This study extends previous research on alienation of temporary workers, by developing a measure of temporary worker alienation and examining differences in the perceptions of alienation between temporary workers, coworkers, and supervisors. This study found that supervisors’ ratings of temporary worker alienation were significantly lower than the temporary workers’ self-ratings. Moreover, the authors found that alienation was negatively associated with self-ratings of job performance but unrelated to supervisors’ ratings of job performance. This supports the contention, based on literature concerning the treatment of temporary workers, that a gap exists between supervisors and temporary workers with regard to perceived alienation.
Allison, N.K. ( 1978). A psychometric development of a test for consumer alienation from the marketplace. Journal of Marketing Research, 15, 565-575.
2.
Ashford, S.J., & Black, J.S. ( 1996). Proactivity during organizational entry: The role of desire for control. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 199-214.
3.
Barker, K. ( 1995). Contingent work: Research and the lens of moral exclusion . In L. E. Tetrick & J. Barling (Eds.). Changing employment relations: Behavioral and social perspectives (pp. 31-60). Washington, DC : American Psychological Association.
4.
Boyce, A.S., Ryan, A.M., & Imus, A.L. ( 2007). Temporary workers, permanent losers? A model of the stigmatization of temporary workers. Journal of Management, 33, 5-29.
5.
Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2005a). Temporary help agency workers. Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/opub/ted/2005/aug/wk1/art02.htm
6.
Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2005b). BLS releases 2004-2014 employment projections. Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/news.release/History/ecopro_12072005.txt
7.
Cammann, C., Fichman, M., Jenkins, D., & Klesh, J. ( 1979). The Michigan Organizational Assessment Questionnaire. Unpublished manuscript, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
8.
Chambel, M.J., & Castanheira, F. (2006). Different temporary work status, different behaviors in organizations. Journal of Business and Psychology, 20, 351-367.
9.
Chen, P.Y., Popovich, P.M., & Kogan, M. ( 1999). Let’s talk: Patterns and correlates of social support among temporary employees. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 4, 55-62.
10.
Connelly, C.E., & Gallagher, D.G. (2004). Emerging trends in contingent work research. Journal of Management, 30, 959-983.
11.
Dean, D.G. ( 1961). Alienation: Its meaning and its measurement. American Sociological Review, 26, 753-758.
12.
Demerouti, E., Bakker, A.B., Vardakou, I., & Kantas, A. ( 2003). The convergent validity of two burnout instruments: A multitraitmultimethod analysis. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 18, 296-307.
13.
DeHart-Davis, L., & Pandey, S.K. ( 2005). Red tape and public employees: Does perceived rule dysfunction alienate managers? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15, 133-148.
14.
Gibelman, M. ( 2005). Social workers for rent: The contingency human services labor force. Families in Society, 86, 457-469.
15.
Gioia, D.A., & Longenecker, C.O. (1994). Delving into the dark side: The politics of executive appraisal. Organizational Dynamics , 22, 47-58.
16.
Golden, T.D., & Veiga, J.F. ( 2005). The impact of extent of tele-commuting on job satisfaction: Resolving inconsistent findings. Journal of Management, 31, 301-318.
17.
Halbesleben, J.R.B. ( 2005, November). The experience of alienation among temporary workers in high-skill jobs: A qualitative analysis of temporary firefighters . Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Southern Management Association, Charleston, SC.
18.
Halbesleben, J.R.B., & Demerouti, E. ( 2005). Assessing the construct validity of an alternative measure of burnout: Investigating the Oldenburg Burnout Inventory. Work & Stress, 19, 208-220.
19.
Hayashi, Y. ( 2008, January 7). Growing reliance on temps hold back Japan’s rebound; firms increasingly add part-time workers; spending power lags. The Wall Street Journal, p. A1.
20.
HR Focus. ( 2006, January). More contingent workers are a blessing and sometimes a challenge for HR. HR Focus, 83, S1-S2.
21.
