This cross-sectional study aimed to identify electrophysiological markers distinguishing stages of development, stability, and early aging in cortical auditory processing to elucidate neurophysiological changes in healthy auditory aging.
Methods
We evaluated 149 healthy participants (both sexes; aged 7-59 years) recruited from the general community via electronic media, posters, radio, and regional television, divided into six age groups (7-11, 12-17, 18-29, 30-39, 40-49, and 50-59 years). Eligibility criteria included normal hearing, no neurological disorders, and normal otoscopy. Cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) were recorded using the syllable /da/ (binaural stimulation, 70 dB HL) with eye-movement control.
Results
Significant differences in P1 latency were observed between children (7-11 years) and older participants (12-59 years). N1 latency differed between children and adults (30-59 years), while N1 amplitude varied between adolescents (12-19 years) and adults aged 40-49 years. P1–N1 latency differed between adolescents and adults aged 40-59 years. Age correlated moderately negatively with P1/N1 latencies and weakly positively with N1 amplitude.
Conclusion
Maturational changes in P1/N1 latencies were evident, but no decline occurred during adulthood or pre-senescence, suggesting stable auditory processing until at least age 59.
DuarteDSBGrizSMSRochaMFBBrittoDBLAMenezesDCAdvínculaKP. The effect of noise on the amplitude and morphology of cortical auditory evoked potentials. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2022;88(Suppl. 3):S59–S65. doi:10.1016/j.bjorl.2021.11.006
2.
HaumannNTPetersenBVuustPBratticoE. Age differences in central auditory system responses to naturalistic music. Biol Psychol. 2023;179(179):108566. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2023.108566
3.
EddinsACOzmeralEJEddinsDA. Aging alters across-hemisphere cortical dynamics during binaural temporal processing. Front Neurosci. 2023;16:1060172. doi:10.3389/fnins.2022.1060172
4.
CrielYBoonCDepuydtE, et al.Aging and sex effects on phoneme perception: An exploratory mismatch negativity and P300 investigation. Int J Psychophysiol. 2023;190:69–83. doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2023.06.002
5.
GürkanSBaşokçuODurankayaSMİşlerYKırkımG. Central auditory changes associated with age-related hearing loss. Clin EEG Neurosci. 2024;55(4):508–517. doi:10.1177/15500594241243116
6.
WangXNieSWenY, et al.Age-related differences in auditory spatial processing revealed by acoustic change complex. Front Hum Neurosci. 2024;18:1342931. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2024.1342931
7.
TalekarJVanajaCS. Cortical auditory-evoked potentials in children and adults: A comparative study. Egypt J Otolaryngol. 2025;41:29. doi:10.1186/s43163-025-00773-y
8.
Liégeois-ChauvelCMusolinoABadierJMMarquisPChauvelP. Evoked potentials recorded from the auditory cortex in man: Evaluation and topography of the middle latency components. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1994;92(3):204–214. doi:10.1016/0168-5597(94)90064-7
9.
OstroffJMMartinBABoothroydA. Cortical evoked response to acoustic change within a syllable. Ear Hear. 1998;19(4):290–297. doi:10.1097/00003446-199808000-00004
10.
PontonCWEggermontJJKwongBDonM. Maturation of human central auditory system activity: Evidence from multi-channel evoked potentials. Clin Neurophysiol. 2000;111(2):220–236. doi:10.1016/s1388-2457(99)00236-9
11.
KummerPBurgerMSchusterMRosanowskFEysholdtUHoppeU. Cortical auditory evoked potentials to acoustic changes in speech stimuli in children. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2007;59(5):273–280. doi:10.1159/000104466
12.
SilvaLAFMagliaroFCLCarvalhoACMMatasCG. Maturation of long latency auditory evoked potentials in hearing children: Systematic review. Codas. 2017;29(3):e20160107. doi:10.1590/2317-1782/20172016107
13.
SanjuHKJainTKumarP. Acoustic change Complex as a neurophysiological tool to assess auditory discrimination skill: A review. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023;27(2):e362–e369. doi:10.1055/s-0042-1743202
14.
McPhersonL. Late Potentials of the Auditory System. Vol 1. Singular; 1996.
15.
LunardeloPPHebiharaMTHZuanettiPAPontes-FernandesACFerrettiMIZanchettaS. Cortical auditory evoked potentials with different acoustic stimuli: Evidence of differences and similarities in coding in auditory processing disorders. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2021;151:110944. doi:10.1016/j.ijporl.2021.110944
16.
WunderlichJLCone-WessonBKShepherdR. Maturation of the cortical auditory evoked potential in infants and young children. Hear Res. 2006;212(1-2):185–202. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2005.11.010
17.
SharmaAKrausNMcGeeTJNicolTG. Developmental changes in P1 and N1 central auditory responses elicited by consonant-vowel syllables. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1997;104(6):540–545. doi:10.1016/s0168-5597(97)00050-6
18.
SussmanESteinschneiderMGumenyukVGrushkoJLawsonK. The maturation of human evoked brain potentials to sounds presented at different stimulus rates. Hear Res. 2008;236(1-2):61–79. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2007.12.001
19.
NäätänenRPictonT. The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: A review and an analysis of the component structure. Psychophysiology. 1987;24(4):375–425. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1987.tb00311.x
20.
SharmaACampbellJCardonG. Developmental and cross-modal plasticity in deafness: Evidence from the P1 and N1 event related potentials in cochlear implanted children. Int J Psychophysiol. 2015;95(2):135–144. doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2014.04.007
21.
