Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) is an innovative technology which exploits the laws of quantum physics to generate and distribute shared secret key for use in cryptographic devices. Quantum Key Distribution offers the advantage of ‘unconditionally secure’ key generation with the unique ability to detect eavesdropping on the key distribution channel and shows promise for high-security applications such as those found in banking, government, and military environments. However, Quantum Key Distribution is a nascent technology where realized systems suffer from implementation non-idealities, which may significantly impact system performance and security. In this article, we discuss the modeling of a decoy state enabled Quantum Key Distribution system built to study the impact of these practical limitations. Specifically, we present a thorough background on the decoy state protocol, detailed discussion of the modeled decoy state enabled Quantum Key Distribution system, and evidence for component and sub-system verification, as well as, multiple examples of system-level validation. Additionally, we bring attention to practical considerations associated with implementing the decoy state protocol security condition gained from these research activities.
MaillouxLOGrimailaMRHodsonDD. Performance evaluations of quantum key distribution system architectures. IEEE Secur Privacy2015; 13(1): 30–40.
2.
MorrisJDGrimailaMRHodsonDD. Using the discrete event system specification to model quantum key distribution system components. J Defense Modeling Simulat2014: 1548512914554404.
3.
MaillouxLO. A modeling framework for studying quantum key distribution system implementation non-idealities. IEEE Access2015: 110–130.
4.
GisinNRibordyGTittelW. Quantum cryptography. Rev Modern Phys2002; 74(1): 145–195.
5.
ScaraniVBechmann-PasquinucciHCerfNJ. The security of practical quantum key distribution. Rev Modern Phys2009; 81(3): 1301–1350.
6.
LoeppSWootersWK. Protecting information. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
7.
NielsenMAChuangIL. Quantum computation and quantum information. Cambridge University Press, 2010.
BennettCHBrassardG. Quantum cryptography: Public key distribution and coin tossing. In: Proceedings of IEEE international conference on computers, systems and signal processing, 1984.
18.
GilbertSV. Cipher printing telegraph systems for secret wire and radio telegraphic communications. Trans Am Inst Electr Engrs1926; 45: 295–301.
19.
ShannonCE. Communication theory of secrecy systems. Bell System Tech J1949; 28: 656-715.
20.
RenatoRGisinNKrausB. An information-theoretic security proof for QKD protocols. Phys Rev A (arXiv:quant-ph/0502064) 2005; 72(1).
21.
GottesmanDLoH-KLutkenhausN. Security of quantum key distribution with imperfect devices. In: Proceedings of International symposium on information theory, 2004. ISIT 2004. IEEE, 2004, p. 136.
22.
ScaraniVKurtsieferC. The black paper of quantum cryptography: real implementation problems. arXiv:0906.4547v2, 2009.
WangX-B. Beating the photon-number-splitting attack in practical quantum cryptography. Phys Rev Lett2005; 94(23): 230503.
30.
MaXQiBZhaoY. Practical decoy state for quantum key distribution. Phys Rev2005; 72(1): 012326.
31.
WangX-B. Decoy-state protocol for quantum cryptography with four different intensities of coherent light. Phys Rev A2005; 72(1): 012322.
32.
ZhaoYQiBMaX. Experimental quantum key distribution with decoy states. Phys Rev Lett2006; 96(7): 070502.
33.
ZhaoYQiBMaX. Simulation and implementation of decoy state quantum key distribution over 60km telecom fiber. In: IEEE international symposium on information theory, 2006, 2006. 2094–2098.
34.
WangX-BPengC-ZPanJ-W. Simple protocol for secure decoy-state quantum key distribution with a loosely controlled source. Appl Phys Lett2007; 90(3): 031110.
35.
WangX-BYangLPengC-Z. Decoy-state quantum key distribution with both source errors and statistical fluctuations. New J Phys 2009; 11(7): 075006.
36.
HuJ-ZWangX-B. Reexamination of the decoy-state quantum key distribution with an unstable source. Phys Rev A2010; 82(1): 012331.
37.
HuJ-ZWangX-B. Secure quantum key distribution in an easy way. arXiv:1004.3730, 2010.
38.
HarringtonJWEttingerJMHughesRJ. Enhancing practical security of quantum key distribution with a few decoy states. arXiv, 2005: quant-ph/0503002.
39.
HorikiriTKobayashiT. Decoy state quantum key distribution with a photon number resolved heralded single photon source. Phys Rev A2006; 73(3).
40.
HayashiM. General theory for decoy-state quantum key distribution with an arbitrary number of intensities. New J Phys2007; 9(8).
41.
MauererWSilberhornC. Quantum key distribution with passive decoy state selection. Phys Rev A2007; 75(5): 050305.
42.
BrassardGSalvailL. Secret-key reconciliation by public discussion. In: Advances in cryptology: EUROCRYPT’93, 1994, pp.410–423.
MaillouxLOGrimailaMRHodsonDD. Modeling continuous time optical pulses in a quantum key distribution discrete event simulation. In: International Conference on Security and Management SAM’14, 2014.
45.
GiancoliDC. Physics for scientists and engineers. Prentice Hall, 1989.
46.
MillerDA. Quantum mechanics for scientists and engineers. Cambridge University Press, 2008.
47.
SorensenNTGrimailaMR. Discrete event simulation of the quantum channel within a quantum key distribution system. J Defense Modeling and Simul: Appl, Methodol, Technol 1548512915569743 (2015).
48.
SargentRG. Verification and validation of simulation models. In: Proceedings of the 2010 Winter simulation conference, 2010, pp.166–183.
49.
SmithMIMurray-SmithDJHickmanDVerification and validation issues in a generic model of electro-optic sensor systems. J Defense Modeling Simul2007; 4(1): 17–27.
50.
RozaMVoogdJSebaljD. The generic methodology for verification and validation to support acceptance of models, simulations and data. J Defense Modeling Simul2012; 10(4): 347–365.
51.
ChenT-Y. ‘Field test of a practical secure communication network with decoy-state quantum cryptography.’Opt Express2009; 17(8): 6540–6549.
52.
DixonARYuanZLDynesJF. Gigahertz decoy quantum key distribution with 1 Mbit/s secure key rate. Opt Express200816(23): 18790–18979.
53.
DynesJFYuanZLSharpeAW. Practical quantum key distribution over 60 hours at an optical fiber distance of 20km using weak and vacuum decoy pulses for enhanced security. Op Express2007; 15(13): 8465–8471.
54.
YuanZLSharpeAWShieldsAJ. Unconditionally secure one-way quantum key distribution using decoy pulses. Appl Phys Lett2007; 90(1): 011118.
55.
DixonARYuanZLDynesJF. Continuous operation of high bit rate quantum key distribution. Appl Phys Lett2010; 96(16): 161102.
56.
PengC-Z. ‘Experimental long-distance decoy-state quantum key distribution based on polarization encoding. Phys Rev Lett2007; 98(1): 010505.
