Hypothesis driven research has been shown to be an excellent model for pursuing investigations in neuroscience. The Human Genome Project demonstrated the added value of discovery research, especially in areas where large amounts of data are produced. Neuroscience has become a data rich field, and one that would be enhanced by incorporating the discovery approach. Databases, as well as analytical, modeling and simulation tools, will have to be developed, and they will need to be interoperable and federated.
This paper presents an overview of the development of the field of neuroscience databases and associate tools: Neuroinformatics. The primary focus is on the impact of NIH funding of this process. The important issues of data sharing, as viewed from the perspective of the scientist and private and public funding organizations, are discussed. Neuroinformatics will provide more than just a sophisticated array of information technologies to help scientists understand and integrate nervous system data. It will make available powerful models of neural functions and facilitate discovery, hypothesis formulation and electronic collaboration.
HuertaMFKoslowSHLeshnerAIThe Human Brain Project: An international resource. Trends Neuroscience1993;16:436–438.
2.
FosterI.Data grids. In: KoslowSHSubramaniamS, (eds). Databasing the Brain: From Data to Knowledge (Neuroinformatics). Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2004: 99–109.
3.
HeintzN.Gene expression nervous system atlas (GENSAT). Nature Neuroscience2004;7:483.
4.
MartoneMGuptaAEllismanMHE-Neuroscience: Challenges and triumphs in integrating distributed data from molecules to brain. Nature Neuroscience2004;7:467–472.
5.
Van HornJDGraftonSTRockmoreDGazzanigaMSSharing neuroimaging studies of human cognition. Nature Neuroscience2004;7:473–481 (http://www.fmridc.org).
6.
PostleBRBergerJSTaichAMD'EspositoM.Activity in human frontal cortex associated with spatial working memory and saccadic behavior. J Cogn Neurosci2000;12(2):2–14.
7.
GreiciusMDSrivastavaGReissALMenonV.Default-mode network activity distinguishes Alzheimer's disease from healthy aging: Evidence from functional MRI. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA2004;101:4637–4642.
8.
CarlsonTASchraterPHeS.Patterns of activity in the categorical representations of objects. J Cogn Neurosci2003;15:704–717.
9.
MechelliAPriceCJNoppeneyUFristonKJA dynamic causal modeling study on category effects: Bottom-up or top-down mediation?J Cogn Neurosci2003;15:925–934.
HirschMDKoslowSHThe Human Brain Project: Accelerating the new age of scientific discovery via neuroinformatics research. TINS (submitted 2005).
14.
FialaJCHarrisKMExtending unbiased stereology of brain ultrastructure to three-dimensional volumes. J Am Med Inform Assoc2001;8(1):1–16.
15.
MartoneMEGuptaAWongMQianXSosinskyGLudaescherBEllismanMHA cell centered database for electron tomographic data. J Struct Biology2002;138:145–155.
16.
SamsonvichAAscoliG.Statistical morphological analysis of hippocampal principal neurons indicates selective repulsion of dendrites from their own cell. J Neurosci Res2003;71:173–187.
17.
ConnollyMTCapraJAWilliamsRWInformatics center for mouse genomics: The dissection of complex traits of the nervous system. Neuroinformatics2003; 1.327–342.
KerwinJScottMSharpeJPuellesLRobsonSCMartinez-de-la-TorreMThree dimensional modelling of early human brain development using optical projection tomography. BMC Neuroscience2004;5:27.
20.
GardnerD.Neurodatabase.org: networking the microelectrode. Nat Neurosci2004;7: 486–487.
21.
GardnerDKnuthKHAbatoMErdeSMWhiteTDeBellisRGardnerEPCommon data model for neuroscience data and data model exchange. J Am Med Inform Assoc2001;8:17–33.
22.
ShepherdGMMirskyJSHealyMDSingerMSSkoufosEHinesMSThe Human Brain Project: Neuroinformatics tools for integrating, searching and modeling multidisciplinary neuroscience data. Trends Neurosci1998;21:460–468.
