BrownM. E.TreviñoL. K.HarrisonD. A. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97, 117-134.
2.
DeRueD. S.NahrgangJ. D.WellmanN.HumphreyS. E. (2011). Trait and behavioral theories of leadership: An integration and meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Personnel Psychology, 64, 7-52.
3.
FiedlerF. E. (1967). A theory of leadership effectiveness. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
4.
FiedlerF. E.ChemersM. M. (1974). Leadership and effective management. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
5.
FleishmanE. A. (1973). Twenty years of consideration and structure. In FleishmanE. A.HuntJ. G. (Eds.), Current developments in the study of leadership (pp. 1-40). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
6.
JudgeT. A.PiccoloR. F.IliesR. (2004). The forgotten ones? The validity of consideration and initiating structure in leadership research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 36-51.
7.
JudgeT. A.PiccoloR. F.KosalkaT. A. (2009). The bright and dark sides of leader traits: A review and theoretical extension of the leader trait paradigm. Leadership Quarterly, 20, 855-875.
8.
LathamG. P.LockeE. A. (2007). New developments in and directions for goal setting research. European Psychologist, 12, 290-300.
9.
LawlerE. E. (1973). Motivation in work organizations. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
10.
LockeE. A.LathamG. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57, 705-717.
11.
LockeE. A.LathamG. P. (2006). New directions in goal-setting theory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 265-268.
12.
LordR. G.de VaderC. L.AlligerG. M. (1986). A meta-analysis of the relation between personality traits and leadership perceptions: An application of validity generalization procedures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 402-410.