Recently, the dementias have been classified into 2 categories-Cortical (CD) and Subcortical (SD). Some studies have questioned this classification. We attempted to validate the classification on electrophysiologic grounds. Fourteen of 15 patients with SD had relatively normal EEGs as compared to only 3 of 15 patients with CD, matched for age, sex and severity of dementia (p > 0.01). SER test results were often abnormal in the SD group but always normal in CD patients. These preliminary data appear to validate the classification of dementias into SD and CD categories.
AlbertM.L., FeldmanR.G., and WillisA.L., The ‘subcortical dementia’ of progressive supranuclear palsy, J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiat., 37:121–130, 1974.
2.
CummingsJ.L., and BensonF., Subcortical dementia: review of an emerging concept, Arch. Neurol., 41:874–879, 1984.
3.
MayeauxR., SternY., RosenJ., . Is subcortical dementia a recognizable clinical entity? Ann. Neurol., 14:278–283, 1983.
4.
WhitehouseP.J., The concept of subcortical and cortical dementia. Another Look, Ann. Neurol., 19:1–6, 1986.
MckhannG., DrachmanD., FolsteinM., KatzmanR., PriceD., and StadlanE.M., Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease, Neurology, 34:939–944, 1984.
7.
McgeachieR.E., FlemingJ.O., SharerL.R., . Diagnosis of Pick's disease by computed tomography, J. Comput. Ass. Tomo., 3:113–115, 1979.
8.
AdamsR.D., FischerC.M., HakimS., . Symptomatic ‘occult’ hydrocephalus with “normal” cerebrospinal-fluid pressure: A treatable syndrome, N. Engl. J. Med., 273:117–126, 1965.
9.
KooiK.A., Electrographic signs of cerebral disorder, In: KooiK.A., TuckerR.P., MarshallR.E., (eds), Fundamentals of Electroencephalography, New York, Harper and Row, pp. 89–121, 1978.
10.
FreedmanM., Cortical and subcortical dementia, Ann. Neurol., 15:506–508, 1984.
11.
GoldensohnE., Neurophysiologic substrate of EEG activity, In: KlassD.W., DalyD.D., (eds), Current Practice of Clinical Electroencephalography, New York, Raven Press, pp. 421–439, 1980.
12.
EisenA., and CraccoR. Q., Overuse of evoked potentials: Caution, Neurology, 33:618–621, 1983.
13.
SwainJ.M., Electroencephalographic abnormalities in presenile atrophy, Neurology (Minneap), 9:722–727, 1959.
MclnnesA., Evoked potentials in hydrocephalus, Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 50:233–234, 1980.
16.
VermaN.P., KooiK.A., and GILROYJ.Monocular pattern-shift visual evoked potentials in hemispheric strokes, Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 58:205–210, 1984.
17.
HecoxK.E., ConeB., and BLAWM. E., Brainstem auditory evoked response in the diagnosis of pediatric neurologic disease, Neurology, 31:832–840, 1981.
18.
MarkandO.H., DemyerW.E., WorthR.M., ., Multimodality evoked potentials in neurology, In: CourjanJ., MauguiereF., RevolM., (eds), Clinical Applications of Evoked Potentials in Neurology, New York, Raven Press, pp. 409–416, 1982
