When Friendship is Not Mutual: The Influence of Network Centrality Incongruence on Leadership Emergence and Organizational Identification

Abstract

Integrating balance theory with self-perception theory, we propose that the incongruence between in-degree and out-degree centrality in a friendship network (“centrality incongruence” hereafter) contributes to the emergence of informal leadership. Through leadership emergence, centrality incongruence has a positive and indirect influence on organizational identification. In-degree centrality reflects the extent to which one is sought by others in the group as a friend, whereas out-degree centrality captures the extent to which one sees others as a friend. We surveyed 257 employees from 38 self-management business units at three observation points. Results based on polynomial regression and surface response analysis supported our hypotheses. Besides, the relationship between centrality incongruence and informal leadership emergence was stronger when the in-degree centrality is greater than the out-degree centrality compared to when the out-degree centrality is greater than the in-degree centrality. Our study points out the value of jointly considering in-degree and out-degree centrality in a social network in understanding their effects on leadership emergence and other work outcomes.

Keywords

degree centrality friendship network leadership emergence organizational identification surface response analysis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ahuja

M. K.

Galletta

D. F.

Carley

K. M.

(2003). Individual centrality and performance in virtual R&D groups: An empirical study. Management Science, 49(1), 21-38. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.49.1.21.12756

Aiken

L. S.

West

S. G.

(1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Sage.

Ashforth

B. E.

Mael

(1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20-39. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4278999

Badura

K. L.

Grijalva

Newman

D. A.

Yan

T. T.

Jeon

(2018). Gender and leadership emergence: A meta-analysis and explanatory model. Personnel Psychology, 71(3), 335-367. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12266

Baldwin

Bedell

Johnson

(1997). The social fabric of a team-based mba program: Network effects on student satisfaction and performance. The Academy of Management Journal, 40(6), 1369-1397. https://doi.org/10.5465/257037

Becker

G. S.

(1964). Human capital. Columbia University Press.

Bem

D. J.

(1972). Self-perception theory. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 6, 1-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60024-6

Berman

E. M.

West

J. P.

Richter

M. N.

Jr. (2002). Workplace relations: Friendship patterns and consequences (according to managers). Public Administration Review, 62(2), 217-230. https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00172

Borgatti

S. P.

Everett

M. G.

Freeman

L. C.

(2002). Ucinet for windows: Software for social network analysis. Analytic Technologies.

10.

Brass

D. J.

(1984). Being in the right place: A structural analysis of individual influence in an organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(4), 518-539. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392937

11.

Brass

D. J.

Burkhardt

M. E.

(1993). Potential power and power use: An investigation of structure and behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 36(3), 441-470. https://doi.org/10.5465/256588

12.

Brislin

R. W.

Lonner

W. J.

Thorndike

R. M.

(1973). Cross-cultural research methods. John Wiley.

13.

Burkhardt

M. E.

Brass

D. J.

(1990). Changing patterns or patterns of change: The effects of a change in technology on social network structure and power. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 104-127. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393552

14.

Burt

R. S.

(1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Harvard University Press.

15.

Carter

D. R.

DeChurch

L. A.

Braun

M. T.

Contractor

N. S.

(2015). Social network approaches to leadership: An integrative conceptual review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(3), 597-622. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038922

16.

Chiu

C. Y. (Chad)

Balkundi

Weinberg

F. J.

(2017). When managers become leaders: The role of manager network centralities, social power, and followers’ perception of leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 28(2), 334-348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.05.004

17.

Cole

M. S.

Carter

M. Z.

Zhang

(2013). Leader-team congruence in power distance values and team effectiveness: The mediating role of procedural justice climate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(6), 962-973. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034269

18.

Crandall

C. S.

Silvia

P. J.

N’Gbala

A. N.

Tsang

J. A.

Dawson

(2007). Balance theory, unit relations, and attribution: The underlying integrity of Heiderian theory. Review of General Psychology, 11(1), 12-30. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.11.1.12

19.

