Background: Functional (un-)coupling (task-related change of functional connectivity) between different sites of the brain is a mechanism of general importance for cognitive processes. In Alzheimer's disease (AD), prior research identified diminished cortical connectivity as a hallmark of the disease. However, little is known about the relation between the amount of functional (un-)coupling and cognitive performance and decline in AD. Method: Cognitive performance (based on CERAD-Plus scores) and electroencephalogram (EEG)-based functional (un-)coupling measures (connectivity changes from rest to a Face-Name-Encoding task) were assessed in 135 AD patients (age: M = 73.8 years; SD = 9.0). Of these, 68 patients (M = 73.9 years; SD = 8.9) participated in a follow-up assessment of their cognitive performance 1.5 years later. Results: The amounts of functional (un-)coupling in left anterior-posterior and homotopic interhemispheric connections in beta1-band were related to cognitive performance at baseline (β = .340; p < .001; β = .274; P = .001, respectively). For both markers, a higher amount of functional coupling was associated with better cognitive performance. Both markers also were significant predictors for cognitive decline. However, while patients with greater functional coupling in left anterior-posterior connections declined less in cognitive performance (β = .329; P = .035) those with greater functional coupling in interhemispheric connections declined more (β = −.402; P = .010). Conclusion: These findings suggest an important role of functional coupling mechanisms in left anterior–posterior and interhemispheric connections in AD. Especially the complex relationship with cognitive decline in AD patients might be an interesting aspect for future studies.
BresslerSL. Large-scale cortical networks and cognition. Brain Res Rev. 1995;20(3):288-304. doi:10.1016/0165-0173(94)00016-I
4.
BresslerSLMenonV. Large-scale brain networks in cognition: emerging methods and principles. Trends Cogn Sci. 2010;14(6):277-290. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2010.04.004
5.
BabiloniCLizioRMarzanoN, et al.Brain neural synchronization and functional coupling in Alzheimer's Disease as revealed by resting state EEG rhythms. Int J Psychophysiol. 2016;103May 2016:88-102. doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2015.02.008
6.
RossiniPMRossiSBabiloniCPolichJ. Clinical neurophysiology of aging brain: from normal aging to neurodegeneration. Prog Neurobiol. 2007;83(6):375-400. doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2007.07.010
JellesBScheltensPvan der FlierWMJonkmanEJda SilvaFHStamCJ. Global dynamical analysis of the EEG in Alzheimer’s disease: frequency-specific changes of functional interactions. Clin Neurophysiol. 2008;119(4):837-841. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2007.12.002
10.
KoenigTPrichepLDierksT, et al.Decreased EEG synchronization in Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment. Neurobiol Aging. 2005;26(2):165-171. doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2004.03.008
11.
LeeSHParkYMKimDWImCH. Global synchronization index as a biological correlate of cognitive decline in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurosci Res. 2010;66(4):333-339. doi:10.1016/j.neures.2009.12.004
12.
ParkYMCheHJImCHJungHTBaeSMLeeSH. Decreased EEG synchronization and its correlation with symptom severity in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurosci Res. 2008;62(2):112-117. doi:10.1016/j.neures.2008.06.009
13.
StamCJMontezTJonesBF, et al.Disturbed fluctuations of resting state EEG synchronization in Alzheimer’s disease. Clin Neurophysiol. 2005;116(3):708-715. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2004.09.022
14.
KoelewijnLBompasATalesA, et al.Alzheimer’s disease disrupts alpha and beta-band resting-state oscillatory network connectivity. Clin Neurophysiol. 2017;128(11):2347-2357. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2017.04.018
15.
JeongJ. EEG Dynamics in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Clin Neurophysiol. 2004;115(7):1490-1505. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2004.01.001
16.
ShawJC. An introduction to the coherence function and its use in EEG signal analysis. J Med Eng Rechn. 1981;5(6):279-288.
BowyerSM. Coherence a measure of the brain networks: past and present. Neuropsychiatr Electrophysiol. 2016;2(1):1. doi:10.1186/s40810-015-0015-7
19.
SausengPKlimeschWSchabusMDoppelmayrM. Fronto-parietal EEG coherence in theta and upper alpha reflect central executive functions of working memory. Int J Psychophysiol. 2005;57(2):97-103. doi:10.1016/J.IJPSYCHO.2005.03.018
20.
