We analyze the concept of multiple unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) on a shared tether (MUST), where the UAVs act as control nodes for the shape of the tether, enabling the system to maneuver around obstacles without tangling or colliding for increased flexibility compared with single-tethered UAVs. MUST use cases are gathered from stakeholders in the military, public safety, and commercial domains. We present a model for the tether shape to use in collision checking and a model for the interactions among tether weight, size, and power, which we exercise to determine the maximum tether segment sizes. We apply three probabilistic path-planning algorithms from the literature to MUSTs, using a novel local planner and constraint set. In simulation, we show that probabilistic planners are a feasible approach to path planning for MUSTs with curved tether segments. We also show the first manual piloting modality of MUSTs.
WalendziukWOldziejDSlowikM. Power supply system analysis for tethered drones application. In: 2020 international conference mechatronic systems and materials (MSM), Bialystok, 1–3 July 2020, pp. 1–6. New York: IEEE.
2.
VishnevskyVMTereschenkoBTumchenokDA, et al. Principles of building a power transmission system for tethered unmanned telecommunication platforms. In: International conference on distributed computer and communication networks, Moscow, 14–18 September 2019, pp. 94–110. New York: Springer.
3.
KosarnovskyBArogetiS. A string of tethered drones-system dynamics and control. In: 2019 European conference on mobile robots (ECMR), Prague, 4–6 September 2019, pp. 1–6. New York: IEEE.
4.
KyonoYYonezawaTNozakiH, et al. EverCopter: continuous and adaptive over-the-air sensing with detachable wired flying objects. In: Proceedings of the 2013 ACM conference on Pervasive and ubiquitous computing adjunct publication (UbiComp ’13 Adjunct). 2019, pp. 299–302. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.
5.
FagianoL. Systems of tethered multicopters: modeling and control design. IFAC-PapersOnLine2017; 50(1): 4610–4615.
6.
ClariziaG. Co-design optimization of a tethered multi drone system. Ph.D. Dissertation, Politecnico di Milano, Milano, 2018.
7.
BologniniMFagianoL. Lidar-based navigation of tethered drone formations in an unknown environment. IFAC-PapersOnLine2020; 53: 9426–9431.
8.
TognonMFranchiA. Nonlinear observer for the control of bi-tethered multi aerial robots. In: 2015 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS), Hamburg, 28 September–2 October 2015, pp. 1852–1857. New York: IEEE.
9.
KosarnovskyBArogetiS. Geometric and constrained control for a string of tethered drones. Robot Autonom Syst2020; 133: 103609.
10.
JainKPKotaruPde SaM, et al. Tethered power supply for quadcopters: architecture, analysis and experiments. arXiv, 2022, https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.08180
11.
TalkeKADe OliveiraMBewleyT. Catenary tether shape analysis for a UAVUSV team. In: 2018 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS), Madrid, 1–5 October 2018. New York: IEEE.
12.
PapachristosCTzesA. The power-tethered UAV-UGV team: a collaborative strategy for navigation in partially-mapped environments. In: 22nd mediterranean conference on control and automation, Palermo, 16–19 June 2014, pp. 1153–1158. New York: IEEE.
13.
XiaoXDufekJSuhailM, et al. Motion planning for a UAV with a straight or kinked tether. In: 2018 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS), Madrid, 1–5 October 2018, pp. 8486–8492. New York: IEEE.
14.
Martínez-RozasSAlejoDCaballeroF, et al. Optimization-based trajectory planning for tethered aerial robots. In: 2021 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), Xi’an, China, 30 May–5 June 2021, pp. 362–368. New York: IEEE.
15.
CarusoMGallinaPSerianiS. On the modelling of tethered mobile robots as redundant manipulators. Robotics2021; 10(2): 81.
16.
D’AndreaR. Can drones deliver?IEEE Trans Automat Sci Eng2014; 11(3): 647–648.
17.
