Recent reviews of corporate social responsibility (CSR) research indicate a need for studies of micro-level influence processes addressing CSR values. Transformational leadership is a values-laden influence process whereby leaders elicit superior follower performance through the alignment of work values. Using data from 129 leaders and 582 of their direct reports, this study’s results demonstrated that leader CSR values were associated with transformational leadership. Transformational leadership was positively associated with follower stakeholder CSR values and negatively related to follower shareholder CSR values. Leader stakeholder CSR values moderated the relationship between transformational leadership and follower stakeholder values, offering evidence of leader–follower value congruence while addressing a limitation of prior studies that adopted perceptual measures of values congruence. Implications for transformational leadership theory, practice, and future research are discussed.
AguinisH. (2011). Organizational responsibility: Doing good and doing well. In ZedeckS. (Ed.), APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 855-879). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
3.
AguinisH.GlavasA. (2012). What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38. 932-968.
BasuK.PalazzoG. (2008). Corporate social responsibility: A process model of sensemaking. Academy of Management Review, 33, 122-136.
11.
BretzR.AshR.DreherG. (1989). Do the people make the place? An examination of the attraction-selection-attrition hypothesis. Personnel Psychology, 42, 561-581.
12.
BrownM.TreviñoL. (2006). Socialized charismatic leadership, values congruence, and deviance in work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 954-962.
13.
BrownM.TreviñoL. (2009). Leader-follower values congruence: Are socialized charismatic leaders better able to achieve it?Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 478-490.
14.
BurnsJ. (1978). Leadership. New York, NY: Harper Row.
15.
ClarkS. (2013). Safety leadership: A meta-analytic review of transformational and transactional leadership styles as antecedents of safety behaviors. Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, 86(1), 22-49.
16.
DeCellesK.PfarrerM. (2004). Heroes or villains? Corruption and the charismatic leader. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 11, 67-77.
17.
De LuqueM.WashburnN.WaldmanD.HouseR. (2008). Unrequited profit: How stakeholder and economic values relate to subordinates’ perceptions of leadership and firm performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53, 626-654.
18.
DvirT.EdenD.AvolioB.ShamirB. (2002). Impact of transformational leadership on follower development and performance: A field experiment. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 735-744.
19.
EngelbrechtA.Van AswegenA.TheronC. (2004). The effect of ethical values on transformational leadership and ethical climate in organizations. South African Journal of Business Management, 36(2), 19-26.
20.
ErdoganR.KraimerM.LidenR. (2007). Work value congruence and intrinsic career success: The compensatory roles of leader-member exchange and perceived organizational support. Personnel Psychology, 57, 305-322.
21.
FriedmanM. (1962). Capitalism and freedom. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
22.
GrovesK.LaRoccaM. (2011). Responsible leadership outcomes via stakeholder CSR values: Testing a values-centered model of transformational leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 98, 37-55.
23.
GrovesK.LaRoccaM. (2012). Does transformational leadership facilitation followers beliefs in corporate social responsibility? A field study of leader personal values and follower outcomes. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 19, 215-229.
24.
HadleyC.PittinskyT.SommerA.ZhuA. (2011). Measuring the efficacy of leaders to assess information and make decisions in a crisis: The C-LEAD scale. Leadership Quarterly, 22, 633-648.
25.
HoffmanB.BynumB.PiccoloR.SuttonA. (2011). Person-organization value congruence: How transformational leaders influence work group effectiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 779-796.
26.
HoganR.RaskinR.FazziniD. (1990). The dark side of charisma. In ClarkK.ClarkM. (Eds.), Measures of leadership (pp. 343-354). West Orange, NJ: Leadership Library of America.
27.
HowellJ. M. (1988). Two faces of charisma: Socialized and personalized leadership in organizations. In CongerJ. A.KanungoR. N. (Eds.), Charismatic leadership (pp. 213-236). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
28.
HuiW.LawK.HackettR.DuanxuW.ZhenX. (2005). Leader-member exchange as a mediator of the relationship between transformational leadership and followers’ performance and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 420-432.
29.
JacobsenA.HouseR. (2001). Dynamics of charismatic leadership: A process theory, simulation model, and tests. Leadership Quarterly, 12, 75-112.
30.
JamesL. R.DemareeR. G.WolfG. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 85-98.
31.
JensenM. (2002). Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12, 235-256.
32.
JudgeT.PiccoloR. (2004). Transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 755-768.
33.
JudgeT.PiccoloR.KosalkaT. (2009). The bright and dark sides of charisma: A review and theoretical extension of the leader trait paradigm. Leadership Quarterly, 20, 855-875.
34.
JungD.AvolioB. (2000). Opening the black box: An experimental investigation of the mediating effects of trust and value congruence on transformational and transactional leadership. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 949-964.
35.
KanungoR. (2001). Ethical values of transactional and transformational leaders. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 18, 257-265.
36.
KelmanH. (1958). Compliance, identification, and internalization: Three processes of attitude change. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2, 51-60.
37.
KleinK.HouseR. (1995). On fire: Charismatic leadership and levels of analysis. Leadership Quarterly, 6, 183-198.
