Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

We develop a multilevel framework that examines the simultaneous co-occurrence of charismatic leadership and abusive supervision and how they jointly diminish followers’ prosocial motivation. Furthermore, we tested a mediated moderation model to examine whether followers’ prosocial motivation mediates the link between charismatic leadership and followers’ citizenship behavior under high and low levels of abusive supervision. Results from a field study based upon 296 employees and 44 supervisors in 44 teams across three organizations provided support for the predicted relationships. Charismatic leadership positively influenced followers’ prosocial motivation when abusive supervision was low but not high. Furthermore, followers’ prosocial motivation mediated the link between charismatic leadership and followers’ organizational citizenship behavior when abusive supervision was low but not high. We discuss theoretical implications for abusive supervision's neutralizing effect, identify avenues to advance charismatic leadership and prosocial motivation research, and provide recommendations for practitioners to cultivate an environment that nurtures employees’ prosocial motivation.

Keywords

charismatic leadership abusive supervision prosocial motivation citizenship behavior

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Asparouhov

(2005). Sampling weights in latent variable modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 12(3), 411-434. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1203_4

Banks

G. C.

Batchelor

J. H.

Seers

O'Boyle

E. H.

Pollack

J. M.

Gower

(2014). What does team–member exchange bring to the party? A meta-analytic review of team and leader social exchange. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(2), 273-295. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1885

Bass

B. M.

(1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. Free Press.

Bass

B. M.

(1998). Transformational leadership: Industry, military, and educational impact. Lawrence Erlbaum.

Bass

B. M.

Avolio

B. J.

(2004). Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire: Manual leader form, rater, and scoring key for MLQ (Form 5x-Short). Mind Garden.

Bliese

P. D.

(2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In Klein

K. J.

Kozlowski

S. W. J.

(Eds.), Multilevel theory, research and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 349-381). Jossey-Bass.

Bolino

M. C.

(1999). Citizenship and impression management: Good soldiers or good actors? The Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 82-98. https://doi.org/10.2307/259038

Bolino

M. C.

Grant

A. M.

(2016). The bright side of being prosocial at work, and the dark side, too: A review and agenda for research on other-oriented motives, behavior, and impact in organizations. Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 599-670. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2016.1153260

Bolino

M. C.

Harvey

Bachrach

D. G.

(2012). A self-regulation approach to understanding citizenship behavior in organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 119(1), 126-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.05.006

10.

Bono

J. E.

Ilies

(2006). Charisma, positive emotions and mood contagion. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(4), 317-334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.04.008

11.

Bourdage

J. S.

Lee

J. H.

Shin

K. H.

(2012). Motives for organizational citizenship behavior: Personality correlates and coworker ratings of OCB. Human Performance, 25(3), 179-200. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2012.683904

12.

Brislin

R. W.

(1980). Translation and content analysis of oral and written material. In Triandis

H. C.

Berry

J. W.

(Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 349-444). Allyn & Bacon.

13.

Brown

D. J.

Keeping

L. M.

(2005). Elaborating the construct of transformational leadership: The role of affect. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(2), 245-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.01.003

14.

Brown

M. E.

Trevino

L. K.

(2006). Socialized charismatic leadership, values congruence, and deviance in work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4), 954-962. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.954

15.

Brown

M. E.

Treviño

L. K.

(2009). Leader–follower values congruence: Are socialized charismatic leaders better able to achieve it? Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(2), 478-490. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014069

16.

Carrie Wong

(2017). Tesla factory workers reveal pain, injury and stress: ‘Everything feels like the future but us’. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/may/18/tesla-workers-factory-conditions-elon-musk

17.

Christensen-Salem

Zanini

M. T.

Walumbwa

F. O.

Parente

Peat

D. M.

Perrmann-Graham

(2021). Communal solidarity in extreme environments: The role of social resources in building serving culture and service performance. Journal of Business Research, 135, 829-839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.07.017

18.

Cicero

Pierro

(2007). Charismatic leadership and organizational outcomes: The mediating role of employees’ work-group identification. International Journal of Psychology, 42(5), 297-306. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207590701248495

19.

Conger

J. A.

Kanungo

R. N.

(1987). Toward a behavioral theory of charismatic leadership in organizational settings. The Academy of Management Review, 12(4), 637-647. https://doi.org/10.2307/258069

20.

Conger

J. A.

Kanungo

R. N.

(1998). Charismatic leadership in organizations. Sage.

21.

Courtright

S. H.

Gardner

R. G.

Smith

T. A.

McCormick

B. W.

Colbert

A. E.

(2016). My family made me do it: A cross-domain, self-regulatory perspective on antecedents to abusive supervision. Academy of Management Journal, 59(5), 1630-1652. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.1009

22.

