Individuals with internet addiction (IA) show difficulties in emotion regulation. However, they could effectively employ emotion regulation strategies when instructed. We speculate that this discrepancy might be caused by maladaptive emotion regulation choices. Recent studies indicated that decreased activity of the left frontal cortex could be a neural marker of reappraisal use. To address this problem, individuals with IA (n = 17, IA group) and healthy individuals (n = 23, healthy control [HC] group) were required to choose an emotion regulation strategy between reappraisal and distraction to regulate their emotions varying in emotional intensity and valence. We also compared the resting state frontal alpha asymmetry (FAA) of these 2 groups. The results replicated more choices of reappraisal in low- versus high-intensity emotional contexts across groups. More importantly, the IA group chose reappraisal less frequently compared with the HC group, irrespective of emotional intensity. Furthermore, we found individuals with IA have lower FAA than healthy controls, and FAA shows a positive correlation with the use of reappraisal. These findings suggest that IA alters individuals’ patterns of emotion regulation choice and impairs frontal activities, causing difficulties in emotion regulation.
AkbariM. Metacognitions or distress intolerance: the mediating role in the relationship between emotional dysregulation and problematic internet use. Addict Behav Rep. 2017;6(October):128–133. doi:10.1016/j.abrep.2017.10.004
2.
ZhangLAmosCMcDowellWC. A comparative study of internet addiction between the United States and China. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2008;11(6):727–729. doi:10.1089/cpb.2008.0026
3.
YoungKS. Internet addiction: the emergence of a new clinical disorder. Cyberpsychol Behav. 1998;1(3):237–244. doi:10.1089/cpb.1998.1.237
4.
AndersonKJ. Internet use among college students: an exploratory study. J Am Coll Health Assoc. 2001;50(1):21–26. doi:10.1080/07448480109595707
5.
KhanMAAlviAAShabbirFRajputTA. Effect of internet addiction on academic performance of medical students. J Islam Int Med Coll. 2016;11(2):48–51.
6.
UsmanNHAlaviMShafeqSM. Relationship between internet addiction and academic performance among foreign undergraduate students. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2014;114(1):845–851. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.795
7.
SpadaMMMarinoC. Metacognitions and emotion regulation as predictors of problematic internet use in adolescents. Clin Neuropsychiatry. 2017;14(1):59–63.
8.
CaplanSE. Theory and measurement of generalized problematic internet use: a two-step approach. Comput Human Behav. 2010;26(5):1089–1097. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.012
9.
CasaleSCaplanSEFioravantiG. Positive metacognitions about internet use: the mediating role in the relationship between emotional dysregulation and problematic use. Addict Behav. 2016;59:84–88. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.03.014
10.
EstévezAJáureguiPSánchez-MarcosILópez-GonzálezHGriffithsMD. Attachment and emotion regulation in substance addictions and behavioral addictions. J Behav Addict. 2017;6(4):534–544. doi:10.1556/2006.6.2017.086
11.
DoneganNHSanislowCABlumbergHP, et al.Amygdala hyperreactivity in borderline personality disorder: implications for emotional dysregulation. Biol Psychiatry. 2003;54(11):1284–1293. doi:10.1016/S0006-3223(03)00636-X
12.
HofmannSGSawyerATFangAAsnaaniA. Emotion dysregulation model of mood and anxiety disorders. Depress Anxiety. 2012;29(5):409–416. doi:10.1002/da.21888
13.
van StralenJ. Emotional dysregulation in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. ADHD Atten Deficit Hyperact Disord. 2016;8(4):175–187. doi:10.1007/s12402-016-0199-0
14.
KaraerYAkdemirD. Parenting styles, perceived social support and emotion regulation in adolescents with internet addiction. Compr Psychiatry. 2019;92:22–27. doi:10.1016/j.comppsych.2019.03.003
15.
KoCHYenJYYenCFChenCSChenCC. The association between internet addiction and psychiatric disorder: a review of the literature. Eur Psychiatry. 2012;27(1):1–8. doi:10.1016/j.eurpsy.2010.04.011
16.
LeeJLeeSChunJWChoHKimDJJungYC. Compromised prefrontal cognitive control over emotional interference in adolescents with internet gaming disorder.Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2015;18(11):661–668. doi:10.1089/cyber.2015.0231
GutentagTHalperinEPoratRBigmanYETamirM. Successful emotion regulation requires both conviction and skill: beliefs about the controllability of emotions, reappraisal, and regulation success. Cogn Emot. 2017;31(6):1225–1233. doi:10.1080/02699931.2016.1213704
19.
SheppesGGrossJJ. Emotion regulation effectiveness: what works when. In: Weiner IB, Tennen HA, Suls JM, eds. Handbook of Psychology. 2nd ed. Wiley; 2012:1–51. doi:10.1002/9781118133880.hop205018
20.
