Preliminary debris risk assessment for mega-constellations in low and medium earth orbit due to satellite breakup

Abstract

This paper presents a theoretical analysis of the potential risk posed by artificial debris clouds in low Earth orbit (LEO) from mega-constellations, modeled after current communication constellations such as Starlink and OneWeb with 750 satellites each. The analysis examines three different constellation designs: a low-altitude LEO, a high-altitude LEO, and a medium Earth orbit (MEO) constellation, which will be positioned using the Walker-Delta design. The study is based on physics-based digital mission engineering and a Monte Carlo simulation framework. The simulation involves debris generated from a single breakup of one randomly selected satellite per run, but does not consider cascading debris events. This debris cloud is propagated for 1 week and how it interacts with the mega-constellation is recorded. The results show an average of 705.65 potential conjunctions within the LEO constellation, with 14.40% of those being considered catastrophic, and an average of 165.5 conjunctions in the MEO constellation, with 0.72% considered catastrophic.

Keywords

Debris mega-constellation survivability OneWeb Starlink

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Vansen

. Mega constellations: commercial small satellite constellation in low earth orbit. In: Joint air space power conference, Essen, 8–10 December 2020, pp. 23–29. Kalkar: Joint Air Power Competence Centre.

Jones

. China to begin constructing its own megaconstellation later this year, SpaceNews, 2023. https://spacenews.com/china-to-begin-constructing-its-own-megaconstellation-later-this-year/#:∼:text=China%20is%20developing%20its%20plans,Starlink%20and%20other%20Western%20ventures.

Liou

Johnson

. Space debris environment: evolution and characterization. Adv Space Res 2012; 50: 729–741.

Liou

Johnson

. Size distribution and orbit evolution of space debris population in low earth orbit. Adv Space Res 2008; 42: 971–982.

Horvath

Wiegand

. Characterization of the size distribution of space debris objects. Adv Space Res 2010; 46: 957–964.

Phillip

. History of on-orbit satellite fragmentations, 15th ed. Houston, TX: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 2018

Buehler

. Utilizing supercomputing to analyze risks of an emergent large-scale debris field in low earth orbit. Technical Report, Air Force Institute of Technology, Wright-Patterson AFB, OH, 23 March 2018.

Liou

. Modeling the evolution of orbital debris clouds. J Guid Control Dyn 1996; 19: 443–452.

Boley

. Satellite mega-constellations create risks in low earth orbit, the atmosphere and on earth. Sci Rep 2021; 11: 10642.

10.

Olivieri

Francesconi

. Large constellations assessment and optimization in LEO space debris environment. Adv Space Res 2020; 65: 351–363. doi: 10.1016/j.asr.2019.09.048

11.

Vallado

. Fundamentals of astrodynamics and applications. 4th ed. New York: Springer, 2013.

12.

Schaub

Junkins

. Chapter: 11. In: Schaub Junkins (eds) Analytical mechanics of space systems. 2nd ed. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2009, pp. 389–427.

13.

Cimmino

. Tuning of NASA standard breakup model for fragmentation events modelling. Aerospace 2021; 8: 185.

14.

Hejduk

Johnson

. Evaluating probability of collision (Pc) uncertainty. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 2016, https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20160005313/downloads/20160005313.pdf

15.

Hong

Lee

, et al. Design of a micro-satellite constellation for communication. Acta Astronaut 2011; 82: 54–59.