Massively Multi-Player (MMP) Environments for Asymmetric Warfare

Abstract

It has been proposed that the Army needs a high-level training capability for asymmetric missions. Current training programs are focused on conventional warfare and are mainly limited to units that are co-located. Where training capability exists, the scenarios have limited interactivity and fail to address a variety of cross-cultural communication issues that troops encounter in the real world.

U.S. Army's Research, Development, and Engineering Command, Simulation, and Training Technology Center in Orlando, Florida, has been conducting an Army Technology Objective (ATO) using massively multi-player (MMP) gaming technology to address these issues. The objective of the ATO is to develop a large-scale, persistent, distributed simulation environment to train soldiers. The research is focused on evaluating the use of MMPs for Army training for operations in asymmetric warfare environments. Weapons of mass destruction, terrorists' actions, crowd and hostage situations, peacekeeping, psychological operations, and civil affairs will be possible interactions faced by the users. OneSAF Objective System computer generated entities will augment the large numbers of real people who will populate the scenarios. The various Armed Forces will be able to engage in such simulation environments anytime, anywhere, using standard personal computers (PCs) connected via the Internet.

The paper details research in the formative evaluation of Internet-based training using soldier participants and gaming technologies. Initial test results with the 101^st Airborne Division of Fort Campbell, Kentucky, and the Illinois Army National Guard are presented to indicate the potential such technology has to meet new asymmetric training needs and optimize use of soldiers' time while preparing for live training events and actual deployment. The paper also addresses the tools needed to build the training environments and required After Action Review capabilities.

Keywords

Asymmetric warfare virtual environment massively multi-player simulation dismounted infantry mission rehearsal

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. Suantak, L. , F. Momen , J. W. Rozenblit , M. J. Barnes , and T. Fichtl . Modeling and Simulation of Stability and Support Operations (SASO). IEEE International Conference and Workshop on the Engineering of Computer Based Systems (2004): 21–28.

2. Basic Officer Leaders Course. 2005. Retrieved June 10, 2005, from www.infantry.army.mil/BOLC

3. Cahlink, G.

“Trial by Fire.”

Government Executive. 2004. Retrieved June 8, 2005, from htp://www.govexec.com/features/0405-01/0405-01s4.htm#top

4. Hays, R. T. , and M. J. Singer . Simulation Fidelity in Training System Design: Bridging the Gap between Reality and Training. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1988.

5. Knerr, B. W., D. R. Lampton, M. Thomas, B. D. Comer, J. R. Grosse, J. H. Centric, P. Blankenbeckler, M. Dlublac, R. L. Wampler, D. Siddon, K. A. Garfield, G. A. Martin, and D. A. Washburn. Virtual Environments for Dismounted Soldier Simulation, Training, and Mission Rehearsal: Results of the FY 2002 Culminating Event. Technical Report 1138 (ADA417360), Alexandria, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 2003.

6. Beal, S. A., and R. E. Christ. Training Effectiveness Evaluation of the Full Spectrum Command Game. Technical Report 1140. U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 2004.

7. Bonk, C. J., and V. P. Dennen. Massive Multiplayer Online Gaming: A Research Framework for Military Training and Education. Technical Report 2005-1, Advanced Distributed Learning Initiative, Readiness and Training, Office of the Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness, 2005.

8. Campbell, D. T. , and J. C. Stanley . Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Chicago: Rand McNally College Publishing Co., 1963.

9. Boldovici, J. A. , D. W. Bessemer , and A. E. Bolton . The Elements of Training Evaluation. Alexandria, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 2002.

10.

10. Defense Population Representation 1998, 2005. Retrieved October 4, 2005, from htp://www.defenselink.mil/prhome/poprep98