38.
KrasikovaD.GreenS.LeBretonJ. (2013). Destructive leadership: A theoretical review, integration, and future research agenda. Journal of Management, 39, 1308-1338.
39.
LeongL.FischerR. (2011). Is transformational leadership universal? A meta-analytical investigation of multifactor leadership questionnaire means across cultures. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 18, 164-174.
LordR.BrownD.FreibergS. (1999). Understanding the dynamics of leadership: The role of follower self-concepts in the leader/follower relationship. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 78, 167-203.
42.
LoweK.KroeckK.SivasubramaniamN. (1996). Effectiveness correlates of transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic review of the MLQ literature. Leadership Quarterly, 7, 385-425.
43.
MaakT.PlessN. (2006). Responsible leadership in a stakeholder society—A relational perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 66, 99-115.
44.
MeglinoB.RavlinE. (1998). Individual values in organizations: Concepts, controversies, and research. Journal of Management, 24, 351-389.
45.
MeglinoB.RavlinE.AdkinsC. The measurement of work value congruence: A field study comparison. Journal of Management, 18, 33-43.
46.
MendoncaM. (2001). Preparing for ethical leadership in organizations. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 18, 266-276.
47.
MillikenF.MartinsL. (1996). Searching for common threads: Understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 21, 402-433.
48.
MorrisJ.BrotheridgeC.UrbanskiJ. (2005). Bringing humility to leadership: Antecedents and consequences of leader humility. Human Relations, 58, 1323-1350.
49.
OregS.BersonY. (2011). Leadership and employees’ reactions to change: The role of leaders’ personal attributes and transformational leadership style. Personnel Psychology, 64, 627-659.
50.
PhillipsR. (2003). Stakeholder legitimacy. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13, 25-41.
51.
PiccoloR.BonoJ.HeinitzK.RowoldJ.DuehrE.JudgeT. (2012). The relative impact of complementary leader behaviors: Which matter most?Leadership Quarterly, 23, 567-581.
52.
PodsakoffP.MacKenzieS.BommerW. (1996). Transformational leader behaviors and substitutes for leadership as determinants of employee satisfaction, commitment, trust, and organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Management, 22, 259-299.
53.
RaelinJ. A. (2003). The myth of charismatic leaders. Training and Development, 57(3), 46-51.
54.
RokeachM. (1973). The nature of human values. New York, NY: Free Press.
55.
RousseauD. M. (1985). Issues of levels in organizational research: Multi-levels and cross level perspectives. In CummingsL. L.StawB. M. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 43-72). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
56.
SchneiderB. (1987). The people make the place. Personnel Psychology, 40, 437-453.
57.
SchwartzS. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 1-65.
58.
ShaferW.FukukawaK.LeeG. (2006). Values and the perceived importance of ethics and social responsibility: The U.S. versus China. Journal of Business Ethics, 70, 265-284.
59.
ShaoR.AquinoK.FreemanD. (2008). Beyond moral reasoning: A review of moral identity research and its implications for business ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18, 513-540.
60.
SinghapakdiA.KarandeK.RaoC.VitellS. (2001). How important are ethics and social responsibility? A multinational study of marketing professionals. European Journal of Marketing, 35, 449-478.
61.
ShamirB.HouseR.ArthurM. (1993). The motivational effects of charismatic leadership: A self-concept based theory. Organization Science, 4, 577-594.
SinghapakdiA.VitellS.RallapalliK.KraftK. (1996). The perceived role of ethics and social responsibility: A scale development. Journal of Business Ethics, 15, 1131-1140.
64.
SosikJ. (2005). The role of personal values in the charismatic leadership of corporate managers: A model and preliminary field study. Leadership Quarterly, 16, 221-244.
65.
VitellS.PaolilloJ.ThomasJ. (2003). The perceived role of ethics and social responsibility: A study of marketing professionals. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13, 63-86.
66.
WaldmanD.GalvinB. (2008). Alternative perspectives of responsible leadership. Organizational Dynamics, 37, 327-341.
67.
WaldmanD.RamirezG.HouseR.PuranamP. (2001). Does leadership matter? CEO leadership attributes and profitability under conditions of perceived environmental uncertainty. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 134-143.
68.
WaldmanD.SiegelD.JavidanM. (2006). Components of CEO transformational leadership and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 1703-1725.
69.
WangG.OhI.CourtrightS.ColbertA. (2011). Transformational leadership and performance across criteria and levels: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of research. Group & Organization Management, 36, 223-270.
70.
ZhuW.AvolioB.RiggioR.SosikJ. (2011). The effect of authentic transformational leadership on follower and group ethics. Leadership Quarterly, 22, 801-817.
71.
ZhuW.RiggioR.AvolioB.SosikJ. (2011). The effect of leadership on follower moral identity: Does transformational/transactional style make a difference?Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 18, 150-163.
72.
ZhuW.SosikJ.RiggionR.YangB. (2012). Relationships between transformational and active transactional leadership and followers’ organizational identification: The role of psychological empowerment. Journal of Behavioral & Applied Management, 13, 186-212.