WeissSRappelsbergerP. Long-range EEG synchronization during word encoding correlates with successful memory performance. Cogn Brain Res. 2000;9(3):299-312. doi:10.1016/S0926-6410(00)00011-2
21.
BabiloniCCarducciFVecchioF, et al.Functional frontoparietal connectivity during short-term memory as revealed by high-resolution EEG coherence analysis. Behav Neurosci. 2004;118(4):687-697. doi:10.1037/0735-7044.118.4.687
22.
BuskJGalbraithGC. Eeg correlates of visual-motor. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1975;38(4):415-422.
23.
SausengPKlimeschWDoppelmayrMHanslmayrSSchabusMGruberWR. Theta coupling in the human electroencephalogram during a working memory task. Neurosci Lett. 2004;354(2):123-126. doi:10.1016/J.NEULET.2003.10.002
24.
BasharpoorSHeidariFMolaviP. EEG Coherence in theta, alpha, and beta bands in frontal regions and executive functions. Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2019;28(3):310-317. doi:10.1080/23279095.2019.1632860
25.
WadaYNanbuYKikuchiMKoshinoYHashimotoTYamaguchiN. Abnormal functional connectivity in Alzheimer’s disease: intrahemispheric EEG coherence during rest and photic stimulation. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1998;248(4):203-208. doi:10.1007/s004060050038
26.
JelicVJulinPShigetaM, et al.Apolipoprotein E ε4 allele decreases functional connectivity in Alzheimer’s disease as measured by EEG coherence. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1997;63(1):59-65. doi:10.1136/jnnp.63.1.59
27.
BabiloniCFrisoniGVecchioF, et al.Global functional coupling of resting EEG rhythms is abnormal in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease: a multicenter EEG study. J Psychophysiol. 2009;23(4):224-234. doi:10.1027/0269-8803.23.4.224
28.
SankariZAdeliHAdeliA. Intrahemispheric, interhemispheric, and distal EEG coherence in Alzheimer’s disease. Clin Neurophysiol. 2011;122(5):897-906. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2010.09.008
29.
DunkinJJOsatoSLeuchterAF. Relationships between EEG coherence and neuropsychological tests in dementia. Clin EEG Neurosci. 1995;26(1):47-59. doi:10.1177/155005949502600107
30.
ChenJLiuCPengC-KFuhJ-LHouFYangAC. Topological reorganization of EEG functional network is associated with the severity and cognitive impairment in Alzheimer’s disease. Phys A. 2019;513:588-597. doi:10.1016/J.PHYSA.2018.09.043
31.
VecchioFMiragliaFQuarantaD, et al.Cortical connectivity and memory performance in cognitive decline: a study via graph theory from EEG data. Neuroscience. 2016;316:143-150. doi:10.1016/J.NEUROSCIENCE.2015.12.036
32.
ComiGCFornaraCLocatelliT, et al.EEG Coherence in Alzheimer and multi-infarct dementia. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 1998;26(Supplement 1):91-98. doi:10.1016/s0167-4943(98)80016-2
33.
BabiloniCFerriRBinettiG, et al.Fronto-parietal coupling of brain rhythms in mild cognitive impairment: a multicentric EEG study. Brain Res Bull. 2006;69(1):63-73. doi:10.1016/j.brainresbull.2005.10.013
34.
DubovikSBouzerda-WahlenANahumLGoldGSchniderAGuggisbergAG. Adaptive reorganization of cortical networks in Alzheimer’s disease. Clin Neurophysiol. 2013;124(1):35-43. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2012.05.028
35.
BabiloniCFerriRMorettiDV, et al.Abnormal fronto-parietal coupling of brain rhythms in mild Alzheimer’s disease: a multicentric EEG study. Eur J Neurosci. 2004;19(9):2583-2590. doi:10.1111/j.0953-816X.2004.03333.x
36.
DunkinJJLeuchterAFNewtonTFCookIA. Reduced EEG coherence in dementia: state or trait marker?Biol Psychiatry. 1994;35(11):870-879. doi:10.1016/0006-3223(94)90023-X
37.
LeuchterAFDunkinJJLufkinRBAnzaiYCookIANewtonTF. Effect of white matter disease on functional connections in the aging brain. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1994;57(11):1347-1354. doi:10.1136/jnnp.57.11.1347
38.
LeuchterAFNewtonTFCookIAWalterDORosenberg-ThompsonSLachenbruchPA. Changes in brain functional connectivity in Alzheimer-type and multi-infarct dementia. Brain. 1992;115(5):1543-1561. doi:10.1093/brain/115.5.1543
39.
