This study investigated the influence of individuals' propensity to trust on the relationship between supervisors and their subordinates. Specifically, the authors tested both the direct and interactional effects of supervisors' and employees' propensity to trust and perceptions of social exchange quality. Results indicated that managerial propensity to trust did not have a direct influence on perceptions of social exchange, but employees' propensity to trust was positively related to their perceived social exchange quality. Additionally, the interaction between managerial and employee propensity to trust indicated that the most positive exchange relationships were perceived to exist when both managers and employees were high in propensity to trust.
Bacharach, S.B., Bamberger, P.A., & Vashidi, D. (2005). Diversity and homophily at work: Supportive relations among White and African-American peers. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 619-644.
4.
Barrick, M.R., & Mount, M.K. (1993). Autonomy as a moderator of the relations between the Big Five personality dimensions and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 111-118.
5.
Bauer, T.N., & Green, S.G. (1996). Development of leader- member exchange: A
6.
longitudinal test. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1538-1567.
7.
Bernerth, J.B., Armenakis, A.A., Feild, H.S., Giles, W.F., & Walker, H.J. (2007). Leader-member social exchange (LMSX): Development and validation of a scale. Journal of Organizational Behavior , 28, 979-1003.
8.
Bernerth, J.B., Armenakis, A.A., Feild, H.S., Giles, W.F., & Walker, H.J. (2008). The influence of personality differences between subordinates and supervisors on perceptions of LMX: An empirical investigation . Group & Organization Management, 33, 216-240.
9.
Blau, P.M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.
10.
Brower, H.H., Schoorman, F.D., & Tan, H.H. (2000). A model of relational leadership: The integration of trust and leader-member exchange. Leadership Quarterly , 11, 227-250.
11.
Butler, J.K. (1991). Toward understanding and measuring conditions in trust: Evolution of a conditions of trust inventory. Journal of Management, 17, 643-663.
12.
Byrne, D. (1971). The attraction paradigm. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
13.
Colquitt, J.A., Scott, B.A., & LePine, J.A. (2007). Trust, trustworthiness, and trust propensity: A meta-analytic test of their unique relationships with risk taking and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology , 92, 909-927.
14.
Dirks, K.T., & Ferrin, D.L. (2002). Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 611-628.
15.
Duchon, D., Green, S.G., & Taber, T.D. (1986). Vertical dyad linkage: A longitudinal
16.
assessment of antecedents, measures, and consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 56-60.
17.
Evans, M.G. (1985). A Monte Carlo study of the effects of correlated method variance in moderated multiple regression analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 36, 305-323.
18.
Ferrin, D.L., Dirks, K.T., & Shah, P.P. (2006). Direct and indirect effects on third-party relationships of interpersonal trust. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 870-883.
19.
Ferris, G.R. (1985). Role of leadership in the employee withdrawal process: A constructive replication. Journal of Applied Psychology , 69, 367-371.
20.
Gerstner, C.R., & Day, D.V. (1997). Meta-analytic review of leader-member exchange theory: Correlates and construct ideas. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 56-60.
21.
Gomez, C., & Rosen, B. (2001). The leader-member exchange as a link between managerial trust and employee empowerment. Group & Organization Management , 26, 53-69.
22.
Gouldner, A.W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement . American Sociological Review, 25, 161-178.
23.
Graen, G.B., Liden, R.C., & Hoel, W. (1982). Role of leadership in the employee withdrawal process. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 868-872.
24.
Graen, G.B., & Scandura, T.A. (1987). Toward a psychology of dyadic organizing. Research in Organizational Behavior, 9, 175-208.
25.
Jackson, S.E., & Alvarez, E.B. (1992). Working through diversity as a strategic imperative . In S. Jackson (Ed.), Diversity in the workplace (pp. 13-29). New York: Guilford.
26.
Johnson, S.K. (2008). I second that emotion: Effects of emotional contagion and affect at work on leader and follower outcomes. Leadership Quarterly, 19, 1-19.
27.
Jones, G.R., & George, J.M. (1998). The experience and evolution of trust: Implications for cooperation and teamwork. Academy of Management Review , 23, 531-546.
28.
Leonard, J.S., Levine, D.I., & Joshi, A. (2004). Do birds of a feather shop together? The effects on performance of employees' similarity with one another and with customers . Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 731-754.
29.
Liden, R.C., & Graen, G.B. (1980). Generalizability of the vertical dyad linkage model of leadership. Academy of Management Journal, 23, 451-465.
