Objectives. Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a common and potentially lethal disorder affecting up to 14% of all persons worldwide. However, one-third to thwo-thirds of patients are nonresponders to first-line therapy. Even the electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) as the option of choice in therapy-resistant MDD still shows a high proportion of nonresponders. In case of a predicted nonresponse to ECT, for example, by means of electrophysiological electroencephalogram (EEG) parameters, other therapies of MDD (eg, augmentation, polypharmacy etc) could be chosen. Methods. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed 2-minute resting state EEGs from patients with MDD who underwent ECT (6-12 sessions with 3 sessions per week) between 2006 and 2015 at the University Hospital of Zurich. Following several lines of evidence, we hypothesized altered linear EEG connectivity within the alpha band being predictive for treatment outcome. We used a network-based statistics (NBS) approach to compare connectivity measures between responders and nonresponders. Source estimates and connectivity measures were mapped using low-resolution brain tomography (LORETA). As the main outcome parameter served the retrospectively assessed efficacy index (CGI-E) from the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) rating scale. Results. Responders in comparison with non-responders showed a significant lower linear lagged connectivity in widespread cortical areas within the EEG alpha 2 band. Additionally, there were strong correlations between CGI ratings and connectivity strength mainly within frontal cortices. Conclusions. Pretreatment EEG-connectivity within the alpha 2 band has a predictive value for the efficacy of ECT treatment.
BrometEAndradeLHHwangI, et al. Cross-national epidemiology of DSM-IV major depressive episode. BMC Med. 2011;26:90. doi:10.1186/1741-7015-9-90.
2.
DienerCKuehnerCBrusniakWUblBWessaMFlorH.A meta-analysis of neurofunctional imaging studies of emotion and cognition in major depression. Neuroimage. 2012;61:677-685.
3.
KaiserRHAndrews-HannaJRWagerTDPizzagalliDA.Large-scale network dysfunction in major depressive disorder: a meta-analysis of resting-state functional connectivity. JAMA Psychiatry. 2015;72:603-611. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2015.0071.
4.
World Health Organization. mhGAP intervention guide for mental, neurological and substance use disorders in non-specialized health settings. 2010. http://www.thehealthwell.info/node/69810. Accessed March 2018.
5.
KoenigAMThaseME.First-line pharmacotherapies for depression—what is the best choice?Pol Arch Med Wewn. 2009;119:478-486.
HusainMMRushARFinkM, et al. Speed of response and remission in major depressive disorder with acute electroconvulsive therapy (ECT): a Consortium for Research in ECT (CORE) report. J Clin Psychiatry. 2004;65:485-491
PizzagalliDAOakesTRFoxAS, et al. Functional but not structural subgenual prefrontal cortex abnormalities in melancholia. J Mol Psychiatry. 2004;9:393-405.
13.
PhillipsMLDrevetsWCRauchSLLaneR.Neurobiology of emotion perception I: the neural basis of normal emotion perception. Biol Psychiatry. 2003;54:504-514.
14.
MiskovicVSchmidtLA.Cross-regional cortical synchronization during affective image viewing. Brain Res. 2010;1362:102-111.
15.
OlbrichSTränknerAChittkaTHegerlUSchönknechtP.Functional connectivity in major depression: increased phase synchronization between frontal cortical EEG-source estimates. Psychiatry Res. 2014;222:91-99. doi:10.1016/j.pscychresns.2014.02.010.
16.
FingelkurtsAAFingelkurtsAARytsäläHSuominenKIsometsäEKähkönenS.Impaired functional connectivity at EEG alpha and theta frequency bands in major depression. Hum Brain Mapp. 2007;28:247-261. doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20275.
17.
LeeTWWuTYYuWYChenMCChenTJ.The implication of functional connectivity strength in predicting treatment response of major depressive disorder: a resting EEG study. Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging. 2011;194:372-377.
18.
IsegerTAMayureshSKorgaonkarJ, et al. EEG Connectivity between the subgenual anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortices in response to antidepressant medication. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2017;27:301-312. doi:10.1016/j.euroneuro.2017.02.002.
19.
BusnerJTargumSD.The Clinical Global Impressions Scale. Psychiatry (Edgmont). 2007;4(7):28-37.
20.
JouRJHandenBLHardanAY.Retrospective assessment of atomoxetine in children and adolescents with pervasive developmental disorders. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2005;15:325-330. doi:10.1089/cap.2005.15.325.
21.
BeckATWardCHMendelsonMMockJErbaughJ.An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1961;4:561-571.
22.
Pascual-MarquiRD.Instantaneous and lagged measurements of linear and nonlinear dependence between groups of multivariate time series: frequency decomposition. 2007. ArXiv e-print 0711.1455. http://arxiv.org/abs/0711.1455. Accessed January 2018
23.
HenriquesJBDavidsonRJ.Regional brain electrical asymmetries discriminate between previously depressed and healthy control subjects. J Abnorm Psychol. 1990;99:22-31.
TenkeCEKayserJ.Reference-free quantification of EEG spectra: combining current source density (CSD) and frequency principal components analysis (fPCA). Clin Neurophysiol. 2005;116:2826-2846. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2005.08.007.
26.
KlimeschWDoppelmayrMSchimkeHPachingerT.Alpha frequency, reaction time, and the speed of processing information. J Clin Neurophysiol. 1996;13:511-518.
