FabianiM.SohmerH.TaitC.GafniM., and KinartiR., A functional measure of brain activity: Brainstem transmission time, Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 47:483–491, 1979.
2.
RobinsonK., and RudgeP., Abnormalities of the auditory evoked potentials in patients with multiple sclerosis, Brain, 100:19–40, 1977.
3.
ElidanJ.SohmerH.GafniM., and KahanaE., Contribution of changes in click rate and intensity on diagnosis of multiple sclerosis by brainstem evoked potentials, Acta. Neuro. Scand., 65:570–585, 1982.
4.
SeltersW.A., and BrackmannD.E., Acoustic tumor detection with brainstem electric response audiometry, Arch. Otolaryngol., 103: 181–187, 1977.
5.
SeltersW.A., and BrackmannD.E., Brainstem electric response audiometry in acoustic tumor detection. In: HouseW.F., and LeutjeC.M., (eds), Acoustic Tumors, Vol. I., Diagnosis, University Park Press, Baltimore, pp. 225–235, 1979.
6.
SohmerH., and CohenD., Responses of the auditory pathway in several types of hearing loss, In: RubenR.J.ElberlingC.SalomonG., (eds), Electrocochleography, University Park Press, Baltimore, pp. 431–437, 1976.
7.
ChisinR.GafniM., and SohmerH., Patterns of auditory nerve and brainstem-evoked response (ABR) in different types of peripheral hearing loss, Arch. Otorhinolaryngol, 237:165–173, 1983.
8.
SohmerH.KinartiR., and GafniM., The latency of auditory nerve-brainstem responses in sensorineural hearing loss, Arch. Otorhinolaryngol., 230:189–199, 1981.
9.
SchwartzD.M.LukmireN.K.BassettM., and JabbariB., Confounding effects of high-frequency hearing loss on the auditory brainstem response in diagnosis of acoustic tumor, Trans. Amer. Neurol. Assoc., 106:109–110, 1981.
10.
CoatsA.C, On electrocochleographic electrode design, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 56:708–711, 1974.
11.
SalomonG.ElberlingC., and TosM., Combined use of electrocochleography and brainstem recording in the diagnosis of acoustic tumors, Rev. Laryngol., 100:678–707, 1979.
12.
RuthR.A.HildebrandD.L., and Can-TrellR.W., A study of methods used to enhance wave 1 in the auditory brain stem response, Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg., 90:635–640, 1982.
13.
CoatsA.C, and MartinJ.L., Human auditory nerve action potentials and brain stem evoked responses. Effects of audiogram shape and lesion location, Arch. Otolaryngol., 103:605–622, 1977.
14.
WangW.Y., and DallosP., Latency of whole nerve action potentials: Influence of hair cell normalcy, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 52: 1678–686, 1972.
15.
DallosP., and HarrisD., Properties of auditory nerve response in absence of outer hair cells, J. Neurophysiol., 41:375–383, 1978.
16.
SalviR.J.HendersonD., and HammernikR.P., Single auditory nerve fiber action potential latencies in normal and noise treated chinchillas, Hearing Res., 1:237–251, 1979.
17.
MollerK., and BlegvadB., Brain stem responses in patients with sensorineural hearing loss, Scand. Audiol., 5:115–127, 1976.
18.
JergerJ., and MauldinL., Prediction of sensorineural hearing level from the brain stem evoked response, Arch. Otolaryngol., 104:456–461, 1978.