Deci

E. L.

Ryan

R. M.

(1985). The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 19(2), 109-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(85)90023-6

20.

Derue

Ashford

(2010). Who will lead and who will follow? A social process of leadership identity construction in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 35(4), 627-647. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.35.4.zok627

21.

Diener

Seligman

M. E.

(2002). Very happy people. Psychological Science, 13(1), 81-84. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00415

22.

Downey

Feldman

S. I.

(1996). Implications of rejection sensitivity for intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(6), 1327-1343. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.6.1327

23.

Eagle

Pentland

Lazer

(2009). Inferring friendship network structure by using mobile phone data. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(36), 15274-15278. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0900282106

24.

Edwards

J. R.

Cable

D. M.

(2009). The value of value congruence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(3), 654-677. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014891

25.

Edwards

J. R.

Parry

M. E.

(1993). On the use of polynomial regression equations as an alternative to difference scores in organizational research. Academy of Management Journal, 36(6), 1577-1613. https://doi.org/10.5465/256822

26.

Ensari

Riggio

R. E.

Christian

Carslaw

(2011). Who emerges as a leader? Meta-analyses of individual differences as predictors of leadership emergence. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(4), 532-536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.05.017

27.

Fang

Landis

Zhang

Anderson

M. H.

Shaw

J. D.

Kilduff

(2015). Integrating personality and social networks: A meta-analysis of personality, network position, and work outcomes in organizations. Organization Science, 26(4), 1243-1260. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2015.0972

28.

Freeman

L. C.

(1978). Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1(3), 215-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7

29.

French, J. R. P., & Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 150-167). Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.

30.

Ganster, D. C., Hennessey, H. W., & Luthans, F. (1983). Social desirability response effects: Three alternative models. Academy of Management Journal, 26(2), 321-331. https://doi.org/10.5465/255979

31.

Gerpott

F. H.

Lehmann-Willenbrock

Voelpel

S. C.

Van Vugt

(2019). It’s not just what is said, but when it’s said: A temporal account of verbal behaviors and emergent leadership in self-managed teams. Academy of Management Journal, 62(3), 717-738. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2017.0149

32.

Gerstner

C. R.

Day

D. V.

(1997). Meta-Analytic review of leader–member exchange theory: Correlates and construct issues. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(6), 827-844. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.82.6.827

33.

Brown

A. D.

(2013). Organizational identity and organizational identification: A review of the literature and suggestions for future research. Group & Organization Management, 38(1), 3-35. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601112473815

34.

Heider

(1958). Psychology of interpersonal relations. Wiley.

35.

Hill

C. A.

(1987). Affiliation motivation: People who need people … but in different ways. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(5), 1008-1018. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.5.1008

36.

V. T.

Pollack

J. M.

(2014). Passion isn’t always a good thing: Examining entrepreneurs’ network centrality and financial performance with a dualistic model of passion. Journal of Management Studies, 51(3), 433-459. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12062

37.

Hofstede

Bond

M. H.

(1988). The confucius connection: From cultural roots to economic growth. Organizational Dynamics, 16(4), 5-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616(88)90009-5

38.

Hummon

N. P.

Doreian

(2003). Some dynamics of social balance processes: Bringing Heider back into balance theory. Social Networks, 25(1), 17-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-8733(02)00019-9

39.

Ibarra

(1992). Homophily and differential returns: Sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(3), 422-447. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393451

40.

Ibarra

Andrews

S. B.

(1993). Power, social influence, and sense making: Effects of network centrality and proximity on employee perceptions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(2), 277-303. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393414

41.

Jansen

K. J.

Kristof-Brown

A. L.

(2005). Marching to the beat of a different drummer: Examining the impact of pacing congruence. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97(2), 93-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.03.005

42.

Jehn

K. A.

Shah

P. P.

(1997). Interpersonal relationships and task performance: An examination of mediation processes in friendship and acquaintance groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(4), 775-790. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.4.775

43.

Kalish

Luria

(2016). Leadership emergence over time in short-lived groups: Integrating expectations states theory with temporal person-perception and self-serving bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101, 1474-1486. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000126

44.

