KlinglerM., EEG observations in uremia, Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 6:519, 1954.
2.
KennedyA.C.LintonA.I.LukeR.G., and RenfrewS., Electroencephalographic changes during hemodialysis, Lancet, 1:408–411, 1963.
3.
KileyJ.E., and HinesO., EEG evaluation of uremia: Wave frequency evaluation on 40 uremic patients, Arch. intern Med., 116:67–73, 1965.
4.
BourneJ.R.MezinF.M.WardJ.W., and TeschanP.E., Computer quantification of electroencephalographic data recorded from renal patients, Comp. biomed. Res., 8:461–473, 1975a.
5.
BourneJ.R.WardJ.W.TeschanP.E.MussoM.JohnstonH.B.Jr., and GinnH.E., Quantitative assessment of the electroencephalogram in renal disease, Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 39:377–388, 1975b.
6.
KileyJ.E.PrattK.L.GisserD.G., and SchafferC.A., Techniques of EEG frequency analysis for evaluation of uremic encephalopathy, Clin. Nephrol., 5 (6):279–285, 1976.
7.
KileyJ.E.WoodruffM.W., and PrattK.L., Evaluation of encephalopathy by EEG frequency analysis in chronic dialysis patients, Clin. Nephrol., 5 (6):245–250, 1976.
8.
HymanP.R., and KooiK.A., Visually evoked cortical responses in renal insufficiency, U. Mich. Med. Ctr. J., 35:177–179, 1969.
9.
HamelB.BourneJ.R.WardJ.W., and TeschanP.E., Visually evoked cortical potentials in renal failure: Transient potentials, Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 44:606–616, 1978.
10.
LewisE.G.DustmanR.E., and BeckE.C., Visual and somatosensory evoked potential characteristics of patients undergoing hemodialysis and kidney transplantation, Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 44:223–231, 1978.
11.
HamelBBourneJ.R.WardJ.W., and TeschanP.E., Quantitative assessment of photic driving in renal failure, Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 45:719–730, 1978.
12.
GotmanJ.GloorP., and RayW.F., A quantitative comparison of traditional reading of the EEG and interpretation of computer extracted features in patients with supratentorial brain lesions, Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 38:623–639, 1975.
13.
KooiK.A.GuvenerA.M., and BagchiB.K., Visual evoked responses in lesions of the higher optic pathways, Neur. (Minneap.), 15:841–854, 1965.
CigánekL., The EEG response (evoked potential) to light stimulus in man, Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 13:165–172, 1961.
16.
PeacockS.M.Jr., and YanovskiA., Some evidence for multiple visual projections in cortex, Clin. EEG, 8:170–183, 1977.
17.
HughesJ.R., and AndyO.J., The human amygdala. I. Electrophysiological responses to odorants, Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 46:428–443, 1979.
18.
KooiK.A.TuckerR.P., and MarshallR.E., Fundamentals of Electroencephalography (2nd Ed.), Harper and Row, Hagerstown, Md., 249 pp, 978, 1978.
19.
CantorF.K., and IlbagF., Facilitation of photic response by focal lesions, Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 34:77–79, 1973.
20.
PictonT.W.HillyardS.A.KrauszH.I., and GalambosR., Human auditory evoked potentials. I. Evaluation of components, Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 36:179–190, 1974.
21.
BurešJ.PetráňM., and ZacharJ., Electrophysiological Methods in Biological Research (3rd ed.) Academic, New York, 824 pp., 1967.