A field study was conducted to compare the three meta-categories assessed in the Managerial Practices Survey (MPS) with the “full-range” taxonomy assessed in the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ). Dyadic and group-level analyses found that subordinate job attitudes and boss-rated managerial effectiveness were predicted better by the MPS meta-categories than by the MLQ meta-categories. Results also suggested that at least one of the three meta-categories from the MPS was more important in predicting each effectiveness outcome than any of the meta-categories from the MLQ. Implications germane to leadership theory and research are further discussed.
AllenN. J.MeyerJ. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 1-18.
2.
AmabileT. M.SchatzelE. A.MonetaG. B.KramerS. J. (2004). Leader behaviors and the work environment for creativity: Perceived leader support. Leadership Quarterly, 15, 5-32.
3.
AntonakisJ.AvolioB. J.SivasubramaniamN. (2003). Context and leadership: An examination of the nine-factor full-range leadership theory using the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. Leadership Quarterly, 14, 261-295.
4.
ArnoldJ. A.AradS.RhoadesJ. A.DrasgowF. (2000). The empowering leadership questionnaire: The construction and validation of a new scale for measuring leader behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 249-269.
5.
AvolioB. J.BassB. M.JungD. I. (1995). Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire technical report. Redwood City, CA: Mind Garden.
6.
AvolioB. J.BassB. M.JungD. I. (1999). Re-examining the components of transformational and transactional leadership using the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72, 441-462.
7.
AzenR.BudescuD. V. (2003). The dominance analysis approach for comparing predictors in multiple regression. Psychological Methods, 8, 129-148.
8.
BagozziR. P.PhillipsL. W. (1982). Representing and testing organizational theories: A holistic construal. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27, 459-489.
9.
BarlingJ.WeberT.KellowayE. K. (1996). Effects of transformational leadership training on attitudinal and financial outcomes: A field experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 827-832.
10.
BassB. M. (1998). Transformational leadership: Industrial, military, and educational impact. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11.
BassB. M.RiggioR. E. (2006). Transformational leadership. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12.
BlieseP. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and Analysis. In KleinK. J.KozlowskiS. W. (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations (pp. 349-381). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
BonoJ. E.JudgeT. A. (2003). Self-concordance at work: Toward understanding the motivational effects of transformational leaders. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 554-571.
15.
BrayfieldA. H.RotheH. F. (1951). An index of job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 35, 307-311.
16.
BrownM. E.TrevinoL. K.HarrisonD. A. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97, 117-134.
17.
BudescuD. V. (1993). Dominance analysis: A new approach to the problem of relative importance of predictors in multiple regression. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 542-551.
18.
BycioP.HackettR. D.AllenJ. S. (1995). Further assessments of Bass’s (1985) conceptualization of transactional and transformational leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 468-478.
19.
ByrneB. M. (1989). A primer of LISREL: Basic applications and programming for confirmatory factor analytic models. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
20.
CarlessS. A. (1998). Assessing the discriminant validity of transformational leader behavior as measured by the MLQ. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 71, 353-358.
21.
ChoJ.DansereauF. (2010). Are transformational leaders fair? A multi-level study of transformational leadership, justice perceptions, and organizational citizenship behaviors. Leadership Quarterly, 21, 409-421.
22.
Clapp-SmithR.VogelgesangG. R.AveyJ. B. (2009). Authentic leadership and positive psychological capital: The mediating role of trust at the group level of analysis. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 15, 227-240.
23.
CohenJ.CohenP.WestS. G.AikenL. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
DaleK.FoxM. L. (2008). Leadership style and organizational commitment: Mediating effect of role stress. Journal of Managerial Issues, 20, 109-130.
26.
DarlingtonR. B. (1968). Multiple regression in psychological research and practice. Psychological Bulletin, 69, 161-182.
27.
DumdumU. R.LoweK. B.AvolioB. J. (2002). A meta-analysis of transformational and transactional leadership correlates of effectiveness and satisfaction: An update and extension. In AvolioB. J.YammarinoF. J. (Eds.), Transformational and charismatic leadership: The road ahead (pp. 35-66). Oxford, England: JAI/Elsevier.
28.
DvirT.EdenD.AvolioB. J.ShamirB. (2002). Impact of transformational leadership on follower development and performance: A field experiment. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 735-744.
29.
EkvallG.ArvonenJ. (1991). Change-centered leadership: An extension of the two-dimensional model. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 7, 17-26.
30.
FleishmanE. A. (1953). The description of supervisory behavior. Personnel Psychology, 37, 1-6.
31.
GilF.RicoR.AlcoverC. M.BarrasaA. (2005). Change-oriented leadership, job satisfaction and performance in work groups: Effects of team climate and group potency. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 20, 312-328.
32.
GlickW. H. (1985). Conceptualizing and measuring organizational and psychological climate: Pitfalls in multilevel research. Academy of Management Review, 10, 601-616.
33.
GootyJ.GavinM.JohnsonP. D.FrazierM. L.SnowD. B. (2009). In the eyes of the beholder: Transformational leadership, positive psychological capital, and performance. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 15, 353-367.
34.
GrinyerP. H.MayesD.McKiernanP. (1990). The sharpbenders: Achieving a sustained improvement in performance. Long Range Planning, 23, 116-125.
35.
HinkinT. R.SchriesheimC. A. (2008). An examination of “nonleadership”: From laissez-faire leadership to leader reward omission and punishment omission. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 1234-1248.
36.
HinkinT. R.SchriesheimC. A. (2009). A theoretical and empirical examination of the transactional and non-leadership dimensions of the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ). Leadership Quarterly, 19, 501-513.
37.
