During the age of above-ground nuclear weapons testing, the effect of vegetation on radiation energy deposition in soil was computationally too challenging to study. Today, improvements in high-performance computing, mature and accurate radiation transport models, and user-friendly optimization and statistical analysis software packages enable investigations into modeling and quantifying the impact of forest vegetation on the prompt gamma-ray energy deposition within the soil from an atmospheric nuclear weapon detonation. Our approach simulates radiation transport, amasses results, and statistically analyzes the results using CUBIT®, Dakota, and MCNP® to perform meshing, geometry creation, and radiation transport. Depending on the forest parameters, there is 0.16% --1.3% change in photon energy deposition in the soil. This research successfully demonstrates a methodology for streamlining a complex radiation modeling effort across multiple codes to quantify and answer a nuclear weapons effects question.
PontonJMaagCBarrettMF, et al. Operation tumbler-snapper 1952. Technical report no. DNA 6019F, 14June1982. Washington, DC: Defense Nuclear Agency.
2.
PontonJMaagC.Shots Able, Baker, Charlie, and Dog: the first tests of the Tumbler-Snapper Series, 1 April–1 May 1952. Technical report no. DNA 6020F, 15June1982. Washington, DC: Defense Nuclear Agency.
3.
PontonJMassieJMaagC, et al. Operation Upshot-Knothole 1953. Technical report no. DNA 6014F, 11January1982. Washington, DC: Defense Nuclear Agency.
4.
MassieJMaagCRohrerS, et al. Shots encore to climax: the final four tests of the Upshot-Knothole Series, 8 May–4 June 1953. Technical report no. DNA 6018F, 15January1982. Washington, DC: Defense Nuclear Agency.
5.
MartinEJRowlandRH.Castle series 1954. Technical report no. DNA 6035F, 1April1982. Washington, DC: Defense Nuclear Agency.
6.
FonsWLStoreyTG.Operation castle: pacific proving grounds, March–May 1954, project 3.3 Blast effects on tree stand. Technical report no. WT-921, 1March1965. Washington, DC: Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Division of Fire Research.
ReislerREEthridgeNHGiglio-TosTLBlast measurements from a 50-ton hemispherical TNT detonation in a coniferous forest (Operation Distant Plain, Event 4). Technical report no. BRL-MR-1898, 1January1968. Aberdeen, MD: Army Ballistic Research Lab, Aberdeen Proving Ground.
9.
LehrD.Misty picture event, test execution report. Project Officer’s Report, report no. DNA-POR-7186, 30November1987. Kirtland Air Force Base, NM: Defense Nuclear Agency, New Mexico Operations Office, Test Directorate, HE Simulation Division.
10.
SauerJ. Misers gold, test execution report. Project Officer’s Report, report no. DNA-POR-7351, 1June1990. Kirtland Air Force Base, NM: Defense Nuclear Agency, New Mexico Operations Office, Test Directorate, HE Simulation Division.
11.
PetesJMillerRMcMullanFUser’s guide and history of ANFO (Ammonium Nitrate/Fuel Oil) as a nuclear weapons effect simulation explosive. Technical report no. DNA-TR-82-156, 31March1983. Washington, DC: Defense Nuclear Agency.
12.
KerrJWBuckCCClineWE, et al. (U) Nuclear weapons effects in a forest environment–Thermal and fire. The Technical Cooperation Program, Panel N-2. July1971. Washington, DC: DoD Nuclear Information and Analysis Center, Defense Nuclear Agency.
13.
GlasstoneSDolanPJ.The effects of nuclear weapons. Washington, DC: Department of Defense & Department of Energy, 1977.
14.
MorelloMR.Estimating disruption fires from a nuclear weapon detonation using fire following earthquake methodology. September2014. Wright-Patterson AFB, OH: Air Force Institute of Technology.
15.
Nevada Operations Office, United States Department of Energy. United States Nuclear Tests, July1945 through September1992, 2000.
16.
IngramJK.Operation distant plain, events 1, 2A, 3, 4, and 5: project 3.02A, earth motion and stress measurements. US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS, 1May1971.
AdamsBM, et al. Dakota: a multilevel parallel object-oriented framework for design optimization, parameter estimation, uncertainty quantification, and sensitivity analysis–Version 6.15 user’s manual. Technical report no. SAND2020-12495, November2021. Albuquerque, NM: Sandia National Laboratories.
20.
ShippCELaflerKP.Proficiency in JMP® Visualization. SAS Global Forum 2012: Reporting and Information Visualization, Paper 227-2012. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc., 2012.
21.
SAS Institute, Inc. Discovering JMP® 16. 2020–2021. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.
AhrensJGeveciBLawC. ParaView®: an end-user tool for large data visualization. In: HansenCJohnsonC (eds) Visualization Handbook. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2005, pp. 717–731.
24.
McConnRJJr, et al. Radiation portal monitor project: compendium of material composition data for radiation transport modeling. Technical report no. PNNL-15870 Rev. 1, 4March2011. Alexandria, VA: Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.
25.
WhiteSWHolmesRL.Standardized unclassified little boy and fat man outputs. Technical report no. DTRA-IR-13-67, September2013. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Threat Reduction Agency.
26.
National Wildfire Coordinating Group (NWCG). Canopy fuel characteristics, 7July2021.
27.
AndersenHEMcGaugheyRJReutebuchSE.Estimating forest canopy fuel parameters using LIDAR data. Remote Sens Environ2005; 94: 441–449.
PettersenRCRowellRM.The chemistry of solid wood. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society, 1984.
30.
HubbellJHSeltzerSM. Tables of X-ray mass attenuation coefficients and mass energy-absorption coefficients (version 1.4). 2004. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology. http://physics.nist.gov/xaamdi
31.
BergerM, et al. XCOM: Photon cross section database (Version 1.5). Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2010. http://physics.nist.gov/xcom
32.
WilksSS.Determination of sample sizes for setting tolerance limits. Ann Math Stat1941; 12: 91–96. doi:10.1214/aoms/1177731788
33.
ScottJHReinhardtED. Assessing crown fire potential by linking models of surface and crown fire behavior. Research report no. RMRS-RP-29. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, 2001.
