Modern air defense at sea doctrines need to consider the emerging technology of software-defined radar. In this manner the surveillance and tracking abilities of imaging radar are implemented in software. Concurrently there exists the need to forge the other side of the same coin. The Software-defined Radar Countermeasure System (S-dRCS) might be a solution for confusing adversary radar operators. In this spirit the current contribution is the proof of concept for a S-dRCS special case called the Simulator-defined Radar Countermeasure System (Sim-dRCS). The simulator approach for imaging radar countermeasures is preferred because it provides a bespoke generation of the required signals valid for a diverse set of adversary observers, which are considered to be Inverse Synthetic Aperture Radar systems. The simulator receives input from the sensors of the Sim-dRCS and then crafts false targets matched to the heading and velocity vectors of the threat. In this case the countermeasure output is a battleship-class false naval target. The achievement of verisimility enhancement is the main requirement in order to support this deceptive stratagem.
Stokes R., 2010, Maskelyne Magic, http://www.maskelynemagic.com/alameinphotos.html, accessed on 20th December, 2010.
2.
War and Game blog.‘Operation Bertram’, http://warandgame.blogspot.com/2008/06/operation-bertram-september-november.html (2007, accessed 15 February 2010).
3.
Wilkinson N.‘The Dazzle Painting of Ships’ , as reprinted in James Bustard, Camouflage, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norman_Wilkinson_(artist) (1919 , accessed 15 February 2010).
4.
Ford K. and White J.Gazala 1942: Rommel’s greatest victory. Oxford: Osprey, (2008).
Marvin A.How the cavity magnetron defeated the wolf pack. IET Commun Eng (2006); April-May Volume: 4 Issue: 2. pp 42-43.
7.
Griffiths HD and Baker CJFundamentals of tomography and radar. London: University College London, ( 2005).
8.
Neri F.2007, Introduction to Electronic Defense Systems, Artech House, London, Chapter 5-6-24, ISBN 9781580531795
9.
Cleveland K.E. , 2001, How to use the 36 Chinese Stratagems To Win, Influence Marketing, LLC, http://www.maxpersuasion.com, accessed on 20th December, 2010.
10.
Hellenic Defense and Diplomacy.AEGIS, monthly journal publication in Hellenic, March, (2009); 215: 64-65.
11.
Fenn AJ, Temme DH, Delaney WP and Courtney WEThe development of phased-array radar technology. Lincoln Lab J (2000); 12: 321-340.
12.
Pace PE, Fouts DJ and Zulaica DPDigital image synthesizers: are enemy sensors really seeing what’s there? In: Proceedings of the 72nd MORS Symposium , http://handle.dtic.mil/100.2/ADA428160 ( 2004).
13.
Garnier J. and Solna K.Coherent interferometric imaging for synthetic aperture radar in the presence of noise. Inverse Prob (2008); 24: 055001.
14.
Lazarov A.D., Minchev Ch. N., 2007, SAR Imaging of a Moving Target, 3rd International Conference on Recent Advances in Space Technologies, 2007. RAST ‘07, Constantinople, Issue Date: 14-16 June 2007, pp 366-372.
15.
Rzemien R.Coherent data collectors; a hardware perspective. Johns Hopkins APL Tech Digest (1997); http://www.jhuapl.edu/techdigest/TD/td1804/index.pdf18(3), 377-387.
16.
Hill JRAir defense at sea. Shepperton, Surrey: Ian Allan, (1988).
17.
Stavropoulos DBSan Carlos Bay , 21st May 1982: a long day for the British Navy in the Falklands Conflict. J Mil Hist ( 2008 ); 148: 66-81.
18.
Rui C. and Ming-liang XLL.Research on jamming effect evaluation method of ISAR. IEEE Xplore (2007) p65-67. Huangshan, China; http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/freeabs_all.jsp?arnumber=4418556 .
19.
Yuan LI, Xue-mei Luo and Gao-huan LVThe study of multi-false targets synthesizing technology against chirp ISAR . Proc ICMMT (2008): (2) pp 802-805. Nanjing, China.
20.
Fouts DJ, Pace PE, Karow C. and Ekestrom RTA single-chip false target radar image generator for countering wideband imaging radars. IEEE J of Solid-State Circuits ( 2002 ); 37751-759.
21.
Doerry AW, 2008, Ship Dynamics for Maritime ISAR Imaging, SAND2008-1020 , Sandia National Laboratories, California, USA.
Frakes WB and Kang K.Software reuse research: status and future. IEEE Trans Software Eng (2005); 31: 529-536.
24.
Baldwinson J. and Antipov I.A modelling and simulation tool for the prediction of electronic attack effectiveness . Edinburgh, Australia: Electronic Warfare & Radar Division, Defense Science and Technology Organisation, (2008).
25.
Schleher CD1999, Electronic Warfare in the Information Age, Artech House, London, UK ISBN 0-89006-526-8.
26.
Kostis TG, Baker CJ and Griffiths HDInterferometric inverse synthetic aperture radar. In: Proceedings of the London Communications Symposium2005. London, (2005), pp.1-4.
27.
Rihaczek AWPrinciples of high resolution radar. In: Identification of ships, Ch.5. New York: McGraw Hill, 1996, pp.433-579.
28.
Siouris GM, 2003, Missile Guidance and Control Systems, Springer-Verlag, New York, USA. ISBN 0-387-00726-1.
29.
Kostis TG, Galanis KG and Katsikas SKAngular glint effects generation for false naval target verisimility requirements . Meas Sci Technol (2009); 20: 104016.
30.
Abran A., Bourque J-P., Dupuis R., Tripp LL and Moore W.SWEBOK: guide to the software engineering body of knowledge. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society , (2004).
31.
Lieberman BA ( 2007) The art of software modelling . Boca Raton, Florida, USA: Auerbach Publications, Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
32.
Kostis TG, Galanis KG and Nikitakos NVInterferometric inverse synthetic aperture radar software: analysis for air defense at sea. In: Proceedings of the NATO Sensors & Electronics Technology (SET-136) Software Radar Specialist’s Meeting , Lisbon, Portugal, 23-25 June ( 2009 ).
33.
Lynch D.2004, Introduction to RF Stealth, Sci-Tech Publishing, North Carolina, USA.
34.
Alberts DS, Garstka JJ, and Stein FP, 2000, Network Centric Warafer; Developing and Leveraging Information Superiority, CCRP Publication Series, http://www.dodccrp.org/files/Alberts_NCW.pdf, accessed on 20th December, 2010.
35.
Kostis TG, Baker CJ and Griffiths HDAn interferometric ISAR system model for automatic target identification . In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Synthetic Aperture Radar 2006 (EUSAR 2006), Dresden, Germany, no. 58, (2006).