ZhangJCampbellJFSweeneyDC, et al. Energy consumption models for delivery drones: a comparison and assessment. Transp Res Part D: Transp Environ2021; 90: 1026682021.
18.
BiczyskiMSehabRWhidborneJF, et al. Multirotor sizing methodology with flight time estimation. J Adv Transp2020; 2020: 9689604.
19.
DorlingKHeinrichsJMessierGG, et al. Vehicle routing problems for drone delivery. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybernet Syst2016; 47(1): 70–85.
20.
LiuZSenguptaRKurzhanskiyA. A power consumption model for multi-rotor small unmanned aircraft systems. In: 2017 international conference on unmanned aircraft systems (ICUAS), Miami, FL, 13–16 June 2017, pp. 310–315. New York: IEEE.
21.
MulgaonkarYWhitzerMMorganB, et al. Power and weight considerations in small, agile quadrotors. In: Micro-and nanotechnology sensors, systems, and applications VI, Vol. 9083, 2014, Baltimore, MD. Bellingham: International Society for Optics and Photonics.
22.
XuJ. Design perspectives on delivery drones. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2017.
ChangKHHungSK. Design and implementation of a tether-powered hexacopter for long endurance missions. Appl Sci2021; 11(24): 11887.
25.
AbdillaARichardsABurrowS. Power and endurance modelling of battery-powered rotorcraft. In: 2015 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS), Hamburg, 28 September–2 October 2015, pp. 675–680. New York: IEEE.
26.
VishnevskyVShirvanyanA. Calculation of the power required to operate a tethered unmanned airborne platform in gust conditions. J Phys Conf Ser2021; 2091(1): 012035.
Aktaş. Up to 2 kW power transfer system for tether powered unmanned aerial vehicles to provide long flight time. Ph.D. Dissertation, Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara, 2019.
30.
SavnikP. Tether control for unmanned aerial vehicle: creating a platform for tether control of UAV. Master’s Thesis, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, 2015.
MartinGE. The foundations of geometry and the non-Euclidean plane. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1998.
34.
LaValleSM. Planning algorithms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press2006.
35.
KavrakiLESvestkaPLatombeJC, et al. Probabilistic roadmaps for path planning in high-dimensional configuration spaces. IEEE Trans Robot Autom1996; 12(4): 566–580.
36.
DijkstraEW. A note on two problems in connexion with graphs. Numerische Mathematic1959; 1(1): 269–271.
37.
LaValleSMKuffnerJJJr. Randomized kinodynamic planning. Int J Robot Res2001; 20(5): 378–400.
38.
MashayekhiRIdrisMYIAnisiMH, et al. Informed RRT*-connect: an asymptotically optimal single-query path planning method. IEEE Access2020; 8: 19842–19852.
39.
GammellJDSrinivasaSSBarfootTD. Batch informed trees (BIT*): sampling-based optimal planning via the heuristically guided search of implicit random geometric graphs. In: 2015 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), Seattle, WA, 26–30 May 2015, pp. 3067–3074. New York: IEEE.
40.
KuffnerJJLaValleSM. RRT-Connect: an efficient approach to single-query path planning. In: Proceedings 2000 ICRA millennium conference. IEEE international conference on robotics and automation. Symposia proceedings (Cat. No. 00CH37065), Vol. 2, San Francisco, CA, 24–28 April 2000, pp. 995–1001. New York: IEEE.
41.
GammellJDBarfootTDSrinivasaSS. Batch informed trees (BIT*): informed asymptotically optimal anytime search. Int J Robot Res2020; 39(5): 543–567.
42.
TutsoyOBarkanaDEBalikciK. A novel exploration-exploitation-based adaptive law for intelligent model-free control approaches. IEEE Trans Cybernet2021; 53: 329–337.
43.
ŞucanIAMollMKavrakiLE. The open motion planning library. IEEE Robot Autom Magazine2012; 19(4): 72–82.