De Dreu

C. K. W.

(2006). Rational self-interest and other orientation in organizational behavior: A critical appraisal and extension of Meglino and Korsgaard (2004). Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(6), 1245-1252. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1245

23.

DeGroot

Kiker

D. S.

Cross

T. C.

(2000). A meta-analysis to review organizational outcomes related to charismatic leadership. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l'Administration, 17(4), 356-372. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1936-4490.2000.tb00234.x

24.

Diez-Roux

A. V.

(2000). Multilevel analysis in public health research. Annual Review of Public Health, 21(1), 171-192. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.21.1.171

25.

Doering

Rhodes

S. R.

Schuster

M. R.

(1983). The aging worker: Research and recommendations. Sage Publications, Inc.

26.

Duffy

M. K.

Ganster

D. C.

Pagon

(2002). Social undermining in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 45(2), 331-351. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069350

27.

Duhigg

(2018). Dr. Elon & Mr. Musk: Life Inside Tesla's production hell. Wired. Retrieved from https://www.wired.com/story/elon-musk-tesla-life-inside-gigafactory/

28.

Enders

C. K.

Tofighi

(2007). Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: A new look at an old issue. Psychological Methods, 12(2), 121-138. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.12.2.121

29.

Erez

Misangyi

V. F.

Johnson

D. E.

LePine

M. A.

Halverson

K. C.

(2008). Stirring the hearts of followers: Charismatic leadership as the transferal of affect. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(3), 602-616. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.3.602

30.

Ernst

B. A.

Banks

G. C.

Loignon

A. C.

Frear

K. A.

Williams

C. E.

Arciniega

L. M.

Gupta

R. K.

Kodydek

Subramanian

(2022). Virtual charismatic leadership and signaling theory: A prospective meta-analysis in five countries. The Leadership Quarterly, 33(5), 101541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2021.101541

31.

Finkelstein

M. A.

(2006). Dispositional predictors of organizational citizenship behavior: Motives, motive fulfillment, and role identity. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 34(6), 603-616. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2006.34.6.603

32.

Finney

T. G.

Finney

R. Z.

Roach

J. G.

III . (2021). Abusive supervision: Exploring the relationship with narcissism, self-promotion and unpredictability. Journal of Management Development, 40(3), 209-223. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-10-2020-0326

33.

Fischer

Sitkin

S. B.

(2023). Leadership styles: A comprehensive assessment and way forward. Academy of Management Annals, 17(1), 331-372. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2020.0340

34.

Galvin

B. M.

Waldman

D. A.

Balthazard

(2010). Visionary communication qualities as mediators of the relationship between narcissism and attributions of leader charisma. Personnel Psychology, 63(3), 509-537. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01179.x

35.

Gauglitz

I. K.

Schyns

Fehn

Schütz

(2023). The dark side of leader narcissism: The relationship between leaders’ narcissistic rivalry and abusive supervision. Journal of Business Ethics, 185(1), 169-184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05146-6

36.

Gavett

(2013). What it's like to work for Jeff Bezos (Hint: He'll probably call you stupid). Harvard Business Review, Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2013/10/what-its-like-to-work-for-jeff-bezos-hint-hell-probably-call-you-stupid

37.

Gouldner

A. W.

(1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25(2), 161-178. https://doi.org/10.2307/2092623

38.

Grant

A. M.

(2007). Relational job design and the motivation to make a prosocial difference. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 393-417. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.24351328

39.

Grant

A. M.

(2008). Does intrinsic motivation fuel the prosocial fire? Motivational synergy in predicting persistence, performance, and productivity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(1), 48-58. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.48

40.

Grant

A. M.

Mayer

D. M.

(2009). Good soldiers and good actors: Prosocial and impression management motives as interactive predictors of affiliative citizenship behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(4), 900-912. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013770

41.

Hartnell

C. A.

Christensen-Salem

Walumbwa

F. O.

Stotler

D. J.

Chiang

F. F.

Birtch

T. A.

(2023). Manufacturing motivation in the mundane: Servant leadership’s influence on employees’ intrinsic motivation and performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 188(3), 533-552. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-023-05330-2

42.

Hobfoll

S. E.

(1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44(3), 513-524. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.3.513

43.

Hobman

E. V.

Restubog

S. L. D.

Bordia

Tang

R. L.

(2009). Abusive supervision in advising relationships: Investigating the role of social support. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 58(2), 233-256. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2008.00330.x

44.

Holmes

(2019). Lakers 2.0: The failed reboot of the NBA's crown jewel. ESPN, Retrieved from https://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/26821790/lakers-20-failed-reboot-nba-crown-jewel

45.

