Simulation models provide useful tools to support decision-making in military workforce planning and management context. This paper presents a literature review of the applications of three most common simulation-based modeling methods in the field of military workforce planning and management: system dynamics, agent-based modeling, and discrete-event simulation. The review consolidates the current state of using these methods in the subject area and also provides a reader with a structured approach to navigation through the subject domain. Findings from this literature review shed light on the research gaps, and potential directions for future research. We present common themes and insights from the review, along with our recommendations for future research. These recommendations are consistent with rigorous research principles and good modeling practices.
EdwardsJS. A survey of manpower planning models and their application. J Opl Res Soc1983; 34: 1031–1040.
2.
BrailsfordSCDesaiSMVianaJ. Towards the holy grail: combining system dynamics and discrete-event simulation in healthcare. In: Proceedings of the winter simulation conference, (eds JohanssonBJainSMontoya-TorresJet al.), Marriott Waterfront Hotel, Baltimore, MD, 5–8 December 2010, pp.2293–2303. IEEE Conference Publications.
3.
BrailsfordSCDesaiSMVianaJ. Towards the holy grail: combining system dynamics and discrete-event simulation in healthcare. In: Proceedings of the 2010 winter simulation conference, pp.2293–2303. IEEE Publishing.
4.
HesterPTTolkA. Applying methods of the M&S spectrum for complex systems engineering, In: Proceedings of the 2010 spring simulation multi-conference, Article No.75, pp.1–8. Society for Computer Simulation International.
5.
JajoNK. The trade-off between DES and SD in modelling military manpower. J MSL Online Publication5, pp.369–376, Epub ahead of print 4February2015. DOI: 10.5267/j.msl.2015.2.002, Growing Science Ltd., Online Referencing, www.GrowingScience.com/msl (accessed 23 May 2016).
6.
PurkissC. Corporate manpower planning: a review of models. Eur J Opl Res1981; 8: 315–323.
7.
GassSI. Military manpower planning models. Computers Ops Res1991; 18: 65–73
8.
WangJ. A review of operations research applications in workforce planning and potential modelling of military training, DSTO-TR-1688, Land Operations Division Systems Sciences Laboratory, Defence Science and Technology Group, 2005.
9.
CoyleRG. System dynamics applied to Defense analysis: A literature survey. Defence Anal J1996, Online Referencing, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07430179608405690 (accessed 25 September 2016).
10.
BelienJForceH. Supply chain management of blood products: A literature review. Eur J Opl Res2011; 217: 1–16.
11.
CardoenBDemeulemeesterEBelienJ. Operating room planning and scheduling: A literature review. Eur J Opl Res2010; 201: 921–932.
12.
GunalMMPiddM. Discrete event simulation for performance modelling in health care: a review of the literature. J Simulation2010; 4: 42–51.
13.
AckoffRL. On the use of models in corporate planning. Strategic Manage J1981; 2: 353–359.
14.
GalottiKM. Decision structuring in important real-life choices. Psychol Sci2007; 18: 320–325.
15.
McLucasA. Incorporating soft variables into System Dynamics models: a suggested method and basis for ongoing research, In: Proceeds from 2003 systems dynamics conference. online referencing, http://www.systemdynamics.org/conferences/2003/proceed/PAPERS/214.pdf (accessed 23 May 2016).
16.
SweesterA. A comparison of system dynamics (SD) and discrete event simulation (DES). In: Proceedings of the international conference of system dynamics society and 5th Australian and New Zealand systems conference (eds CavanaRYVennixAMRouwetteAJAet al.), Wellington, New Zealand, 20–23 July 1999, New Zealand: CD Design and Creation.
17.
BonabeauE. Agent-based modelling: methods and techniques for simulating human systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA2002; 99: 7280–7287.
18.
PiddM. Computer simulation in management science. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, 2004.
19.
YadavalliVSS. A semi-Markov model of manpower system. Stochastic Anal Applic2001; 19: 1077–1086.
20.
MoultonJL. Defence planning: the uncertainty factor. Long Range Plann1971, 3: 50–53.
21.
HorneGE. Manoeuvre warfare distillations: essence not verisimilitude. In: Proceedings of the 31st winter simulation conference (eds FarringtonPANembhardHBSturrockDTet al.), Squaw Peak, Phoenix, AZ, 5–8 December 1999, Vol. 2, pp.1147–1151. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Conference Publications.
22.
SargentRG. Verifying and validating simulation models. In: Proceedings of the winter simulation conference (eds TolkADialloSYRyzhovIOet al.), Savannah, GA, 7–10 December 2014, pp.118–131. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Conference Publications.
23.
BalciO. Validation, verification, and testing techniques throughout the life cycle of a simulation study. Annf Ops Res1994; 53: 121–173.
24.
BalciO. A life cycle for modelling and simulation. Simulation2012; 88: 870–883.
25.
RobinsonS. Simulation: the practice of model development and use. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014, Chapter 13.
BishopC. Embracing uncertainty: the new machine learning. In: Proceedings of the 35th annual computer software and applications conference, 2011. IEEE Publishing.
