The present study investigated whether personality and leadership evaluations based on photographs of Chinese CEOs made by Western raters were accurate at predicting organizational outcomes. Consistent with implicit leadership prototypes held by Westerners, perceived effectiveness was associated with higher levels of perceived intelligence, dominance, and positivity. However, actual organization performance was associated with the culturally appropriate leadership trait of risk taking. These findings suggest that although it is possible to use perceptions of personality based on photographs to predict objective leader effectiveness, individuals using a leadership paradigm suited to Western cultures are poor judges of potential success in Eastern cultures.
AvolioB. J.GardnerW. L. (2005). Authentic leadership development: Getting to the root of positive forms of leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 16, 315-338.
4.
BarneyJ.ZhangS. (2008). The future of Chinese management research: A theory of Chinese management versus a Chinese theory of management. Management and Organization Review, 5, 15-28.
5.
BassB. (1990). Bass and Stogdill’s handbook of leadership. New York, NY: Free Press.
6.
BaumJ. R.LockeE.SmithK. (2001). A multi-dimensional model of venture growth. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 292-303.
7.
BondM.SmithP. (1996). Cross-cultural social and organizational psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 205-235.
8.
BorkenauP.LieblerA. (1992). Trait inferences: Sources of validity at zero acquaintance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 645-657.
9.
CannellaA.MonroeM. (1997). Contrasting perspectives on strategic leaders: Toward a more realistic view of top managers. Journal of Management, 23, 213-237.
10.
CarréJ. M.McCormickC. M. (2008). In your face: Facial metrics predict aggressive behavior in the laboratory and in varsity and professional hockey players. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 275, 2651-2656.
11.
CarréJ. M.McCormickC. M.MondlochC. J. (2009). Facial structure is a reliable cue of aggressive behavior. Psychological Science, 3, 1-5.
12.
ChangL. (2008). Factory girls: From village to city in a changing China. New York, NY: Spiegel & Grau.
13.
ChatterjeeA.HambrickD. (2007). It’s all about me: Narcissistic chief executive officers and their effects on company strategy and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52, 351-386.
14.
CooperA.SchendelD. (1976). Strategic responses to technological threats. Business Horizons, 19, 61-69.
15.
DeRueD. S.WellmanN.NahrgangJ.HumphreyS. (2011). Trait and behavioral theories of leadership: An integration and meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Personnel Psychology, 64, 7-52.
16.
DorfmanP.HowellJ.HibinoS.LeeJ.TateJ.BautistaA. (1997). Leadership in Western and Asian countries: Commonalities and differences in effective leadership processes across cultures. Leadership Quarterly, 8, 233-274.
17.
ElenkovD.JudgeW.WrightP. (2005). Strategic leadership and executive innovation influence: An international multi-cluster comparative study. Strategic Management Journal, 26, 665-682.
18.
GoslingS. (2008). Snoop. New York, NY: Basic Books.
19.
HambrickD.MasonP. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9, 193-206.
20.
HarmsP. D.RobertsB. W.WoodD. (2007). Who shall lead? An integrative personality approach to the study of the antecedents of status in informal social organizations. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 689-699.
21.
HaselhuhnM.WongE. (2011). Bad to the bone: Facial structure predicts unethical behavior. Proceedings of the Royal Society B. Advance online publication. doi:10.1098/rspb.2011.119310.1098/rspb.2011.1193
22.
HaterJ.BassB. (1988). Supervisors’ evaluations and subordinates’ perceptions of transformational and transactional leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 695-702.
23.
HaywardM.HambrickD. (1997). Explaining the premiums paid for large acquisitions: Evidence of executive hubris. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 103-127.
24.
HofstedeG. (2007). Cultural constraints in management theories. In VecchioR. (Ed.), Leadership: Understanding the dynamics of power and influence in organizations (2nd ed.). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
25.
HofsteeW. (1994). Who should own the definition of personality?European Journal of Personality, 8, 149-162.
26.
HoganR. (2007). Personality and the fate of organizations. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
27.
HouseR.HangesP.JavidanM.DorfmanP.GuptaV. (2004). Leadership culture and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28.
JacquartP.AntonakisJ.RamusC. (2008). Does CEO personality matter? Implications for financial performance and corporate responsibility. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting for the Academy of Management, Montreal, Canada.
29.
LittrellR. (2002). Desirable leadership behaviors of multi-cultural managers in China. Journal of Management: Development, 21, 5-74.
30.
LivingstoneR.PearceN. (2009). The teddy-bear effect: Does having a baby face benefit black chief executive officers?Psychological Science, 20, 1229-1236.