House

R. J.

Howell

J. M.

(1992). Personality and charismatic leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 3(2), 81-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(92)90028-E

46.

Kantor

Streitfeld

(2015). Inside Amazon: Wrestling big ideas in a bruising workplace. New York Times, 15, 74-80. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/16/technology/inside-amazon-wrestling-big-ideas-in-a-bruising-workplace.html

47.

Kark

Shamir

Chen

(2003). The two faces of transformational leadership: Empowerment and dependency. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(2), 246-255. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.2.246

48.

Kozlowski

S. W. J.

Klein

K. J.

(2000). A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In Klein

K. J.

Kozlowski

S. W. J.

(Eds.), Multilevel theory, research and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 3-90). Jossey-Bass.

49.

LeBreton

J. M.

Senter

J. L.

(2008). Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement. Organizational Research Methods, 11(4), 815-852. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428106296642

50.

Lee

Allen

N. J.

(2002). Organizational citizenship behavior and workplace deviance: The role of affect and cognitions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1), 131-142. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.1.131

51.

Lemoine

G. J.

Hartnell

C. A.

Leroy

(2019). Taking stock of moral approaches to leadership: An integrative review of ethical, authentic, and servant leadership. Academy of Management Annals, 13(1), 148-187. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2016.0121

52.

Lian

Ferris

D. L.

Brown

D. J.

(2012). Does taking the good with the bad make things worse? How abusive supervision and leader–member exchange interact to impact need satisfaction and organizational deviance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 117(1), 41-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.10.003

53.

Liao

Rupp

D. E.

(2005). The impact of justice climate and justice orientation on work outcomes: A cross-level multifoci framework. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(2), 242-256. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.2.242

54.

Lowe

K. B.

Kroeck

K. G.

Sivasubramaniam

(1996). Effectiveness correlates of transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic review of the MLQ literature. The Leadership Quarterly, 7(3), 385-425. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(96)90027-2

55.

Mackey

J. D.

Frieder

R. E.

Brees

J. R.

Martinko

M. J.

(2017). Abusive supervision: A meta-analysis and empirical review. Journal of Management, 43(6), 1940-1965. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315573997

56.

Mackey

J. D.

McAllister

C. P.

Maher

L. P.

Wang

(2019). Leaders and followers behaving badly: A meta-analytic examination of curvilinear relationships between destructive leadership and followers’ workplace behaviors. Personnel Psychology, 72(1), 3-47. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12286

57.

Marinova

S. V.

Cao

Park

(2018). Constructive organizational values climate and organizational citizenship behaviors: A configural view. Journal of Management, 45(5), 2045-2071. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0149206318755301

58.

Martinko

M. J.

Mackey

J. D.

Moss

S. E.

Harvey

McAllister

C. P.

Brees

J. R.

(2018). An exploration of the role of subordinate affect in leader evaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(7), 738-752. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000302

59.

Matta

F. K.

Scott

B. A.

Colquitt

J. A.

Koopman

Passantino

L. G.

(2017). Is consistently unfair better than sporadically fair? An investigation of justice variability and stress. Academy of Management Journal, 60(2), 743-770. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.0455

60.

Mawritz

M. B.

Dust

S. B.

Resick

C. J.

(2014). Hostile climate, abusive supervision, and employee coping: Does conscientiousness matter? Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(4), 737-747. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035863

61.

Meyer

A. D.

Tsui

A. S.

Hinings

C. R.

(1993). Configurational approaches to organizational analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 36(6), 1175-1195. https://doi.org/10.2307/256809

62.

Mumford

M. D.

Fried

(2014). Give them what they want or give them what they need? Ideology in the study of leadership. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(5), 622-634. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1921

63.

Nadler

D. A.

Tushman

M. L.

(1997). Competing by design: The power of organizational architecture. Oxford University Press.

64.

O’Reilly

C. A.

Chatman

J. A.

(2020). Transformational leader or narcissist? How grandiose narcissists can create and destroy organizations and institutions. California Management Review, 62(3), 5-27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125620914989

65.

Organ

D. W.

(1988). A restatement of the satisfaction-performance hypothesis. Journal of Management, 14(4), 547-557. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638801400405

66.

Ostroff

(2019). Contextualizing context in organizational research. In Humphrey

S. E.

LeBreton

J. M.

(Eds.), The handbook of multilevel theory, measurement, and analysis (pp. 39-65). American Psychological Association.

67.

Padilla

Hogan

Kaiser

R. B.

(2007). The toxic triangle: Destructive leaders, susceptible followers, and conducive environments. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(3), 176-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.03.001

68.

