Leader–member exchange (LMX) ratings from 375 supervisor–subordinate pairs were used to examine employee outcomes within the context of leader and member agreement/disagreement on the quality of their exchange relationship. The outcomes of interest included members’ turnover intentions and actual turnover within the 6 months following the initial survey. Results indicate that outcomes varied across the different dyadic relationships. Furthermore, the LMX variable (i.e., the leader’s rating, member’s rating, or both) that was significantly related to intent to turnover and actual turnover when both LMX variables were added to the model simultaneously was contingent on the nature of the LMX relationship being examined.
BauerT. N.ErdoganB.LidenR. C.WayneS. J. (2006). A longitudinal study of the moderating role of extraversion: Leader-member exchange, performance, and turnover during new executive development. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 298-310.
2.
BentlerP. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246.
3.
BentlerP. M.BonettD. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606.
4.
BlauP. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
5.
BrowerH. H.SchoormanF. D.TanH. H. (2000). A model of relational leadership: The integration of trust and leader-member exchange. Leadership Quarterly, 11, 227-250.
6.
BurgoonJ. K.Le PoireB. A. (1993). Effects of communication expectancies, actual communication, and expectancy disconfirmation on evaluation of communicators and their communication behavior. Human Communication Research, 20, 67-96.
7.
CammannC.FichmanM.JenkinsG. D.Jr.KleshJ. R. (1983). Assessing the attitudes and perceptions of organizational members. In SeashoreS. E.LawlerE. E.IIIMirvisP. H.CammannC. (Eds.), Assessing organizational change: A guide to methods, measures, and practices (pp. 71-138). New York, NY: Wiley.
8.
CashmanJ.DansereauF. J.GraenG. B.HagaW. J. (1976). Organizational understructure and leadership: A longitudinal investigation of role-making process. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 15, 278-296.
9.
CogliserC. C.SchriesheimC. A.ScanduraT. A.GardnerW. L. (2009). Balance in leader and follower perceptions of leader-member exchange: Relationships with performance and work attitudes. Leadership Quarterly, 20, 452-465.
10.
ColemanD. F. (1998). An alternative “limited domain” view of leader-member exchange. In DansereauF.Jr.YammarinoF. J. (Eds.), Leadership: The multiple-level approaches. Part B: Contemporary and alternative (pp. 137-148). Stamford, CT: JAI Press.
11.
CottonJ. L.TuttleJ. M. (1986). Employee turnover: A meta-analysis and review with implications for research. Academy of Management Review, 11, 55-70.
12.
DansereauF.Jr.GraenG.HagaW. J. (1975). A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations: A longitudinal investigation of the role making process. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 13, 46-78.
13.
DayD. V.CrainE. C. (1992). The role of affect and ability in initial exchange quality perceptions. Group & Organization Management, 17, 380-397.
14.
DeConinckJ. B. (2009). The effect of leader-member exchange on turnover among retail buyers. Journal of Business Research, 62, 1081-1086.
15.
DelugaR. J. (1994). Supervision trust building, leader-member exchange and organizational citizenship behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 67, 315-326.
16.
DelugaR. J.PerryT. J. (1994). The role of subordinate performance and ingratiation in leader-member exchanges. Group & Organization Management, 19, 67-86.
17.
DieneschR. M.LidenR. C. (1986). Leader-member exchange model of leadership: A critique and further development. Academy of Management Review, 11, 618-634.
18.
DockeryT. M.SteinerD. D. (1990). The role of the initial interaction in leader-member exchange. Group & Organization Management, 15, 395-413.
19.
DulacT.Coyle-ShapiroJ. A. M.HendersonD. J.WayneS. J. (2008). Not all responses to breach are the same: The interconnection of social exchange and psychological contract processes in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 51, 1079-1098.
20.
EdwardsJ. R. (1994). The study of congruence in organizational behavior research: Critique and a proposed alternative. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 58, 51-100.
21.
FairhurstG. T. (1993). The leader-member exchange patterns of women leaders in industry: A discourse analysis. Communication Monographs, 60, 321-351.
22.