DelbeuckXvan der LindenMColletteF. Alzheimer’s Disease as a disconnection syndrome?Neuropsychol Rev. 2003;13(2):79-92. doi:10.1023/A:1023832305702
40.
BadhwarAPTamADansereauCOrbanPHoffstaedterFBellecP. Resting-state network dysfunction in Alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Alzheimers Dement. 2017;8:73-85. doi:10.1016/J.DADM.2017.03.007
41.
TzimourtaKDChristouVTzallasAT, et al.Machine learning algorithms and statistical approaches for Alzheimer’s disease analysis based on resting-state EEG recordings: a systematic review. Int J Neural Syst.2021;31(5). doi:10.1142/S0129065721300023
42.
KrienenFMThomas YeoBTBucknerRL. Reconfigurable task-dependent functional coupling modes cluster around a core functional architecture. Philos Trans R Soc B. 2014;369(1653). doi:10.1098/rstb.2013.0526
43.
ColeMWItoTCocuzzaCSanchez-RomeroR. The functional relevance of task-state functional connectivity. J Neurosci. 2021;41(12):2684-2702. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1713-20.2021
44.
EltonAGaoW. Task-positive functional connectivity of the default mode network transcends task domain. J Cogn Neurosci. 2015;27(12):2369-2381. doi:10.1162/JOCN_A_00859
WirsichJRidleyBBessonP, et al.Complementary contributions of concurrent EEG and fMRI connectivity for predicting structural connectivity. Neuroimage. 2017;161:251-260. doi:10.1016/J.NEUROIMAGE.2017.08.055
47.
BaşarEGüntekinBTülayEYenerGG. Evoked and event related coherence of Alzheimer patients manifest differentiation of sensory-cognitive networks. Brain Res. 2010;1357:79-90. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2010.08.054
48.
DiXGohelSKimEHBiswalBB. Task versus rest-different network configurations between the coactivation and the resting-state brain networks. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013;7(SEP):1-9. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00493
49.
ChorlianDBRangaswamyMPorjeszB. EEG Coherence: topography and frequency structure. Exp Brain Res. 2009;198(1):59-83. doi:10.1007/s00221-009-1936-9
50.
PijnenburgYALVd MadeYVan Cappellen Van WalsumAMKnolDLScheltensPStamCJ. EEG Synchronization likelihood in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease during a working memory task. Clin Neurophysiol. 2004;115(6):1332-1339. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2003.12.029
51.
van der HieleKVeinAAReijntjesRHAM, et al.EEG Correlates in the spectrum of cognitive decline. Clin Neurophysiol. 2007;118(9):1931-1939. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2007.05.070
HidasiZCziglerBSalaczPCsibriÉMolnárM. Changes of EEG spectra and coherence following performance in a cognitive task in Alzheimer’s disease. Int J Psychophysiol. 2007;65(3):252-260. doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2007.05.002
54.
StevensAKircherTNickolaMBartelsMRosellenNWormstallH. Dynamic regulation of EEG power and coherence is lost early and globally in probable DAT. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2001;251(5):199-204. doi:10.1007/s004060170027
55.
BenkeTDelazerMSaninG, et al.Cognition, gender, and functional abilities in Alzheimer’s disease : how are they related?J Alzheimer's Dis. 2013;35(2):247-252. doi:10.3233/JAD-122383
56.
SeilerSSchmidtHLechnerA, et al.Driving cessation and dementia: results of the prospective registry on dementia in Austria (PRODEM). PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e52710. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0052710
57.
McKhannGDrachmanDFolsteinMKatzmanRPriceDStadlanEM. Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: report of the NINCDS-ADRDA Work Group under the auspices of department of health and human services task force on Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology. 1984;34(7):939-944. doi:10.1212/WNL.34.7.939
FolsteinMFFolsteinSEMcHughPR. Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12(3):189-198. doi:10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6
60.
YesavageJABrinkTLRoseTL, et al.Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: a preliminary report. J Psychiatr Res. 1982;17(1):37-49. doi:10.1016/0022-3956(82)90033-4
61.
AebiC. Validierung der neuropsychologischen Testbatterie CERAD-NP: Eine Multi-Center Studie. Dissertation. 2003. doi:10.5451/unibas-002728525
62.
