Effective communication is a foundational leadership skill. Many leadership theories implicitly assume communication skills, without investigating them behaviorally. To be able to research leader communication as a building block of effective leader behavior, we propose a new concept, i.e., leader attentive communication which refers to “an open-minded, attentive demeanor while in a conversation with an employee”. Instead of focusing on the content or form of the communication, we propose to study the communication skills of the leader from the viewpoint of the employee. In this article, we both validate a questionnaire and test LAC's influence on employee wellbeing in four different studies. We use information from 1,320 employees and their leaders, in 422 teams, in 3 different datasets. The result is a 10-item questionnaire with 2 dimensions consisting of general attention (towards the employee) and attention to non-verbal cues. We also find that LAC is associated with work engagement, psychological needs and Kahn's conditions for work engagement. With this questionnaire, we contribute to calls for a more behavioral, detailed view on leader communication behavior.
ArendtJ. F. W.Pircher VerdorferA.KuglerK. G. (2019). Mindfulness and leadership: Communication as a behavioral correlate of leader mindfulness and its effect on follower satisfaction. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 667. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00667
2.
AvolioB. J.BassB. M. (2004). Multifactor leadership questionnaire (MLQ). Mind Garden.
3.
AvolioB. J.BassB. M.JungD. I. (1999). Re-examining the components of transformational and transactional leadership using the multifactor leadership questionnaire. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72, 441-462. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317999166789
4.
BaardP. P.DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (2004). The relation of intrinsic need satisfaction to performance and well-being in two work settings. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(10), 2045-2068. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02690.x
5.
BaerR. A.CarmodyJ.HunsingerM. (2012). Weekly change in mindfulness and perceived stress in a mindfulness-based stress reduction program. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 68(7), 755-765. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.21865
6.
BaerR. A.SmithG. T.HopkinsJ.KrietemeyerJ.ToneyL. (2006). Using self-report assessment methods to explore facets of mindfulness. Assessment, 13(1), 27-45. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191105283504
7.
Bakker-PieperA.De VriesR. E. (2013). The incremental validity of communication styles over personality traits for leader outcomes. Human Performance, 26, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2012.736900
BellouV.GkorezisP. (2016). Unveiling the link between facets of positive nonverbal communication and perceived leader effectiveness: A moderated mediation model. Human Performance, 29(4), 310-330. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2016.1157597
11.
BodieG. D. (2011). The active-empathic listening scale (AELS): Conceptualization and evidence of validity within the interpersonal domain. Communication Quarterly, 59(3), 277-295. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2011.583495
12.
BreevaartK.BakkerA.HetlandJ.DemeroutiE.OlsenO. K.EspevikR. (2014). Daily transactional and transformational leadership and daily employee engagement. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 87(1), 138-157. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12041
13.
BrownK. W.RyanR. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 822-848. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.822
14.
CastroD. R.AnseelF.KlugerA. N.LloydK. J.Turjeman-LeviY. (2018). Mere listening effect on creativity and the mediating role of psychological safety. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts,12(4), 489-502. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000177.supp
15.
CastroD. R.KlugerA. N.ItzchakovG. (2016). Does avoidance-attachment style attenuate the benefits of being listened to?European Journal of Social Psychology, 46(6), 762-775. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2185
16.
ChristianM. S.GarzaA. S.SlaughterJ. E. (2011). Work engagement: A quantitative review and test of its relations with task and contextual performance. Personnel Psychology, 64(1), 89-136. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01203.x
17.
CornelisI.HielA. V.De CremerD.MayerD. M.RossS. M. (2013). When leaders choose to be fair: Follower belongingness needs and leader empathy influences leaders’ adherence to procedural fairness rules. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 605-613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.02.016
18.
CostelloA. B.OsborneJ. W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10(7), 1-9. http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v = 10&n = 7
19.
DayD. V.FleenorJ. W.AtwaterL. E.SturmR. E.McKeeR. A. (2014). Advances in leader and leadership development: A review of 25 years of research and theory. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(1), 63-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LEAQUA.2013.11.004
20.
De VriesR. E.Bakker-PieperA.SibergR. A.Van GamerenK.VlugM. (2009). The content and dimensionality of communication styles. Communication Research, 36(2), 178-206. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650208330250
21.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (2008). Self-Determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation. Development, and Health. Canadian Psychology, 49(3), 182-185. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012801
22.
DecuypereA. (2021). Unraveling the black box of how leaders affect employee well-being: The role of leadership, leader well-being and leader attentive communication. Chapter 6: Leader attentive communication: Developing and testing an evidence-based training protocol [Doctoral dissertation]. Ghent University.
23.
DecuypereA.SchaufeliW. (2020). Leadership and work engagement : Exploring explanatory mechanisms. German Journal of Human Resource Management, 34(1), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1177/2397002219892197
24.
DecuypereA.SchaufeliW. (2021). Exploring the leadership–engagement nexus: A moderated meta-analysis and review of explaining mechanisms. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(16), 8592. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168592
25.