30.
Liden, R.C., Wayne, S.J., & Stilwell, D. (1993). A longitudinal study on the early development of leader-member exchanges. Journal of Applied Psychology , 78, 662-674.
31.
Mayer, R.C., Davis, J.H., & Schoorman, F.D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20, 709-734.
32.
McAllister, D.J. (1995). Affect- and cognitive-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 24-59.
33.
McClelland, G.H., & Judd, C.M. (1993). Statistical difficulties of detecting interactions and moderator effects. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 376-390.
34.
McColl-Kennedy, J.R., & Anderson, R.D. (2005). Subordinate-manager gender combinations and perceived leadership style influence on emotions, self-esteem, and organizational commitment. Journal of Business Research , 58, 115-125.
35.
McKnight, D.H., Cummings, L.L., & Chervany, N.L. (1998). Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships. Academy of Management Review, 23, 473-490.
36.
Mellor, S. (1992). The influence of layoff severity on post layoff union commitment among survivors: The moderating effect of the perceived legitimacy of a layoff account. Personnel Psychology, 45, 579-600.
37.
Muchinsky, P.M., & Monahan, C.J. (1987). What is person-environment congruence? Supplementary versus complementary model of fit. Journal of Vocational Behavior , 31, 268-277.
38.
Murphy, S.M., Wayne, S.J., Liden, R.C., & Erdogan, B. (2003). Understanding social loafing: The role of justice perceptions and exchange relationships. Human Relations, 56, 61-84.
39.
Neter, J., Wasserman, W., & Kutner, M.H. (1990). Applied linear statistical models: Regression, analysis of variance, and experimental designs (3rd ed.). Boston: Irwin.
40.
Neuman, G.A., Wagner, S.H., & Christiansen, N.D. (1999). The relationship between work-team personality composition and the job performance of teams. Group & Organization Management, 24, 28-45.
41.
Phillips, A.S., & Bedeian, A.G. (1994). Leader-follower exchange quality: The role of personal and interpersonal attributes. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 990-1001.
42.
Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Lee, J.Y., & Podsakoff, N.P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies . Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879-903.
43.
Pulakos, E.D., & Wexley, K.N. (1983). The relationship among perceptual similarity, sex, and performance ratings in manager-subordinate dyads. Academy of Management Journal, 26, 129-139.
44.
Ring, S.M., & Van de Ven, A. (1992). Structuring cooperative relationships between organizations. Strategic Management Journal, 13, 483-498.
45.
Riordan, C.M. (2000). Relational demography within groups: Past developments, contradictions, and new directions. In G. R. Ferris (Ed.), Research in personnel and human resource management (Vol. 19, pp. 131-174). New York: JAI.
46.
Rotter, J.B. (1980). Interpersonal trust, trustworthiness, and gullibility . American Psychologist, 35, 1-7.
47.
Settoon, R.P., Bennett, N., & Liden, R.C. (1996). Social exchange in organizations: Perceived organizational support, leader-member exchange, and employee reciprocity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 219-227.
48.
Turban, D.B., & Jones, A.P. (1988). Supervisor-subordinate similarity: Types, effects, and mechanisms. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 228-234.
49.
Tyler, T.R., & Lind, E.A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 115-191). New York: Academic Press.
50.
Uhl-Bien, M., & Maslyn, J.M. (2003). Reciprocity in manager-subordinate relationships: Components, configurations, and outcomes. Journal of Management , 29, 511-532.
51.
Van Dyne, L., Vandewalle, D., Kostova, T., Latham, M.E., & Cummings, L.L. (2000). Collectivism, propensity to trust and self-esteem as predictors of organizational citizenship in a non-work setting. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 3-23.
52.
Walter, F., & Bruch, H. (2008). The positive group affect spiral: A dynamic model of the emergence of positive affective similarity in work groups. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29, 239-261.
53.
Wells, C.V., & Kipnis, D. (2001). Trust, dependency, and control in the contemporary organization. Journal of Business and Psychology, 15, 593-603.
54.
Whitener, E.M., Brodt, S.E., Korsgaard, M.A., & Werner, J.M. (1998). Managers as initiators of trust: An exchange relationship framework for understanding managerial trustworthy behavior. Academy of Management Review, 23, 513-530.
55.
Zand, D.E. (1972). Trust and managerial problem solving. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 229-239.