Jex, S.M., & Gudanowski, D.M. (1992). Efficacy beliefs and work stress: An exploratory study. Journal of Organizational Behavior , 13, 509-517.
22.
Judge, T.A., Thoresen, C.J., Bono, J.E., & Patton, G.K. ( 2001). The job satisfaction-job performance relationship: A qualitative and quantitative review. Psychological Bulletin , 127, 376-407.
23.
Kanungo, R.N. ( 1992). Alienation and empowerment: Some ethical imperatives in business. Journal of Business Ethics, 11, 413-422.
24.
Kirsch, M., & Lengermann, J.J. (1972). An empirical test of Robert Blauner’s ideas on alienation in work as applied to different types jobs in a white-collar setting. Sociology and Social Research , 56, 180-194.
25.
Major, B., Quinton, W.J., McCoy, S.K., & Schmader, T. ( 2000). Reducing prejudice: The target’s perspective. In S. Okasmp (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination (pp. 211-238). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
26.
McCarty, P.A. ( 1986). Effects of feedback on the self-confidence of men and women. Academy of Management Journal, 29, 840-847.
27.
Morrison, E.W. ( 1993). Newcomer information seeking: exploring types, modes, sources, and outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 557-589.
28.
Plewes, T.J. ( 1988). Understanding the data on part-time and temporary employment . In K. Christiansen & M. Murphee (Eds), Flexible workstyles: A look at contingent labor (pp. 9-13). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor, Women’s Bureau.
29.
Polivka, A.E., & Nardone, T. ( 1989). On the definition of contingent work. Monthly Labor Review, 112, 9-16.
Redpath, L., Hurst, D., & Devine, K. ( 2007). Contingent knowledge workers challenges. Human Resource Planning, 30, 33-38.
32.
Renn, R.W., & Fedor, D.B. ( 2001). Development and field test of a feedback seeking, self-efficacy, and goal setting model of work performance. Journal of Management , 27, 563-583.
33.
Rogers, J.K. ( 1995). Just a temp: Experience and structure of alienation in temporary clerical employment. Work and Occupations, 22, 137-166.
34.
Seeman, M. ( 1959). On the meaning of alienation. American Sociological Review, 24, 783-791.
35.
Seeman, M. ( 1975). Alienation studies. Annual Review of Sociology, 1, 91-123.
36.
Slater, M.D., Henry, K.L., Swaim, R.C., & Cardador, J.M. (2004). Vulnerable teens, vulnerable times: How sensation seeking, alienation, and victimization moderate the violent media content- aggressiveness relation. Communication Research , 31, 642-668.
37.
Smith, R. ( 2008). Legal protections and advocacy for contingent or "casual" workers in the United States: A case study in day labor. Social Indicators Research, 88, 197-213.
38.
von Hippel, C., Mangum, S.L., Greenberger, D.B., Heneman, R.L., & Skoglind, J.D. (1997). Temporary employment: Can organizations and employees both win?Academy of Management Executive, 11, 93-103.
39.
Vosko, L. ( 2008). Transnational labor regulation: SER-centrism and the risk of exacerbating gendered precariousness. Social Indicators Research, 88, 131-145.
40.
Weiss, H.M., & Cropanzano, R. (1996). Affective events theory: A theoretical discussion of the structure, causes, and consequences of affective experiences at work. Research in Organizational Behavior, 18, 1-74.
41.
Wheeler, A.R., & Buckley, M.R. ( 2001). Examining the motivation process of temporary employees: A holistic model and research framework. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 16, 339-354.
42.
Wheeler, A.R., Buckley, M.R., & Halbesleben, J.R. (2002). The basics of the contingent workforce. In G. R. Ferris, M. R. Buckley, & D. B. Fedor (Eds.) Human resource management: Perspectives, context, functions, and outcomes (pp. 155-164). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
43.
Williams, L.J., & Anderson, S.E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors . Journal of Management, 17, 601-617.