DerueD. S.RossS. M.NahrgangJ. D.CareyW. P.WellmanN.HumphreyS. E. (2011). Trait and behavioral theories of leadership: An integration and meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Personnel Psychology, 64, 7-52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01201.x
26.
EberlyM. B.JohnsonM. D.HernandezM.AvolioB. J. (2013). An integrative process model of leadership examining loci. Mechanisms, and Event Cycles. American Psychologist, 68(6), 427-443. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032244
27.
ErbenJ.SchneiderF. M.MaierM. (2019). In the ear of the beholder: Self-other agreement in leadership communication and its relationship with subordinates’ job satisfaction. International Journal of Business Communication, 56(4), 505-529. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488416672431
FleenorJ. W.SmitherJ. W.AtwaterL. E.BraddyP. W.SturmR. E. (2010). Self–other rating agreement in leadership: A review. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(6), 1005-1034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.10.006
30.
GoodD. J.LyddyC. J.GlombT. M.BonoJ. E.BrownK. W.DuffyM. K.BaerR. A.BrewerJ. A.LazarS. W. (2016). Contemplating mindfulness at work: An integrative review. Journal of Management, 42(1), 114-142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315617003
31.
GraenG. B.Uhl-BienM. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219‒247. https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(95)90036-5
32.
GreenleafR. K. (1977). Servant leadership: A journey into the nature of legitimate power and greatness. Paulist Press.
33.
GuoW.LiT.WuN. (2015). Empirical study on the effects of leader’s verbal communication style on employee’s job satisfaction. Journal of Human Resource and Sustainability Studies, 3(04), 211. https://doi.org/10.4236/jhrss.2015.34027
34.
HayesA. F.MontoyaA. K.RockwoodN. J. (2017). The analysis of mechanisms and their contingencies: PROCESS versus structural equation modeling. Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ), 25(1), 76‒81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ausmj.2017.02.001
35.
HinkinT. R. (1995). A review of scale development practices in the study of organizations. Journal of Management, 21(5), 967-988. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639502100509
36.
HouseR. J.PodsakoffP. M. (1994). Leadership effectiveness: Past perspectives and future directions for research. In GreenbergJ. (Ed.), Series in applied psychology. Organizational behavior: The state of the science (pp. 45-82). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
37.
HoltS.MarquesJ. (2012). Empathy in leadership: Appropriate or misplaced? An empirical study on a topic that is asking for attention. Journal of Business Ethics, 105(1), 95-105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0951-5
38.
InceogluI.ThomasG.ChuC.PlansD.GerbasiA. (2018). Leadership behavior and employee well-being: An integrated review and a future research agenda. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(1), 179-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.12.006
39.
JohnO. P.Benet-MartínezV. (2000). Measurement: Reliability, construct validation, and scale construction. In ReisH. T.JuddC. M. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 339-369). Cambridge University Press.
40.
JonesS. M.BodieG. D.HughesS. D. (2016). The impact of mindfulness on empathy, active listening, and perceived provisions of emotional support. Communication Research, 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650215626983
41.
KacmarK. M.WittL. A.ZivnuskaS.GullyS. M. (2003). The interactive effect of leader-member exchange and communication frequency on performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(4), 764-772. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.764
42.
Kabat-ZinnJ. (2005). Coming to our senses: Healing ourselves and the world through mindfulness. Hachette Books.
43.
KahnW. A. (1990). Academy of Management Journal; Dec Academy of Management Journal, 33(334), 692-724. https://doi.org/10.5465/256287
44.
KarelaiaN.RebJ. (2015). Improving decision making through mindfulness. In RebJ.AtkinsP. W. B. (Eds.), Mindfulness in organizations: Foundations, research and applications (pp. 163-189). Cambridge University Press.
45.
KellettJ. B.HumphreyR. H.SleethR. G. (2002). Empathy and complex task performance: Two routes to leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 13, 523-544. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00142-X
46.
KimW.KolbJ. A.KimT. (2013). The relationship between work engagement and performance: A review of empirical literature and a proposed research agenda. Human Resource Development Review, 12(3), 248-276. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484312461635
47.
LeBretonJ. M.SenterJ. L. (2008). Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement. Organizational Research Methods, 11(4), 815-852. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428106296642
48.
LevyD. M.WobbrockJ. O.KaszniakA. W.OstergrenM. (2012). The effects of mindfulness meditation training on multitasking in a high-stress information environment. Proceedings of Graphics Interface (GI ‘12), 45-52. http://worcester.ma/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/meditation-study.pdf
49.
LloydK. J.BoerD.VoelpelS. C. (2017). From listening to leading: Toward an understanding of supervisor listening within the framework of leader-member exchange theory. International Journal of Business Communication, 54(4), 431-451. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488415572778
50.
MayD. R.GilsonR. L.HarterL. M. (2004). The psychological conditions of meaningfulness, safety and availability and the engagement of the human spirit at work. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology Psychology Module, 77, 11-37. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317904322915892
MayfieldM.MayfieldJ. (2009). The role of leader-follower relationships in leader communication: A test using the LMX and motivating language models. The Journal of Business Inquiry, 8(1), 65-82. https://journals.uvu.edu/index.php/jbi/article/view/208
MishimaN.KubotaS.NagataS. (2000). The development of a questionnaire to assess the attitude of active listening. Journal of Occupational Health, 42(3), 111-118. https://doi.org/10.1539/joh.42.111
55.
