Simulation-based training (SBT) has a positive effect on learning. The aim of this study was to examine perceived learning of a command and control (C2) team in a Swedish naval exercise conducted in two settings (low and high fidelity). The participants were part of the permanent C2 team onboard a vessel in the Navy and could maintain their ordinary roles during the SBT. A within-group design was used whereby the C2 team first took part in the low-fidelity setting followed by the high-fidelity setting. The questionnaires used in this study were developed based on the learning objectives for the exercise, and questions were asked as statements. The results indicate that SBT may constitute a learning opportunity. The conclusion of the research highlights the same learning effects in a low-fidelity setting.
SalasERosenMAHeldJD, et al. Performance measurement in simulation-based training: a review and best practices. Simul Gaming2009; 40: 328–376.
5.
Angelborg-ThanderzM.Prisvärd militär flygning med rimliga risker. Dissertation, Stockholm School of Economics Institute for Research, Stockholm, 1990.
6.
BellBBillingtonSBennettW, et al. Performance gains from speech-enhanced simulation in military flying training. J Defense Model Simul2010; 7: 67–87.
7.
VillafainaSFuentes-GarcíaJPGusiN, et al. Psychophysiological response of military pilots in different combat flight maneuvers in a flight simulator. Physiol Behav2021; 238: 113483.
8.
SotomayorTMarajCMottJ, et al. Humeral head intraosseous access: filling the military training gap. J Defense Model Simul2017; 14: 361–369.
9.
AbildgrenLLebahn-HadidiMMogensenCB, et al. The effectiveness of improving healthcare teams’ human factor skills using simulation-based training: a systematic review. Adv Simul2022; 7: 12.
10.
FeronHLehmannAJosseF.A generic architecture and validation considerations for tactical combat casualty care serious games. J Defense Model Simul2015; 12: 319–334.
11.
ThobenKnoke BK-D. Training simulators for manufacturing processes: literature review and systematisation of applicability factors. Comput Appl Eng Educ2021; 29: 1191–1207.
12.
NyirendaCPhiriSKawimbeB.Simulation based training in basic life support for medical and non-medical personnel in resource limited settings. Int J Anesth Clin Med2020; 8: 42–46.
13.
ÖrenTI.Uses of simulation. In: SokolowskJABanksCM (eds) Principles of Modeling and Simulation: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2009, pp. 160, 280.
14.
BillingsDR.Efficacy of adaptive feedback strategies in simulation-based training. Mil Psychol2012; 24: 114–133.
15.
MoroneyWFLilienthalMC.Human factors in simulation and training: an overview. In: VincenziDAWiseJAMoulouaM, et al. (eds) Human Factors in Simulation and Training. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2009, pp. 3–38.
16.
ThompsonTNCarrollMBDeatonJE. Justification for use of simulation. In: VincenziDAWiseJAMoulouaM, et al. (eds) Human Factors in Simulation and Training. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2009, pp. 39–48.
17.
LiuDBlickensderferELMacchiarellaND, et al. Transfer of training. In: VincenziDAWiseJAMoulouaM, et al. (eds) Human Factors in Simulation and Training. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2009, p. 49.
18.
BouaichaSEpprechtSJentzschT, et al. Three days of training with a low-fidelity arthroscopy triangulation simulator box improves task performance in a virtual reality high-fidelity virtual knee arthroscopy simulator. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc2020; 28: 862–868.
19.
NeubauerCKhooshabehPCampbellJ.When less is more: studying the role of functional fidelity in a low fidelity mixed-reality tank simulator. Adv Intell Syst Comput2018; 591: 220–229.
PrytzEJonsonC-ORybingJ.Current state of exercise research. Karlstad: The Civil Contingencies Agency, 2017 (in Swedish).
24.
KolbDA.Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1984.
25.
MorrisTH.Experiential learning—a systematic review and revision of Kolb’s model. Interact Learn Environ2020; 28: 1064–1077.
26.
MoonJA.A handbook of reflective and experiential learning theory and practice. Abingdon: Routledge, 2004.
27.
NählinderSBerggrenPSvenssonE.Reoccurring LISREL patterns describing mental workload, situation awareness and performance. Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc Annu Meet2004; 48: 2485–2488.
28.
Swedish Armed Forces. Damage Control Warship (SJÖGK9202102). Stockholm: Swedish Armed Forces, 2019.
29.
KayesABKayesDCKolbDA.Experiential learning in teams. Simul Gaming2005; 36: 330–354.
30.
NilssonH.Demand for rapid and accurate regional medical response at major incidents. Medical Dissertation No. 1350, Linköping University, Linköping, 2012.
31.
NilssonHVikströmTRüterA.Quality control in disaster medicine training—initial regional medical command and control as an example. Am J Disaster Med2010; 5: 35–40.
32.
NilssonHJonsonCOVikströmT, et al. Simulation-assisted burn disaster planning. Burns2013; 39: 1122–1130.
33.
NilssonAÅslundKLampiM, et al. Improved and sustained triage skills in firemen after a short training intervention. Scand J Trauma Resus Emerg Med2015; 23: 1–6.
34.
RüterAVikstromT.Improved staff procedure skills lead to improved management skills: an observational study in an educational setting. Prehosp Disaster Med2009; 24: 376–379.
35.
Swedish Armed Forces. Technical, economic objective for training Materials (TEMU): training facility in fire protection and related ship training. Stockholm: Swedish Armed Forces, 2012.
36.
SvenssonERencrantzCMarklundJ, et al. Empirical studies of command and control centres at the Swedish Air Force. In: BerggrenPNählinderSSvenssonE (eds) Assessing Command and Control Effectiveness. Dealing with a Changing World. Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2014, pp. 103–125.
37.
SvenssonERencrantzCLindoffJ, et al. Dynamic measures for performance assessment in complex environments. Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc Annu Meet2006; 50: 2585–2589.
38.
NottegarMGauthierTPakianathanS, et al. Royal Canadian navy—fighting the internal battle with a battle damage control system and embedded kill cards. In: Conference Proceedings of INEC, Glasgow, 2–4October2018.
39.
Swedish Armed Forces. Swedish navy recoverability guide. H SKM 2020. FM2019-695:5. Stockholm: Swedish Armed Forces, 2020.