BlasiMDIGiardinaAGiordanoC, et al.Problematic video game use as an emotional coping strategy: evidence from a sample of MMORPG gamers. J Behav Addict. 2019;8(1):25–34. doi:10.1556/2006.8.2019.02
21.
McNicolMLThorsteinssonEB. Internet addiction, psychological distress, and coping responses among adolescents and adults. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2017;20(5):296–304. doi:10.1089/cyber.2016.0669
22.
YoungKS. Treatment outcomes using CBT-IA with internet-addicted patients. J Behav Addict. 2013;2(4):209–215. doi:10.1556/JBA.2.2013.4.3
23.
YoungKS. CBT-IA: the first treatment model for internet addiction. J Cogn Psychother. 2011;25(4):304–312. doi:10.1891/0889-8391.25.4.304
24.
SheppesGScheibeSSuriGRaduPBlechertJGrossJJ. Emotion regulation choice: a conceptual framework and supporting evidence. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2014;143(1):163–181. doi:10.1037/a0030831
25.
SheppesG. Emotion regulation choice: theory and findings. In: Gross JJ, ed. Handbook of Emotion Regulation. The Guilford Press; 2014:126–139.
26.
SchönfelderSKanskePHeisslerJWessaM. Time course of emotion-related responding during distraction and reappraisal. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2013;9(9):1310–1319. doi:10.1093/scan/nst116
27.
SheppesGMeiranN. Divergent cognitive costs for online forms of reappraisal and distraction. Emotion. 2008;8(6):870–874. doi:10.1037/a0013711
28.
AhnHMKimSAHwangIJ, et al.The effect of cognitive reappraisal on long-term emotional experience and emotional memory. J Neuropsychol. 2015;9(1):64–76. doi:10.1111/jnp.12035
29.
HermannAKressLStarkR. Neural correlates of immediate and prolonged effects of cognitive reappraisal and distraction on emotional experience. Brain Imag Behav. 2017;11(5):1227–1237. doi:10.1007/s11682-016-9603-9
30.
ThiruchselvamRBlechertJSheppesGRydstromAGrossJJ. The temporal dynamics of emotion regulation: an EEG study of distraction and reappraisal. Biol Psychol. 2011;87(1):84–92. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.02.009
31.
ShafirRSchwartzNBlechertJSheppesG. Emotional intensity influences pre-implementation and implementation of distraction and reappraisal. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2015;10(10):1329–1337. doi:10.1093/scan/nsv022
32.
RichardsJMGrossJJ. Emotion regulation and memory: the cognitive costs of keeping one’s cool. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000;79(3):410–424. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.79.3.410
33.
RichardsJMGrossJJ. Personality and emotional memory: how regulating emotion impairs memory for emotional events. J Res Pers. 2006;40(5):631–651. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2005.07.002
34.
SheppesGCatranEMeiranN. Reappraisal (but not distraction) is going to make you sweat: physiological evidence for self-control effort. Int J Psychophysiol. 2009;71(2):91–96. doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2008.06.006
35.
ShafirRZuckerLSheppesG. Turning off hot feelings: down-regulation of sexual desire using distraction and situation-focused reappraisal. Biol Psychol. 2018;137:116–124. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2018.07.007
SunDLChenZJMaNZhangXCFuXMZhangDR. Decision-making and prepotent response inhibition functions in excessive internet users. CNS Spectr. 2009;14(2):75–81. doi:10.1017/S1092852900000225
38.
HayACSheppesGGrossJJGruberJ. Choosing How to feel: emotion regulation choice in bipolar disorder. Emotion. 2015;15(2):139–145. doi:10.1037/emo0000024
39.
KussDJLopez-FernandezO. Internet addiction and problematic internet use: a systematic review of clinical research. World J Psychiatry. 2016;6(1):143. doi:10.5498/wjp.v6.i1.143
40.
LaRoseRLinCAEastinMS. Unregulated internet usage: addiction, habit, or deficient self-regulation?Media Psychol. 2003;5(3):225–253. doi:10.1207/S1532785XMEP0503_01
41.
BurleighTLGriffithsMDSumichAWangGYKussDJ. Gaming disorder and internet addiction: a systematic review of resting-state EEG studies. Addict Behav. 2020;107(April):106429. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106429
42.
WangGYGriskova-BulanovaI. Electrophysiological activity is associated with vulnerability of internet addiction in non-clinical population. Addict Behav. 2018;84(April):33–39. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.03.025
43.
WangGYKyddRWouldesTAJensenMRussellBR. Changes in resting EEG following methadone treatment in opiate addicts. Clin Neurophysiol. 2015;126(5):943–950. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2014.08.021
44.
ParkSMLeeJYKimYJ, et al.Neural connectivity in internet gaming disorder and alcohol use disorder: a resting-state EEG coherence study. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):1–12. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-01419-7
45.