Preacher

K. J.

Zyphur

M. J.

Zhang

(2010). A general multilevel SEM framework for assessing multilevel mediation. Psychological Methods, 15(3), 209-233. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020141

69.

Priesemuth

Schminke

Ambrose

M. L.

Folger

(2014). Abusive supervision climate: A multiple-mediation model of its impact on group outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 57(5), 1513-1534. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0237

70.

Rioux

S. M.

Penner

L. A.

(2001). The causes of organizational citizenship behavior: A motivational analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(6), 1306-1314. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.6.1306

71.

Roberson

Q. M.

(2006). Justice in teams: The activation and role of sensemaking in the emergence of justice climates. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 100(2), 177-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.02.006

72.

Ryan

R. M.

Connell

J. P.

(1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(5), 749-761. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.5.749

73.

Schulte

Ostroff

Shmulyian

Kinicki

(2009). Organizational climate configurations: Relationships to collective attitudes, customer satisfaction, and financial performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(3), 618-634. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014365

74.

Shamir

House

R. J.

Arthur

M. B.

(1993). The motivational effects of charismatic leadership: A self-concept based theory. Organization Science, 4(4), 577-594. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.4.4.577

75.

Stollberger

Las Heras

Rofcanin

Bosch

M. J.

(2019). Serving followers and family? A trickle-down model of how servant leadership shapes employee work performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 112, 158-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2019.02.003

76.

Stoverink

A. C.

Umphress

E. E.

Gardner

R. G.

Miner

K. N.

(2014). Misery loves company: Team dissonance and the influence of supervisor-focused interpersonal justice climate on team cohesiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(6), 1059-1073. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037915

77.

Horton

Riggio

(2018). Charismatic leadership: Eliciting and channeling follower emotions. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(1), 58-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.12.008

78.

Takeuchi

Bolino

M. C.

Lin

C. C.

(2015). Too many motives? The interactive effects of multiple motives on organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(4), 1239-1248. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000001

79.

Tepper

B. J.

(2000). Consequences of abusive supervision. Academy of Management Journal, 43(2), 178-190. https://doi.org/10.2307/1556375

80.

Toh

S. M.

Morgeson

F. P.

Campion

M. A.

(2008). Human resource configurations: Investigating fit with the organizational context. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(4), 864-882. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.4.864

81.

Trougakos

J. P.

Beal

D. J.

Cheng

B. H.

Hideg

Zweig

(2015). Too drained to help: A resource depletion perspective on daily interpersonal citizenship behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(1), 227-236. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038082

82.

Waldman

D. A.

Ramirez

G. G.

House

R. J.

Puranam

(2001). Does leadership matter? CEO leadership attributes and profitability under conditions of perceived environmental uncertainty. Academy of Management Journal, 44(1), 134-143. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069341

83.

Waldman

D. A.

Wang

Hannah

S. T.

Owens

B. P.

Balthazard

P. A.

(2018). Psychological and neurological predictors of abusive supervision. Personnel Psychology, 71(3), 399-421. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12262

84.

Walter

Bruch

(2009). An affective events model of charismatic leadership behavior: A review, theoretical integration, and research agenda. Journal of Management, 35(6), 1428-1452. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309342468

85.

Woehr

D. J.

Loignon

A. C.

Schmidt

P. B.

Loughry

M. L.

Ohland

M. W.

(2015). Justifying aggregation with consensus-based constructs: A review and examination of cutoff values for common aggregation indices. Organizational Research Methods, 18(4), 704-737. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428115582090

86.

J. B.

Tsui

A. S.

Kinicki

A. J.

(2010). Consequences of differentiated leadership in groups. Academy of Management Journal, 53(1), 90-106. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.48037079

87.

A. J.

Loi

Lam

L. W.

(2015). The bad boss takes it all: How abusive supervision and leader–member exchange interact to influence employee silence. The Leadership Quarterly, 26(5), 763-774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.03.002

88.

Zellars

Tepper

B. J.

Duffy

M. K.

(2002). Abusive supervision and subordinates’ organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(6), 1068-1076. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1068

89.

Zhang

A. Y.

Tsui

A. S.

Wang

(2017). CEO humility, narcissism and firm innovation: A paradox perspective on CEO traits. The Leadership Quarterly, 28(5), 585-604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.01.003

90.

Zhang

Liu

Yang

L. Q.

Bednall

T. C.

(2019). Why abusive supervision impacts employee OCB and CWB: A meta-analytic review of competing mediating mechanisms. Journal of Management, 45(6), 2474-2497. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206318823935

When Charismatic Leadership Loses its Luster: Examining the Interactive Effect of Charismatic Leadership and Abusive Supervision on Follower Prosocial Motivation and Citizenship Behavior

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References