DavisH., Principles of electric response audiometry, Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol., 85, Suppl. 28:4–96, 1976.
2.
GibsonW.P.R., The use of auditory evoked potentials for the estimation of hearing, in HallidayA.M., (ed): Evoked Potentials in Clinical Testing, Churchill Livingstone, London, pp. 313–343, 1982.
3.
ChiappaK.H., Brain stem auditory evoked potentials, in Clinical Medicine, Raven Press, New York, pp. 105–202, 1983.
4.
StockardJ.J., StockardJ.E., and Shar-BroughF.W., Brainstem auditory evoked potentials in neurology: Methodology, interpretation, and clinical application, in AminoffM.J., (ed): Electrodiagnosis in Clinical Neurology, 2nd Ed, Churchill Livingstone, New York, pp. 467–503, 1986.
5.
EggermontJ.J., Use of electrocochleography and brainstem auditory evoked potentials in the diagnosis of cerebellopontine angle pathology, Adv. Oto-Rino-Laryng, 34:47–56, 1984.
6.
PictonT.W., TaylorM.J., Durieux-SmithA., and EdwardsC.G., Brainstem auditory evoked potentials in pediatrics, in AminoffM.J. (ed): Electrodiagnosis in Clinical Neurology, 2nd Ed, Churchill Livingstone, New York, pp. 505–534,1986.
7.
NagaoS., SunamiN., TsutsuiT., HonmaY., DoiA., and NishimotoA., Serial observations of brain stem function by auditory brain stem responses in central transtentorial herniation, Surg. Neurol., 17:355–357, 1982.
8.
NagaoS., SunamiN., TsutsuiT., HonmaY., MonnaF., NishiuraT., and NishimotoA., Diagnosis of uncal herniation by auditory brainstem response, Neurol. Med. Chir. (Tokyo), 24:396–400, 1984.
9.
NagataK., TazawaT., MizukamiM., and ArakiG., Application of brain stem auditory evoked potentials to evaluation of cerebral herniation, in Evoked Potentials II, The second international evoked potentials symposium, Ed. RichardH.Nodar and Colin Barbar, pp. 183–193, 1984.
10.
PrattH., and SohmerH., Intensity and rate functions of cochlear and brain stem evoked responses to click stimuli in man, Arch. Oto-Rino-Laryngol., 212:85–92, 1976.
11.
RoweM.J., Normal variability of the brain-stem auditory evoked response in young and old adult subjects, Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 44:459–470, 1978.
12.
SohmerH., Neurologic disorders, in MooreE.J., (ed): Bases of Auditory Brain-stem Evoked Responses, Grune & Stratton, New York, pp. 317–341, 1983.
13.
StoneJ.L., GhalyR.F., ., Modified auditory brainstem responses (MABR); Part II -Studies in patients with intracranial lesions, Manuscript for submission.
14.
HughesJ.R., and FinoJ., Usefulness of piezoelectric earphones in recording the brain stem auditory evoked potentials: a new early deflection, Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 48:357–360, 1980.
15.
Hosford-DunnH., MendelsonT., and SalamyA., Binaural interactions in the short-latency evoked potentials of neonates, Audiology, 20:394–408,1981.
16.
LevineR.A., Binaural interaction in brainstem potentials of human subjects, Ann. Neurol.9:384–393, 1981.
17.
DavisH., and YoshieN., Human evoked cortical responses to auditory stimuli, The Physiologist, 6:164, 1963.
18.
JewettD.L., Volume-conducted potentials in response to auditory stimuli as detected by averaging in the cat, Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 28:609–618, 1970.
19.
SohmerH., and FessheimerM., Cochlear and cortical audiometry conveniently recorded in the same subject, Isreal J. Med. Sci., 6:219–223, 1970.
20.
JewettD.L., and WillistonJ.S., Auditory-evoked far fields averaged from the scalp of humans, Brain, 94:681–696, 1971.
21.
EggermontJ.J., and OdenthalD.W., Action potentials and summating potentials in the normal human cochlea, Acta. Otolaryng. (Stockh.), Suppl. 316:39–61, 1974.