ChoiJSParkSMLeeJ, et al.Resting-state beta and gamma activity in internet addiction. Int J Psychophysiol. 2013;89(3):328–333. doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2013.06.007
46.
LeeJHwangJYParkSM, et al.Differential resting-state EEG patterns associated with comorbid depression in internet addiction. Prog Neuro-Psychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2014;50:21–26. doi:10.1016/j.pnpbp.2013.11.016
47.
JacksonDCMuellerCJDolskiI, et al.Now you feel it, now you don’t: frontal brain electrical asymmetry and individual differences in emotion regulation. Psychol Sci. 2003;14(6):612–617. doi:10.1046/j.0956-7976.2003.psci_1473.x
48.
GoodmanRNRietschelJCLoLCCostanzoMEHatfieldBD. Stress, emotion regulation and cognitive performance: the predictive contributions of trait and state relative frontal EEG alpha asymmetry. Int J Psychophysiol. 2013;87(2):115–123. doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2012.09.008
49.
Tortella-FeliuMMorillas-RomeroABalleMLlabrésJBornasXPutmanP. Spontaneous EEG activity and spontaneous emotion regulation. Int J Psychophysiol. 2014;94(3):365–372. doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2014.09.003
50.
CoanJAAllenJJB. Frontal EEG asymmetry as a moderator and mediator of emotion. Biol Psychol. 2004;67(1-2):7–50. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2004.03.002
51.
MathersulDWilliamsLMHopkinsonPJKempAH. Investigating models of affect: relationships among EEG alpha asymmetry, depression, and anxiety. Emotion. 2008;8(4):560–572. doi:10.1037/a0012811
52.
MikolajczakMBodarwéKLaloyauxOHansenneMNelisD. Association between frontal EEG asymmetries and emotional intelligence among adults. Pers Individ Dif. 2010;48(2):177–181. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2009.10.001
53.
WangYLuJGuCHuB. Mapping the frontal alpha asymmetry indicators of habitual emotion regulation: a data-driven approach. Neuroreport. 2018;29(15):1288–1292. doi:10.1097/WNR.0000000000001109
54.
YoungKS. Internet addiction: symptoms, evaluation, and treatment. In: Thomas J, Leon V, eds. Innovations in Clinical Practice. Professional Resource Press; 1996.
55.
BeckATSteerRABrownG. Manual for the Beck Depression Inventory-II. Psychological Corporation; 1996.
56.
ShekDTL. Reliability and factorial structure of the Chinese version of the state-trait anxiety inventory. J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 1988;10(4):303–317. doi:10.1007/BF00960624
57.
YaoRLiangL. Analysis of the application of simplified NEO-FFI to undergraduates. Chinese J Clin Psychol. 2010;18(4):457–459.
58.
HardieETeeMY. Excessive internet use: the role of personality, loneliness and social support networks in internet addiction. Aust J Emerg Technol Soc. 2007;5(1):34–47.
59.
LangPJBradleyMMCuthbertBN. International affective picture system (IAPS): affective ratings of pictures and instruction manual. University of Florida; 2008.
60.
KurdiBLozanoSBanajiMR. Introducing the open affective standardized image Set (OASIS). Behav Res Methods. 2017;49(2):457–470. doi:10.3758/s13428-016-0715-3
61.
FaulFErdfelderELangA-GBuchnerA. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods.. 2007;39(2):175–191. doi:10.3758/BF03193146
62.
DelormeAMakeigS. EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. J Neurosci Methods. 2004;134(1):9–21. doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009
63.
KlugMGramannK. Identifying key factors for improving ICA-based decomposition of EEG data in mobile and stationary experiments. Eur J Neurosci. 2020(August):1–15. doi:10.1111/ejn.14992
64.
ZhangJHuaYXiuLOeiTPHuP. Resting state frontal alpha asymmetry predicts emotion regulation difficulties in impulse control.Pers Individ Dif. 2020;159(November):109870. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2020.109870
GordonEPalmerDMCooperN. EEG alpha asymmetry in schizophrenia, depression, PTSD, panic disorder, ADHD and conduct disorder. Clin EEG Neurosci. 2010;41(4):178–183. doi:10.1177/155005941004100404
67.
SheppesGLevinZ. Emotion regulation choice: selecting between cognitive regulation strategies to control emotion. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013;7(Apr 2013):1–4. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00179
68.
BillieuxJ. Problematic use of the internet and self-regulation: a review of the initial studies. Open Addict J. 2012;5(1):24–29. doi:10.2174/1874941001205010024
69.
SheppesGMeiranN. Better late than never? On the dynamics of online regulation of sadness using distraction and cognitive reappraisal. Personal Soc Psychol Bull. 2007;33(11):1518–1532. doi:10.1177/0146167207305537
70.
GrossJJJohnOP. Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003;85(2):348–362. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.348
71.