Kelly

Doyle

Parker

(2020). Methods for assessing higher education research team collaboration: Comparing research outputs and participant perceptions across four collaborative research teams. Higher Education Research and Development, 39(2), 215-229. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2019.1676199

45.

Kenny

D. A.

(1975). Cross-lagged panel correlation: A test for spuriousness. Psychological Bulletin, 82(6), 887-903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.82.6.887

46.

Kilduff

Brass

D. J.

(2010). Organizational social network research: Core ideas and key debates. Academy of Management Annals, 4(1), 317-357. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2010.494827

47.

Klein

K. J.

Lim

B. C.

Saltz

J. L.

Mayer

D. M.

(2004). How do they get there? An examination of the antecedents of centrality in team networks. Academy of Management Journal, 47(6), 952-963. https://doi.org/10.5465/20159634

48.

Knoke

Burt

R. S.

(1983). Prominence. In Burt

R. S.

Miner

M. J.

(Eds.), Applied network analysis: A methodological introduction (pp. 195-222). Sage.

49.

Korman

A. K.

(1970). Toward an hypothesis of work behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 54(1), 31-41. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0028656

50.

Kwok

Hanig

Brown

D. J.

Shen

(2018). How leader role identity influences the process of leader emergence: A social network analysis. Leadership Quarterly, 29(6), 648-662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.04.003

51.

Lee

E.-S.

Park

T.-Y.

Koo

(2015). Identifying organizational identification as a basis for attitudes and behaviors: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 141(5), 1049-1080. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000012

52.

Lee

S. H. (Mark)

Cotte

Noseworthy

T. J.

(2010). The role of network centrality in the flow of consumer influence. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20(1), 66-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2009.10.001

53.

Lincoln

J. R.

Miller

(1979). Work and friendship ties in organizations: A comparative analysis of relational networks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 181-199. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392493

54.

Lord, R. G., Brown, D. J., Harvey, J. L., & Hall, R. J. (2001). Contextual constraints on prototype generation and their multilevel consequences for leadership perceptions. The Leadership Quarterly, 12(3), 311-338. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(01)00081-9

55.

Luria

Berson

(2013). How do leadership motives affect informal and formal leadership emergence? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(7), 995-1015. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1836

56.

MacKinnon

D. P.

Lockwood

C. M.

Hoffman

J. M.

West

S. G.

Sheets

(2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7, 83-104. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.7.1.83

57.

Mael

Ashforth

B. E.

(1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(2), 103-123. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030130202

58.

McClean

E. J.

Martin

S. R.

Emich

K. J.

Woodruff

C. T.

(2018). The social consequences of voice: An examination of voice type and gender on status and subsequent leader emergence. Academy of Management Journal, 61(5), 1869-1891. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.0148

59.

Morrison

E. W.

(2002). Newcomers’ relationships: The role of social network ties during socialization. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), 1149-1160. https://doi.org/10.5465/3069430

60.

Newcomb

T. M.

(1978). The acquaintance process: Looking mainly backward. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(10), 1075-1083. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.36.10.1075

61.

Novak, M. A., & Sigmund, K. (2005). The evolution of indirect reciprocity. Nature, 437(7063), 1292-1298. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04131

62.

Paulhus

D. L.

(1984). Two-component models of socially desirability responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(3), 598-609. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.46.3.598

63.

Preacher

K. J.

Selig

J. P.

(2012). Advantages of Monte Carlo confidence intervals for indirect effects. Communication Methods and Measures, 6(2), 77-98. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2012.679848

64.

Rankin

D. J.

Taborsky

(2009). Assortment and the evolution of generalized reciprocity. Evolution: International Journal of Organic Evolution, 63(7), 1913-1922. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00656.x

65.

Rath

(2006). Vital friends: The people you can’t afford to live without. Simon and Schuster.

66.

Riketta

(2005). Organizational identification: A meta-analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66(2), 358-384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2004.05.005

67.

