Towards a World Wide Web of Simulation

Abstract

The process of developing and running simulations needs to become simple and accessible to audiences ranging from middle school students in a learning environment to subject matter experts in order to make the benefits of modeling and simulation commonly available. However, current simulations are for the most part developed and run on platforms that are: (1) demanding in terms of computational resources, (2) difficult for general audiences to use owing to unintuitive interfaces mired in mathematical syntax, (3) expensive to acquire and maintain and (4) hard to interoperate and compose. The result is a four-dimensional expense that makes simulation inaccessible to the general public. In this paper we show that by embracing the web and its standards, the use and development of simulations can become democratized and be part of a Web of Simulation where people of all skill levels are able to build, upload, retrieve, rate, and connect simulations. We show how the Web of Simulation can be built using the three basic principles of service orientation, platform independence, and interoperability. Finally, we present strategies for implementing the Web of Simulation and discuss challenges and possible approaches.

Keywords

HTML 5 human factors languages modeling and simulation simulation engine standardization theory validation verification Web of Simulation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Gore

Diallo

Padilla

ConceVE: Conceptual modeling and formal validation for everyone. ACM Trans Model Comput Simul (TOMACS) 2014; 24(2): 12.

Sokolowski

Turnitsa

Diallo

. A conceptual modeling method for critical infrastructure modeling. In: Proceedings of the 41st annual simulation symposium, 2008 (ANSS 2008), 2008, pp.203–211. IEEE.

Tolk

Turnitsa

Diallo

. Composable M&S web services for net-centric applications. J Defense Model Simul: Applic, Method, Technol 2006; 3(1): 27–44.

Shaffer

AR.

The value of modeling and simulation for the department of defense. Guest Editorial: The Value of Modeling and Simulation for the Department of Defense 2012; 2.

Sarjoughian

Zeigler

BP.

Towards making modeling & simulation into a discipline. Simul Ser 2001; 33(2): 130–135.

Sarjoughian

Cochran

Collofello

. Graduate education in modeling \& simulation: rationale and organization of a Masters program. Simul Ser 2004; 36(4): 111–115.

Youtube. Modeling and simulation, http://bit.ly/1NMk4PA (2015, accessed 23 September 2015).

Mittal

Extending DoDAF to allow integrated DEVS-based modeling and simulation. J Defense Model Simul: Appl, Methodol, Technol 2006; 3(2): 95–123.

Chen

Wang

Zeng

Intelligence and security informatics for homeland security: information, communication, and transportation. IEEE Tran Intell Transp Syst 2004; 5(4): 329–341.

10.

Wabiszewski

Jr Andel

Mullins

. Enhancing realistic hands-on network training in a virtual environment. In: Proceedings of the 2009 spring simulation multiconference. Society for Computer Simulation International, 2009, pp.69–76.

11.

Chen

Lin

Dou

. CBF: a packet filtering method for DDoS attack defense in cloud environment. In: 9th international conference on dependable, autonomic and secure computing (DASC), 2011, pp.427–434. IEEE.

12.

Huang

. A cooperative intrusion detection system framework for cloud computing networks. In: 39th international conference on parallel processing workshops (ICPPW), 2010, pp.280–284. IEEE.

13.

Wang

Lin

Kuo

. Threat risk analysis for cloud security based on attack-defense trees. In: 8th International Conference on Computing Technology and Information Management (ICCM), 2012, pp.106–111. IEEE.

14.

Zhang

Chai

Hou

. System security approach for web-enabled HLA/RTI in the cloud simulation environment. In: 6th IEEE conference on industrial electronics and applications (ICIEA), 2011, pp.245–248. IEEE.

15.

Tolk

Diallo

Padilla

. Reference modelling in support of M&S – foundations and applications. J Simulat 2013, doi: 10.1057/jos.2013.3.

16.

Diallo

Padilla

Tolk

Why is interoperability bad: towards a paradigm shift in simulation composition. In: Fall simulation interoperability workshop, 2010, IEEE CS Press.