22.
GibsonW.P.R., Electrocochleography, in HallidayA.M., (ed): Evoked Potentials in Clinical Testing, Churchill Livingstone, London, pp. 283–311, 1982.
23.
MooreE.J., Effects of stimulus parameters, in MooreE.J., (ed): Bases of Auditory Brain-stem Evoked Responses, Grune & Stratton, New York, pp. 221–251, 1983.
24.
HecoxK., and GalambosR., Brainstem auditory evoked responses in human infants and adults, Arch. Otolaryngol., 99:30–33, 1974.
25.
CoatesA.C. and MartinJ.L., Human auditory nerve action potentials and brain stem evoked responses: Effects of audiogram shape and lesion location, Arch. Otolaryngol., 103:605–622, 1977.
26.
PrattH., and SohmerH., Comparison of hearing threshold determined by auditory pathway electric responses and by behavioral responses, Audiology, 17:285–292, 1978.
27.
RobinsonK., and RudgeP., Centrally generated auditory potentials, in HallidayA.M. (ed): Evoked Potentials in Clinical Testing, Churchill Livingstone, London, pp. 345–372, 1982.
28.
CoatsA.C., Human auditory nerve action potentials and brain stem evoked responses: Latency-intensity functions in detection of cochlear and retrocochlear abnormality, Arch. Otolaryngol., 104:709–717, 1978.
29.
PrasherD.K., SainzM., and GibsonW.P.R., Binaural voltagesummation of brain stem auditory evoked potentials: An adjunct to the diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis, Ann. Neurol., 11:86–91, 1982.
30.
PictonT.W., WoodsD.L., Baribeau-BraunJ., and HealeyT.M.G., Evoked potential audiometry, J. Otolaryngol.6:90–119, 1977.
31.
HuangC.M., and BuchwaldJ.S., Factors that affect the amplitudes and latencies of the vertex short latency acoustic responses in the cat, Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 44:179–186, 1978.
32.
StockardJ.E., StockardJ.J., WestmorelandB.F., and CorfitsJ.L., Brainstem auditory-evoked responses: Normal variation as a function of stimulus and subject characteristics, Arch. Neurol.36:823–831, 1979.
33.
ChiappaK.H., GladstoneK.J., and YoungR.R., Brain stem auditory evoked responses: Studies of waveform variations in 50 normal human subjects, Arch. Neurol.36:81–87, 1979.
ZöllnerC., KarnahlT., and StangeG., Input-output function and adaptation behavior of the five early potentials registered with the earlobe-vertex pick-up, Arch. Oto-Rino-Laryng., 212:23–33, 1976.
36.
StoneJ.L., HughesJ.R., KumarA., MeyerD., SubramanianK.S., ZalkindM.S., and FinoJ., Electrocochleography recorded non-invasively from the external ear, Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 63:494–496, 1986.
37.
DonM., AllenA.A., and StarrA., Effect of click rate on the latency of auditory brain stem responses in humans, Ann. Otol., 86:186–195, 1977.
38.
ThorntonA.R.D., and ColemanM.J., The adaptation of cochlear and brain stem auditory evoked potentials in humans, Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol, 39:399–406, 1975.
39.
HarkinsS.W., McevoyT.M., and ScottM.L., Effects of interstimulus interval on latency of the brain stem auditory evoked potential, Int. J. Neurosci., 10:7–14, 1979.
40.
McdonaldW.I., and SearsT.A., The effects of experimental demyelination on conduction in the central nervous system, Brain, 93:583–598, 1970.
41.
RasminskyM., and SearsT.A., Internodal conduction in undissected demyelinated nerve fibers, J. Physiol., 227:323–350, 1972.
42.
StockardJ.J. and RossiterV.S., Clinical and pathological correlates of brain stem auditory response abnormalities, Neurology, 27:316–325, 1977.
43.
HecoxK.E., ConeB., and BlawM.E., Brainstem auditory evoked response in the diagnosis of pediatric neurologic diseases, Neurology, 31:832–840, 1981.