakisG. Test-retest reliability of the P50 mid-latency auditory evoked response. Psychiatry Research1991; 39: 181–192.
22.
HetrickWPSandmanCABunneyWEJinYPotkinSGWhiteMH. Gender differences in gating of the auditory evoked potential in normal subjects. Biol Psychiatry1996; 39: 51–58.
23.
SmithDABoutrosNNSchwarzkopfSB. Reliability of P50 auditory event-related potential indices of sensory gating. Psychophysiology, 1994; 31: 495–502.
24.
Hernandez-PeonR. Physiological mechanisms in attention. In: RussellRW (ed). Frontiers in Physiological Psychology. New York: Academic Press; 1966: 121–144.
25.
Hernandez-PeonRScherrerH. Habituation to acoustic stimuli in cochlear nucleus. Federal Proceedings1955; 14: 71.
26.
Hernandez-PeonRScherrerHJouvetM. Modification of electrical activity in the cochlear nucleus during “attention” in unanesthetized cats. Science (Washington DC)1956; 123: 331–332.
27.
OatmanLC. Role of visual attention on auditory evoked potentials in unanesthetized cats. Exp Neurology1971; 32: 341–356.
28.
OatmanLC. Effects of visual attention on the intensity of auditory evoked potentials. Exp Neurology1976; 51: 41–53.
29.
OatmanLCAndersonBW. Effects of visual attention on tone burst evoked auditory potentials. Exp Neurology1977; 57: 200–211.
30.
LukasJH. Human auditory attention: The olivocochlear bundle may function as a peripheral filter. Psychophysiology1980; 17: 444–452.
31.
LukasJH. The role of efferent inhibition in human auditory attention: An examination of the auditory brainstem potentials. Int. J Neuroscience1981; 12: 137–145.
32.
WaldorffMHansenJCHillyardSA. Evidence for effects of selective attention in the midlatency range of the human auditory ERR ElectroencephalogrClin Neurophysiol (suppl)1987; 40: 146–153.