17.

Turnitsa

. Extending the levels of conceptual interoperability model. In: Proceedings of the IEEE summer computer simulation conference, 2005. IEEE CS Press.

18.

Page

Briggs

Tufarolo

. Toward a family of maturity models for the simulation interconnection problem. In: Spring Simulation Interoperability Workshop, 2004. IEEE CS Press.

19.

Axelrod

Advancing the art of simulation in the social sciences. Complexity 1997; 3(2): 16–22.

20.

Wild

Griggs

EY.

An architecture for distributed scenario building and evaluation. Commun ACM 2005; 48(11):80–86.

21.

Singh

Mads

Creating an adaptive network of hubs using Schelling’s model. Commun ACM 2006; 49(3): 69–73, 10.1145/1118178.1118204.

22.

Tolk

(ed.). Engineering principles of combat modeling and distributed simulation. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2012.

23.

Tolk

. What comes after the semantic web? PADS implications for the dynamic web. In: Proceedings of the 20th Workshop on Principles of Advanced and Distributed Simulation (PADS’06). IEEE, 2006.

24.

Morville

Rosenfeld

Information architecture for the World Wide Web: Designing large-scale web sites. US: O’Reilly, 2008.

25.

Owre

Rushby

Shankar

PVS: A prototype verification system. In: Automated deduction: CADE-11. Springer Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, 1992, pp.748-752.

26.

Tolk

. Modeling and simulation development and preparation processes. Engng Principles Combat Model Distrib Simul 2012: 243–262.

27.

Lanman

Proctor

MD.

Governance of data initialization for service oriented architecture-based military simulation and command and control federations. J Defense Model Simul: Applic, Method, Technol 2009; 6(1): 5–16.

28.

Silver

Bellipady

Miller

. Supporting interoperability using the Discrete-event Modeling Ontology. In: Proceedings of the 2009 Winter simulation conference (WSC), 2009, pp.1399–1410. IEEE.

29.

Nastasi

Clements

Battista

MT.

Social-cognitive interactions, motivation, and cognitive growth in Logo programming and CAI problem-solving environments. J Edu Psychol 1990; 82(1): 150.

30.

David

HTML5: Designing rich internet applications. 2010: US: Taylor & Francis.

31.

Reynolds

CW.

Flocks, herds and schools: A distributed behavioral model. In: ACM SIGGRAPH computer graphics 1987; 21(4): 25–34.

32.

Terborgh

Mixed flocks and polyspecific associations: Costs and benefits of mixed groups to birds and monkeys. Am J Primatol 2005; 21(2): 87–100.

33.

Schelling

TC.

Dynamic models of segregation. J Math Sociol 1971; 1(2): 143–186.

34.

Padilla

Diallo

Barraco

. Cloud-based simulators: making simulations accessible to non-experts and experts alike. In: Proceedings of the 2014 winter simulation conference (WSC), 2014, pp.3630–3639. IEEE.

35.

Shneiderman

Promoting universal usability with multi-layer interface design. ACM SIGCAPH Computers and the Physically Handicapped 2003; 73–74: 1–8.

36.

Diallo

Wood

Bizub

Coalition battle management services. In: Interservice/industry training, simulation, and education conference (I/ITSEC), 2012. Orlando, FL.

37.

Wood

. Implementation of DDM in the MAK high performance RTI. In: Proceedings of the simulation interoperability workshop, 2002.

38.

Shah

Anastasakis

Behzad

From UML to alloy and back again. Models in software engineering, 2010, pp.158–171.

39.

Tolk

Diallo

Model-based data engineering for web services. IEEE Int Comput 2005; July/August: 65–70.

40.

Yilmaz

On the need for contextualized introspective models to improve reuse and composability of defense simulations. J Defense Model Simul: Applic, Methodol, Technol, 2004; 1(3): 141–151.