23.
PittendrighSJacobsGANeurosys: A semi-structured laboratory database. Neuroinformatics2003;1:167–176.
24.
JacobsGAPittendrighCSPredicting emergent properties of neuronal ensembles a database of individual neurons. AscoliG, (ed). Computational Neuroanatomy. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press; 2002: 151–170.
25.
MarinGLetelierJCHennyPSentisEFarfánGFredesFSpatial organization of the tecto-rotundal pathway of the pigeon: Tiling of large RF tectal cells to construct global RFs in RT. J Comp Neurology2003;458:361–380.
26.
MajorDELibedinskyCRodmanHKartenHJThe pattern of retinal projections in the California ground squirrels (Spermophilius beecheyi): an anterograde tracing study using cholera toxin. J Comp Neurology2003;463(3): 317–340.
27.
MazziottaJCTogaAWEvansACFoxPTLancasterJZillesKA probabilistic atlas and reference system for the human brain. J Royal Society2000;356:1293–1322.
28.
MegaMSChenSThompsonPMWoodsRPKaracaTJTiwariAMapping pathology to metabolism: Co registration of stained whole brain sections to PET in Alzheimer's disease. NeuroImage1997;5:147–153.
29.
MegaMSChuTMazziottaJCTrivediKHThompsonPMShahAMapping biochemistry to metabolism: FDG-PET and beta-amyloid burden in Alzheimer's disease. NeuroReport1999;10:2911–2917.
30.
CannonTDThompsonPMvan ErpTTogaAWPoutanenV-PHuttunenMCortex mapping reveals heteromodal gray matter deficits in monozygotic twins discordant for schizophrenia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA2001;99:3228–3233.
31.
DinovIDMegaMSThompsonPMLeLWoodsRPHolmesCJAnalyzing functional brain images in a probabilistic atlas: A validation of sub-volume thresholding. J Comput Assist Tomogr2000;24:128–138.
32.
Van EssenDCDruryHADicksonJHarwellJHanlonDAndersonCHAn integrated software suite for surface-based analyses of cerebral cortex. J Am Med Inform Assoc2001;8:443–459.
33.
Van EssenDCSurface-based atlases of cerebellar cortex in human, macaque, and mouse. In: HighsteinSMThachT (eds). New Directions in Cerebellar Research. Ann NY Acad Sci2002;978: 468–479.
34.
MoriSKaufmannWEDavatzikosCStieltjesBAmodeLFredericksenKImaging cortical association tracts in the human brain using diffusion-tensor-based axonal tracking. Magn Reson Med2002;47:215–223.
35.
BullmoreEFadiliJBreakspearMSalvadorRSucklingJBrammerM.Wavelets and statistical analysis of functional magnetic resonance images of the human brain. Stat Meth Med Res2003;12:375–399.
36.
HerskovitsEHMegalooikonomouVDavatzikosCChenABryanRNGerringJP. Is the spatial distribution of brain lesions associated with closed-head injury predictive of subsequent development of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder?Radiology1999;213(2): 389–394.
37.
KennedyDNHaselgroveCMcInerneyS.MRI-based morphometric of typical and atypical brain development. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev2003;9:155–160.
38.
KimbergDFissellKTseytlinECunninghamDCarterCSSchneiderWCohenJDFiswidgets: A graphical computing environment for neuroimaging analysis. Neuroinformatics2003;1:111–125.
39.
StrotherSCLangeNAndersonJRSchaperKARehmKHansenLKRottenbergDAActivation pattern reproducibility: Measuring the effects of group size and data analysis models. Human Brain Map1997;5:312–316.
40.
StrotherSCRehmKLangeNAndersonJRSchaperKAHansenLKRottenbergDAMeasuring activation pattern reproducibility using resampling techniques. In: CarsonREDaube-WitherspoonMEHerscovitchP, (eds). Quantitative Functional Brain Imaging with Positron Emission Tomography. San Diego: Academic Press; 1998: 241–245.