FerrisG. R. (1985). Role of leadership in the employee withdrawal process: A constructive replication. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 777-781.
23.
GerstnerC. R.DayD. V. (1997). Meta-analytic review of leader-member exchange theory: Correlates and construct issues. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 827-844.
24.
GraenG. B.CashmanJ. F. (1975). A role making model of leadership in formal organizations: A developmental approach. In HuntJ. G.LarsonL. L. (Eds.), Leadership frontiers (pp. 143-165). Kent, OH: Kent State University Press.
25.
GraenG. B.LidenR. C.HoelW. (1982). Role of leadership in the employee withdrawal process. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 868-872.
26.
GraenG. B.ScanduraT. A. (1987). Toward a psychology of dyadic organizing. Research in Organizational Behavior, 9, 175-208.
27.
GraenG. B.SchiemannW. (1978). Leader-member agreement: A vertical dyad linkage approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 206-212.
28.
GraenG. B.Uhl-BienM. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. Leadership Quarterly, 6, 219-247.
HarrisK. J.KacmarK. M.WittL. A. (2005). An examination of the curvilinear relationship between leader-member exchange and intent to turnover. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 363-378.
31.
HarrisK. J.WheelerA. R.KacmarK. M. (2009). Leader-member exchange and empowerment: Direct and interactive effects on job satisfaction, turnover intentions, and performance. Leadership Quarterly, 20, 371-382.
32.
HaysW. L. (1994). Statistics. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace.
33.
HenlyJ. R.ShaeferH. L.WaxmanE. (2006). Nonstandard work schedules: Employer- and employee-driven flexibility in retail jobs. Social Service Review, 80, 609-634.
34.
HoltomB. C.LeeT. W.TiddS. T. (2002). The relationship between work status congruence and work-related attitudes and behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 903-915.
35.
HoltomB. C.MitchellT. R.LeeT. W.EberlyM. B. (2008). Turnover and retention research: A glance at the past, a closer review of the present, and a venture into the future. Academy of Management Annals, 2, 231-274.
36.
HoltomB. C.MitchellT. R.LeeT. W.InderriedenE. J. (2005). Shocks as causes of turnover: What they are and how organizations can manage them. Human Resource Management, 44, 337-352.
37.
HuangX.WrightR. P.ChiuW. C. K.WangC. (2008). Relational schemas as sources of evaluation and misevaluation of leader-member exchanges: Some initial evidence. Leadership Quarterly, 19, 266-282.
38.
HughesL. W.AveyJ. B.NixonD. R. (2010). Relationships between leadership and follower quitting intentions and job search behaviors. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 17, 351-362.
KlineR. B. (2010). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
41.
LeeJ.JablinF. M. (1995). Maintenance communication in superior-subordinate work relationships. Human Communication Research, 22, 220-257.
42.
LeeT. H.GerhartB.WellerI.TrevorC. O. (2008). Understanding voluntary turnover: Path-specific job satisfaction effects and the importance of unsolicited job offers. Academy of Management Journal, 51, 651-671.
43.
LeeT. W.MitchellT. R. (1994). An alternative approach: The unfolding model of voluntary employee turnover. Academy of Management Review, 19, 51-89.
44.
LeeT. W.MitchellT. R.WiseL.FiremanS. (1996). An unfolding model of voluntary employee turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 5-36.
45.
MarkhamS. E.YammarinoF. J.MurryW. D.PalanskiM. E. (2010). Leader-member exchange, shared values, and performance: Agreement and levels of analysis do matter. Leadership Quarterly, 21, 469-480.
46.
MaslynJ. M.Uhl-BienM. (2001). Leader-member exchange and its dimension: Effects of self-effort and other’s effort on relationship quality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 697-708.
47.
NahrgangJ. D.MorgesonF. P.IliesR. (2009). The development of leader-member exchanges: Exploring how personality and performance influence leader and member relationships over time. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108, 256-266.
48.
O’ConnorB. P. (2004). SPSS and SAS programs for addressing interdependence and basic levels-of-analysis issues in psychological data. Behavior Research Methods, Instrumentation, and Computers, 36, 17-28.