LiangLZhuMDaiJLiMZhengY. The mediating roles of emotional regulation on negative emotion and internet addiction among Chinese adolescents from a development perspective. Front Psychiatry. 2021;12(April):1–9. doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2021.608317
72.
DrymanMTHeimbergRG. Emotion regulation in social anxiety and depression: a systematic review of expressive suppression and cognitive reappraisal. Clin Psychol Rev. 2018;65(February):17–42. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2018.07.004
73.
EhringTTuschen-CaffierBSchnülleJFischerSGrossJJ. Emotion regulation and vulnerability to depression: spontaneous versus instructed use of emotion suppression and reappraisal. Emotion. 2010;10(4):563–572. doi:10.1037/a0019010
74.
AldaoANolen-HoeksemaSSchweizerS. Emotion-regulation strategies across psychopathology: a meta-analytic review. Clin Psychol Rev. 2010;30(2):217–237. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2009.11.004
75.
ShafirRGuarinoTLeeIASheppesG. Emotion regulation choice in an evaluative context: the moderating role of self-esteem. Cogn Emot. 2017;31(8):1725–1732. doi:10.1080/02699931.2016.1252723
76.
BonannoGAPapaALalandeKWestphalMCoifmanK. The importance of being flexible: the ability to both enhance and suppress emotional expression predicts long-term adjustment. Psychol Sci. 2004;15(7):482–487. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00705.x
77.
BlackhartGCMinnixJAKlineJP. Can EEG asymmetry patterns predict future development of anxiety and depression? A preliminary study. Biol Psychol. 2006;72(1):46–50. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2005.06.010
78.
ZhangJHuaYXiuLOeiTPHuP. Resting state frontal alpha asymmetry predicts emotion regulation difficulties in impulse control. Pers Individ Dif. 2020;159(November):109870. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2020.109870
79.
KlimeschWSausengPHanslmayrS. EEG alpha oscillations: the inhibition-timing hypothesis. Brain Res Rev. 2007;53(1):63–88. doi:10.1016/j.brainresrev.2006.06.003
80.
SausengPKlimeschWDoppelmayrMPecherstorferTFreunbergerRHanslmayrS. EEG alpha synchronization and functional coupling during top-down processing in a working memory task. Hum Brain Mapp. 2005;26(2):148–155. doi:10.1002/hbm.20150
81.
AvramJBalteşFRMicleaMMiuAC. Frontal EEG activation asymmetry reflects cognitive biases in anxiety: evidence from an emotional face Stroop task. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2010;35(4):285–292. doi:10.1007/s10484-010-9138-6
82.
ChoiDSekiyaTMinoteNWatanukiS. Relative left frontal activity in reappraisal and suppression of negative emotion: evidence from frontal alpha asymmetry (FAA). Int J Psychophysiol. 2016;109:37–44. doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2016.09.018
83.
GrünewaldBDGreimelETrinklMBartlingJGroßheinrichNSchulte-KörneG. Resting frontal EEG asymmetry patterns in adolescents with and without major depression. Biol Psychol. 2018;132:212–216. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2018.01.003
84.
WangYShangguanCGuCHuB. Individual differences in negative emotion differentiation predict resting-state spontaneous emotional regulatory processes. Front Psychol. 2020;11(November):1–10. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.576119
85.
TsaiJKLuWHHsiaoRCHuHFYenCF. Relationship between difficulty in emotion regulation and internet addiction in college students: a one-year prospective study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(13):1–11. doi:10.3390/ijerph17134766
86.
PeckhamADJohnsonSL. Cognitive control training for emotion-related impulsivity. Behav Res Ther. 2018;105(March):17–26. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2018.03.009
87.
LakeSLStanfordMSPattonJH. Emotional processing and frontal asymmetry in impulsive aggressive individuals. Pers Individ Dif. 2014;70(January):131–135. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.06.025
YoungKS. Psychology of computer use: XL. Addictive use of the internet: a case that breaks the stereotype. Psychol Rep. 1996:79(3):899–902. doi:10.2466/pr0.1996.79.3.899.
90.
BeardKWWolfEM. Modification in the proposed diagnostic criteria for internet addiction. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2001;4(3):377–383. doi:10.1089/109493101300210286
91.
YenJYYehYCWangPWLiuTLChenYYKoCH. Emotional regulation in young adults with internet gaming disorder. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(1):1–11. doi:10.3390/ijerph15010030
92.
ZsidoANAratoNLangALabadiBStecinaDBandiSA. The connection and background mechanisms of social fears and problematic social networking site use: a structural equation modeling analysis. Psychiatry Res. 2020;292(February):113323. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113323
93.
BrandMLaierCYoungKS. Internet addiction: coping styles, expectancies, and treatment implications. Front Psychol. 2014;5(Nov):1–14. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01256