HouseR. J. (1996). Path-goal theory of leadership: Lessons, legacy, and a reformulated theory. Leadership Quarterly, 7, 323-352.
38.
HouseR. J.ShamirB. (1993). Toward the integration of transformational, charismatic and visionary theories of leadership. In ChemersM.AymanR. (Eds.), Leadership theory and research: Perspectives and directions (pp. 81-107). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
39.
HowellJ. M.AvolioB. J. (1993). Transformational leadership, transactional leadership, locus of control, and support for innovation: Key predictors of consolidated business unit performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 891-902.
40.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
41.
JamesL. R. (1982). Aggregation bias in estimates of perceptual agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 219-229.
42.
JudgeT.A.PiccoloR.F. (2004). Transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 755-768.
43.
JudgeT. A.PiccoloR. F.IliesR. (2004). The forgotten ones? The validity of consideration and initiating structure in leadership research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 36-51.
44.
KimH.YuklG. (1995). Relationships of managerial effectiveness and advancement to self-reported and subordinate-reported leadership behaviors from the multiple-linkage model. Leadership Quarterly, 6, 361-377.
45.
KirkpatrickS. A.LockeE. A. (1996). Direct and indirect effects of three core charismatic leadership components on performance and attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 36-51.
46.
KotterJ. P. (1996). Leading change. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
47.
LeBretonJ. M.SenterJ. L. (2008). Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement. Organizational Research Methods, 11, 815-852.
48.
LikertR. (1961). New patterns of management. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
49.
LoweK. B.KroeckK. G.SivasubramaniamN. (1996). Effectiveness correlates of transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic review of the MLQ literature. Leadership Quarterly, 7, 385-425.
50.
McColl-KennedyJ. R.AndersonR. D. (2002). Impact of leadership style and emotions on subordinate performance. Leadership Quarterly, 13, 545-559.
51.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (2007). Mplus user’s guide (5th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
52.
NunnallyJ.BernsteinI. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
53.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.BommerW. H. (1996). Transformational leader behaviors and substitutes for leadership as determinants of employee satisfaction, commitment, trust, and organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Management, 22, 259-298.
54.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.MoormanR. H.FetterR. (1990). Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers’ trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors. Leadership Quarterly, 1, 107-142.
55.
PodsakoffP. M.OrganD. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12, 531-544.
56.
RaffertyA. E.GriffinM. A. (2004). Dimensions of transformational leadership: Conceptual and empirical extensions. The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 329-354.
57.
RaffertyA. E.GriffinM. A. (2006). Refining individualized consideration: Distinguishing developmental leadership and supportive leadership. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 79, 37-61.
58.
SchriesheimC. A.NeiderL. L.ScanduraT. A. (1998). Delegation and leader-member exchange: Main effects, moderators, and measurement issues. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 298-318.
59.
SmithB. N.MontagnoR. V.KuzmenkoT. N. (2004). Transformational and servant leadership: Content and contextual comparisons. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 10, 80-91.
60.
SpectorP. E. (2006). Method variance in organizational research: Truth or urban legend?Organizational Research Methods, 9, 221-232.
61.
TestaM. R.EhrhartM. G. (2005). Service leader interaction behavior: Comparing employee and manager perspectives. Group & Organization Management, 30, 456-486.
62.
TraceyJ. B.HinkinT. R. (1998). Transformational leadership or effective managerial practices. Group & Organization Management, 23, 220-236.
63.
Van ScotterJ.R.MotowidloS.J. (1996). Interpersonal facilitation and job dedication as separate facets of contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 525-531.
64.
WatsonC.HoffmanL. R. (2004). The role of task-related behavior in the emergence of leaders: The dilemma of the informed woman. Group & Organization Management, 29, 659-685.
65.
WilliamsL.FordL.NguyenN. (2002). Basic and advanced measurement models for confirmatory factor analysis. In RogelbergS. (Ed.), Handbook of research methods in industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 366-389). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
66.
YuklG. (1997). Effective leadership behavior: A new taxonomy and model. Paper presented at the Eastern Academy of Management International Conference, Dublin, Ireland.
67.
YuklG. (1999a). An evaluation of the conceptual weaknesses in transformational and charismatic leadership theories. Leadership Quarterly, 10, 285-305.
68.
YuklG. (1999b). An evaluative essay on current conceptualizations of effective leadership. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 8, 33-48.
69.
YuklG. (2006). Leadership in organizations (6th ed). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
70.
YuklG.GordonA.TaberT. (2002). A hierarchical taxonomy of leadership behavior: Integrating a half century of behavior research. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 9, 15-32.
71.
YuklG.LepsingerR. (2004). Flexible leadership: Creating value by balancing multiple challenges and choices. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
72.
YuklG.TraceyJ. B. (1992). Consequences of influence tactics used with subordinates, peers, and the boss. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 525-535.
73.
YuklG.Van FleetD. D. (1992). Theory and research on leadership in organizations. In DunnetteM. D.HoughL. M. (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 147-197). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
74.
YuklG.WallS.LepsingerR. (1990). Preliminary report on validation of the managerial practices survey. In ClarkK. E.ClarkM. B. (Eds.), Measures of leadership (pp. 223-238). West Orange, NJ: Leadership Library of America.
75.
ZhuW.AvolioB. J.WalumbwaF. O. (2009). Moderating role of follower characteristics with transformational leadership and follower work engagement. Group & Organization Management, 34, 590-619.
76.
ZhuW.MayD. R.AvolioB. J. (2004). The impact of ethical leadership behavior on employee outcomes: The roles of psychological empowerment and authenticity. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 11, 16-26.
