The paper sets out the results of an experiment carried out using MASA SWORD simulator to verify the use of the unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) reconnaissance model during battalion force protection activities. The authors focus particularly on the first phase of the battle—enemy approaching and early reconnaissance. The reconnaissance was planned using the UAV reconnaissance model which is part of the Tactical Decision Support System (TDSS). The aim of the experiment is to verify the possibilities of using the UAV reconnaissance model for battalion-size unit force protection and to compare this model with ordinarily used tactical procedures. The experiment proves the hypothesis defined in the introduction and quantifies some defined variables. Based on the result of the experiment, it is possible to state that UAV reconnaissance has significant impact on the effectiveness of the military mission. Moreover, the simulation environment opens a wide range of possibilities for future research including multiple simulations of the scenario, comparison of achieved results in dependence on the set conditions and variable settings, tailoring tactics for the scenario at hand, and so on.
U.S. Department of the Army. Operations: ADP 3-0. 2nd ed.Washington, DC: HQ Department of the Army, 2016.
2.
PalasiewiczTZáleskýJ. Modelling of the force protection process automation in military engineering. In: MazalJ (ed.) Modelling and simulation for autonomous systems. Cham: Springer, 2019, pp. 599–613.
3.
DrozdJStodolaPKřišťálováD, et al. Experiments with the UAS reconnaissance model in the real environment. In: MazalJ (ed.) Modelling and simulation for autonomous systems, vol. 10756. Cham: Springer, 2018, pp. 340–349.
4.
DrozdJNeubauerJ. Use of an aerial reconnaissance model during the movement of oversized loads. J Def Model Simul2020; 17: 447–456.
5.
StodolaPMazalJ. Tactical decision support system to aid commanders in their decision-making. In: MazalJ (ed.) Modelling and simulation for autonomous systems, vol. 9991. Cham: Springer, 2016, pp. 396–406.
Hošková-MayerováŠTalhoferVOtřísalP, et al. Influence of weights of geographical factors on the results of multicriteria analysis in solving spatial analyses. ISPRS Int J Geo-Inf2020; 9: 489.
HrdinaJVašíkPProcházkaJ, et al. The weighted core of games based on tactical decisions. In: MazalJ (ed.) Modelling and simulation for autonomous systems, vol. 11995. Cham: Springer, 2020, pp. 244–252.
10.
MooreRQuinnMMorrisonJ. A tactical decision support system based on naturalistic cognitive processes. Proc Hum Fact Ergon Soc Ann Meet1996; 40: 868.
11.
FrantišPHodickýJ. Virtual reality in presentation layer of C3I system. In: Proceedings of the international congress on modelling and simulation: advances and applications for management and decision making (MODSIM), 2005, pp. 3045–3050, https://mssanz.org.au/modsim05/papers/frantis.pdf
12.
FrantišPHodickýJ.Human machine interface in command and control system. In: Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE international conference on virtual environments, human-computer interfaces and measurement systems (VECIMS), Taranto, 6–8 September 2010, vol. 5609345, pp. 38–41. New York: IEEE.
13.
StodolaP. Improvement in the model of cooperative aerial reconnaissance used in the tactical decision support system. J Def Model Simul2017; 14: 483–492.
14.
MuratoreMSilvestriniRTChungTH. Simulation analysis of UAV and ground teams for surveillance and interdiction. J Def Model Simul2014; 11: 125–135.
15.
WangZLiuLLongT, et al. Multi-UAV reconnaissance task allocation for heterogeneous targets using an opposition-based genetic algorithm with double-chromosome encoding. Chin J Aeronaut2018; 31: 339–350.
16.
ShamesIFidanBAndersonBDO. Close target reconnaissance using autonomous UAV formations. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on decision and control, Cancún, Mexico, 9–11 December 2008, pp. 1729–1734. New York: IEEE.
17.
SteczWGromadaK. UAV mission planning with SAR application. Sensors2020; 20: 1080.
18.
MyersDBattaRKarwanM. A real-time network approach for including obstacles and flight dynamics in UAV route planning. J Def Model Simul2016; 13: 291–306.
YuXLiCZhouJ. A constrained differential evolution algorithm to solve UAV path planning in disaster scenarios. Knowl Based Syst2020; 204: 106209.
21.
WuYLowKHLvC. Cooperative path planning for heterogeneous unmanned vehicles in a search-and-track mission aiming at an underwater target. IEEE Trans Veh Technol2020; 69: 6782–6787.
22.
SpyridisYLagkasTSarigiannidisP, et al. Modelling and simulation of a new cooperative algorithm for UAV swarm coordination in mobile RF target tracking. Simul Model Pract Theor2021; 107: 102232.
23.
SekelovaMKorbaPHovanecM, et al. Options of measuring the work performance of the air traffic controller. In: Proceedings of the transport means 2018, Trakai, 3–5 October 2018, pp. 1476–1481. Kaunas: Kaunas University of Technology.
24.
DringušAMadarászLOravecM, et al. Concept of situational control in road tunnels. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international symposium on logistics and industrial informatics, Smolenice, 5–7 September 2012, pp. 113–120. New York: IEEE.
25.
SinayJPacaiovaHOravecM. Present state of machinery safety assessment. In: Proceedings of the annals of DAAAM and proceedings of the international DAAAM symposium, Opatija, 2005, pp. 347–348. Gale Academic OneFile, link.gale.com/apps/doc/A176688420/AONE?u=anon~b2aec581&sid=googleScholar&xid=bb6778dd
26.
TillmanFALieCHHwangCL. Simulation model of mission effectiveness for military systems. IEEE Trans Reliab1978; R-27: 191–194.
27.
ZhaoXMaoSZhouF. Research on effectiveness evaluation of the mission-critical system. In: Proceedings of the international conference on measurement, information and control, Harbin, China, 16–18 August 2013, pp. 869–873. New York: IEEE.
28.
HodickýJFrantišP. Using simulation for prediction of units movements in case of communication failure. Int J Electron Commun Eng2011; 5: 801–803.
29.
CaronJFongVBrionV. On the use of simulation and optimization for mission modules selection in a maritime context. Milit Oper Res2019; 24: 41–56.
30.
HernandezAMcDonaldMOuelletJ. Post wargame experimentation and analysis: re-examining executed computer-assisted wargames for new insights. Milit Oper Res2015; 20: 19–37.