49.
PaglisL. L.GreenS. G. (2002). Leadership self-efficacy and managers’ motivation for leading change. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 215-235.
50.
PorterL. W.SteersR. M. (1973). Organizational, work, and personal factors in employee turnover and absenteeism. Psychological Bulletin, 80, 151-176.
51.
RousseauD. M. (1998). LMX meets the psychological contract: Looking inside the black box of leader-member exchange. In DansereauF.Jr.YammarinoF. J. (Eds.), Leadership: The multiple-level approaches. Contemporary and alternative (Vol. 24, pp. 149-154). Stamford, CT: JAI Press.
52.
RoyaltyA. B. (1998). Job-to-job and job-to-nonemployment turnover by gender and education level. Journal of Labor Economics, 16, 392-442.
53.
SaksA. M.AshforthB. E. (1997). A longitudinal investigation of the relationships between job information sources, applicant perceptions of fit, and work outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 50, 395-426.
54.
ScanduraT. A.PellegriniE. K. (2008). Trust and leader-member exchange: A closer look at relational vulnerability. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 15, 101-110.
55.
Schermelleh-EngelK.MoosbruggerH.MullerH. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8, 23-74.
56.
SchmittN. (1994). Method bias: The importance of theory and measurement. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15, 393-398.
57.
SchriesheimC. A.CastroS. L.CogliserC. C. (1999). Leader-member exchange (LMX) research: A comprehensive review of theory, measurement, and data-analytic practices. Leadership Quarterly, 10, 63-113.
58.
SchriesheimC. A.NeiderL. L.ScanduraT. A. (1998). Delegation and leader-member exchange: Main effects, moderators, and measurement issues. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 298-318.
59.
SchynsB.KroonB.MoorsG. (2008). Follower characteristics and the perception of leader-member exchange. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23, 772-788.
60.
SchynsB.TorkaN.GösslingT. (2007). Turnover intention and preparedness for change. Career Development International, 12, 660-679.
61.
SekiguchiT.BurtonJ. P.SablynskiC. J. (2008). The role of job embeddedness on employee performance: The interactive effects with leader-member exchange and organization-based self-esteem. Personnel Psychology, 61, 761-792.
62.
ShawJ. D.GuptaN.DeleryJ. E. (2005). Alternative conceptualizations of the relationship between voluntary turnover and organizational performance. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 50-68.
63.
SinH. P.NahrgangJ. D.MorgesonF. P. (2009). Understanding why they don’t see eye to eye: An examination of leader-member exchange (LMX) agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1048-1057.
64.
SinghJ. (2000). Performance productivity and quality of frontline employees in service organizations. Journal of Marketing, 64(2), 15-35.
65.
SparroweR. T.LidenR. C. (1997). Process and structure in leader-member exchange. Academy of Management Review, 22, 522-552.
66.
SpectorP. E. (1994). Using self-report questionnaires in OB research: A comment on the use of a controversial method. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15, 385-392.
67.
TurbanD. B.JonesA. P. (1988). Supervisor-subordinate similarity: Types, effects and mechanisms. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 228-234.
68.
Uhl-BienM.MaslynJ. M. (2000). Examining the exchange in leader-member exchange (LMX): Identification of dyadic relational styles and their association with key attitudes and behaviors. Academy of Management Proceedings, K1-K6.
69.
U.S. Department of Labor. (2006). Employed persons by detailed occupation and sex, 2006 annual averages. Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.
70.
WeisbergH. F.KrosnickJ. A.BowenB. D. (1996). An introduction to survey research, polling, and data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
71.
YammarinoF. J. (1998). Multivariate aspects of the varient/WABA approach: A discussion and leadership illustration. Leadership Quarterly, 9, 203-227.
72.
YammarinoF. J.MarkhamS. E. (1992). On the application of within and between analysis: Are absence and affect really group-based phenomena?Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 168-176.
73.
ZhouX.SchriesheimC. A. (2009). Supervisor-subordinate convergence in descriptions of leader-member exchange (LMX)quality: Review and testable propositions. Leadership Quarterly, 20, 920-932.