BerresMMonschAUBernasconiFThalmannBStähelinHB. Normal ranges of neuropsychological tests for the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. Stud Heal Technol Informatics Med Infobahn Eur - Proc MIE2000 GMDS2000. 2000;77:195-199. doi:10.3233/978-1-60750-921-9-195
63.
MorrisJCHeymanAMohsRC, et al.The consortium to establish a registry for Alzheimer’s disease neuropathology. Part I. Clinical and neuropsychological assessment of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology. 1989;39(April 1988):1159-1165. doi:10.1212/WNL.39.9.1159
64.
ChandlerMJLacritzLHHynanLS, et al.A total score for the CERAD neuropsychological battery. Neurology. 2005;65(1):102-106. doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000167607.63000.38
65.
JasperHH. The Ten-twenty electrode system of the international federation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1958;10:371-375.
66.
GarnHWaserMDeistlerM, et al.Quantitative EEG in Alzheimer’s disease: cognitive state, resting state and association with disease severity. Int J Psychophysiol. 2014;93(3):390-397. doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2014.06.003
67.
WaserMGarnH. Removing cardiac interference from the electroencephalogram using a modified Pan-Tompkins algorithm and linear regression. Conference Proceedings: Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual Conference. Vol. 2013. IEEE; 2013:2028-2031. doi:10.1109/EMBC.2013.6609929
BrillingerDR. Time series: data analysis and theory. 1981.
70.
WaserM. Changes of EEG synchrony in the course of Alzheimer’s disease - Markers based on the multivariate spectral density. Doctoral dissertation. 2013.
71.
HoganMJSwanwickGRJKaiserJRowanMLawlorB. Memory-related EEG power and coherence reductions in mild Alzheimer’s disease. Int J Psychophysiol. 2003;49(2):147-163. doi:10.1016/S0167-8760(03)00118-1
72.
ScholzSSchneiderSRoseM. Differential effects of ongoing EEG beta and theta power on memory formation. PLoS One. 2017;12(2):1-18. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0171913
73.
CaplanJBGlaholtMG. The roles of EEG oscillations in learning relational information. Neuroimage. 2007;38(3):604-616. doi:10.1016/J.NEUROIMAGE.2007.07.054
74.
StokićMMilovanovićDLjubisavljevićMRNenadovićVČukićM. Memory load effect in auditory–verbal short-term memory task: eEG fractal and spectral analysis. Exp Brain Res. 2015;233(10):3023-3038. doi:10.1007/s00221-015-4372-z
75.
SternY. What is cognitive reserve? Theory and research application of the reserve concept. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2002;8(3):448-460. doi:10.1017/S1355617702813248
76.
SternY. Cognitive reserve in ageing and Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet Neurol. 2012;11(11):1006-1012. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70191-6
77.
AnsadoJCollinsLJoubertS, et al.Interhemispheric coupling improves the brain’s ability to perform low cognitive demand tasks in Alzheimer’s disease and high cognitive demand tasks in normal aging. Neuropsychology. 2013;27(4):464-480. doi:10.1037/a0032854
78.
CabezaR. Hemispheric asymmetry reduction in older adults: the HAROLD model. Psychol Aging. 2002;17(1):85-100. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.17.1.85
79.
FestiniSBZahodneLReuter-LorenzPAFestiniSBZahodneLReuter-LorenzPA. Theoretical perspectives on Age differences in brain activation: HAROLD, PASA, CRUNCH—How Do they STAC Up?Oxford Res Encycl Psychol. 2018:1-24. doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780190236557.013.400
80.
GradyCLMcIntoshARBeigSKeightleyMLBurianHBlackSE. Evidence from functional neuroimaging of a compensatory prefrontal network in Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurosci. 2003;23(3):986-993. doi:10.1523/jneurosci.23-03-00986.2003
81.
ParkDCReuter-LorenzP. The adaptive brain: aging and neurocognitive scaffolding. Annu Rev Psychol. 2009;60(1):173-196. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093656
82.
Reuter-LorenzPACappellKA. Neurocognitive aging and the compensation hypothesis. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2008;17(3):177-182. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00570.x
83.
HanounehSAminHUSaadNMMalikAS. EEG Power and functional connectivity correlates with semantic long-term memory retrieval. IEEE Access. 2018;6:8695-8703. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2788859
84.
MauritsNMScheeringaRVan Der HoevenJHDe JongR. EEG coherence obtained from an auditory oddball task increases with age. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2006;23(5):395-403. doi:10.1097/01.WNP.0000219410.97922.4E