Riordan

C. M.

Griffeth

R. W.

(1995). The opportunity for friendship in the workplace: An underexplored construct. Journal of Business and Psychology, 10(2), 141-154. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02249575

68.

Rossman

Esparza

Bonacich

(2010). I’d like to thank the academy, team spillovers, and network centrality. American Sociological Review, 75(1), 31-51. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122409359164

69.

Salancik

G. R.

Pfeffer

(1978). A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23(2), 224-253. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392563

70.

Schaubroeck

J. M.

Peng

A. C.

Hannah

S. T.

(2013). Developing trust with peers and leaders: Impacts on organizational identification and performance during entry. Academy of Management Journal, 56(4), 1148-1168. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0358

71.

Schaubroeck, J., Peng, A. C., Hannah, S. T., Ma, J., & Cianci, A. M. (2021). Struggling to meet the bar: Occupational progress failure and informal leadership behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 64(6), 1740-1762. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2018.0956

72.

Schultz, T. W. (1961). Investment in human capital. American Economic Review, 51(1), 1-17. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1818907

73.

Schwartz, J., Bohdal-Spiegelhoff, U., Gretczko, M., & Sloan, N. (2016). The new organization: Different by design. New York: Deloitte University Press. Retrieved from https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/global/Documents/HumanCapital/gx-dup-global-human-capital-trends-2016.pdf

74.

Schultz, T. W. (1961). Investment in human capital. American Economic Review, 51(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.2307/1818907

75.

Scott

W. R.

(2001). Institutions and organizations. Sage.

76.

Shanock, L. R., Baran, B. E., Gentry, W. A., Pattison, S. C., & Heggestad, E. D. (2010). Polynomial regression with response surface analysis: A powerful approach for examining moderation and overcoming limitations of difference scores. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(4), 543-554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-010-9183-4

77.

Sluss

D. M.

Ashforth

B. E.

(2008). How relational and organizational identification converge: Processes and conditions. Organization Science, 19(6), 807-823. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0349

78.

Sparrowe

R. T.

Liden

R. C.

Wayne

S. J.

Kraimer

M. L.

(2001). Social networks and the performance of individuals and groups. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 316-325. https://doi.org/10.5465/3069458

79.

Tyler

T. R.

Blader

S. L.

(2001). Identity and cooperative behavior in groups. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 4(3), 207-226. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430201004003003

80.

Venkataramani

Zhou

Wang

Liao

Shi

(2016). Social networks and employee voice: The influence of team members’ and team leaders’ social network positions on employee voice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 132, 37-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2015.12.001

81.

Wang

Waldman

D. A.

Zhang

(2014). A meta-analysis of shared leadership and team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(2), 181-198. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034531

82.

Wasserman

Faust

(1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge University Press.

83.

Weick

K. E.

Sutcliffe

K. M.

Obstfeld

(2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16(4), 409-421. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0133

84.

Westwood

(1997). Harmony and patriarchy: The cultural basis for’paternalistic headship’among the overseas Chinese. Organization Studies, 18(3), 445-480. https://doi.org/10.1177/017084069701800305

85.

Wheelan

S. A.

Johnston

(1996). The role of informal member leaders in a system containing formal leaders. Small Group Research, 27(1), 33-55. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496496271002

86.

Yukl

(2010). Leadership in organizations. Pearson.

87.

Zhang

Nahrgang

J. D.

Ashford

S. J.

DeRue

D. S.

(2020). The risky side of leadership: Conceptualizing risk perceptions in informal leadership and investigating the effects of their over-time changes in teams. Organization Science, 31(5), 1138-1158. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2019.1350

88.

Zyphur, M. J., Allison, P. D., Tay, L., Voelkle, M. C., Preacher, K. J., Zhang, Z., Hamaker, E. L., Shamsollahi, A., Pierides, D. C., Koval, P., & Diener, E. (2019). From data to causes i: Building a general cross-lagged panel model (gclm). Organizational Research Methods, 23(4), 651-687. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428119847278