27.
ZaleskyAFornitoABullmoreET.Network-based statistic: identifying differences in brain networks. Neuroimage. 2010;53:1197-1207. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.06.041.
28.
DebenerSBeauducelANesslerDBrockeDHeilemannHKayserJ.Is resting anterior EEG alpha asymmetry a trait marker for depression? Findings for healthy adults and clinically depressed patients. Neuropsychobiology. 2000;41:31-37. doi.org/26630.
29.
SegraveRACooperNRThomsonRHCroftRJSheppardDMFitzgeraldPB.Individualized alpha activity and frontal asymmetry in major depression. Clin EEG Neurosci. 2011;42:45-52.
30.
BegićDPopović-KnapićVGrubišinJ, et al. Quantitative electroencephalography in schizophrenia and depression. Psychia Danub. 2011;23:355362.
31.
JaworskaNBlierPFuseeWKnottV.The temporal electrocortical profile of emotive facial processing in depressed males and females and healthy controls. J Affect Disord. 2012;136:1072-1081. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2011.10.047.
32.
RoemerRAShagassCDubinWJaffeRSiegalL.Quantitative EEG in elderly depressives. Brain Topogr. 1992;4:285-290.
33.
Knorring vonLPerrisCGoldsteinLKemaliDMonakhovKVaccaL. Intercorrelations between different computer-based measures of the EEG alpha amplitude and its variability over time and their validity in differentiating healthy volunteers from depressed patients. Adv Biol Psychiatry. 1982;13:172181.
34.
JohnER.The role of quantitative EEG topographic mapping or ‘neurometrics’ in the diagnosis of psychiatric and neurological disorders: the pros. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1989;73:2-4. doi:10.1016/0013-4694(89)90013-8.
35.
PrichepLSJohnER.QEEG profiles of psychiatric disorders. Brain Topogr. 1992;4:249-257. doi:10.1007/BF01135562.
36.
HegerlUWilkKOlbrichSSchoenknechtPSanderC.Hyperstable regulation of vigilance in patients with major depressive disorder. World J Biol Psychiatry. 2012;13:436-446. doi:10.3109/15622975.2011.579164.
37.
OlbrichSSanderCMinkwitzJ, et al. EEG vigilance regulation patterns and their discriminative power to separate patients with major depression from healthy controls. Neuropsychobiology. 2012;65:188-194. doi:10.1159/000337000.
38.
LieberAL. Diagnosis and subtyping of depressive disorders by quantitative electroencephalography: I. Discriminant analysis of selected variables in untreated depressives. Hillside J Clin Psychiatry. 1988;10:71-83.
39.
LieberAL. Diagnosis and subtyping of depressive disorders by quantitative electroencephalography: II. Interhemispheric measures are abnormal in major depressives and frequency analysis may discriminate certain subtypes. Hillside J Clin Psychiatry. 1988;10:84-97.
40.
O’ConnorKPShawJCOngleyCO.The EEG and differential diagnosis in psychogeriatrics. Br J Psychiatry. 1979;135:156-162.
41.
KnottVMahoneyCKennedySEvansK.EEG power, frequency, asymmetry and coherence in male depression. Psychiatry Res. 2001;106:123-140.
42.
SunYLiYZhuYChenXTongS.Electroencephalographic differences between depressed and control subjects: an aspect of interdependence analysis. Brain Res Bull. 2008;76:559-564. doi:10.1016/j.brainresbull.2008.05.001.
43.
WhittonAEDeccySIronsideMLKumarPBeltzerMPizzagalliDA.Electroencephalography source functional connectivity reveals abnormal high-frequency communication among large-scale functional networks in depression. Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2018;3:50-58. doi:10.1016/j.bpsc.2017.07.001.
44.
OlbrichSArnsM.EEG Biomarkers in major depressive disorder: discriminative power and prediction of treatment response. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2013;25:604-618. doi:10.3109/09540261.2013.816269.
45.
JeongHGKoYHHanCKimYKJoeSH.Distinguishing quantitative electroencephalogram findings between adjustment disorder and major depressive disorder. Psychiatry Investig. 2013;10:62-68. doi:10.4306/pi.2013.10.1.62.
46.
RedlichROpelNGrotegerdD, et al. Prediction of individual response to electroconvulsive therapy via machine learning on structural magnetic resonance imaging data. JAMA Psychiatry. 2016;73:557-564. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.0316.
47.
Gudayol-FerréEPeró-CebolleroMGonzález-GarridoAAGuàrdia-OlmosJ.Changes in brain connectivity related to the treatment of depression measured through fMRI: a systematic review. Front Hum Neurosci. 2015;3:582. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2015.00582.
48.
ArgyelanMLenczTKalioraS, et al. Subgenual cingulate cortical activity predicts the efficacy of electroconvulsive therapy. Transl Psychiatry. 2016;6:e789. doi:10.1038/tp.2016.54.
49.
KrystalADWestMPradoRGreensideHZoldiSWeinerRD.EEG effects of ECT: implications for RTMS. Depress Anxiety. 2000;12:157-165. doi:10.1002/1520-6394(2000)12:3<157::AID-DA7>3.0.CO;2-R.
50.
RiedelMMöllerHJObermeierM, et al. Response and remission criteria in major depression—a validation of current practice. J Psychiatr Res. 2010;44:1063-1068. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2010.03.006.
