Quantifying the Effect of Transportation Practices in Military Supply Chains

Abstract

Traditional multi-echelon inventory and readiness-based models have not fully examined the ability of effective transportation utilization to reduce cost, delay times, and improve readiness in the overall military logistics network. In this paper, we develop a simulation-based methodology for quantifying the effect of transportation options (i.e., truckload shipping, less-than-truckload shipping, transshipments, and express air shipping) on shipping costs, customer wait times, abort rates, and operational availability. Simulation was used to develop a multi-echelon (depots, bases) model of regional supply chain support for aircraft spare part maintenance activities. The resulting model was used for experimentation and to develop response surface equations for the behavior of the system. The logistics implications of the results are discussed as well as managerial insights into the behavior of such systems. Our analysis indicates that focusing more on local inventory and local repair can have a significant impact on the operational availability of the system. This shift should be looked at in terms of the cost of local repair resources compared to transportation costs.

Keywords

Supply chain simulation multi-echelon military spare part inventory

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. Muckstadt, J. A. Analysis and Algorithms for Service Parts Supply Chain. New York: Springer Science+Business Media, 2005.

2. Sherbrooke, C. C.

“METRIC: Multi-Echelon Technique for Recoverable Item Control.”

Operations Research 16 (1968): 122–141.

3. Sherbrooke, C. C.

“VARI-METRIC: Improved Approximations for Multi-indentured, Multi-Echelon Availability Models.”

Operations Research 34, no. 2 (1986): 311–319.

4. Muckstadt, J. A.

“A Model for a Multi-Item, Multi-Echelon Multi-Indenture Inventory System.”

Management Science 20, no. 4 (1973): 472–481.

5. Nahmias, S. , and H. Rivera.

“A Deterministic Model for a Repairable Item Inventory System with a Finite Repair Rate.”

International Journal of Production Research 17, no. 3 (1979): 215–221.

6. Slay, M. F. “VARI-METRIC: An Approach to Modeling Multi-Echelon Resupply When the Demand Process is Poisson with a Gamma Prior.” Logistics Management Institute, LMI Working Note AF301–3. 1984.

7. Bachman, T. C., R. C. Kline, T. J. O'Malley, F. L. Eichorn, and R. M. King. “Optimizing Spares Support: The Aircraft Sustainability Model.” Logistics Management Institute, LMI Report AF501MR1. 1996.

8. Graves, S. C.

“A Multi-Echelon Inventory Model for a Repairable Item with One-for-One Replenishment.”

Management Science 31, no. 10 (1985): 1247–1256.

9. Condon, T. , and T. Cunningham.

“A Comparison of Air Force Organic Airlift and Commercial Air Express Distribution Performance.”

Air Force Journal of Logistics 23, no. 1 (1999): 8–12.

10.

10. Miller, L. W. “DRIVE (Distribution and Repair in Variable Environments): Design and Operation of the Ogden Prototype.” RAND Report (R-4158-AF). 1992.

11.

11. Law, A. M. , and W. D. Kelton. Simulation Modeling and Analysis. 3d ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2000.

12.

12. Montgomery, D. C. , and G. C. Runger. Applied Statistics and Probability for Engineers. 2d ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1999.

13.

13. Masciulli, J. L. , and W. A. Cunningham III.

“Air Force MICAP Shipping Policies: Are They Optimal from a Cost Standpoint?”

Air Force Journal of Logistics 25, no. 3 (2001): 1–41.

14.

14. Carter, M. W. , and R. London.

“Why So Many AWP LRUs?”

Air Force Journal of Logistics 26, no. 4 (Winter 2002): 31–33.

15.

15. Larvick, J. A.

“Improving Support to AMC.”

Air Force Journal of Logistics 24, no. 4 (2000): 2–41.

16.

16. Murphy, M. J.

“Collocating Air Force Weapon Systems Inventory with the Defense Logistics Agency Premium Service Facility.”

Air Force Journal of Logistics 23, no. 3 (1999): 29–41.

17.

17. Blazer, D., B. McCormick, S. Naylor, R. A. Nicholson, R. Oates, and T. Parrish. “Air Force Regional Stockage Policy Opportunities - Part I: Regional Stock Levels for Non-Communication Electronic Low Demand Items.” AFLMA Report LS200126302, Air Force Logistics Management Agency, Maxwell AFB, Gunter Annex, AL 36114–3236.