MurphyK. (2020). You’re not listening. What you’re missing & why it matters. Penguin Random House.
56.
NeufeldD. J.WanZ.FangY.NeufeldD. J.WanZ.IveyR. (2010). Remote leadership, communication effectiveness and leader performance. Group Decis Negot, 19, 227-246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-008-9142-x
57.
NortonR. W.PettegrewL. S. (1979). Attentiveness as a style of communication: A structural analysis. Communications Monographs, 46(1), 13-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637757909375987
58.
NorthouseP. G. (2021). Leadership: theory and practice (7th ed). Sage publications.
59.
PekaarK. A.BakkerA. B.van der LindenD.BornM. P. (2018). Self- and other-focused emotional intelligence_ development and validation of the rotterdam emotional intelligence scale (REIS). Personality and Individual Differences, 120, 222-233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.08.045
60.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.LeeJ. Y.PodsakoffN. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
61.
RahmadaniV. G.SchaufeliW. B.IvanovaT. Y.OsinE. N. (2019). Basic psychological need satisfaction mediates the relationship between engaging leadership and work engagement: A cross-national study. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 30(4), 453-471. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21366
62.
RebJ.NarayananJ.ChaturvediS. (2014). Leading mindfully: Two studies on the influence of supervisor trait mindfulness on employee well-being and performance. Mindfulness, 5(1), 36-45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-012-0144-z
63.
ReeveJ. (2018). Understanding motivation and emotion (7th edition). John Wiley & Sons.
64.
RiggioR. E. (2013). A social skills model for understanding the foundations of leader communication. In RiggioR. E.TanS. J. (Eds.), Leader interpersonal and influence skills: The soft skills of leadership (pp. 31-45). Routledge.
65.
RiggioR. E.DariolyA. (2016). Measuring nonverbal sensitivity. In MatsumotoD.HwangH. C.FrankM. G. (Eds.), APA Handbook of nonverbal communication (pp. 589-606). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14669-023
66.
RobertsJ. A.WilliamsB. H. (2017). Put down your phone and listen to me: How boss phubbing undermines the psychological conditions necessary for employee engagement. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 206-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.05.021
67.
RosseelY. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modelling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1-36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
68.
RowoldJ.BorgmannL.DiebigM. (2015). A “tower of Babel”? – interrelations and structure of leadership constructs. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 36(2), 137-160. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-01-2013-0009
69.
RubenB. D.GigliottiR. A. (2017). Communication: Sine Qua non of organizational leadership theory and practice. International Journal of Business Communication, 54(1), 12-30. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488416675447
SchaufeliW. B. (2012). The measurement of work engagement. In SinclairR. R.WangM.TetrickL. E. (Eds.), Research methods in occupational health psychology: Measurement, design, and data analysis (pp. 138-153). Routledge.
72.
SchaufeliW. B. (2015). Engaging leadership in the job demands-resources model. Career Development International, 20(5), 446-463. https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-02-2015-0025
SchaufeliW. B.ShimazuA.HakanenJ.SalanovaM.De WitteH. (2017). An ultra-short measure for work engagement: The UWES-3 validation across five countries. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000430
75.
ScheinE. H. (2013). Humble inquiry. The gentle art of asking instead of telling. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
76.
SchriesheimC. A.CastroS. L.CogliserC. C. (1999). Leader-member exchange (LMX) research: A comprehensive review of theory, measurement, and data-analytic practices. The Leadership Quarterly, 10(1), 63‒113. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(99)80009-5
77.
Smith-CroweK.BurkeM. J.CohenA.DovehE. (2014). Statistical significance criteria for the r WG and average deviation interrater agreement indices. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99, 239-261. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034556
78.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (Fourth Edi). Harper & Row.
79.
VachonD. D.LynamD. R. (2016). Fixing the problem with empathy: Development and validation of the affective and cognitive measure of empathy. Assessment, 23(2), 135-149. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191114567941
80.
Van Den BroeckA.VansteenkisteM.De WitteH.SoenensB.LensW. (2010). Capturing autonomy, competence, and relatedness at work: Construction and initial validation of the work-related basic need satisfaction scale. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(4), 981-1002. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317909X481382
81.
van DierendonckD.NuijtenI. (2011). The servant leadership survey: Development and validation of a multidimensional measure. Journal of Business and Psychology, 26(3), 249-267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-010-9194-1
82.
Van QuaquebekeN.FelpsW. (2016). Respectful inquiry: A motivational account of leading through asking open questions and listening. Academy of Management Review, 43(1), 5-27. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2014.0537
YuklG. (2002). Leadership in organizations (5th editio). Prentice Hall.
85.
ZhaoX.LynchJ. G.JrChenQ. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 197‒206. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309335187
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