31.
LordR. G.De VaderC. L.AlligerG. M. (1986). A meta-analysis of the relation between personality traits and leadership perceptions: An application of validity generalization procedures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 402-410.
32.
MastumotoD. (2002). The new Japan: Debunking seven cultural stereotypes. Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press.
33.
MillerD.Kets de VriesM.ToulouseJ. (1982). Top executive locus of control and its relationship to strategy-making, structure, and environment. Academy of Management Journal, 25, 237-253.
34.
MuellerU.MazurA. (1996). Facial dominance of West Point cadets as a predictor of later military rank. Social Forces, 74, 823-850.
35.
NadkarniS.HerrmannP. (2010). CEO personality, strategic flexibility, and firm performance: The case of the Indian business process outsourcing industry. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 1050-1073.
36.
NaumannL.VazireS.RentfrowP.GoslingS. (2009). Personality judgments based on physical appearance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 1661-1671.
37.
O’BrienR. (2007). A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Quality & Quantity, 41, 673-690.
38.
OosterhofN.TodorovA. (2008). The functional basis of face evaluation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 11087-11093.
39.
PengM. (2004). Outside directors and firm performance during institutional transitions. Strategic Management Journal, 25, 453-471.
40.
Penton-VoakI.PoundN.LittleA.PerrettD. (2006). Personality judgments from natural and composite facial images: More evidence of a “kernel of truth” in social perception. Social Cognition, 24, 607-640.
41.
RobertsB. W.HarmsP. D.SmithJ.WoodD.WebbM. (2006). Methods in personality psychology. In EidM.DienerE. (Eds.), Handbook of psychological assessment: A multi-method perspective (pp. 321-335). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
42.
RuleN. O.AmbadyN. (2008). The fac.e of success: Inferences from Chief Executive Officers’ appearance predict company profits. Psychological Science, 19, 109-111.
43.
RuleN. O.AmbadyN. (2009). She’s got the look: Inferences from female chief executive officers’ faces predict their success. Sex Roles, 61, 644-652.
44.
RuleN. O.AmbadyN. (2011). Face and fortune: Inferences of personality from managing partners’ faces predict their law firms’ financial success. Leadership Quarterly, 22, 690-696. doi:10.1016/j.leagua.2011.05.00910.1016/j.leagua.2011.05.009
45.
RuleN. O.AmbadyN.AdamsR. B.Jr.OzonoH.NakashimaS.YoshikawaS.WatabeM. (2010). Polling the face: Prediction and consensus across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 1-15.
46.
StirratM.PerrettD. (2010). Valid cues to cooperation and trust: Male facial width and trustworthiness. Psychological Science, 21, 349-354.
47.
TodorovA.MandisodazA. N.GorenA.HallC. C. (2005). Inferences of competence from faces predict election outcomes. Science, 308, 1623-1626.
48.
TsuiA.WangH.XinK.ZhangL.FuP. (2004). Let a thousand flowers bloom: Variation of leadership styles among Chinese CEOs. Organizational Dynamics, 33, 5-20.
49.
VallaJ. M.CeciS. J.WilliamsW. M. (2011). The accuracy of inferences about criminality based on facial appearance. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, 5, 66-91.
50.
WalkerM.JiangF.VetterT.SczesnyS. (2011). Universals and cultural differences in forming personality trait judgments from faces. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2, 609-617.
51.
WangH.TsuiA.XinK. (2011). CEO leadership behaviors, organizational performance, and employees’ attitudes. Leadership Quarterly, 22, 92-105.
52.
WongE.OrmistronM.HaselhuhnM. (2011). A face only an investor could love: CEO’s facial structure predicts their firms’ financial performance. Psychological Science, 22, 1478-83.
53.
WoodD.HarmsP. D.VazireS. (2010). Perceiver effects as projective tests: What your general perceptions of others says about you. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 174-190.
54.
ZaccaroS. J.KempCBaderP. (2004). Leader traits and attributes. In AntonakisJ.CiancioloA. T.StembergR. J. (Eds.). The nature of leadership, (pp. 101-123). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
55.
ZebrowitzL.CollinsM. A. (1997). Accurate social perception at zero acquaintance: The affordances of a Gibsonian approach. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 204-223.
56.
ZebrowitzL. A.MontepareJ. M. (2000). Too young, too old: Stigmatizing adolescents and the elderly. In HeathertonT.KleckR.HullJ. G.HeblM. (Eds.), Stigma (pp. 334-373). New York: Guilford Publications.