WagnerMRoychoudhuryACampanelliLShaferVLMartinBSteinschneiderM. Representation of spectro-temporal features of spoken words within the P1-N1-P2 and T-complex of the auditory evoked potentials (AEP). Neurosci Lett. 2016;614:119–126. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2015.12.020
22.
SowellERPetersonBSThompsonPMWelcomeSEHenkeniusALTogaAW. Mapping cortical change across the human life span. Nat Neurosci. 2003;6(3):309–315. doi:10.1038/nn1008
23.
DahlMJMatherMSanderMCWerkle-BergnerM. Noradrenergic responsiveness supports selective attention across the adult lifespan. J Neurosci. 2020;40(22):4372–4390. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0398-19.2020
24.
DobriSGJRossB. Total GABA level in human auditory cortex is associated with speech-in-noise understanding in older age. Neuroimage. 2021;225:117474. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117474
BethlehemRAISeidlitzJWhiteSR, et al.Brain charts for the human lifespan. Nature. 2022;610(7906):7931. doi:10.1038/s41586-022-05300-0
27.
Kuruvilla-MathewAThornePRPurdySC. Effects of aging on neural processing during an active listening task. PLoS One. 2022;17(9):e0273304. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0273304
28.
CunninghamJNicolTZeckerSKrausN. Speech-evoked neurophysiologic responses in children with learning problems: Development and behavioral correlates of perception. Ear Hear. 2000;21(6):554–568. doi:10.1097/00003446-200012000-00003
29.
MisalePLepchaAThomaPSebastianSSebastianT. Normative data for cortical evoked response audiometry of a heterogeneous Indian population and its comparison with behavioral audiometry. Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2020;23(3):296–302. doi:10.4103/aian.AIAN_397_18
ListerJJHarrison BushALAndelRMatthewsCMorganDEdwardsJD. Cortical auditory evoked responses of older adults with and without probable mild cognitive impairment. Clin Neurophysiol. 2016;127(2):1279–1287. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2015.11.007
32.
KoravandAJutrasBLassondeM. Abnormalities in cortical auditory responses in children with central auditory processing disorder. Neuroscience. 2017;346:135–148. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.01.011
JergerJ. Clinical experience with impedance audiometry. Arch Otolaryngol. 1970;92(4):311–324. doi:10.1001/archotol.1970.04310040005002
35.
PereiraLDSchochatE. Testes auditivos comportamentais para avaliação do processamento auditivo. 2nd ed. Pró-Fono; 2011.
36.
Auditec™. 1997. Evaluation Manual of Pitch Pattern Sequence and Duration Pattern Sequence.
37.
SchochatERabeloCMSanfinsMD. Processamento Auditivo Central: Testes Tonais de Padrão de Freqüência e de Duração em Indivíduos Normais de 7 a 16 anos de idade. Pró-Fono. 2000;12(2):1–7.
MattosPSerra-PinheiroMARohdeLAPintoD. Apresentação de uma versão em português para uso no Brasil do instrumento MTA-SNAP-IV de avaliação de sintomas de transtorno do déficit de atenção/hiperatividade e sintomas de transtorno desafiador e de oposição. Rev Psiquiatr Rio Gd Sul. 2006;28(3):290–297. doi:10.1590/S0101-81082006000300008
40.
OuvrierRAGoldsmithRFOuvrierSWilliamsIC. The value of the Mini-Mental State Examination in childhood: A preliminary study. J Child Neurol. 1993;8(2):145–148. doi:10.1177/088307389300800206
41.
BruckiSMNitriniRCaramelliPBertolucciPHOkamotoIH. Suggestions for utilization of the Mini-Mental State Examination in Brazil. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2003;61(3B):777–781. doi:10.1590/s0004-282 ( 2003000500014
42.
JainMPassiGR. Assessment of a modified Mini-Mental Scale for cognitive functions in children. Indian Pediatr. 2005;42(9):907–912.
43.
VenturaLMAlvarengaKFFilhoCAO. Protocol to collect late latency auditory evoked potentials. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2009;75(6):879–883. doi:10.1016/s1808-8694(15)30553-x
44.
HallJW. New Handbook of Auditory Evoked Responses. Vol 1. Allyn & Bacon; 2006.
45.
TomczakMTomczakE. The need to report effect size estimates revisited: An overview of some recommended measures of effect size. Trends Sport Sci. 2014;21(1):19–25.
46.
CohenJ. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
47.
MahajanYMcArthurG. Maturation of auditory event-related potentials across adolescence. Hear Res. 2012;294(1-2):82–94. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2012.10.005
CheekDConeB. Evidence of vowel discrimination provided by the acoustic change Complex. Ear Hear. 2020;41(4):855–867. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000809
50.
LightfootG. Summary of the N1-P2 cortical auditory evoked potential to estimate the auditory threshold in adults. Semin Hear. 2016;37(1):1–8. doi:10.1055/s-0035-1570334
51.
TremblayKLPiskoszMSouzaP. Effects of age and age-related hearing loss on the neural representation of speech cues. Clin Neurophysiol. 2003;114(7):1332–1343. doi:10.1016/s1388-2457(03)00114-7
52.
SörösPTeismannIKManemannELütkenhönerB. Auditory temporal processing in healthy aging: A magnetoencephalographic study. BMC Neurosci. 2009;10:34. doi:10.1186/1471-2202-10-34
53.
PoulsenCPictonTWPausT. Age-related changes in transient and oscillatory brain responses to auditory stimulation in healthy adults 19-45 years old. Cereb Cortex. 2007;17(6):1454–1467. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhl056
54.
PoulsenCPictonTWPausT. Age-related changes in transient and oscillatory brain responses to auditory stimulation during early adolescence. Dev Sci. 2009;12(2):220–235. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00760.x