41.
NgYRShiffmanSBrosnanTJLinksJMBeachLSJudgeNSBrainImage: A Java-based framework for interoperability in neuroscience, with specific application to neuroimaging. J Am Med Inform Assoc2001;8:431–42.
42.
ShenDHerskovitsEHDavatzikosC.An adaptive-focus statistical shape model for segmentation and shape modeling of 3D brain structures. IEEE Trans Med Imaging2001;20:257–270.
43.
SmithKJajodiaSSwarupVHamiltonGHoytJFaatzDCornettT.Enabling the sharing of neuroimaging data through well-defined intermediate levels of visibility. Neuroimage2004;22:1646–1656.
44.
TheunissenFEDavidSVSinghNCHsuAVinjeWGallantJLEstimating spatio-temporal receptive fields of auditory and visual neurons from their responses to natural stimuli. Network Comp Neural Syst2001;12:1–28.
PardoJVLeeJTSheikhSAMunchKRCarlisJVLewisSMWhere the brain grows old. Nature2004. In press.
50.
BrinkleyJFRosseC.Imaging informatics and the human brain project: the role of structure. Yearbook of Medical Informatics. Stuttgart, Germany: Schattauer Publ Co.; 2002: 111–128.
51.
SmalheiserNRSwansonDRUsing Arrowsmith: A computer-assisted approach to formulating and assessing scientific hypothesis. Comp Meth Progr Biomed1998;57:149–153.
DelormeAMakeigSEEGLAB: An open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. J Neurosci Meth2004;134:9–21.
54.
GordonE.Integrative neuroscience: The role of a standardized database. Clin EEG Neurosci2005;2:64–75.
55.
PechuraCMMartinJBMapping the Brain and Its Functions: Integrating Enabling Technologies Into Neuroscience Research. Washington, D.C.; National Academy Press; 1991.
56.
KoslowSHHirschMDCelebrating a decade of neuroscience databases. Neuroinformatic2004;2:267–269.
57.
ChicurelM.Databasing the brain. Nature2000;406:822–825.
58.
Whose scans are they, anyway?Nature2000; 406, 443.
59.
Sharing Publication-Related Data and Materials.Responsibilities of Authorship in the Life Science. Committee on Responsibilities of Authorship in the Biological Sciences. Board on Life Sciences. Washington D.C.: National Research Council of the National Academies, National Academy Press; 2003.
60.
InselTRVolkowNDLiT-KBatteyJFJr.LandisSCNeuroscience networks data-sharing in an information age. PLoS Biology2003;1:009–011.
61.
Editorial.Mapping the mouse brain. Nature Neuroscience2004;6:1113.
62.
InselTRVolkowNDLandisSCLiT-KBatteyJFJr.SievingP.Limits to growth: Why neuroscience needs large scale science. Nature Neurosci2004;7:426–427.
63.
KoslowSHSharing primary data: A threat or asset to discovery?Nature Rev Neuroscience2002;3:311–313.
BegleyB.Anxious for cures, grant givers turn more demanding. Wall Street Journal; September 29, 2004.
68.
GardnerDTogaAWAscoliGABeattyJBrinkleyJFDaleAMTowards effective and rewarding data sharing. J Neuroinformatics2003; 1; 289–295.
69.
Report on Neuroinformatics from The Global Science Forum Neuroinformatics Working Group of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. June 2002http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/58/34/1946728.pdf.
70.
ArzbergerPSchroederPBeaulieuABowkerGCaseyKLaaksonenLAn international framework to promote access to data. Science2004;303:1777–1778.
71.
Science, Technology, and Innovation for the 21st Century. Paris: Meeting of the OECD Committee for Science and Technological Policy at Ministerial Level; January 29–30, 2004; Final communiqué, Annex 1. Declaration on Access to Research Data from Public Funding. http://www.oecd.org/document/15/0,2340;en_21571361_21590465_25998799_1_1_1_1,00.html.
